Jump to content

The Biden Cabinet

Bullneck

By Bullneck
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 989
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Bama Chick
Bama Chick

Fuck anyone suggesting Mitt Fucking Romney or keeping Steve Fucking Mnuchin.

We’reTexas
We’reTexas
Pescado_Rojo
Pescado_Rojo

Can he appoint Rand Paul to lead the department of fucking his own face? 

Posted Images

henrygandorf

henrygandorf 29223

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

I truly don't get stanning for Pete. He's fine as far as talented, sociopathic politicians go. There's a lot of them and he's more talented than most, and I'd rather he be with the Democrats than Republicans. But anyone getting passionate about him is just weird.

getting passionate about pete is definitely weird.  now here are the 20 vague reasons i have for all of the strong opinions i have about him that i will keep repeating for months.  but yeah, some of y'all are weird.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Lobo

Guest Lobo

Posted
Posted

I didn't vote for him in the primary in 2020 (I went Bloomberg, full disclosure).  But I like the guy and I just do not understand the hate and distrust for Mayor Pete.  

Maybe he's not progressive enough for many of you, I get that.  But the narrative that his time as a Harvard/Oxford guy, a Naval Intelligence Officer,  a McKinsey consultant, and involved with the Truman NSP.........to me those are incredible experiences.  If our elected officials had that breadth and scope, we'd be fine as a nation.  Instead, those of you pissing on those past experiences of Pete's sound like the equivalent of a left-wing Trumper.  Bashing anything that seems too educated, too experienced, too measured.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SilasCoade

SilasCoade 2622

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Lobo said:

I didn't vote for him in the primary in 2020 (I went Bloomberg, full disclosure).  But I like the guy and I just do not understand the hate and distrust for Mayor Pete.  

Maybe he's not progressive enough for many of you, I get that.  But the narrative that his time as a Harvard/Oxford guy, a Naval Intelligence Officer,  a McKinsey consultant, and involved with the Truman NSP.........to me those are incredible experiences.  If our elected officials had that breadth and scope, we'd be fine as a nation.  Instead, those of you pissing on those past experiences of Pete's sound like the equivalent of a left-wing Trumper.  Bashing anything that seems too educated, too experienced, too measured.  

Exactly no one is doing anything like that

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bad_teammate

bad_teammate 13481

Posted
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, BradInATX said:

I'm just glad to be back to the debates we were having in January instead of worrying if Trump is going to burn the country down.

Trump already lost and this is the Biden cabinet thread.

It's better days for sure.

 

Bye Donald

 

Edited by bad_teammate
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pyrohornIII

pyrohornIII 4845

Posted
Posted

 

7 hours ago, elfenix said:

in a move that surprises no one, republicans to start caring about the qualifications of cabinet posts again:

https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2020-12-07/republicans-raise-red-flags-over-becerras-nomination-to-lead-biden-health-department

Quote

WASHINGTON — 

Senate Republicans raised red flags Monday over President-elect Joe Biden’s plan to nominate California Atty. Gen. Xavier Becerra to be secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, although it is uncertain whether that could grow into enough opposition to scuttle the confirmation.

At least five Republicans objected to Becerra’s nomination, citing his endorsement of a government-run “Medicare for all” healthcare system, his support for abortion rights or his relative lack of healthcare expertise and experience running an expansive government agency.

Now this bothers them, huh?  

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
wildcat09

wildcat09 29561

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Lobo said:

I didn't vote for him in the primary in 2020 (I went Bloomberg, full disclosure).  But I like the guy and I just do not understand the hate and distrust for Mayor Pete.  

Maybe he's not progressive enough for many of you, I get that.  But the narrative that his time as a Harvard/Oxford guy, a Naval Intelligence Officer,  a McKinsey consultant, and involved with the Truman NSP.........to me those are incredible experiences.  If our elected officials had that breadth and scope, we'd be fine as a nation.  Instead, those of you pissing on those past experiences of Pete's sound like the equivalent of a left-wing Trumper.  Bashing anything that seems too educated, too experienced, too measured.  

Harvard/McKinsey is like half of DC already. We don’t need more of them, we need to purge them.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hank Kingsley

Hank Kingsley 21601

Posted
Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, Bama Chick said:

And calling a thirty-something dude whose highest relevant job experience is being the mayor of a mid sized town from a small state “too experienced” is........really something.

When Beto was 33 he left the private sector and entered politics by running for El Paso City Council. 

When Pete was 33 he was won a second term as Mayor after a 7 month deployment in Afghanistan. 

 

 

Edited by Hank Kingsley
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 86953

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:

Loyalty.

I mean, yeah.

And it's not a Senate confirmed position.

It's just weird for her skillset unless she approached Biden about her ambition for elected office (blech) and needs domestic policy chops. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bama Chick

Bama Chick 28596

Posted
Posted
When Beto was 33 he left the private sector and entered politics by running for El Paso City Council. 
When Pete was 33 he was won a second term as Mayor after a 7 month deployment in Afghanistan. 
 
 

Why do you always whatabout to Beto or Warren or whoever when someone has the audacity to criticize Pete?

It’s very weird. My criticism of the way Pete has behaved has absolutely zero to do with anyone else.

I’m allowed to think what I think about him and no amount of your snarky comparisons are going to change that.

Every politician has their flaws. The only one who seems to have a problem with admitting that is you.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SydneyCarton

SydneyCarton 49335

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

12 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:


Why do you always whatabout to Beto or Warren or whoever when someone has the audacity to criticize Pete?

It’s very weird. My criticism of the way Pete has behaved has absolutely zero to do with anyone else.

I’m allowed to think what I think about him and no amount of your snarky comparisons are going to change that.

Every politician has their flaws. The only one who seems to have a problem with admitting that is you.

Probably because you're boy Beto gets drug into the conversation by you at every opportunity. Below is your immediately prior post on this thread, where you un-prompted entered Beto into the conversation in a direct comparison to Pete, who was the topic of discussion. To which he directly responded to you. Don't play fucking innocent. Why does he get whatabouted? Because you brought it up!

21 hours ago, Bama Chick said:

I’m perfectly fine with being a stan of the guy who did real grassroots non-self aggrandizing work in 2020 over the guy who spent the year dropping zingers on Fox News morons, writing a book, and starting a podcast.

And “drank [their] milkshake”??? What’s your sorority’s philanthropy?

Edited by SydneyCarton
Link to comment
Share on other sites
washparkhorn

washparkhorn 9967

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Js1 said:

Rice for Domestic Policy Council? Why?  Her whole life is foreign policy. 

The nation's infrastructure and policies have become so dilapidated and corrupted that nation building policies and programs are required for the United States. American policy solutions for foreign nations have become solutions for domestic problems.

(wouldn't it be nice if Rice and Neera gave a fuck about American people)

Accurate Answer: Susan Rice and Neera Tanden protect the wealthy's interest in the status quo. They are paid to do that. Period.

Edited by washparkhorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Satchel

Satchel 6982

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Js1 said:

https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-denis-mcdonough-marcia-fudge-veterans-affairs-tom-vilsack-9e2faea3bf168bab198475dc8be1ec3d

Rice for Domestic Policy Council? Why?  Her whole life is foreign policy. 

Biden probably allowed her to choose a job that didn’t require Senate confirmation since she was really not up for kissing McConnell’s ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bama Chick

Bama Chick 28596

Posted
Posted
 

Lie. This was the first post that brought up Beto in this conversation after I had some unkind things to say about Pete.

Let's be very clear here: 
Yes, Pete Buttigieg drank Elizabeth Warren's milkshake during the primary race. 
Yes, Pete Buttigieg drank Beto O'Rourke's milkshake during the primary race. 
Yes, Pete Buttigieg won the Iowa caucuses. 
giphy.gif?cid=ecf05e47ca777irm6i855b05dso0i8nm1g8zw37debl39mby&rid=giphy.gif
 
Now fucking get over it. 
 



So. Try again.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SydneyCarton

SydneyCarton 49335

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:


Lie. This was the first post that brought up Beto in this conversation after I had some unkind things to say about Pete.




So. Try again.

You mean that general post, where he DIDN'T quote you, where he made comments about 2 politicians with popular followings here that didn't perform as well as Pete by pretty much any estimation? So. Try again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bama Chick

Bama Chick 28596

Posted
Posted

Oh come on.

Hugo and I had made a couple of posts criticizing Pete and he came in with that juvenile “PETE DRANK THEIR MILKSHAKES” crap and just coincidentally used Beto and Warren as examples and you think he was making some generic point? And not taking potshots at us, the biggest Beto and Warren supporters respectively?

You’re a dick but you’re not dumb so quit playing like you are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hank Kingsley

Hank Kingsley 21601

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:

Hugo and I had made a couple of posts criticizing Pete and he came in with that juvenile “PETE DRANK THEIR MILKSHAKES” crap and just coincidentally used Beto and Warren as examples and you think he was making some generic point? And not taking potshots at us, the biggest Beto and Warren supporters respectively?

I was absolutely taking potshots at you and Hugo. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hank Kingsley

Hank Kingsley 21601

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, washparkhorn said:

Beto fighting for change in the way we approach problems > Buttigieg fighting for status quo

How exactly is Beto fighting for change in the way we approach problems? I like him, but outside of his "hell yes, we're gonna take away your AR-15s" line after the El Paso mass shooting, he's been a pretty standard liberal Democrat. 

Buttigieg called for the decriminalization of any type of drug possession. He ran on abolishing the electoral college, removing the filibuster, and SC reform. You can't fix shit without major democratic reform, and he talked about that more than any other candidate. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
washparkhorn

washparkhorn 9967

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

How exactly is Beto fighting for change in the way we approach problems?

This hooked me as bold:

"There can be no reward, no benefit, no tax break for anyone or any institution, any organization in America that denies the full human rights and the full civil rights of every single one of us," O'Rourke said. "And so as president, we're going to make that a priority and we are going to stop those who are infringing upon the human rights of our fellow Americans."

But - I am talking about a bold side of incrementalism in the relative scheme of themes. This nation needs to progress quickly out of this long stretch of austerity that has gutted the nation's ability to innovate, produce and thrive. We need to hit the ground running as a nation. We are behind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bad_teammate

bad_teammate 13481

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, washparkhorn said:

"There can be no reward, no benefit, no tax break for anyone or any institution, any organization in America that denies the full human rights and the full civil rights of every single one of us," O'Rourke said. "And so as president, we're going to make that a priority and we are going to stop those who are infringing upon the human rights of our fellow Americans."

Like 50 words to say... what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 46063

Posted
Posted

Watching these cabinet nominees speak just drives home the point of how immature, inept, corrupt, and just plain stupid all of dotard's cabinet was.  It's astonishing how we got used to just complete drivel and blather and lies from those fucks.  It's going to be so fucking nice to have adults back in charge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 86953

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

Watching these cabinet nominees speak just drives home the point of how immature, inept, corrupt, and just plain stupid all of dotard's cabinet was.  It's astonishing how we got used to just complete drivel and blather and lies from those fucks.  It's going to be so fucking nice to have adults back in charge.

"Nope, they don't have perfect resumes or employment histories.  They SUCK and are no better than Trump's idiot cronies!"  - Progressives

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
henrygandorf

henrygandorf 29223

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Biff Tannen said:

Watching these cabinet nominees speak just drives home the point of how immature, inept, corrupt, and just plain stupid all of dotard's cabinet was.  It's astonishing how we got used to just complete drivel and blather and lies from those fucks.  It's going to be so fucking nice to have adults back in charge.

they won't be an official cabinet until we see them going around the table and one by one complimenting the job biden is doing for the cameras.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 46063

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, henrygandorf said:

they won't be an official cabinet until we see them going around the table and one by one complimenting the job biden is doing for the cameras.

WTF that is such psychotic shit.  Seriously, what sane human that grew up in a democracy would look at that shit and be like, yeah, that's normal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MaybeACoordinator

MaybeACoordinator 8350

Posted
Posted
On 12/9/2020 at 1:56 PM, henrygandorf said:

i said this a couple of weeks ago, but one of their decision makers thinks 'diverse' and 'progressive' are interchangeable.

One of their decision makers? How about the entire mainstream Democratic party? That's their whole deal nowadays. Business as usual, only now with figureheads of color. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...