Jump to content

Desantis is a POS and needs his own thread


Gil Bang

Recommended Posts

$70m to support fatherhood?  Is it basically paying for alcohol and viagra?  Isn't spending money to replace families an age-old disproven mantra?  

I also like the fatherhood bill signing is 9 men.  Because as we know...fatherhood is only about men.  I'm a good father because I'm nice to women.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, 27-25 said:

Apparently the FL legislature is turning over its power to set districts gerrymander to Desantis.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/11/politics/desantis-florida-redistricting-map/index.html

I came here to post this.  Key quote:

Quote

Last month, DeSantis vetoed the new district boundaries approved by lawmakers -- a rare public display of contention between the governor and a state legislature controlled entirely by his own party. DeSantis has demanded the legislature join his fight to eliminate two districts where Black residents are a plurality.
For months, Republican lawmakers appeared ready to defy DeSantis, passing a map even after he threatened to veto it. House and Senate map drawers defended their maps as constitutional and insisted the governor was leading lawmakers toward a court fight with specious legal footing.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.wfla.com/news/politics/florida-doe-rejects-54-math-books-from-state-curriculum/

No example banned text in the math books were included in any stories I could find. I would love to read how crt was included in elementary math books as they claim.

Social studies is next. They might just decide to burn all submissions at this rate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pacman said:

https://www.wfla.com/news/politics/florida-doe-rejects-54-math-books-from-state-curriculum/

No example banned text in the math books were included in any stories I could find. I would love to read how crt was included in elementary math books as they claim.

Social studies is next. They might just decide to burn all submissions at this rate.

"Johnny has ten apples, but realizes that his apple farm was on land taking from indigenous people, was planted by slaves, and is harvested by undocumented migrant workers. If he wants to do the right thing and pay Voluntary Land Taxes, Reparations, and a Living Wage, how many apples will he have left?"
 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, pacman said:

https://www.wfla.com/news/politics/florida-doe-rejects-54-math-books-from-state-curriculum/

No example banned text in the math books were included in any stories I could find. I would love to read how crt was included in elementary math books as they claim.

Social studies is next. They might just decide to burn all submissions at this rate.

 

i can't wait for the CRT examples to go public

 

it's going to make snowflakes look like forward thinkers 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Like most reasonable Americans, I’m considering moving to Florida to keep my children safe from math.

Ron DeSantis, governor of the Sunshine (unless it illuminates something we don’t want people to see) State, has taken a bold stand against fiendish liberal attempts to use math textbooks to transform young American students into woke and genderless soy children.

The Florida Department of Education announced Friday that it has rejected more than 50 math textbooks because they included nation-destroying concepts like “Critical Race Theory” and “Social Emotional Learning.” The department’s statement carried the headline: “Florida Rejects Publishers' Attempts to Indoctrinate Students.”

 

Ignorance keeps me safe
I don’t know what critical race theory or social emotional learning are, because I’ve been told they’re dangerous and I’m afraid if I Google them I’ll turn into a lib. But thank goodness DeSantis’ education officials caught those textbooks in time before any students were allowed to learn something.

In the statement, Commissioner of Education Richard Corcoran said: “When it comes to education, other states continue to follow Florida’s lead as we continue to reinforce parents’ rights by focusing on providing their children with a world-class education without the fear of indoctrination or exposure to dangerous and divisive concepts in our classrooms.”

 

The commissioner and the entire DeSantis administration are so concerned about those dangerous and divisive concepts imbedded in math textbooks that they gave the public no specific examples. That’s a smart move, because it protects us all from possible accidental arithmetical indoctrination, and it makes the Democrats super mad.

 

Nice try, social justice warrior. I know the indoctrination is there because I’ve done my research by watching Fox News, the network that taught me long ago that “2 + 2 = 5” and that anyone who says otherwise is a socialist.

A 'very transparent' process?
On Monday morning, Florida Lt. Gov. Jeanette Nunez spoke with Fox News and said there has been “a systematic attempt by these publishers to infiltrate our children's education by embedding topics such as critical race theory” and then wisely gave no specific examples and said: “This was a very transparent and open process.”

 

For starters, I’m quite sure these textbooks contain references to equilateral triangles, alleged “triangles” that have three equal sides and three equal angles that are always 60 degrees. This is in-your-face leftist geometric messaging, demanding young kids embrace controversial concepts like equality and the soft, liberal idea that all are equal.

And of course, three 60-degree angles? 60-60-60. 6-6-6. That’s satanism. Do the math, people. (Actually, don’t. If you do, Satan wins.)

Our children should be learning only about the traditional right triangle, with occasional, age-appropriate references to the isosceles triangle in advanced grades.

74.2 million votes > 81.3 million votes
The entire concept of greater-than and less-than has been overtaken by communist thinking, to the point where students could read a word problem like, “If Joe Biden received 81.3 million votes in the 2020 presidential election and Donald Trump received 74.2 million votes, who got more votes?” and be told the correct answers is “Joe Biden.”

 

The right answer is obviously: “Donald Trump, because Joe Biden cheated.” Florida parents can now rest easy knowing their children will never be so misled.

Don’t get me started on any K-12 books that promote mathematical filth like binomials, trinomials and polynomials. THESE ARE CHILDREN, FOR GOD’S SAKE!

And while I have no evidence of this, and if I did I wouldn’t share it with you, I’m sure these banned textbooks included pages of nonsense about Critical Rhombus Theory, which asserts that square supremacy is a social construct embedded in Euclidean geometry. There’s no way I’ll allow some teacher to make my kids feel guilty about the history of shapes.


That’s why I’m moving my family to Florida, where students are taught proper math and encouraged to answer sensible, patriotic math questions like this: “If a Republican governor wants to become president, how many times will he need to mention critical race theory before it happens?”

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

2 hours ago, Beau Vine said:

For starters, I’m quite sure these textbooks contain references to equilateral triangles, alleged “triangles” that have three equal sides and three equal angles that are always 60 degrees. This is in-your-face leftist geometric messaging, demanding young kids embrace controversial concepts like equality and the soft, liberal idea that all are equal.

And of course, three 60-degree angles? 60-60-60. 6-6-6. That’s satanism. Do the math, people. (Actually, don’t. If you do, Satan wins.)

Our children should be learning only about the traditional right triangle, with occasional, age-appropriate references to the isosceles triangle in advanced grades.

 

I also believe degrees are the devil's work. That is why we should all embrace the divine radian.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, HenryJames said:

When you think your supporters are idiots.

Jesus, these fucking morons will lie about the most easily verifiable stuff.  "It hasn't been great on return on investment.  It was been static for many many years."

5 years ago, twitter was selling for $16.48/share. Now it's at $46.50.  

That's an annualized return of over 23% per year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HenryJames said:

When you think your supporters are idiots.

Politicians attacking private businesses with impunity should terrify everyone. But hilariously, corporations much like individual citizens will still probably shovel cash to their re-election campaigns. 

I wonder how long before he starts suggesting that Florida find ways to block twitter from their internets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Beau Vine said:

Jesus, these fucking morons will lie about the most easily verifiable stuff.  "It hasn't been great on return on investment.  It was been static for many many years."

5 years ago, twitter was selling for $16.48/share. Now it's at $46.50.  

That's an annualized return of over 23% per year.

Well 23% is pretty low when you can operate a scam fleecing olds and illiterates from all of their money via donations. You too can destroy evil forever for $9.95 a month.

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

Politicians attacking private businesses with impunity should terrify everyone. But hilariously, corporations much like individual citizens will still probably shovel cash to their re-election campaigns. 

I wonder how long before he starts suggesting that Florida find ways to block twitter from their internets. 

Actually, I might be on board with some progressive types attacking private corporations.  Maybe their stock buy backs.

What's good for the goose  . . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Actually, I might be on board with some progressive types attacking private corporations.  Maybe their stock buy backs.

What's good for the goose  . . . .

Have you not met Senator Warren, or the smart but unattractive (name escapes me) rep from Ca?  It’s their entire shtick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/19/2022 at 2:47 PM, HenryJames said:

When you know your supporters are idiots.

Fixed.

I guess DeSantis is getting involved in BIG issues and not just Florida stuff.  

He probably thinks Musk is an ally.  And one that will help him.  And give TFG his account back.  I wonder if that might backfire in 2024?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, StruggleBus said:

I was really hoping to vote for Elizabeth Warren but Ron is definitely my second choice 

Ah, so you're just shit posting/trolling. Is that because you've got nothing of value to say about your support of De Santis, or is it because you lack confidence in what you'd say?

Apparently, you do like him because he is your "second choice."

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/17/2022 at 10:20 PM, pacman said:

The DeSantis camp couldn't wait to put their foot in their mouths. Citing a one off worksheet example that is neither CRT or textbook material.

 

 

 

I get it. Clearly it’s CRT because it references single moms, pimps; prostitutes, and drug dealers right?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

I get it. Clearly it’s CRT because it references single moms, pimps; prostitutes, and drug dealers right?

And we all know what THAT means, right?

I should probably add that I’m white, was raised by a single mom, and have dealt some drugs in my past.

Edited by WhatTheBuck
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

I am amazed at how Republicans are taking something that literally does not exist anywhere i.e. sex education for kindergartners and enacting legislation forbidding it. 

That’s the funny paradox.
 

1) Something doesn’t even exist.
 

2)Pass law banning non existent thing.

 

3)People throw tantrum about how wrong it is to ban non existent thing (that happens to be creepy). 
 

4)Sane people wonder why you’re wasting energy and airtime defending creepy, yet totally non existent thing. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
  • Fuck You 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Immaculate Vibes said:

That’s the funny paradox.
 

1) Something doesn’t even exist.
 

2)Pass law banning non existent thing.

 

3)People throw tantrum about how wrong it is to ban non existent thing (that happens to be creepy). 
 

4)Sane people wonder why you’re wasting energy and airtime defending creepy, yet totally non existent thing. 

No because the law goes beyond  just banning sex ed for kindergartners. You know that. It is designed to further marginalize, disenfranchise, and “other” a group that people in the party consider undesirable. Eventually they will get around to you and yours

Edited by Sawbonz
  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Immaculate Vibes said:

That’s the funny paradox.
 

1) Something doesn’t even exist.
 

2)Pass law banning non existent thing.

 

3)People throw tantrum about how wrong it is to ban non existent thing (that happens to be creepy). 
 

4)Sane people wonder why you’re wasting energy and airtime defending creepy, yet totally non existent thing. 

 

...and one more added to the ignore list

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, bonnieblue said:

Because this shit has actual collateral damage (teachers, students, the public school system, the court system, LGBT people etc.) you disingenuous ghoul. The push for these laws has many end goals (some more cynical than others), but it will certainly serve to rile up the mouth-breathing QAnon base into a frenzy and people are going to get hurt.

 

@Immaculate Vibes knows this. He’s not a true believer just a cynical opportunist who doesn’t care what happens to anyone else as long as his taxes stay low. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Immaculate Vibes said:

I’m amazed at how much Ds keep leaning into this. A losing issue that they keep demanding be stuck to them. And they’re amplifying it!

 

Also lol from the replies. 
 

 

I'm trying to imagine being so retarded as to believe that only a biologist can advise a kid on whether they're a boy or girl. Or that if a kindergartener tells a teacher that they don't know which they are, the best thing for everyone is for the government to punish a teacher for even responding to the kid. But I can't imagine that level of retarded.

The Dems aren't "leaning into" anything by opposing this government overreach. That used to be the kind of thing Rs believed in.

Btw, your shitposting is more than sufficient, there's no need to import shitposts here as well. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Immaculate Vibes said:

That’s the funny paradox.
 

1) Something doesn’t even exist.
 

2)Pass law banning non existent thing.

 

3)People throw tantrum about how wrong it is to ban non existent thing (that happens to be creepy). 
 

4)Sane people wonder why you’re wasting energy and airtime defending creepy, yet totally non existent thing. 

Why do you support legislators spending their time and public money banning non-existent things?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The man has an uncanny ability for picking fights that he 1) knows the other side will refuse to bow out of and 2) knows that he will win in a knockout. He has the entire Democratic party throwing a national shit-fit defending teaching transgenderism to kindergartners. It's phenomenal.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or at least that's what brain-dead fucking imbeciles who think math textbooks that mention African-American mathematicians are CRT or that mentioning a same-sex relationship is educating kindergarteners about sex or grooming them to be gay think. It's too bad there are millions of these brain-dead fucking imbeciles, because they are an incredible fucking anchor on our country with their gullibility, susceptibility to grift, bigotry, stupidity, and hatred all rolled up into one ball of dipshit. 

Amazing how the same yokels who always scream about FAKE NEWS are the first dumbfucks in line to believe this shit. 

Edited by TXSooner518
  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

Hey guys what’s the big deal? So what if some random teacher is getting sued personally for telling his kindergarten class that he has a husband? Isn’t teaching sex ed in kindergarten creepy?

Why discuss it anyway? 
 

Discussing gender identity stuff, as defined by liberals, with kids is creepy. 
 

Who talks about gender or sexuality at all with little kids that aren’t theirs anyway? Answer, creeps. 

Edited by Immaculate Vibes
  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

The man has an uncanny ability for picking fights that he 1) knows the other side will refuse to bow out of and 2) knows that he will win in a knockout. He has the entire Democratic party throwing a national shit-fit defending teaching transgenderism to kindergartners. It's phenomenal.

Anything to keep your taxes low right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

The man has an uncanny ability for picking fights that he 1) knows the other side will refuse to bow out of and 2) knows that he will win in a knockout. He has the entire Democratic party throwing a national shit-fit defending teaching transgenderism to kindergartners. It's phenomenal.

That's not what's happening, but honesty has never really been your thing . . . 

Did you celebrate when the new Texas approach circumvented the legislature and resulted in state agents investigating parents and threatening to remove their children for being trans? is that the kind of limited governemnt you can get behind?

Quote

On February 23, 2022,

following the issuance of the Paxton Opinion and the Abbott Letter, Jane communicated with her supervisor at DFPS to seek clarification of how the Abbott Letter would affect DFPS policy. Such clarification was important for her family as well as to her ability to perform her job at DFPS.

81. That same day, and just mere hours later, Jane Doe was placed on leave from her employment because she has a transgender daughter with a medical need for treatment of gender dysphoria.

82. The next day, on the afternoon of February 24, 2022, Plaintiff Jane Doe was informed that her family would be investigated in accordance with Governor Abbott’s letter to determine if Jane Doe and John Doe had committed abuse by affirming their transgender daughter’ s identity and obtaining the medically necessary health care that she needs.

83. On February 25, 2022, a DFPS Child Protective Services (CPS) investigator visited the Doe family’s home to interview Jane Doe, John Doe, and Mary Doe. The CPS investigator interviewed Jane Doe and John Doe, who were accompanied by counsel, together, while he interviewed Mary Doe, who was accompanied by different counsel, apart from her parents. Aside from interviewing the Doe family, the CPS investigator sought access through releases to Mary Doe’s medical records, which the Doe Plaintiffs refused to sign.

84. The CPS investigator disclosed that the sole allegation against Jane Doe and John Doe is that they have a transgender daughter and that their daughter may have been provided with medically necessary gender affirming health care and is “currently transitioning from male to female.”

85. The issuance of the Paxton Opinion and the Abbott Letter, along with DFPS’s implementation of these, has terrorized the Doe family and inflicted ongoing and irreparable harm.

86.

As a result of DFPS’s implementation and the subsequent investigation of the Doe family, Jane Doe has been placed on leave from her employment. Should DFPS incorrectly find that Jane Doe and John Doe have committed “abuse” based on Governor Abbott’s and Attorney General Paxton’s erroneous and misguided missives and understanding of medical treatment for gender dysphoria, Jane Doe could face termination, which would result not only in the loss of income for the family but also their health care coverage

But we know you don't actually care. Your limited government principles exist only to enrich you and inflict pain on others. As long as government can be weaponized to eliminate what you don't like, then its all good. God forbid you ever have a child struggling with gender identify. These kids kill themselves at a much higher rate, and you sit on the sidelines cheering their persecution. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...