Jump to content

Official Thread for Abortion Demagoguery

bad_teammate

By bad_teammate
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Bama Chick
Bama Chick

No. Fuck off with that. Not every abortion is about trauma and tragedy and using that framing plays into the christofascist’s hands. Women are humans. Humans have bodily autonomy. Ergo, women have b

Brisketexan
Brisketexan

I do love this argument. I really do. It’s as convenient a way to label yourself a drooling moron as exists, outside of towing around a giant neon “I’M A MORON” sign. No, they didn’t teach us that

hayden_horn
hayden_horn

of course you do. thing is, i would support that. if they choose that. and the real thing is, i'm actually pro life. both my sons were very premature, and had they been born in the 80s, they

Posted Images

Bozo_Casanova

Bozo_Casanova 26294

Posted
Posted
On 8/16/2022 at 5:49 PM, Bama Chick said:

If a Democratic consultant doesn’t start using “Carry to Bury” in every ad about abortion then what are they even doing?

 

On 8/17/2022 at 4:02 PM, washparkhorn said:

“Carry to bury” laws are barbaric.  

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bozo_Casanova

Bozo_Casanova 26294

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, workswithseed said:

I still don't understand how that passage was for abortion, but not for infidelity. She didn't even needed to pregnant, and it doesn't even apply to just being pregnant that you can get rid of your child, but only to cheating. 

 Not that he lives in Oklahoma freakshow and I am the idoit 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
safe sex

safe sex 11685

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

It literally describes giving a poison to the woman to terminate her pregnancy. The aborted products of conception, if present, are proof of the infidelity 

Fucking unreal how dim he is, and how uninterested he is in brightening the lights.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
joe dirt

joe dirt 285

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Sawbonz said:

It literally describes giving a poison to the woman to terminate her pregnancy. The loss of a leg aborted products of conception, if present, are proof of the infidelity 

fify.

and totallllly makes sense, too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
hpslugga

hpslugga 4044

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, workswithseed said:

I still don't understand how that passage was for abortion, but not for infidelity.

It’s nominally for both, but in reality it most certainly is meant to condone abortion. For what reason would a man living in the those times have to suspect one of his wives had been unfaithful?

She wouldn’t have an iPhone that contained some incriminating text messages to some other dude. In fact women back then were by and large illiterate, so a written correspondence in any form wouldn’t be in the cards. It’s not like he’s gonna catch her talking on the phone to this guy, either. 

See, here’s another dirty secret about the Bible, both OT and NT: contrary to what American evangelicals prefer to make believe, the Bible does not say that marriage is “one man and one woman.” It does not say that. In fact there’s no clear definition (i.e. one passage or multiple passages saying the same thing) of what qualifies as a marriage.

If you read it, and by that I mean all of it and not just the flowery passages your pastor carefully selected for recommendation to you, what you’ll come away with is this: the implied, consensus biblical definition of marriage is one man and however many women that man can afford to keep in his house.

Since that’s the case, here’s why one of a man’s wives would be subjected to this nasty bit of insanity that’s found in Numbers 5:

Men traveled with other men for hunting  quite a bit and they would be gone for long stretches. If one of them returned home and one of his wives, that he didn’t favor as much as the others, turned up looking like she was pregnant when she should not be, THAT was the hint that led him to believe she had cheated on him.

It wasn’t based on “intuition” or “instinct,” or even paranoia. The fucking girl is pregnant, and he knows it’s not by him. Yeah Numbers 5 and its test of the unfaithful wife does list the possibilities of what happens when a woman drinks that nasty ass water, but we all know where it’s leading. It’s leading to a nightmarish conclusion. 

So by now, if you’re honest, you might be asking “so if he already knows, why take her to the priest to find out what he already knows?” The answer is simple. No man wants one of his wives carrying around some other dude’s bastard, especially when the deed was done while she was already married. And that’s really the point; that men in those times had as much respect for a woman’s choice as American conservatives do today.

Fortunately for all of us, there’s as much reason to believe that dusty water could actually serve as a magic potion that induced abortions as there is to believe in that ridiculous book in general. 

and it’s about time to remind our wonderful readers that America is not a Christian theocracy and it would be a ludicrous waste of time defending one’s political views on the basis of what’s found in the Bible. But however ludicrous it is, it’s that much more ludicrous to defend one’s political views on the basis of what’s imagined to be found in the Bible. To me, that’s like basing speed limits on the idea that reaching 88 mph will cause the car to disappear and reanimate at a different point in time.

Edited by hpslugga
  • Hook 'Em 12
  • Like 6
  • Haha 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bozo_Casanova

Bozo_Casanova 26294

Posted
Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, workswithseed said:

I forget, you're not Christian.

22 and may this water that causes the curse go into your stomach, and make your belly swell and your thigh rot.”

‘Then the woman shall say, “Amen, so be it.”

The Gospel of Christ has much to say about  praying on street corners hypocrisy and pride, but little if any about abortion. If you are going to quote the Torah on the topic, maybe talk to a Rabbi first.

Edited by Bozo_Casanova
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 45563

Posted
Posted
On 8/18/2022 at 9:08 AM, Anastasis said:

If there is a singular action that derailed the civics process wrt Abortion in this country it is probably the Roe decision. 

The scary thing is that I actually think you believe the utter bullshit you type multiple times a day.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Satchel

Satchel 6908

Posted
Posted

Again, women and the men who support women’s health will punish Republicans in November for things like this:

https://www.timesofisrael.com/louisiana-woman-battles-state-law-requiring-her-to-deliver-fetus-without-a-skull/

Hospital denies abortion to Louisiana woman whose 10-week-old fetus missing a skull

36-year-old hires lawyer after medical center refused to conduct procedure because acrania not on list of exceptions to ban; so she’s forced to cross state lines for operation

  • Rage+1 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45500

Posted
Posted

Official today.  Ho hum.  Vote motherfuckers.

https://www.texastribune.org/2022/08/25/texas-trigger-law-abortion/

Quote

Texans who perform abortions now face up to life in prison, $100,000 fine

Quote

Performing an abortion is now a felony punishable by up to life in prison in Texas after the state’s trigger law, which has only narrow exceptions to save the life of a pregnant patient, went into effect Thursday.

The law was “triggered” when the U.S. Supreme Court issued its judgment in Dobbs v. Jackson, the case that overturned Roe v. Wade and allowed states to set their own laws about abortion.

Abortion clinics across Texas had already stopped performing the procedure, fearing prosecution under state laws that were on the books before Roe v. Wade.

 

  • Rage+1 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MC Fresh Breath

MC Fresh Breath 4074

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Biff Tannen said:

Official today.  Ho hum.  Vote motherfuckers.

https://www.texastribune.org/2022/08/25/texas-trigger-law-abortion/

 

from the article:

Quote

 

Already, conservative lawmakers have said they intend to propose legislation to allow prosecutors to bring abortion cases outside their own jurisdiction if the local district attorney won’t.

“That’s never been done in Texas, but the Legislature probably can at least start that ball rolling,” said Dallas attorney David Coale. “Then, you’ve got prosecutors with conflicting opinions about the same set of facts, and then you’ve really got a zoo.”

 

Full insanity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nice Guy Eddie

Nice Guy Eddie 13414

Posted
Posted

The best people.

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/neighborhood/moco/news/article/Former-Texas-Right-to-Life-political-director-17397607.php?utm_campaign=premiumchron_breakingnews_20220825&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email
 

Quote

Former Texas Right to Life Political Director Luke Bowen has been charged with online solicitation of a minor after an Aug. 3 sting operation by Montgomery County Internet Crime Against Children.

Bowen is out on a $50,000 bond. The charge is a second-degree felony, which could result in a two- to 20-year sentence and a fine of up to $10,000.

He earned the the former title AFTER his arrest. Basically he was simultaneously fighting to eliminate all abortions while trolling for young kids on the internet.

on a separate note, his attorney is pointing out that since this was a sting operation, we should remember these isn’t a real victim here. SMH.

  • Haha 2
  • Rage+1 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
crash_davis

crash_davis 23084

Posted
Posted

These asshats write their own jokes. 

Mental illness and the religious right. Match made in heaven.

 

https://www.currentrevolt.com/p/texas-right-to-life-political-director?sd=pf&triedSigningIn=true

TEXAS RIGHT TO LIFE POLITICAL DIRECTOR ARRESTED FOR SOLICITATION OF A MINOR

Luke Bowen is the Political Director for Texas Right to Life

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sawbonz

Sawbonz 27443

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

The best people.

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/neighborhood/moco/news/article/Former-Texas-Right-to-Life-political-director-17397607.php?utm_campaign=premiumchron_breakingnews_20220825&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email
 

He earned the the former title AFTER his arrest. Basically he was simultaneously fighting to eliminate all abortions while trolling for young kids on the internet.

on a separate note, his attorney is pointing out that since this was a sting operation, we should remember these isn’t a real victim here. SMH.

This guy a pedophile? GTFOH

 

image.png.73c1b16d3200789a5cdaece9e5fbc9be.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
elfenix

elfenix 34180

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

The best people.

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/neighborhood/moco/news/article/Former-Texas-Right-to-Life-political-director-17397607.php?utm_campaign=premiumchron_breakingnews_20220825&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email
 

He earned the the former title AFTER his arrest. Basically he was simultaneously fighting to eliminate all abortions while trolling for young kids on the internet.

on a separate note, his attorney is pointing out that since this was a sting operation, we should remember these isn’t a real victim here. SMH.

the real groomers are the republicans we met along the way

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nice Guy Eddie

Nice Guy Eddie 13414

Posted
Posted

I’m reading how some GOP candidates are muddying the waters by stating that they’re pro-life while also not supporting a federal ban on abortion. They’re trying to do anything to convince women to vote for them even by making up a fake item.

To my knowledge there isn’t a proposed federal ban on abortion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aqua Buddha

Aqua Buddha 14524

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

I’m reading how some GOP candidates are muddying the waters by stating that they’re pro-life while also not supporting a federal ban on abortion. They’re trying to do anything to convince women to vote for them even by making up a fake item.

To my knowledge there isn’t a proposed federal ban on abortion.

It's like them saying that while they're for civil rights, they support states rights to deny people those rights.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
elfenix

elfenix 34180

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

I’m reading how some GOP candidates are muddying the waters by stating that they’re pro-life while also not supporting a federal ban on abortion. They’re trying to do anything to convince women to vote for them even by making up a fake item.

To my knowledge there isn’t a proposed federal ban on abortion.

HR705 (federal fetal heartbeat act)

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hpslugga

hpslugga 4044

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

When are they going after birth control?  We know they are going to. Would be nice if they obliged us and did it before the mid-terms to help drive up younger turnout.

I mean just knowing that they’re going to should be reason enough. I can’t understand anyone who’d think “well i know uncle Ruckus said they should do that, but it probably won’t be until later so I’ll sit this one out for now.”

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sawbonz

Sawbonz 27443

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

as soon as R's take the House and Senate, it's happening. Scotus is primed to rubber stamp it

SCOTUS won’t have to rubber stamp it if it’s a law passed by Congress and signed by the president. That’s always been the problem with RvW. It made it so Congress could shirk its responsibilities 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PenelopeWitherspoon

PenelopeWitherspoon 19094

Posted
Posted (edited)

MSNBC is having some good coverage on how the Dobbs decision has changed things.  

Tudor Dixon is a fucking ghoul.  

They talked about a good Beto add on the new Texas trigger law.  Anyone got it?

And now onto Blake Masters trying to erase his previous comments on abortion.  Fuck him.

Edited by PenelopeWitherspoon
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Post Oak

Post Oak 20187

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, PenelopeWitherspoon said:

MSNBC is having some good coverage on how the Dobbs decision has changed things.  

Tudor Dixon is a fucking ghoul.  

They talked about a good Beto add on the new Texas trigger law.  Anyone got it?

And now onto Blake Masters trying to erase his previous comments on abortion.  Fuck him.

 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Voldemort86

Voldemort86 2259

Posted
Posted
53 minutes ago, Zonahorn said:

Courts in Arizona deciding between a 15 week ban or a ban that completely eliminates all abortions with no exceptions written when Arizona was a territory. The trigger law will probably go in effect. 

Will just make Arizona bluer then next few elections.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...