Jump to content

A story about a pathetic man's downfall [34 Felony Convictions]

Francisco 2.0

By Francisco 2.0
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Hagbard Celine

Hagbard Celine 10,907

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, RomaVicta said:

We know Hannity and others had direct access to President Trump to advise him. Were they behind the coup until it went bad? Was it their culpability that caused them to text (for the record) Trump to say call it off? If Trump had been successful in bullying Pence to disrupt the certification with help from the elected traitors in the joint meeting, had FOX agreed to make the case that the coup was legal and right?

In a coup or rebellion, the first things you take over are the radio and TV stations.

Seven Days in May

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Days_in_May

Burt Lancaster, Kirk Douglas, Fredric March, Ava Gardner

book '62, filmed '63 (BEFORE dealey plaza), released 12 Feb 64

so fucking close to reality at the time that it's been erased from the national consciousness

re: freshness today, no spoliers

$3.99 on prime

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 41.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • tx 3 putt

    1687

  • TwiceHorn

    1467

  • WhatTheBuck

    1322

  • atomheartbevo

    1315

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Beau Vine
Beau Vine

To be fair, President Trump’s four years in office weren’t so bad, except when when he incited an insurrection against the government, mismanaged a pandemic that killed nearly half a million Americans

Bama Chick
Bama Chick

Y’all about to get a great visual representation of Cullman, Alabama. Only good things to come out of Cullman are the Britt brothers (Roll Tide!) and orange rolls from All Steak restaurant. That pla

ChiTownDoc
ChiTownDoc

You seem really pissed off for a nontrumper.  Just laugh at the trumpers, bro.  They’re really gullible dumbfucks who worship this orange blob…you know, people completely unlike yourself.  

Posted Images

chainsaw

chainsaw 9,873

Posted
Posted

Here's what's most fucked up about the Kilmeade thing. This photoshop could have stayed in the twitter/4chan cesspool.

Fox News knows damn well they have an enormous audience that has no overlap with 4chan and is gullible enough to storm the capitol or yolo FBI buildings.

They also know that the the average Fox News viewer is sitting in a diner somewhere in east texas not actually listening to the audio, assuming tv is even audible to the customers.

Fox News knows at least 10% of its audience is going to look up at the TV, see the name and picture of the judge hanging around with Maxwell without any visual disclaimer on it, and tell all their idiot friends that the judge was on the Epstein flight logs.

That is precisely the outcome Fox News intended.

Putting out some bullshit "retraction" tweet the day after is not enough to fix this damage and i don't think it's even possible to fix. They should be sued to oblivion.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Celery Man

Celery Man 20,991

Posted
Posted

So how long do our surly brothers who have the requisite defects of intellect and character to still vote for the GOP remain shut the fuck up? 3 days before they’re back acting like it is people other than them who are childlike and without even the wisdom you would expect from a horny 19 year old?

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Surly Bevo

Surly Bevo 25,124

Posted
Posted
So how long do our surly brothers who have the requisite defects of intellect and character to still vote for the GOP remain shut the fuck up? 3 days before they’re back acting like it is people other than them who are childlike and without even the wisdom you would expect from a horny 19 year old?

One of the hardest things in the world tor a human is to fully acknowledge and admit publicly they got duped. If this keeps playing out just take the win and enjoy the silence.
  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chainsaw

chainsaw 9,873

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

He offered them. I’m not sure if anyone was ever able to collect. 

Kinda feels more like the difference between attempted murder and murder. The fact that Trump plays footsie with him should be considered when determining how to punish the treason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mrs Whiggins

Mrs Whiggins 13,050

Posted
Posted

Question regarding the screenshot below--isn't the person commenting making assumptions regarding culpability in "strike one," and that "strike three" is not about the archives, but regarding the possibility of transfer of information to others (i.e. the criminal aspect of espionage etc)?

 

Ag5.png.3feee1d2d1379804e72d4f1395687e5b.png

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31,520

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Brisketexan said:

It was a parody ad that the court determined "could not have been reasonably considered believable."

I'm expecting that we can go out on the internet right now and pluck hundreds of posts about how they are going to go get that pedophile judge who posed with Maxwell.  People DO believe it, and Fox amplified it.  Also, Hustler v. Falwell was an intentional infliction of emotional distress case.  And had NO fact pattern about people threatening to murder Falwell based in part on the published statement.

Kilmeade and Fox should pay.

The one that I saw upthread was pretty clearly marked what.I.meme.to.say in two places, one less prominent than the other.

Was that after the fact?  That's what I based my opinion on.  But if that wasn't the case with the image they showed, they're in trouble.

They're also on the level of a skin mag. A pink shot skin mag.

Edited by TwiceHorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chainsaw

chainsaw 9,873

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Mrs Whiggins said:

Question regarding the screenshot below--isn't the person commenting making assumptions regarding culpability in "strike one," and that "strike three" is not about the archives, but regarding the possibility of transfer of information to others (i.e. the criminal aspect of espionage etc)?

 

Ag5.png.3feee1d2d1379804e72d4f1395687e5b.png

Strike One is a peak aggy argument.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pato del Muerto

Pato del Muerto 52,557

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

Putting out some bullshit "retraction" tweet the day after is not enough to fix this damage and i don't think it's even possible to fix. They should be sued to oblivion.

They also know that most of their audience won’t see a retraction tweet.   The law should be you retract on the same platform that you defamed on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Bozo_Casanova

Bozo_Casanova 26,521

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
6 minutes ago, Mrs Whiggins said:

Question regarding the screenshot below--isn't the person commenting making assumptions regarding culpability in "strike one," and that "strike three" is not about the archives, but regarding the possibility of transfer of information to others (i.e. the criminal aspect of espionage etc)?

 

Ag5.png.3feee1d2d1379804e72d4f1395687e5b.png

So you are contending that the reason employed by “aggiehawg” from the Texags politics subforum may be unsound? Please let Billy Liucci know immediately. He would not want this kind of thing reflecting poorly on his enterprise.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
  • Haha 6
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dahobbs

Dahobbs 17,644

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Mrs Whiggins said:

Question regarding the screenshot below--isn't the person commenting making assumptions regarding culpability in "strike one," and that "strike three" is not about the archives, but regarding the possibility of transfer of information to others (i.e. the criminal aspect of espionage etc)?

 

Ag5.png.3feee1d2d1379804e72d4f1395687e5b.png

Well, the person citing 793 isn't summarizing that section of the code correctly at all, so you can just ignore everything else about it. For your reference I've done a quick truncation of the section for you, full citation below that. 

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

(a) Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation, goes upon ... place connected with the national defense ... or

(b) Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid ... copies, takes, makes, or obtains, ... anything connected with the national defense; or

(c) Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, receives . . . anything connected with the national defense, knowing or having reason to believe . . . that it has been or will be obtained, taken, made, or disposed of by any person contrary to the provisions of this chapter; or

(d) Whoever, lawfully having possession of ... any document ... relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates ... the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand ...; or

(e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of ... any document ... relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates ... the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same ...; or

(f)Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession ... of any document ... relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place ... or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place ... or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss ...

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793

 

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dahobbs

Dahobbs 17,644

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

The one that I saw upthread was pretty clearly marked I.know.what.you.meme in two places, one less prominent than the other.

Was that after the fact?  That's what I based my opinion on.  But if that wasn't the case with the image they showed, they're in trouble.

They're also on the level of a skin mag. A pink shot skin mag.

I think you're attaching way too much importance to how the photo was marked with the word "meme." That mere fact doesn't communicate or represent that the photo is fake. Especially, if that is not how it was presented on the show. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mdhorn

Mdhorn 5,978

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Chopper said:

The real photo is Epstein but someone photshopped the Magistrate Judge's head on it, and added the candy or cereal (whatever it was) to cover up the bad photoshop. Fox ran with it.

You can see the neck and forehead lines where it was cut--the lines show a shade shift.  First thing I thought when I saw it was this is doctored.  It's garbage.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TXSG8R

TXSG8R 3,362

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

Strike One is a peak aggy argument.

So the simplest of questions. Where did the GSA folks get these documents to pack? Was this stuff laying around unsecure in the WH when the packers came?  This is stuff that should only be viewed in a SCIF, so if this was laying in the bottom drawer of the resolute desk and accidentally got packed… still a crime.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...