Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We have credible accusations of rape by a grown woman, and now by a 13 YO girl, and yet some want to think that Trump didn't abuse Ivanka.

I'm thinking some people need to reevaluate just how despicable this man most likely is.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
22 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

I'm thinking some people need to reevaluate just how despicable this man most likely is.

No shit. He has demonstrated time and time again that not only does he not value any human life other than his own, but also that he views women as possessions, not as people. He feels no guilt about abusing them, so it is preposterous to think he hasn't used money and power to cover up and justify all kinds of horrible things we haven't even imagined.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Walden Ponderer said:

No shit. He has demonstrated time and time again that not only does he not value any human life other than his own, but also that he views women as possessions, not as people. He feels no guilt about abusing them, so it is preposterous to think he hasn't used money and power to cover up and justify all kinds of horrible things we haven't even imagined.

Robert Durst may not be the only NYC real estate developer out there killin' it.

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Bullneck said:

This seems kind of serious, but I'm not a lawyer.  Just a guy reading things on Twitter:

 

 


trump will file a counter suit that she’s only trying to make him look bad 

  • Haha 2
  • 5 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Sawbonz said:

 

Even if that were completely, 100% true, which is historically doubtful, and it were true that slaves led more secure, healthier lives than they might have in Africa had they not been enslaved, the party who finds it an infringement on their freedumb to wear a mask or get a vaccination doesn't see the problem.

Edited by TwiceHorn
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 3
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Even if that were completely, 100% true, which is historically doubtful, and it were true that slaves led more secure, healthier lives than they might have in Africa had they not been enslaved, the party who finds it an infringement on their freedumb to wear a mask or get a vaccination doesn't see the problem.

 

socialism was good for the slaves !!!!!

Posted
18 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Even if that were completely, 100% true, which is historically doubtful, and it were true that slaves led more secure, healthier lives than they might have in Africa had they not been enslaved, the party who finds it an infringement on their freedumb to wear a mask or get a vaccination doesn't see the problem.

Those BLM protesters better not block the streets because George Floyd got murdered by cops, but hooray for the truckers blocking the streets in Canada because they don’t want to get vaccinated. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
10 hours ago, WhatTheBuck said:

Those BLM protesters better not block the streets because George Floyd got murdered by cops, but hooray for the truckers blocking the streets in Canada because they don’t want to get vaccinated. 


pull that shit in Florida and you can run them over !

Posted

I’d bet money that it was Sidney Powell who drafted the executive order to seize voting machines. She’s a fucking loon but she’s also a traitor who should hang. Whatever happens to her, she’s getting off easy. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Horn Dog said:

 

They say a federal judge portrayed them as “overwrought, dangerous lunatics”

 

200.gif

I disagree.  The judge did not portray them as "overwrought, dangerous lunatics."  The shit they filed in open court did that.  The judge just saw it.  If you want to avoid that, the best thing to do is.....not be an overwrought, dangerous lunatic in public filings. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 4
Posted

Sanctions orders do have a tendency to be overturned.  Part of that is that the trial court is actually aggrieved by the misconduct in the "first person," while the court of appeals views it on a cold record.

But, I think because this sanctions order was entered after all the wailing and gnashing of teeth was over, instead of in the middle of it as is often the case, this one stands a pretty good chance of standing up on appeal.

  • Like 2
Posted
Sanctions orders do have a tendency to be overturned.  Part of that is that the trial court is actually aggrieved by the misconduct in the "first person," while the court of appeals views it on a cold record.
But, I think because this sanctions order was entered after all the wailing and gnashing of teeth was over, instead of in the middle of it as is often the case, this one stands a pretty good chance of standing up on appeal.

This. It’s supported and supportable by undisputed conduct, after numerous opportunities for them to correct their path.
Posted
4 hours ago, Brisketexan said:


This. It’s supported and supportable by undisputed conduct, after numerous opportunities for them to correct their path.

Also, I should clarify, by "overturned." I mean remanded to the district court for a do-over.  Not that they go away entirely.

Posted
7 hours ago, Beau Vine said:

Not sure where this goes, but it needs the Chapelle gif...

Oh, goody!  Kick the officers, that's another charge.

Posted

"Sad that he got shot, he just should have complied -- that's what happens when you don't obey a lawful order!"

[blonde white chick fucking kicking at officers, resisting the whole way.....released from custody on the scene]

[amended statement below]

"So....sad that other dude got shot.  He just shoulda been a blonde white chick!"

Jesus fuck.  This country, man.

  • Rage+1 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Bojack said:

still tho . . . serving a warrant for illegally recording a hearing? seems like that should be some court rule and not a penal statute.

Posted
Just now, BehoId, The Underminer! said:

still tho . . . serving a warrant for illegally recording a hearing? seems like that should be some court rule and not a penal statute.

If this had been in Minneapolis, they'd have nabbed her with a no-knock warrant, so you know, small blessings and all that.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, BehoId, The Underminer! said:

still tho . . . serving a warrant for illegally recording a hearing? seems like that should be some court rule and not a penal statute.

I wonder if it was a bench warrant.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
1 hour ago, Gil Bang said:

sad trombone

 

 

 

He should appeal to the Super-Supreme Court, made up of Secret Constitutional Justices Piro, Bannon, and Rudy!  APPEAL AT ONCE!

Posted
30 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

He should appeal to the Super-Supreme Court, made up of Secret Constitutional Justices Piro, Bannon, and Rudy!  APPEAL AT ONCE!

Shhh.  There's a 2-week waiting period.

Posted
30 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

He should appeal to the Super-Supreme Court, made up of Secret Constitutional Justices Piro, Bannon, and Rudy!  APPEAL AT ONCE!

Would you get ahold of yourself, man?  You're an officer of the court.  There is no such thing as the "Super-Supreme Court", dammit!  

You know damn well those justices you mentioned are part of the 'Fantastic Tremendous Supreme Court' as seen on NBC.  

Let's grab Waffle House next week. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Lobo said:

Would you get ahold of yourself, man?  You're an officer of the court.  There is no such thing as the "Super-Supreme Court", dammit!  

You know damn well those justices you mentioned are part of the 'Fantastic Tremendous Supreme Court' as seen on NBC.  

Let's grab Waffle House next week. 

My trial schedule just cleared, so we're on.  Let's pick a day.

And you can hear my idea for a "Smothered and Covered Supreme Court."



×
×
  • Create New...