Jump to content

A story about a pathetic man's downfall [34 Felony Convictions]

Francisco 2.0

By Francisco 2.0
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Js1

Js1 85460

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, kevwun said:

There will be Donald Trump sightings and conspiracy theories about this death still going strong 50 years after he finally dies.

That chair from last night will have nightmares about Trump’s dump truck ass for 50 years 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 41.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • tx 3 putt

    1687

  • TwiceHorn

    1467

  • WhatTheBuck

    1322

  • atomheartbevo

    1315

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Beau Vine
Beau Vine

To be fair, President Trump’s four years in office weren’t so bad, except when when he incited an insurrection against the government, mismanaged a pandemic that killed nearly half a million Americans

Bama Chick
Bama Chick

Y’all about to get a great visual representation of Cullman, Alabama. Only good things to come out of Cullman are the Britt brothers (Roll Tide!) and orange rolls from All Steak restaurant. That pla

ChiTownDoc
ChiTownDoc

You seem really pissed off for a nontrumper.  Just laugh at the trumpers, bro.  They’re really gullible dumbfucks who worship this orange blob…you know, people completely unlike yourself.  

Posted Images

DDD Dad

DDD Dad 14346

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

Yeah, interesting.  First off, it's somewhat gratifying that she accepted the rebuke.  She didn't have to do that.  And yes, by actually modifying her order, I think she mooted the issue for further consideration by the 11th Circuit or by SCOTUS, in the DOJ's appeal.

I guess Trump might now be able to appeal the modification of the order, though.

Is there anything in the order subject to an interlocutory appeal at this point?  I would tend to think not.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
YGIFS

YGIFS 19452

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

 

Of course.  These same fuckwit Q folks think that JFK is coming back.  

 

It's not JFK!  It's JFK, Jr.  And he's not coming back.  He's already back and running the shadow government, okay?  It's not Qanon, it's ConfederatedAnon...it's a different party, it's a different quality of leadership, okay?  Ask Biff Tannen, he'll tell you...

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Satchel

Satchel 6939

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, 956 Worldwide said:

The appellate ruling is heartening. I’m no legal scholar and I know overturns on appeals happen. I also know judges don’t generally like them to happen.  
 

It strikes me that a slap down of this extent doesn’t build confidence in our judiciary.  It wasn’t really a fine point of law, this reads to me as the legal equivalent of “Judge Cannon is wrong about everything and should feel bad.”  So my choices on Cannon are either that she’s really bad at law stuff or she decided to show extreme deference to a former POTUS out of either fear or loyalty. 
 

And I wonder what kind of law people without the resources of the US DOJ are getting when they go into her courtroom. 

I think the judge was being willfully wrongheaded. She’s a honors graduate of Michigan Law.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
yoladu

yoladu 4094

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Js1 said:

He ain’t suffering these fools

 

On Wednesday night, Trump suggested that the FBI planted evidence during the search. He asked Fox News’ Sean Hannity, “Did they drop anything into those piles” of materials taken from Mar-a-Lago, “or did they do it later?”

When asked by Hannity if there is video of that, Trump said, “Nah, I don’t think so.”

 

sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Beau Vine

Beau Vine 54335

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

 

Which is why I'm convinced she ruled as she intially did.  Not because she was paid off, or that beholden to Lord God King Trump, but rather, she was scared shitless of the ramifications if she did rule against him.

 

That's possible, but she could have much more easily avoided that by recusing herself from the case.  She had clear reason to do so.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Beau Vine

Beau Vine 54335

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Js1 said:

He ain’t suffering these fools

 

This absolutely pleases me to no end, and I realize that this kind of hearing is completely unprecedented, but... in a general case, is a judge/SMs supposed to be following a case in the media?  (Like jurors are not?)  Any chance that when this is over and Trump is found guilty (hey, humor me for a second), that having the SM pull info from the media and not the court record gives Trump grounds for a strong appeal?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BehoId, The Underminer!

BehoId, The Underminer! 11669

Posted
Posted
51 minutes ago, Beau Vine said:

This absolutely pleases me to no end, and I realize that this kind of hearing is completely unprecedented, but... in a general case, is a judge/SMs supposed to be following a case in the media?  (Like jurors are not?)  Any chance that when this is over and Trump is found guilty (hey, humor me for a second), that having the SM pull info from the media and not the court record gives Trump grounds for a strong appeal?

judges look at inadmissible stuff all the time.  they are the ones to decide if something is admissible or not.  jury is differently positioned.  they are supposed to be beyond that barrier.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31516

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, wildcat09 said:

Aren't there still some non-classified documents he's asserting executive privilege as a basis for returning them to him? If so, they'll certainly want to carry through with the appeal.

Yes, executive privilege is at least potentially on the table for everything else and there is potential for that to go wrong at any turn, Dearie, Cannon, etc.

Given that the appeal seems to have a pretty decisive panel, they may actually rule that EP categorically cannot apply to the use of these documents in a prosecution.  I think that's the right result, however you get there, but I could see all kinds of procedural shenanigans arising that could impede a less decisive panel from "going there."

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
YGIFS

YGIFS 19452

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Walser said:

We really should vote Hunter out of office.

Crack wise all you want, tomorrow morning...we could start a "Impeach Hunter Biden" website with a donation click box.  By Halloween, we'd have made a million dollars, easy.  I no longer give fuck one about the ethics, optics, or any other -cs.  I'll do in a fucking heartbeat.  My only concern isn't for the Republic, my soul, or my conscience.  Just that one of these lunatic assholes would track down my family.  Only thing keeping me from exploiting them for the easiest million one can make...

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhatTheBuck

WhatTheBuck 28794

Posted
Posted
53 minutes ago, Beau Vine said:

Like fucking clockwork:

 

Seriously, Joe, name him Adviser to the President, give him an office in the White Hiuse with a staff and a budget and security clearance. When we get the classified docs that Trump stole back, put him in charge of returning them to their rightful place.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pig Bellmont

Pig Bellmont 8719

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Satchel said:

I think the judge was being willfully wrongheaded. She’s a honors graduate of Michigan Law.

She went out of her way to be partisan. Like commenting that the only document related leaks came after the DOJ searched his home, and not acknowledging the risk Trump could have already disclosed the info. Those smarmy comments were littered through her orders. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...