Jump to content

the trump election lawsuit thread of dominance

henrygandorf

By henrygandorf
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 10k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Bookman
Bookman

The rumor is that Alito and Thomas voted first, and then there was a dump of 7 votes. Texas expert says there’s only a 0.0039% chance of this happening.

Bama Chick
Bama Chick

Fuck Kayleigh and her headache and all the other enabling babysitters. I hope she hasn’t had a night with more than three hours of sleep for this entire year. I hope he texts her and calls her at al

Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand
Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand

40 plus indictments, guilty pleas, convictions, prison sentences, and roughly a dozen fed cases borne of said investigation is slightly more than jack shit.

Posted Images

jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 45919

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Yep, the clap makes you lose your mind as it progresses, lots of those “mad king” stories have a nexus to syphilis. Antibiotics are an amazing thing. 

Syphilis is not "the clap".  That's gonorrhea.  (Yes, syphilis does lead to mental disorders in later stages.)

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pato del Muerto

Pato del Muerto 52492

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

I’m beginning to think that Lin Wood may be...what’s the expression...”crazier than a shithouse rat.” Seriously, he’s bonafide fucking insane, and should not be practicing law.

The fact that he is still practicing law (assuming he still does things in that capacity and isn’t just a Twitter loon now) brings your profession’s disciplinary procedures into serious question.  

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TexArcher

TexArcher 37774

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

The "Deep State" is, in this case, The Constitution.

That's the thing Trump's supporters now oppose.

The thing is, if Fox News or OAN wanted to, they could have legions of Republicans repeating, "The Constitution was written by a bunch of Northeastern libtards and it ought to be outlawed!"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
aggie08

aggie08 21501

Posted
Posted

While utterly predictable, it is fascinating watching the mental contortions after each failed court case and bogus allegation to conclude that it must be the deep state's immense reach silencing the truth. Somehow, the less evidence of a deep state conspiracy ring, the more likely it is to exist. They've put themselves in a position to never be wrong.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Bozo_Casanova

Bozo_Casanova 26451

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, aggie08 said:

While utterly predictable, it is fascinating watching the mental contortions after each failed court case and bogus allegation to conclude that it must be the deep state's immense reach silencing the truth. Somehow, the less evidence of a deep state conspiracy ring, the more likely it is to exist. They've put themselves in a position to never be wrong.

So this retired rural schoolteacher dies. A lifelong Republican, she was devout and prayerful, a loving grandmother, mother, sister and wife, a servant of the needy, a comforter of those in mourning and a true neighbor to all.

Having led such a life she was borne on the wings of angels to the throne of the one who is called I AM, who, due to her exceptional merit, offered her the truth of  our broken world. 
She asked “did Joe Biden really win the election?”

The Creator responded, “Yes, my beloved”

And she thought “This goes further than I even imagined.”

Edited by Bozo_Casanova
  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 6
  • Haha 8
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 85321

Posted
Posted

11 of 52 isn’t that impressive. That’s 80% of the GOP conference uninterested in sucking tiny orange peen. Especially considering 4 aren’t even sworn in yet and Mitch can make life hell for them 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JimmyJames

JimmyJames 12271

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, Js1 said:

11 of 52 isn’t that impressive. That’s 80% of the GOP conference uninterested in sucking tiny orange peen. Especially considering 4 aren’t even sworn in yet and Mitch can make life hell for them 

 

Rand Paul will almost certainly object. He’s just being a cagey turd about it like he does with everything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bozo_Casanova

Bozo_Casanova 26451

Posted
Posted (edited)
48 minutes ago, Js1 said:

11 of 52 isn’t that impressive. That’s 80% of the GOP conference uninterested in sucking tiny orange peen. Especially considering 4 aren’t even sworn in yet and Mitch can make life hell for them 

 

Lankford? Jesus that’s disappointing .

Edited by Bozo_Casanova
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 85321

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, JimmyJames said:

Rand Paul will almost certainly object. He’s just being a cagey turd about it like he does with everything. 

Probably. I don’t see it being more than 13-15. If it even gets to 15. I do wonder if Mitch and GOP leadership like Thune and Cornyn lean on them to let it go or risk losing good committeeships or 2022 fundraising access. 

Im assuming already that the incoming 4 are already on leadership’s bad side. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gatorubet

Gatorubet 30234

Posted
Posted
I’m beginning to think that Lin Wood may be...what’s the expression...”crazier than a shithouse rat.” Seriously, he’s bonafide fucking insane, and should not be practicing law.

Not so sure about that last part.* Would pay-per-view to see his oral arguments.

At this point all his clients assume the risk of mind numbing, Rule 11 sanctioning, bat-shittery.


* yeah, should not be practicing
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 85321

Posted
Posted

If we win the GA seats, we HAVE TO pass a new Electoral Count Act and at least up the threshold to challenging electoral votes to 75% in both chambers. Just 51 in the Senate or 218 in the House being enough to overturn an entire election is horse shit.  You want to throw it out? Get 75 Senate votes and 327 House votes, assholes. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Longhorn_Fan68

Longhorn_Fan68 33869

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

You think it's going to end with dotard leaving.  It's not.  Rs are going to continue for the next 4 years and if they lose again, it will continue on after that.

while it may be a temporary headache, that's probably what needs to happen. the R side is a rudderless ship right now and they are the ones that disabled it. either they reform and resurrect a viable conservative party, or they fracture and become less effective over time. either way, win-win for the rest of us

Link to comment
Share on other sites
henrygandorf

henrygandorf 29190

Posted
  • Author
Posted
20 minutes ago, Js1 said:

If we win the GA seats, we HAVE TO pass a new Electoral Count Act and at least up the threshold to challenging electoral votes to 75% in both chambers. Just 51 in the Senate or 218 in the House being enough to overturn an entire election is horse shit.  You want to throw it out? Get 75 Senate votes and 327 House votes, assholes. 

yeah, it should be the same threshold as an impeachment conviction, since it's essentially granting the same results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 85321

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

I mean, it's just a "promise" to follow the popular vote.  It's not a law.  Not sure what SCOTUS could say.

It won’t matter. You won’t find enough states worth 270 with friendly enough D legislatures and governors to pass it. It’s only at 196 and the only state I see with the ability to pass it soon is NV. 

And there’s not 38 states to ratify an amendment. 

The best we can do right now is reform the Electoral Count Act and make it harder to pass challenges. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RDCanecutter

RDCanecutter 26428

Posted
Posted
21 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

Lin, instead of saying "Allie, Thee, Motley, & Crew cannot read. They can only rely on their God-given instincts.", I think you meant to say "Allie, Thee, Motley, & Crew cannot read. They can only rely on their Dog-given instincts."

I think the main point is that those 4 dogs are not suffering from insanity.

Maybe Lin isn't either. He's so over the top that I suspect he's pulling some Andy Kaufman performance art bit, for an audience of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31457

Posted
Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

I mean, it's just a "promise" to follow the popular vote.  It's not a law.  Not sure what SCOTUS could say.

And given that it's a choice of the state legislatures, not much the Supremes could or would say, I don't think.  But it's politically impractical.

Edited by TwiceHorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31457

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, RDCanecutter said:

I think the main point is that those 4 dogs are not suffering from insanity.

Maybe Lin isn't either. He's so over the top that I suspect he's pulling some Andy Kaufman performance art bit, for an audience of him.

i might agree that it is some awful shitshow on his part.  But it apparently extends into his private/professional life if you look at that lawsuit.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...