Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The Trump response to that will be something to see.  

Meaning, the lawyers, not Trump himself.  Although that might be something to see also.

Edited by TwiceHorn
Posted
6 hours ago, FirstTimeCaller said:

Lol. Never heard of that dude, but he says he is Trump's favorite author. So what sort of books does he write then?
 

Trump probably confuses Nick Adams with the Dilbert guy.  That would make more sense as his favorite "author".

 

5 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:

88C98704-5580-4D83-B8F8-72D1E4F36850.jpeg

 

 

Fat Guy In A Little Coat GIFs - Get the best GIF on GIPHY

 

1 hour ago, Dnaguy said:

I’ve always been distracted / disgusted by the way he’s holding Ivanka’s hips that I’ve never noticed the statues of two parrots fucking right next to them.

596E62B6-B17C-4EA4-AAD5-E0EC4174B930.jpeg

 

You made me look and now I see the phallic black cattails in the background.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, ChiTownDoc said:

Yeah we can, twicehorn will be here any second now to explain why not only can we let that happen, but we MUST let it happen. 

I never, ever said we must let it happen.

You guys are really good at putting words in my mouth/posts.

What I said was, "we're stuck with it, for the most part, so here's why it might be OK."

It appears that the way DOJ has it set up, that it isn't going to ask for a stay pending appeal of the entire order, so the Special Master thing is going to be done and dusted by the time the 11th Circuit rules on the merits.  Now the only question is whether the classified docs will be part of the review.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
20 minutes ago, Pig Bellmont said:

Monday’s response from Trump will be something, but $1,000 says it won’t argue that the docs are actually not classified 

Digging some of the replies in that thread.  

Posted
7 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:


And that horses name ……….

Ivanka 

 

596E62B6-B17C-4EA4-AAD5-E0EC4174B930.jpeg

The second most disturbing aspect of that photo is Trump in a three-piece suit with ankle socks or no socks.

He's such a pustule.

Posted
2 hours ago, Chewbacca said:

Trump wants no part of a lawsuit here.  Discovery would prove that he did, indeed, take that money for himself.

He won't sue them because he's a broke ass bitch and can't get anyone to work for free any more.

Posted
46 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

I never, ever said we must let it happen.

You guys are really good at putting words in my mouth/posts.

What I said was, "we're stuck with it, for the most part, so here's why it might be OK."

It appears that the way DOJ has it set up, that it isn't going to ask for a stay pending appeal of the entire order, so the Special Master thing is going to be done and dusted by the time the 11th Circuit rules on the merits.  Now the only question is whether the classified docs will be part of the review.

Hey pal, I need someone to blame and sadly your posts are giving me the most sads.  Don't take it personally.  

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
I think our judicial system would be improved a little bit if such long deadlines weren't so frequently given for matters that shouldn't take that long to consider. 
I work on Saturdays regularly. I think the urgency of justice demands a little overtime every now and then, especially when it involves a president stealing nuclear secrets
Or more use of technology and zoom meetings for non jury matters.
Posted
8 minutes ago, Born to Run said:

Inflatio, I think is, where you use your Swedish penis pump prior to receiving fellatio.

It’s not mine, I swear! I don’t even know what to use one of those!

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, trauma babe said:

Three days to think about this is plenty, I feel. Monday should have been the deadline.

What you're failing to consider is that the other side must be given an opportunity to respond and then the judge must consider.

And, these are not the only matters on which the lawyers or the judge are working.  At least the gubmint lawyers and decent lawyers in private practice.  Trump lawyers probably have no other clients.

Lawyers tend to work very long hours, and not just Saturdays.  Sundays and federal holidays, as well.

Tell me how long it took you to write your last 20 page paper?

Most law firms require about 2400 billable hours a year to keep your job, much less make partner.  That's 312 eight-hour days a year, and you can't bill eight hours in eight hours, it's more like 10.  There are only about 260 weekdays a year.

Any decent litigator will have at least two of these deadlines a week.  Maybe one every day.

Edited by TwiceHorn
  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
49 minutes ago, ChiTownDoc said:

Hey pal, I need someone to blame and sadly your posts are giving me the most sads.  Don't take it personally.  

It shouldn't give you a sad.  I never say Trump wins.

Posted
1 minute ago, TwiceHorn said:

It shouldn't give you a sad.  I never say Trump wins.

You know what would make me happy..."oh shit this triggered 45.827.4334.  I had no idea it was even in play.  We're gonna hang him at noon tomorrow!"

Just once, give me...

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted

This is borderline porn:

 

7 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

What you're failing to consider is that the other side must be given an opportunity to respond and then the judge must consider.

And, these are not the only matters on which the lawyers or the judge are working.  At least the gubmint lawyers and decent lawyers in private practice.  Trump lawyers probably have no other clients.

Lawyers tend to work very long hours, and not just Saturdays.  Sundays and federal holidays, as well.

Tell me how long it took you to write your last 20 page paper?

Most law firms require about 2400 billable hours a year to keep your job, much less make partner.  That's 312 eight-hour days a year, and you can't bill eight hours in eight hours, it's more like 10.  There are only about 260 weekdays a year.

FGAjYbYXwAUaEWL.png

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, trauma babe said:

But experience tells us otherwise

This time it's different.

Mueller wasn't really different.  The impeachments weren't different.  He was legally protected and we should have known that from jump and never gotten excited about any of that.

Federal criminal prosecution is different. 

The collective "experience" has been based on faulty assumptions.

Edited by TwiceHorn
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, Beau Vine said:

This is borderline porn:

 

FGAjYbYXwAUaEWL.png

Try that yelling shit when you are in the courtroom, judges love it and will be really sympathetic.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 3
Posted
On 9/7/2022 at 7:41 AM, WhatTheBuck said:

Find the most qualified, objective, unbiased person to do the job and I guarantee the Trump team will object to them. To Trump you are either biased for him or you are biased against him. There is no objective middle ground. (Sort of like how Dubya foreshadowed Trump when he declared that you’re either with us or you’re with the terrorists.)

 

On 9/7/2022 at 7:27 AM, Ghost of LL said:

Actually, a former SecState or SecDef would have the security clearance.  It's just the law degree that would usually be lacking.  But Hillary would work (and would be completely hilarious).

 

On 9/7/2022 at 8:39 AM, Texas St. Armadillos said:

Yep, she has her JD from Yale.

Leon Panetta seems like a good pick?

Posted
3 minutes ago, BehoId, The Underminer! said:

I can’t even parse this. What does she want to happen?  What does consider mean here?

 

 

It reads to me like a “I don’t really understand what’s going on, so here’s something vague I can say for you to use to tell me something smart.”

She's a MAGA mouthbreather,  so I'm not defending her, but this order is not surprising.  Both sides were already supposed to submit briefs tomorrow regarding how the special master should work, such as timing of the document review.  She wants the parties to include in those briefs a discussion of the DOJ's motion filed today to keep the classified documents outside of the special master review.

She may (and I have no faith in her) be laying groundwork to grant the DOJ's motion, and take the off ramp they've provided her.  It'll be interesting to see how trump argues the classified documents could somehow be subject to executive privilege and that he's entitled to them back.  

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Grade of D as in David said:

You think he doesn't have any spare horse deeds lying around to pay people off with?

Don’t forget, he’s a very stable genius.

 

(Credit to Colbert for that one.)

  • Rage+1 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, TexasEd said:

I hope the execute searches at Trump Tower and the combo golf course/cemetery this weekend

If they search the menu of “Champion’s Grill” at Trump Doral they will find it the very tasty deconstructed  “naked burger” with a half pound patty cooked to spec, heirloom tomatoes, arugula dressed with olive oil and balsamic, and burrata. Delicious!

Edited by Bozo_Casanova
  • Haha 2
  • Drool 1
Posted
11 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:


And that horses name ……….

Ivanka 

 

596E62B6-B17C-4EA4-AAD5-E0EC4174B930.jpeg

Never noticed it before, but the parrot in front is a squirter. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 7
Posted (edited)
59 minutes ago, BehoId, The Underminer! said:

I can’t even parse this. What does she want to happen?  What does consider mean here?

 

 

It reads to me like a “I don’t really understand what’s going on, so here’s something vague I can say for you to use to tell me something smart.”

The government pretty clearly alleged, and there must be some basis in the briefing of Trump, that he conceded or waived many of the points about the classified documents.  I think she's giving Trump the opportunity to agree that they should not be subject of the order, which vastly simplifies the appointment of a Special Master, i.e. no security clearance.  And then that simplifies the stay pending appeal.

Edited by TwiceHorn
Posted
3 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

The government pretty clearly alleged, and there must be some basis in the briefing of Trump, that he conceded many of the points about the classified documents.  I think she's giving Trump the opportunity to agree that they should not be subject of the order, which vastly simplifies the appointment of a Special Master, i.e. no security clearance.  And then that simplifies the stay pending appeal.

So she wants Trumps team to agree that the classified docs should not be subject to the SM so that her ruling does not go against Trump but can be what he asked for (as long as they change it)?

I scratched your back granting the SM now scratch mine and make your request reasonable or I will have to rule against you.

Posted
28 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

If they search the menu of “Champion’s Grill” at Trump Doral they will find it the very tasty deconstructed  “naked burger” with a half pound patty cooked to spec, heirloom tomatoes, arugula dressed with olive oil and balsamic, and burrata. Delicious!

Eric Wareheim Mind Blown GIF by Tim and Eric

6 minutes ago, Pods said:

Never noticed it before, but the parrot in front is a squirter. 

It's piss

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
He won't sue them because he's a broke ass bitch and can't get anyone to work for free any more.
I don't think he's broke. He's grifted hundreds of millions of dollars. He's not giving that money away. He does have issues getting good lawyers because of nonpayment.


×
×
  • Create New...