Jump to content

A story about a pathetic man's downfall [34 Felony Convictions]

Francisco 2.0

By Francisco 2.0
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

DigglerontheHoof

DigglerontheHoof 21225

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Mo Horn said:

Shocked I tell ya

I mean what kind of maga moron put this in place of dotard?  The cunt has proved again, and again, and again, and again that he is a fucking deadbeat.  He never pays for shit but vendor after vendor extend him credit. 

Fuck 'em all.  They deserve every single bit of financial hardship that's coming their way. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 41.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • tx 3 putt

    1687

  • TwiceHorn

    1467

  • WhatTheBuck

    1322

  • atomheartbevo

    1315

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Beau Vine
Beau Vine

To be fair, President Trump’s four years in office weren’t so bad, except when when he incited an insurrection against the government, mismanaged a pandemic that killed nearly half a million Americans

Bama Chick
Bama Chick

Y’all about to get a great visual representation of Cullman, Alabama. Only good things to come out of Cullman are the Britt brothers (Roll Tide!) and orange rolls from All Steak restaurant. That pla

ChiTownDoc
ChiTownDoc

You seem really pissed off for a nontrumper.  Just laugh at the trumpers, bro.  They’re really gullible dumbfucks who worship this orange blob…you know, people completely unlike yourself.  

Posted Images

Biff Tannen

Biff Tannen 45728

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

I mean what kind of maga moron put this in place of dotard?  The cunt has proved again, and again, and again, and again that he is a fucking deadbeat.  He never pays for shit but vendor after vendor extend him credit. 

Fuck 'em all.  They deserve every single bit of financial hardship that's coming their way. 

These are not the smartest people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Born to Run

Born to Run 6569

Posted
Posted
probably the chick holding the gun, because i'm into that type of shit.
I would pick that myself 10 out of 10 times myself, because apparently I don't like chill in my domicile, and I'm really gunning to have my Johnson chopped, ripped, or shot off. It's like a dark gift.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tuco

Tuco 5077

Posted
Posted
I mean what kind of maga moron put this in place of dotard?  The cunt has proved again, and again, and again, and again that he is a fucking deadbeat.  He never pays for shit but vendor after vendor extend him credit. 
Fuck 'em all.  They deserve every single bit of financial hardship that's coming their way. 

They are self selecting. You can bet that Dotard is only going to work with major vendors who “put skin in the game” and overextend credit. Developers try to do that kind of shit all the time. Probably the only thing that Trump is effective at is getting a line of rubes who will line up for the opportunity.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nice Guy Eddie

Nice Guy Eddie 13523

Posted
Posted

Interesting theory from CNN on why Trump was so adamant that he didn't have to turn over any of these documents: https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/25/politics/trump-maralago-documents-private-concerns-legal-tom-fitton/index.html

Cliff notes:

  • The non-lawyer head of the Judicial Watch group told Trump that every document from his Presidency was his and not the govt's.
  • The theory stems from this same non-lawyer, who sued to obtain some specific Bill Clinton Presidential records.
  • He lost because a judge said that the National Archives doesn't have the right to designate documents/media as Presidential Records and therefore the documents were Clinton's. 
  • To be clear, the Clinton record in question was an interview with a historian and not nuclear secrets.

While we all speculated (& still do) that perhaps Trump was planning to sell this info, it's also just as likely Trump held onto these documents just because the docs were his.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pig Bellmont

Pig Bellmont 8737

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Interesting theory from CNN on why Trump was so adamant that he didn't have to turn over any of these documents: https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/25/politics/trump-maralago-documents-private-concerns-legal-tom-fitton/index.html

Cliff notes:

  • The non-lawyer head of the Judicial Watch group told Trump that every document from his Presidency was his and not the govt's.
  • The theory stems from this same non-lawyer, who sued to obtain some specific Bill Clinton Presidential records.
  • He lost because a judge said that the National Archives doesn't have the right to designate documents/media as Presidential Records and therefore the documents were Clinton's. 
  • To be clear, the Clinton record in question was an interview with a historian and not nuclear secrets.

While we all speculated (& still do) that perhaps Trump was planning to sell this info, it's also just as likely Trump held onto these documents just because the docs were his.

I don’t understand why the media still grants anonymity to Trump sources when they’ve literally lied for like 6 years. But ok sure - some dark money org president is the real bad guy and manipulated Trump. Otherwise I’m so sure he would’ve given everything back the first 100 times the gov asked 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tuco

Tuco 5077

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Interesting theory from CNN on why Trump was so adamant that he didn't have to turn over any of these documents: https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/25/politics/trump-maralago-documents-private-concerns-legal-tom-fitton/index.html

Cliff notes:

  • The non-lawyer head of the Judicial Watch group told Trump that every document from his Presidency was his and not the govt's.
  • The theory stems from this same non-lawyer, who sued to obtain some specific Bill Clinton Presidential records.
  • He lost because a judge said that the National Archives doesn't have the right to designate documents/media as Presidential Records and therefore the documents were Clinton's. 
  • To be clear, the Clinton record in question was an interview with a historian and not nuclear secrets.

While we all speculated (& still do) that perhaps Trump was planning to sell this info, it's also just as likely Trump held onto these documents just because the docs were his.

That article does two things: 1. Names the scapegoat; 2. Portrays the issue as an honest (if completely stupid) disagreement over what rights a former President has to retain documents.  It is an article that paints the best possible picture of Trump from the known data points.

It's possible it is true.  But, it's coming from the Trump camp and presents the best case interpretation.  So, big grain of salt.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
High Plains Drifter

High Plains Drifter 11052

Posted
Posted

 

I think he took them because he is really fucking stupid and they are like a souvenir he can brag about and show to people he wants to impress. Its like if you got a tour of your favorite sports franchise locker room and saw a jersey on a bench and swiped it. Now during your watch parties you can drag it out and brag about awesome it was to meet the MVP and he gave you his jersey (with tears in his eyes) because you are such an awesome fan.

 

never blame greed or malice when stupidity is an option- Occam

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TexArcher

TexArcher 38051

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, High Plains Drifter said:

 

I think he took them because he is really fucking stupid and they are like a souvenir he can brag about and show to people he wants to impress. Its like if you got a tour of your favorite sports franchise locker room and saw a jersey on a bench and swiped it. Now during your watch parties you can drag it out and brag about awesome it was to meet the MVP and he gave you his jersey (with tears in his eyes) because you are such an awesome fan.

 

never blame greed or malice when stupidity is an option- Occam

 

 

He is that stupid, for sure.

But he's also a grifter whose businesses are leveraged to the hilt.  And these documents are worth a fortune to the wrong people.  Even a stupid man understands that.  So it needs to be treated as if he stole top secret documents to sell them to the highest bidder.  I don't see anything else that makes sense.  He certainly didn't steal them to read them himself.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tuco

Tuco 5077

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, High Plains Drifter said:

 

I think he took them because he is really fucking stupid and they are like a souvenir he can brag about and show to people he wants to impress. Its like if you got a tour of your favorite sports franchise locker room and saw a jersey on a bench and swiped it. Now during your watch parties you can drag it out and brag about awesome it was to meet the MVP and he gave you his jersey (with tears in his eyes) because you are such an awesome fan.

 

never blame greed or malice when stupidity is an option- Occam

 

 

I tend to lean this direction as well.  The safe is what gives me pause.  If he had something in the safe, that's not just a question of throwing all the shit in a box and stupidly claiming rights over it.  That would require some level of filtering, recognition of value, and dedicating resources to protect it.  I want to know what was in the safe.  

 

seven-brad-pitt.gif

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, Mo Horn said:

Shocked I tell ya

I'll say it -- $1.6 million? That's nothing. One email to their user list asking for a donation to keep hearing from Trump would do that easily. If not, some investor will find that in the couch cushions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nice Guy Eddie

Nice Guy Eddie 13523

Posted
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, FirstTimeCaller said:

I'll say it -- $1.6 million? That's nothing. One email to their user list asking for a donation to keep hearing from Trump would do that easily. If not, some investor will find that in the couch cushions.

Trump's normal vendor strategy is to negotiate the invoice amount down after non-payment for months or years.  Ethical companies only do this when there are legitimate disagreements over charges. For Trump's world, it's standard operating procedure.

Trump could easily pay off this bill but in his world that is the sucker move.

EDIT: I'm sure that Trump's experienced vendors either 1) require a deposit that effectively covers months of non-payments 2) raise their rates to accommodate the eventual write-down when they accept a lower amount.  Or more likely, there are probably very few long-term Trump vendors. The few that exist are probably critical and Trump World knows they can't be screwed with. 

Edited by Nice Guy Eddie
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
immamac

immamac 43010

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Trump's normal vendor strategy is to negotiate the invoice amount down after non-payment for months or years.  Ethical companies only do this when there are legitimate disagreements over charges. For Trump's world, it's standard operating procedure.

Trump could easily pay off this bill but in his world that is the sucker move.

EDIT: I'm sure that Trump's experienced vendors either 1) require a deposit that effectively covers months of non-payments 2) raise their rates to accommodate the eventual write-down when they accept a lower amount.  Or more likely, there are probably very few long-term Trump vendors. The few that exist are probably critical and Trump World knows they can't be screwed with. 

This is not true. Lol. He is just broke. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmokeyTheBear

SmokeyTheBear 5562

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, immamac said:

This is not true. Lol. He is just broke. 

Yeah, any "wealth" is tied into his properties, which are backed by foreign investors (namely Russia) who don't mind making deals they'll lose money on because, well, they get other arrangements. The only thing Trump has been successful at is getting his name and face out there. That's the value of "Trump", a big gold placard that stands for 80s New York success, and dumb people eat that shit up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31534

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Interesting theory from CNN on why Trump was so adamant that he didn't have to turn over any of these documents: https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/25/politics/trump-maralago-documents-private-concerns-legal-tom-fitton/index.html

Cliff notes:

  • The non-lawyer head of the Judicial Watch group told Trump that every document from his Presidency was his and not the govt's.
  • The theory stems from this same non-lawyer, who sued to obtain some specific Bill Clinton Presidential records.
  • He lost because a judge said that the National Archives doesn't have the right to designate documents/media as Presidential Records and therefore the documents were Clinton's. 
  • To be clear, the Clinton record in question was an interview with a historian and not nuclear secrets.

While we all speculated (& still do) that perhaps Trump was planning to sell this info, it's also just as likely Trump held onto these documents just because the docs were his.

That decision is here. https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2010cv1834-13

It cites to a DC Circuit case and concludes that the President makes the initial decision whether documents are "personal records" or "presidential records" subject to the PRA.  It then holds that NARA cannot be compelled to challenge that decision.  It also holds that NARA has discretion to challenge that decision.  Regardless, it is only a district court opinion, with little precedential value, but it doesn't really help Trump much.

NARA then is validly exercising its discretion to challenge whether those documents are presidential records, or not.  Moreover, the motion to appoint a special master alleges that some or most of the documents are executive privileged and that, again, is a judicial admission that those are "presidential" records, and not "personal" records, as there would be no claim of executive privilege pertaining to personal records.

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
The Royal We

The Royal We 3072

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
2 minutes ago, Ted Lange said:

 

 

Not that there was any doubt before, but this further cements that anyone who thinks it wasn't in the national interest for these documents to be seized and returned to a properly secured facility should be pointed at, laughed at, and generally made to feel bad about themselves. 

Jesus fuck, what a shit show.

  • Hook 'Em 10
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...