Jump to content

A story about a pathetic man's downfall [34 Felony Convictions]

Francisco 2.0

By Francisco 2.0
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • tx 3 putt

    1687

  • TwiceHorn

    1467

  • WhatTheBuck

    1322

  • atomheartbevo

    1315

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Beau Vine
Beau Vine

To be fair, President Trump’s four years in office weren’t so bad, except when when he incited an insurrection against the government, mismanaged a pandemic that killed nearly half a million Americans

Bama Chick
Bama Chick

Y’all about to get a great visual representation of Cullman, Alabama. Only good things to come out of Cullman are the Britt brothers (Roll Tide!) and orange rolls from All Steak restaurant. That pla

ChiTownDoc
ChiTownDoc

You seem really pissed off for a nontrumper.  Just laugh at the trumpers, bro.  They’re really gullible dumbfucks who worship this orange blob…you know, people completely unlike yourself.  

Posted Images

Pig Bellmont

Pig Bellmont 8678

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Pato del Muerto said:

So everything that dearie does and reports and recommends, cannon can just ignore it?  If so, then who is playing whom here?

It would be really extraordinary to approve a respected judge who Trump chose (Dearie) only to ignore his rulings on all this. Anything is possible, but I don’t see it playing out like that. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bozo_Casanova

Bozo_Casanova 26218

Posted
Posted (edited)

Meanwhile, on Texags

Quote


+ 3 more quotes (click to expand)
ThunderCougarFalconBird said:
Again, correct, but we are not at the phase of this process where those allegations can even be made.
TXAggie2011 said:
Of course we are at that point. They asked for (and got) a Special Master to, ultimately, "evaluate claims for return of property."
We're not there yet.

All of your posts are complaining about the dearth of an allegation that couldn't possibly be made on a credible basis.

All of this is forthcoming.

Look. You and I (and everyone else following this) knows that Occam's Razor points us directly to the real truth about what is going on here: the biden administration is currently freaking out (and appealing at every point possible) because they did something that never should have happened (raid the home of an immediate former president on what is charitably considered a flimsy pretext) and after the fact are facing the very real fallout of having to answer for their actions (instead of getting the usual rubber stamp to railroad whoever they want that they're used to from D.D.C and the D.C. Cir.). Flyover country is a *****, ain't it.

 

 
Edited by Bozo_Casanova
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 3
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BehoId, The Underminer!

BehoId, The Underminer! 11667

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Pig Bellmont said:

It would be really extraordinary to approve a respected judge who Trump chose (Dearie) only to ignore his rulings on all this. Anything is possible, but I don’t see it playing out like that. 

They’ll object to the R&R and after that it is a psychology exam with Cannon.  She knows she’s on camera.  Play it up and change some of the R&R?  Already exhausted with this and takes the opportunity to have the decision rest on someone else’s shoulders?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 31169

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Pig Bellmont said:

It would be really extraordinary to approve a respected judge who Trump chose (Dearie) only to ignore his rulings on all this. Anything is possible, but I don’t see it playing out like that. 

Plus, Dearie will have a well-reasoned, almost unimpeachable basis for doing what he did that is inherently more credible than mere arguments from Trumpco or the government, and she will have to find some reasoned basis to undo it that no longer has anything to do with "protecting appearances" or turning sunlight on a controversial process.

At that point, the harm she does goes beyond mere delay.  I know you lay hysterics can't tolerate delay, but in legal circles it's all in the game, yo.

She may try to do it, but will expose herself as really in the bag for Trump and likely set it up for reversal on appeal.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Texas St. Armadillos

Texas St. Armadillos 1372

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, gernblansten said:

Trump in public: I declassified all those documents.

Court: okay, do I understand correctly Trump declassified the documents?

Trump attorney: I don't believe we've taken that position.

Court:  okay, so Trump didn't declassify the documents?

Trump attorney: I don't believe we've taken that position.

Trump from outside the courthouse: This is all dumb. Deep state. I declassified all the documents. I did it better than anyone in history. I perfectly declassified them. Beautifully.

Court: okay. So, you're not taking a position on whether Trump declassified any documents?

Trump attorney: I don't believe we've taken that position. Our position is Presidents have wide latitude to declassify documents.

Court: Yeah. So did he declassify them or not?

Trump attorney: I need to use the bathroom. Can I be excused?

Unfortunately for Trump, his attorneys are fluent in Bird Law.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhatTheBuck

WhatTheBuck 28700

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

Trump harumphing that "they wouldn't have put ME there"  re: wherever Joe Biden sat at Queen Elizabeth's funeral ... can you imagine how FUCKING TINY Trump's dick must be to not only think something so petty like that but then to post it publicly?  He is such a little bitch.  

Not to mention the low character of his followers who respond positively to that childish pettiness. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BehoId, The Underminer!

BehoId, The Underminer! 11667

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Sbbruin said:

I find TexAgs to be absolutely fascinating.  They start with the presumption Trump can do no wrong, and then back into the arguments from there.

Then claim it was Occam's Razor as they create the winding path to innocence!

 

We bitch about how little public funding the state gives its universities.  I say it is too much!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DDD Dad

DDD Dad 14146

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

so the trump judge has to honor the decision from the 'special master' ?

No.  If a party objects to the special master's ruling the Trump judge gets to review anew (de novo) without deference to the master's recommendation/order.  

Edited by DDD Dad
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tx 3 putt

tx 3 putt 76123

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

I don't see how anyone could read the texags type stuff and not understand immediately it's just really really bad fan fiction.  It's what a 6 year old would come up with.  Kinda like the Wall I guess.

 

years of aggie inbreeding has to greatly warp the mind 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
aggie08

aggie08 21370

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

I don't see how anyone could read the texags type stuff and not understand immediately it's just really really bad fan fiction.  It's what a 6 year old would come up with.  Kinda like the Wall I guess.

I think the whole special master thing was purpose built for them. They know all about getting their hopes up after an early setback, and craft their realities accordingly. The special master was their Miami.

 

Damnit, I made myself sad.

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...