the trump election lawsuit thread of dominance

[mdmost 42863]

Anyone check on TTom? He seems lonely in Purgatory. 

Edited December 12, 2020 by mdmost

[Yuk 1509]

Anyone check on TTom? He seems lonely in Purgatory. 

He’s probably doing his patriotic duty of watching YouTube videos as we speak.

[SameSame 1692]

My mom actually put up a ‘TRUMP 2020 MAKE ‘ EM CRY AGAIN’ sign in her yard.  Sickening.

I would like to call her and be like ‘ Yo What’s up now Bitch?’ ..but she’s my mom so I would never talk to her or disrespect her like that.

But seriously, WHATS UP NOW BITCH?Haha 

[Gil Bang 25897]

3 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

First, lol at "Silver lining is that Biden will be removed soon" and second, holy shit the Q thread replies are almost at 16k.

"It's time for Louisiana to secede". 

 

Yeah, having visited that shithole a dozen or so times, I couldn't agree more. 

['stache 21772]

I have not looked at any of the OSU politics boards in probably 10 years. They were obnoxious then, I can’t imagine how bad they are in the trump era. No desire to see it whatsoever.

[Gil Bang 25897]

Just now, SameSame said:

My mom actually put up a ‘TRUMP 2020 MAKE ‘ EM CRY AGAIN’ sign in her yard.  Sickening.

I would like to call her and be like ‘ Yo What’s up now Bitch?’ ..but she’s my mom so I would never talk to her or disrespect her like that.

But seriously, WHATS UP NOW BITCH?Haha 

you shouldn't speak to your mother that way.

PM me her number, and I'll speak to her that way. 

[Sawbonz 27427]

17 minutes ago, Goredho said:

I like the cut of his jibs.

Those are jowls 

[Neonmoon 38127]

Legal scholar weighs in 

 

[Mrs Whiggins 13049]

6 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

Is that from Olan Mills?

 

 

Looking at his chin, I'm going to say General Mills. Two bowls of Cocoa Puffs every morning.

[cactusflinthead 27594]

 

[TwiceHorn 31272]

Meh.  Standing is not procedure.  It's far more fundamental than that.  It's not a dodge.

It's "you have no claim, motherfucker" at its most fundamental.

[Biff Tannen 45494]

4 minutes ago, Neonmoon said:

Legal scholar weighs in 

 

So how long before she's spit out the bottom of the porn industry?

[Cousin Strawberry 1261]

5 minutes ago, Neonmoon said:

Legal scholar weighs in 

 

When did standing become a technicality?

[Mrs Whiggins 13049]

3 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

So how long before she's spit out the bottom of the porn industry?

I expect she's going to run for office. I mean you've got Sarah Palin on the Georgia tour right now alongside Marjorie Taylor Greene so she'll fit right in.

[BrickHorn 18191]

1 minute ago, TwiceHorn said:

Meh.  Standing is not procedure.  It's far more fundamental than that.  It's not a dodge.

It's "you have no claim, motherfucker" at its most fundamental.

Exactly. Lack of standing is in a sense the complement of an acquittal. The latter says the defendant did nothing wrong; the former says nothing wrong happened to the plaintiff. 

[Brisketexan 104604]

When did standing become a technicality?

When stupidity became the governing philosophy of the ruling party.

[aggie08 21432]

20 minutes ago, Bama Chick said:

Y’all ever continue to wonder why Hugo and I migrated to this fine establishment?

This shit right here. And this mess is actually restrained compared to the usual nutty squirrel turds that usually make up that board.

16,000 replies to the latest Q comings and goings seems reasonable.

How the hell did they not kill Hugo over there? 

Edited December 12, 2020 by aggie08

[DigDug 1649]

9 minutes ago, Neonmoon said:

Legal scholar weighs in 

 

These people have absolutely no sense of humility and honesty, none.

[Mrs Whiggins 13049]

1 minute ago, BrickHorn said:

Exactly. Lack of standing is in a sense the complement of an acquittal. The latter says the defendant did nothing wrong; the former says nothing wrong happened to the plaintiff. 

That seems to be what the Parler crowd are carrying on about now. They're saying that Texas "wasn't injured" but that Trump was, so Trump should sue. Something along these lines:

[Pato del Muerto 52342]

If Louisiana were to secede:

1) we get rid of Louisiana. 
2) I believe they have a lot of oil refining capacity, so it should expedite our transition away from that stuff

3) I assume LSU would be forced to leave the sec and ncaa, as a foreign institution- and all that money. 
4) we get rid of Louisiana. 

[mdmost 42863]

There's always going to be something coming out that will be THE thing which of course will turn into nothing. 

[BrickHorn 18191]

2 minutes ago, Mrs Whiggins said:

That seems to be what the Parler crowd are carrying on about now. They're saying that Texas "wasn't injured" but that Trump was, so Trump should sue.

Huh. It’s almost as if Trump hasn’t thought of that 60 times already.

[Fudge Nuggets 19151]

2 hours ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

 

A bunch of us figured this out years ago.  Hell, some like Twice even joined their little nerd gang.

[Mrs Whiggins 13049]

Just now, BrickHorn said:

Huh. It’s almost as if Trump hasn’t thought of that 60 times already.

It does have the feeling of "deja vu all over again" doesn't it?

[Ted Lange 16048]

I wish TJHOOKER was around so we could laugh in his stupid face.

[Pato del Muerto 52342]

7 minutes ago, Mrs Whiggins said:

That seems to be what the Parler crowd are carrying on about now. They're saying that Texas "wasn't injured" but that Trump was, so Trump should sue. Something along these lines:

There’s foreign interference now too?

[Dahobbs 17447]

7 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

If Louisiana were to secede:

1) we get rid of Louisiana. 
2) I believe they have a lot of oil refining capacity, so it should expedite our transition away from that stuff

3) I assume LSU would be forced to leave the sec and ncaa, as a foreign institution- and all that money. 
4) we get rid of Louisiana. 

Can we keep New Orleans? 

[Ted Lange 16048]

 

[Chewbacca 7730]

Gravy Seal reporting for duty!

[Pato del Muerto 52342]

Just now, Dahobbs said:

Can we keep New Orleans? 

Just go to Memphis?

[conVINCEd 21468]

7 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

If Louisiana were to secede:

1) we get rid of Louisiana. 
2) I believe they have a lot of oil refining capacity, so it should expedite our transition away from that stuff

3) I assume LSU would be forced to leave the sec and ncaa, as a foreign institution- and all that money. 
4) we get rid of Louisiana. 

New Orleans is in Louisiana.  I like New Orleans.

[conVINCEd 21468]

Just now, Pato del Muerto said:

Just go to Memphis?

In this hypothetical secession discussion, I believe Louisiana and Tennessee would be on the same team.

[Gil Bang 25897]

2 minutes ago, Ted Lange said:

 

Milo's wants to take down the GOP?   

All he has to do is come out with a list of all the "Family-Values Republicans" that he's sucked off in a D.C. men's room. 

[Pato del Muerto 52342]

2 minutes ago, conVINCEd said:

In this hypothetical secession discussion, I believe Louisiana and Tennessee would be on the same team.

Well if you expand the scope that much there’s a lot of logistical issues. 

[kevwun 15647]

As long as NOLA becomes an independent City State, Louisiana can fuck off.

[Fudge Nuggets 19151]

5 minutes ago, conVINCEd said:

New Orleans is in Louisiana.  I like New Orleans.

I'm willing to give up New Orleans to get rid of the rest of that shit hole state.  Last I checked you can get drunk in a lot of places and there's plenty of YouTube videos on how to make a mean ass gumbo.  It takes some personal experience to know which videos are legit, but you can't go wrong with my main man Chef Charlie Andrews.  That brother is legit.

[Bookman 4610]

New Orleans is pretty awesome though.

[jimmyjazz 45557]

22 minutes ago, BrickHorn said:

Exactly. Lack of standing is in a sense the complement of an acquittal. The latter says the defendant did nothing wrong; the former says nothing wrong happened to the plaintiff. 

Thank you.  That helps me frame this for my "discussions" with the legions of Trumpers I grew up with.  

[atomheartbevo 89424]

 

[Brisketexan 104604]

Milo's wants to take down the GOP?   
All he has to do is come out with a list of all the "Family-Values Republicans" that he's sucked off in a D.C. men's room. 

That would be “all of them.”

[Mrs Whiggins 13049]

10 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

There’s foreign interference now too?

Apparently, despite what the former CISA official, Chris Krebs, had stated (regarding the elections) they've deduced some convoluted mishmash that relates to Trump's executive order (from 2018) regarding foreign influence in elections, the Swalwell story, Dominion, and I don't know what all else plus the Ratcliffe bit that was in the Parler post. I can't keep it all straight but I'm sure it makes sense to them.

[Ted Lange 16048]

So I thought you had to download an app or signup to read Parler.   Nope, here is Milo and all the glorious replies

https://parler.com/profile/milo

[DigDug 1649]

 

[tx 3 putt 76368]

17 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

Can we keep New Orleans? 

 

legalized prostitution 

[BrickHorn 18191]

4 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Thank you.  That helps me frame this for my "discussions" with the legions of Trumpers I grew up with.  

To be clear, lack of standing does not mean “nothing wrong happened.” It just means that, if something wrong was done, the harm didn’t fall on the plaintiff. 

[Gatorubet 30098]

Just go to Memphis?

Keep south of I-10. Fuck the rest.

[LTbear 4160]

1 hour ago, kilroydos said:

You know what?  Threads like this make me incredibly disappointed and sad as hell when comparing them to similar ones on Oklahoma boards.  I'm a Sooner, but it feels like I've got way more in common with you all than with them on 95% of these things.  Football is fun as hell, and so is hating Texas, but when it comes to the future of the goddamn country, this is where I'd rather be.

Hook 'em.

Vomit in my mouth.

There's a reason I post here more often than the Baylor board, and the Cal/ Berkeley board is too disinterested in football.  The Colorado board is fucking awesome though.

[TwiceHorn 31272]

1 minute ago, BrickHorn said:

To be clear, lack of standing does not mean “nothing wrong happened.” It just means that, if something wrong was done, the harm didn’t fall on the plaintiff. 

In that sense, it is true that the Supremes did not evaluate whether there was fraud or something beyond ordinary irregularity that happens in any election where hundreds of millions of votes are cast.

But there have been fifty-some-odd other suits that have established that there is no credible evidence of that.

The Supremes never would rule on the fraud or related issues, anyway, as they don't make fact findings.

[Rimbo 25779]

2 hours ago, yoladu said:

[Brisketexan 104604]

To be clear, lack of standing does not mean “nothing wrong happened.” It just means that, if something wrong was done, the harm didn’t fall on the plaintiff. 

Which also means “you can’t file an original case in SCOTUS. You have to file it in district court. Where you’ve done nothing but gotten your ass kicked. Relentlessly and repeatedly.”