Jump to content

the trump election lawsuit thread of dominance

henrygandorf

By henrygandorf
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
Tom

Tom 2960

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
4 hours ago, TtomTerrific said:

Or actually listening to the litigants.

Soon.

1695b051d53527c1b27d92df828452d7.jpg

 

Imagine rooting for American democracy to fail because the pussy you supported got his ass handed to him in the election.  Imagine being an enemy of democracy over Donald fucking Trump.

I just can't.  

 

  • Hook 'Em 11
  • Like 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 10k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Bookman
Bookman

The rumor is that Alito and Thomas voted first, and then there was a dump of 7 votes. Texas expert says there’s only a 0.0039% chance of this happening.

Bama Chick
Bama Chick

Fuck Kayleigh and her headache and all the other enabling babysitters. I hope she hasn’t had a night with more than three hours of sleep for this entire year. I hope he texts her and calls her at al

Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand
Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand

40 plus indictments, guilty pleas, convictions, prison sentences, and roughly a dozen fed cases borne of said investigation is slightly more than jack shit.

Posted Images

TtomTerrific

TtomTerrific 200

Posted
Posted

Aw, be nice to him. He’s about to lose his job to some dude from Ohio.

See? That’s not bad.

I lol’ed

Sydney is still wrestling with being a shrieking bitch, but you seem alright.

Wherever you’ve decided to be lined up when proof treason is nigh. At least you’ve got sense of humor.

This entire experience has been nothing if not expository as fuck.

Sydney follows me around counting how many times in a row I’ve posted the “same meme that wasn’t funny the first time” (Sydney being the arbiter of funny while keeping count of how many in a row). WHILE little pieces of spittle fly on to his monitor as he hammers out for the thousandth time some trope about me and alcoholism.

Not lost on him even for a second.

It was 15 years ago, Syd. Let it go. I have. You watched me work through it in places like the AA thread, where you like to hang out and take notes for that one time that one guy posts a Supreme Court Justice’s photo against your screeching bitch sensibilities.

Depending upon who you are that’s funny the first time, I suppose. Particularly the hookers and blow, even if Syd invented the part about hookers after he invented the part about cocaine (sorry, but this seems to occupy a large part of your awareness here either way)

But every obsessed effeminate bitch cry of a post?

All for a demonstration of how butch you really are? Again with the same schtick with the alcohol?

Are you and Wildcat and Hobbes going to invent some posters here whom I’ve threatened with violence again? Or are you still simmering on “racist” and “alcoholic” slow boil?


This’ll be fun. Hey Sydney...”racist and alcoholic.” - right?


I’m proud of what being one of those most of my adult life has wrought and you are lying about the other.
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck You 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Jatrain

Jatrain 288

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

I called in and listened to the Arizona state case today.  The GOP managed to put up a handwriting expert who, on cross, admitted that she uses the term “Dr” even though she hasn’t actually received a PhD. She lists herself on her CV as PhDc, with the little “c” standing for “Candidate”, her studies are at an online diploma mill.  She couldn’t even articulate what peer review was (she said that she had some friends review some articles she wrote for a right wing organization).   She also has a “PhDc” in holistic healing.  
 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
  • Haha 6
  • Rage+1 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Pato del Muerto

Pato del Muerto 52882

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
43 minutes ago, Tom said:

 

Imagine rooting for American democracy to fail because the pussy you supported got his ass handed to him in the election.  Imagine being an enemy of democracy over Donald fucking Trump.

I just can't.  

 

And it’s the same people that have been screaming for years now that kneeling during the anthem is unpatriotic, who now have no issue undermining the founding principles of the country. 

  • Hook 'Em 11
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 3
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cattail

cattail 112

Posted
Posted
I called in and listened to the Arizona state case today.  The GOP managed to put up a handwriting expert who, on cross, admitted that she uses the term “Dr” even though she hasn’t actually received a PhD. She lists herself on her CV as PhDc, with the little “c” standing for “Candidate”, her studies are at an online diploma mill.  She couldn’t even articulate what peer review was (she said that she had some friends review some articles she wrote for a right wing organization).   She also has a “PhDc” in holistic healing.  
 
 

Jesus Fucking Christ. That’s ridiculous and embarrassing
Link to comment
Share on other sites
aggie08

aggie08 21587

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

And it’s the same people that have been screaming for years now that kneeling during the anthem is unpatriotic, who now have no issue undermining the founding principles of the country. 

Except that they 100%, unequivocally know they the election was stolen. So they think they're defending the founding principles of the country. It's a shit show. One single legitimate proof of impropriety (potentially like the video I mentioned earlier that appeared to show votes being counted after everyone else went home) could turn this thing into a powder keg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31686

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, Gil Bang said:

 

Worth noting that the original charge was obscenity reduced to disorderly conduct with a second count of using a computer to commit a crime, which would seem to be obscenity/disorderly conduct.

Probably not a hacking offense, as Michigan has the usual unauthorized use of computer crime.  Obscenity means distributing material that depicts sexual activity in a patently offensive way.

Seems like maybe sending teh noodz, and nasty ones, at that.  Mellissa is a naughty girl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 90056

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, 4th&Five said:

If you can’t trust justthenews.com then who can you trust???

Speaking of that, shitload of Trumpers believe every single word Donnie utters.

Except when he says the vaccines are beautiful and will fix everything and are completely safe.

Then all of the sudden, many Trumpers start looking at the ground and mumbling about needing to go check and see if they turned off the stove.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Horn Under a Bad Sign

Horn Under a Bad Sign 20638

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, aggie08 said:

Except that they 100%, unequivocally know they the election was stolen. So they think they're defending the founding principles of the country. It's a shit show. One single legitimate proof of impropriety (potentially like the video I mentioned earlier that appeared to show votes being counted after everyone else went home) could turn this thing into a powder keg.


I read this the other day and it's one of the truest, most profound things I've ever read:  It's easier to fool people than to convince them they've been fooled. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 90056

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Jive Turkey said:

wouldn't surprise to learn in a few weeks that this lady is one of the persons accused of trying to sell pardons.  but who knows.  there are hundreds of possible candidates.

Guess what?  That lady has been reassigned 

https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/03/politics/heidi-stirrup-justice-department/index.html

Quote

But Stirrup appears to have already been placed in a new role. The White House announced Thursday she would be appointed as a member of the Board of Visitors to the US Air Force Academy.

To go from the White House liaison to the DOJ, to being a member of the "Board of Visitors to the US Air Force Academy."

LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sawbonz

Sawbonz 27780

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Jatrain said:

I called in and listened to the Arizona state case today.  The GOP managed to put up a handwriting expert who, on cross, admitted that she uses the term “Dr” even though she hasn’t actually received a PhD. She lists herself on her CV as PhDc, with the little “c” standing for “Candidate”, her studies are at an online diploma mill.  She couldn’t even articulate what peer review was (she said that she had some friends review some articles she wrote for a right wing organization).   She also has a “PhDc” in holistic healing.  
 

 

They should have asked her if she stayed at a holiday inn express last night

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31686

Posted
Posted (edited)

It's probably worth pointing out that when the first judge found her affidavit "not credible," it was because her allegations didn't match up with any of the other live or affidavit witnesses.  They were uncorroborated, speculative junk.

Which everything she says is, but it wasn't based on her demeanor or other aspects of her "testimony."  Also, the poll book nonsense wasn't part of her original affidavit testimony.  I posted her affidavit earlier on the thread.

Here it is again. https://beta.documentcloud.org/documents/20404633-dominion-contractor-affidavit

That the scope of her testimony keeps growing is another knock on her credibility.

Edited by TwiceHorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bullneck

Bullneck 19316

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, TwiceHorn said:

Worth noting that the original charge was obscenity reduced to disorderly conduct with a second count of using a computer to commit a crime, which would seem to be obscenity/disorderly conduct.

Probably not a hacking offense, as Michigan has the usual unauthorized use of computer crime.  Obscenity means distributing material that depicts sexual activity in a patently offensive way.

Seems like maybe sending teh noodz, and nasty ones, at that.  Mellissa is a naughty girl.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UT_OB1

UT_OB1 2227

Posted
Posted

Coworker tried to show me some video of the lawsuit/“breaking evidence” from some news channel. It was supposed to be showing Georgia where republicans were told to leave because of a water main break but the Democrats kept counting.  I can’t find any source, credible or not, for this video. Anyone know what he was referring to?  Would love to point out tomorrow that the video with the critical evidence was actually take in 2018 in a hotel conference room or something equally ridiculous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
elfenix

elfenix 34387

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Pato del Muerto said:

And it’s the same people that have been screaming for years now that kneeling during the anthem is unpatriotic, who now have no issue undermining the founding principles of the country. 

masks are tyranny but disenfranchising millions is just good democracy

Edited by elfenix
Link to comment
Share on other sites
aggie08

aggie08 21587

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, UT_OB1 said:

Coworker tried to show me some video of the lawsuit/“breaking evidence” from some news channel. It was supposed to be showing Georgia where republicans were told to leave because of a water main break but the Democrats kept counting.  I can’t find any source, credible or not, for this video. Anyone know what he was referring to?  Would love to point out tomorrow that the video with the critical evidence was actually take in 2018 in a hotel conference room or something equally ridiculous. 

You can find me embarrassing myself over it on this page:

Looks like Georgia law freely allows partisan monitors, but doesn't actually require that all parties be represented at all times for counting. Most went home, some didn't.

Edited by aggie08
Link to comment
Share on other sites
UT_OB1

UT_OB1 2227

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, aggie08 said:

You can find me embarrassing myself over it on this page:

Looks like Georgia law freely allows partisan monitors, but doesn't actually require that all parties be represented at all times for counting. Most went home, some didn't.

Thanks. I was hoping it would be more embarrassing, but that’ll do

Link to comment
Share on other sites
aggie08

aggie08 21587

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, UT_OB1 said:

Thanks. I was hoping it would be more embarrassing, but that’ll do

I wouldn't be surprised at all if it's discovered that they had access to the video before they let on (for just getting it at 1am this morning, she sure had all the pertinent time stamps well memorized), and made sure to have some of the affidavits include being told to leave at a certain time. Might be the first halfways decent lawyering thus far: making it seem like the video matches the affidavits, rather than the other way around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mole

Mole 4336

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, RDCanecutter said:

At last, something I can use in real life. Gonna start slapping "PhDc" on all my official crap, see what develops.

I’m not sure why anyone would claim a PhDc if they’re claiming it from an unaccredited institution. Just call it a PhD from Yail or Harverd or whatever fake school and make up your own transcripts. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
elfenix

elfenix 34387

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, aggie08 said:

You can find me embarrassing myself over it on this page:

Looks like Georgia law freely allows partisan monitors, but doesn't actually require that all parties be represented at all times for counting. Most went home, some didn't.

"ok guys when we're up by 3 we're all going to walk out on a smoke break and, here's the kicker, we're not coming back in!  then they can't count the votes and we win!"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Lobo

Guest Lobo

Posted
Posted

I believe in Michigan, a girl of that frame is called a "Yooper"     Rhymes with the other thing she likes.  

the people getting their 15 minutes of fame from this election fraud bullshit almost makes it entertaining.  If it wasn't gouging such a large hole in the integrity of American Democracy.  

I'm morbidly curious to see how some of these folks monetize their involvement in this whole debacle.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nice Guy Eddie

Nice Guy Eddie 13541

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

It's probably worth pointing out that when the first judge found her affidavit "not credible," it was because her allegations didn't match up with any of the other live or affidavit witnesses.  They were uncorroborated, speculative junk.

Which everything she says is, but it wasn't based on her demeanor or other aspects of her "testimony."  Also, the poll book nonsense wasn't part of her original affidavit testimony.  I posted her affidavit earlier on the thread.

Here it is again. https://beta.documentcloud.org/documents/20404633-dominion-contractor-affidavit

That the scope of her testimony keeps growing is another knock on her credibility.

The poll book comments from her are laughable because her job was to help out with paper jams. Her original recorded testimony made it sound like her training consisted of learning how to be careful to not tear a jammed ballot. Fast forward a month and she’s the gop star witness on vote tabulation, poll books and ballot reconciliation for Wayne county. 

Edited by Nice Guy Eddie
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bookman

Bookman 4726

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Lobo said:

I believe in Michigan, a girl of that frame is called a "Yooper"     Rhymes with the other thing she likes.  

the people getting their 15 minutes of fame from this election fraud bullshit almost makes it entertaining.  If it wasn't gouging such a large hole in the integrity of American Democracy.  

I'm morbidly curious to see how some of these folks monetize their involvement in this whole debacle.  

She will get someone to write a book about how voter fraud stole the election. Trumpkins will eat that shit up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31686

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

The poll book comments from her are laughable because her job was to help out with paper jams. Her original recorded testimony made it sound like her training consisted of learning how to be careful to not tear a jammed ballot. Fast forward a month and she’s the gop star witness on vote tabulation, poll books and ballot reconciliation for Wayne county. 

It's really quite astonishing.

Judge Kenney's dismissal of her testimony as not credible was spot-on, but the lack of credibility has only expanded.  Usually, your evidence gets tossed as lacking credibility, you slink away with your tail between your legs,  Not go on TV repeatedly while expanding your lies and acting like a jackhole.

It's just more peak Trump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DigglerontheHoof

DigglerontheHoof 21283

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

It's really quite astonishing.

Judge Kenney's dismissal of her testimony as not credible was spot-on, but the lack of credibility has only expanded.  Usually, your evidence gets tossed as lacking credibility, you slink away with your tail between your legs,  Not go on TV repeatedly while expanding your lies and acting like a jackhole.

It's just more peak Trump.

4 out of 10 Americans think she's a heroic Patriot

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...