Jump to content

A story about a pathetic man's downfall [34 Felony Convictions]

Francisco 2.0

By Francisco 2.0
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Rimbo

Rimbo 25922

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

It’s nice that the feminine leather of the shoes matches the material of his favorite lady’s sports watch.  
How in the fuck did he convince so many Texas ‘Men’ he was an alpha male?  He makes Dan Patrick look like Clint Eastwood.  

hell, he makes DANICA Patrick look masculine.

nttawwt

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 41.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • tx 3 putt

    1687

  • TwiceHorn

    1467

  • WhatTheBuck

    1322

  • atomheartbevo

    1315

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Beau Vine
Beau Vine

To be fair, President Trump’s four years in office weren’t so bad, except when when he incited an insurrection against the government, mismanaged a pandemic that killed nearly half a million Americans

Bama Chick
Bama Chick

Y’all about to get a great visual representation of Cullman, Alabama. Only good things to come out of Cullman are the Britt brothers (Roll Tide!) and orange rolls from All Steak restaurant. That pla

ChiTownDoc
ChiTownDoc

You seem really pissed off for a nontrumper.  Just laugh at the trumpers, bro.  They’re really gullible dumbfucks who worship this orange blob…you know, people completely unlike yourself.  

Posted Images

bolverk

bolverk 29671

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

You can make fun of Trump but you have to admit that he was excellent as the lead in The Nutcracker.


FvIblFMWcAAKDer?format=jpg&name=900x900
 

 

Yeah, but he looks like an idiot as an old fat naval pilot or whatever he's supposed to be in this.

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Matuka

Matuka 1310

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

You can make fun of Trump but you have to admit that he was excellent as the lead in The Nutcracker.


FvIblFMWcAAKDer?format=jpg&name=900x900
 

Too bad he quickly developed bone spurs.  He would have dazzled the NVA in Nam.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mdhorn

Mdhorn 5949

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, mchookem said:

my god i hate his stupid fucking fish lipped mouth. YOU'RE SO GROSS, MOTHERFUCKER!

This is their new birth certificate.  Their guy, however, will never take an IQ test, because we know he'd be lucky to make 90.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Red Five

Red Five 40857

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:

😂😂😂😂

 

biden should show up and debate a baby trump balloon 

Hey the balloon probably won't try to give him Covid, pre-vaccines. Remember that? 

Edited by Red Five
no coffee
  • Rage+1 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dahobbs

Dahobbs 17534

Posted
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, 4th&Five said:

 

For the non-lawyers (I think there are 2 or 3 of you on Surly), all that means is that Trump's team isn't going to call witnesses after the Plaintiff rests their case. In a civil case a defendant can often insert their case into the middle of the plaintiff's case through cross examination. If all the the defendant's witnesses are called by the plaintiff, then there may not be any reason for the defendant to put on a separate case. Here, according to the article, it sounds like the only new witness Trump's team had was an expert witness that it says it now isn't going to call due to health reasons. 

Edited by Dahobbs
  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nice Guy Eddie

Nice Guy Eddie 13512

Posted
Posted

Not that I like Trump but I don’t see how you can present much of a defense to something that is claimed happened 25+ years ago.

i haven’t followed the trial or this case but I would struggle to find someone e liable for a lawsuit that was pursued decades after it occurred. And I completely understand that a woman wouldn’t want to report it at the time. And my opinion isn’t that Trump is innocent. I have no idea. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CTC2

CTC2 2797

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Not that I like Trump but I don’t see how you can present much of a defense to something that is claimed happened 25+ years ago.

i haven’t followed the trial or this case but I would struggle to find someone e liable for a lawsuit that was pursued decades after it occurred. And I completely understand that a woman wouldn’t want to report it at the time. And my opinion isn’t that Trump is innocent. I have no idea. 

Yeah but most defendants would show up and look the jury in the eye and say “I did not do it”.  To totally not show up for a trial where the central allegation is rape cancels out any of that BS especially since the legal standard is only a preponderance of the evidence. 
Glad you aren’t on the jury. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
nbmishoid

nbmishoid 949

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Not that I like Trump but I don’t see how you can present much of a defense to something that is claimed happened 25+ years ago.

i haven’t followed the trial or this case but I would struggle to find someone e liable for a lawsuit that was pursued decades after it occurred. And I completely understand that a woman wouldn’t want to report it at the time. And my opinion isn’t that Trump is innocent. I have no idea. 

You don’t think you would recall being raped, years later?  51% or so sure?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31457

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Dahobbs said:

For the non-lawyers (I think there are 2 or 3 of you on Surly), all that means is that Trump's team isn't going to call witnesses after the Plaintiff rests their case. In a civil case a defendant can often insert their case into the middle of the plaintiff's case through cross examination. If all the the defendant's witnesses are called by the plaintiff, then there may not be any reason for the defendant to put on a separate case. Here, according to the article, it sounds like the only new witness Trump's team had was an expert witness that it says it now isn't going to call due to health reasons. 

Seems risky as hell, too, with the preponderance burden of proof.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
'stache

'stache 21812

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Seems risky as hell, too, with the preponderance burden of proof.

 

I’m pretty sure it’s because he knows he’s judgement proof. It’s already established that his “wealth” is an illusion, and when has he ever paid on any obligation? He isn’t paid wages that can be garnished and I doubt he has any assets in his own name that can be subject to execution. These judgments mean nothing. If they did Alex Jones would be living in a trailer park somewhere with whatever income he’s allowed to keep after paying the parents he tortured in Connecticut. I work in these cases and you generally only collect when the richer agrees to pay when all appeals are exhausted and they pay to keep a decent reputation in the business community. Trump has no reputation to salvage, he’s actually set it up such that paying a judgement would hurt his brand among the dipshit right wing voters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31457

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Chad Fuck said:


Yes she may win, but can she collect a judgment from a serial bankruptcy filer?

Well, you'd actually know better than I.

But the judgment would be against him personally, so that would be a different kettle of fish for teh Donald than the usual bankruptcy of DJT AC SPAC LP III and associated entities.

He ain't filing a personal 7, we know that much.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chad Fuck

Chad Fuck 17673

Posted
Posted
Well, you'd actually know better than I.
But the judgment would be against him personally, so that would be a different kettle of fish for teh Donald than the usual bankruptcy of DJT AC SPAC LP III and associated entities.
He ain't filing a personal 7, we know that much.

We do.

We also know he’s slipperier than greased up snake snot.

I hope for a “we got him!” moment.
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bozo_Casanova

Bozo_Casanova 26451

Posted
Posted

I don't know what this means, or that it means anything. But I do want to record here for posterity that the Trump org employs security execs named Matthew Calamari Sr, and also his son. Matthew Calamari Jr. 

Not clear: which Matthew Calamari is pictured below. 
 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 3
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dahobbs

Dahobbs 17534

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, TwiceHorn said:

Seems risky as hell, too, with the preponderance burden of proof.

Maybe. It just depends on how the evidence has come out so far. If all the testimony and evidence the defense wanted was introduced during the Plaintiff's case, it isn't much of a risk. It isn't like the defense is waiving closing argument. Muddling up the plaintiff's case with all the defense stuff is a time honored tactic. 

54 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Well, you'd actually know better than I.

But the judgment would be against him personally, so that would be a different kettle of fish for teh Donald than the usual bankruptcy of DJT AC SPAC LP III and associated entities.

He ain't filing a personal 7, we know that much.

I agree that a judgment against him personally is going to be harder for him to get around. But I'm sure his paper assets are held in various trusts that then themselves have different holding companies for the various assets. While he may not technically be judgment proof, I would not be surprised if untangling that mess would in and of itself cause a significant expense to any judgment creditor. Hell, maybe he even has found a way to hide many of his assets in an ERISA retirement account, which would make them immune from collection. 

Edited by Dahobbs
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RomaVicta

RomaVicta 29907

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Dahobbs said:

the only new witness Trump's team had was an expert witness that it says it now isn't going to call due to health reasons. 

Yeah, our boy Trump would love to be here kickin' asses and defending himself from this scurrilous assault from this unpretty woman who isn't his type except he's deeply concerned about security and the safety of all others involved with the trial! You're so fuckin' lucky, I tell ya.

Oh, and we have this ace expert witness who would shatter E for Exceptionally Nasty Jean Carroll's fake claims, but he's sick and can't show up. 

Your honor, the dog ate our defense while we were washing it, so we rest. But we really coulda showed 'em, yessirree!

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...