Jump to content

A story about a pathetic man's downfall [34 Felony Convictions]

Francisco 2.0

By Francisco 2.0
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • tx 3 putt

    1687

  • TwiceHorn

    1467

  • WhatTheBuck

    1322

  • atomheartbevo

    1315

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Beau Vine
Beau Vine

To be fair, President Trump’s four years in office weren’t so bad, except when when he incited an insurrection against the government, mismanaged a pandemic that killed nearly half a million Americans

Bama Chick
Bama Chick

Y’all about to get a great visual representation of Cullman, Alabama. Only good things to come out of Cullman are the Britt brothers (Roll Tide!) and orange rolls from All Steak restaurant. That pla

ChiTownDoc
ChiTownDoc

You seem really pissed off for a nontrumper.  Just laugh at the trumpers, bro.  They’re really gullible dumbfucks who worship this orange blob…you know, people completely unlike yourself.  

Posted Images

YGIFS

YGIFS 19458

Posted
Posted

He’s a piece of shit but I think many of y’all underestimate how smart Tucker really is and how much he played/dumbed down for his audience.  He’s gonna get a little more fast and loose to seem like the edgy right wing commentator who isn’t afraid to mix it up with his own side.  And a MAGA acolyte is gonna put a round through his bow tie and right quick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
immamac

immamac 44361

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, longhornmatt said:

What kind of hellscape must Fox News be when Tucker Carlson is a more decent person when he has no guardrails whatsoever on a self-produced Twitter podcast than he is when he’s on Fox?  

This is a serious question? 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Underdog

Underdog 29192

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, YGIFS said:

He’s a piece of shit but I think many of y’all underestimate how smart Tucker really is and how much he played/dumbed down for his audience.  He’s gonna get a little more fast and loose to seem like the edgy right wing commentator who isn’t afraid to mix it up with his own side.  And a MAGA acolyte is gonna put a round through his bow tie and right quick. 

image.jpeg.2aa53eb411874047e32aceb143f27380.jpeg
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
High Plains Drifter

High Plains Drifter 11190

Posted
Posted

 

On 5/17/2023 at 4:16 PM, atomheartbevo said:

Yep.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/17/politics/trump-letter-archives-special-counsel-declassification/index.html

 

 

The 16 presidential records, which were subpoenaed earlier this year, may provide critical evidence establishing the former president’s awareness of the declassification process, a key part of the criminal investigation into Trump’s mishandling of classified docum

 

I have been told numerous times that ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking the law. So why does it have to be proven that he was "aware" that just classifying them with his perfect and beautiful mind is illegal?

 

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
C-Man

C-Man 27780

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, longhornmatt said:

There were actually about 500 people on the list.  Colbert and Kimmel were on it, too.   The best part is that Jimmy Fallon apparently wasn’t listed, so now he has to cope with the realization that he’s the only late night host whose jokes are so hacky they don’t even offend Russia.

That's there's even a 0.00000001% chance this is just a list of names supplied the Rooskies by Trump is fucking hilarious.

steve-buscemi-list.gif

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TwiceHorn

TwiceHorn 32080

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, High Plains Drifter said:

 

 

The 16 presidential records, which were subpoenaed earlier this year, may provide critical evidence establishing the former president’s awareness of the declassification process, a key part of the criminal investigation into Trump’s mishandling of classified docum

 

I have been told numerous times that ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking the law. So why does it have to be proven that he was "aware" that just classifying them with his perfect and beautiful mind is illegal?

 

 

 

Many crimes require proof of a specific intent, not just a general intent to engage in whatever conduct constitutes the crime.

It's often said that specific intent is the intention to commit a or the crime in question, but that's not really accurate.

For example, this is 18 USC 793(d), the defense information statute we think Trump might get charged with:

d)

Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
 
The bolded is a little bit of extra intention required to meet the elements of proof of the crime.  That element of "willfully retain" could be avoided if Trump could credibly say he didn't know he had it, or he didn't think it was classified because he declassified it.  Of course, the statute doesn't even require the material be classified.
 
 
Edited by TwiceHorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Underdog

Underdog 29192

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, HornOnTheBayou said:

Hey Verizon,

Maybe you should stop showing your Seth Meyers commercial during every damn break. Do you really want an international fugitive to be the face of your company?

Now that's a brag. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
YGIFS

YGIFS 19458

Posted
Posted

Donald Trump upon reading that ^^^, "NO JEAN!  You can't triple stamp a double stamp!  You can't!  Forget no erasies!  You can't triple stamp a double stamp."  

The Judge, "Let me guess, Mr. Trump...you'd like to claim you took the comments about her with you after the CNN town hall and therefore they didn't happen and cannot be used against you?"

Donald Trump, "Uh, if that's a thing, let's go with that then..."  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...