Jump to content

A story about a pathetic man's downfall [34 Felony Convictions]

Francisco 2.0

By Francisco 2.0
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • tx 3 putt

    1687

  • TwiceHorn

    1467

  • WhatTheBuck

    1322

  • atomheartbevo

    1315

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Beau Vine
Beau Vine

To be fair, President Trump’s four years in office weren’t so bad, except when when he incited an insurrection against the government, mismanaged a pandemic that killed nearly half a million Americans

Bama Chick
Bama Chick

Y’all about to get a great visual representation of Cullman, Alabama. Only good things to come out of Cullman are the Britt brothers (Roll Tide!) and orange rolls from All Steak restaurant. That pla

ChiTownDoc
ChiTownDoc

You seem really pissed off for a nontrumper.  Just laugh at the trumpers, bro.  They’re really gullible dumbfucks who worship this orange blob…you know, people completely unlike yourself.  

Posted Images

Horn Under a Bad Sign

Horn Under a Bad Sign 20398

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

Is this the newest internet thing now or something?


#trumpsmells has been trending on Twitter for the last few days. I'm doing my best to keep it going.  Considering his diet and lack of vegetables, it's completely believable.   I really do wish a reporter would ask him straight up if he wears adult diapers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
YGIFS

YGIFS 19450

Posted
Posted

It's why he's never seen jogging, swimming, or anything else in shorts.  Because of the Depends.  Last known photograph is that one of him in tennis all-whites and that fucking ladies sportswatch.  Every since then, he's only in long pants...even on a hot golf course.  But I forgot, he's a true Man's Man.  It's because you'd be able to make out the diaper in shorts.  Harder to do in loose, pleated golf pants or a suit.  

I think you'd have to go back to Reagan to not have seen a U.S. President in shorts.  And thats only because he was old, but the guy could at least ride a horse or throw a football.  Shit Trump could never do.  

Fuck, I think even FDR wore shorts with no diaper and he was in a damn wheelchair.  

I'll eventually unpack and kinda, sorta wrap my head around some of the shit y'all see in Trump as your hero.  But the whole Alpha Male/Man's Man thing, that's one I'll just never get.  He's the exact opposite other than being kinda tall & fat.  Maybe that was the whole appeal the whole time?  How opposites attract?  Or how you look for the mirror image of yourself in an idol or whatever?  Nothing else makes sense.  I saw one pic of him years ago from a friend of a friend's boat doing deep-sea fishing.  And his cast looked like Lamar from the Tri-Lambs throwing the javelin. . 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Red Five

Red Five 40857

Posted
Posted

Nice portrait of himself on the wall. It reminds me of how full of himself Obama was. 

Obama: "I want to do good things and help people." 

"That Obama is so arrogant!"

Trump: "I am the greatest person ever. I know more about everything than everyone who has ever lived."

(wild applause) 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bozo_Casanova

Bozo_Casanova 26457

Posted
Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, Red Five said:

Nice portrait of himself on the wall. It reminds me of how full of himself Obama was. 

Obama: "I want to do good things and help people." 

"That Obama is so arrogant!"

Trump: "I am the greatest person ever. I know more about everything than everyone who has ever lived."

(wild applause) 

@TahoeHorn (acquaintance of Mo Brooks) started a whole thread on  Hornfans about the uppity way Obama lifted his chin.


To Tahoe’s credit he only voted for Trump in 2016, before success went to his head.

Edited by Bozo_Casanova
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
bolverk

bolverk 29672

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

Maine looks like it's next up on deciding whether he should be on the ballot. Two complaints are based on the insurrection; the third is rather novel. See bolded at the end.

Quote

 

Maine’s Secretary of State to Decide Whether Trump Can Stay on Ballot
Shenna Bellows, a Democrat, has said she would decide next week whether Maine will join Colorado in disqualifying former President Donald J. Trump from its primary ballot.

Maine’s secretary of state is poised to issue a decision next week that could bolster a citizen-led movement to keep former President Donald J. Trump off primary ballots around the country — or contradict a landmark court decision in Colorado this week.

In a hearing last week at Maine’s State House in Augusta, Shenna Bellows, the secretary of state, weighed three separate complaints challenging Mr. Trump’s eligibility to appear on the state’s Republican primary ballot. Two are based on the same section of the Constitution that the Colorado Supreme Court cited in its 4-to-3 decision on Tuesday that found Mr. Trump cannot hold office again because his actions leading up to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol amounted to engaging in an insurrection.

Some form of challenge to Mr. Trump’s eligibility has been lodged in more than 30 states, but many of those have already been dismissed. Most are unfolding in the courts, but in Maine — because of a quirk in its Constitution — the secretary of state weighs in first, with voters filing petitions, not lawsuits. Her decision can then be appealed to the state’s Superior Court.

The Colorado ruling was the first in history to disqualify a presidential candidate from a ballot under the 14th Amendment, which was drafted after the Civil War. One section of the amendment bars those who have taken an oath “to support” the Constitution from holding office if they “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same,” or had “given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”

Mr. Trump’s campaign has said it will appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court; should the high court take the case, the other challenges around the country are likely to be put on hold.

After the Colorado ruling, Ms. Bellows, an elected Democrat, invited lawyers on both sides in Maine to file supplemental briefs and said that her decision was likely to come next week.

The Republican primaries in Maine and Colorado are both scheduled for March 5, known as Super Tuesday because so many states hold primaries that day. But states have to start sending ballots to service members and overseas voters 45 days before a federal election — Jan. 20, in the case of the March 5 primaries — adding urgency to the situation.

If the Supreme Court agrees to hear Mr. Trump’s appeal, the Colorado court’s decision would not take effect on Jan. 4 as scheduled, and Mr. Trump would remain eligible to appear on the ballot there pending the outcome of the appeal, according to Colorado state officials.

An appeal would also probably pause other efforts to keep him off ballots around the country. But it was unclear this week what it would mean in Maine, where the process is thus far proceeding outside the courts.

Under Maine law, registered voters can challenge a candidate’s ballot access by filing a petition with the secretary of state. The state received three such challenges to Mr. Trump’s ballot eligibility: one from a group of former elected officials, and two from individual residents.

Mark Brewer, the chairman of the political science department at the University of Maine, said little attention had been paid to the complaints in Maine until the ruling in Colorado.

“Now everyone is looking to see where else this might happen,” he said.

The challenge in Michigan is also among those being closely watched. Lawyers on both sides have asked the state’s Supreme Court to rule by next week, but the court could schedule oral arguments first, or wait to see if the U.S. Supreme Court rules on the Colorado case.

Similar lawsuits filed by a long-shot Republican presidential candidate, John Anthony Castro, have been dismissed by federal judges in Rhode Island, New Hampshire and Florida, and withdrawn in a dozen other states.

Sworn in almost three years ago as Maine’s first woman secretary of state, Ms. Bellows grew up in tiny Hancock, Maine, and served two terms as a state senator. She is the former executive director of the nonprofit Holocaust and Human Rights Center of Maine and of the American Civil Liberties Union of Maine.

Dr. Brewer said he could not predict her decision, but noted that in her shoes, he would find it hard to rule as Colorado’s court did.

“Whatever you may think he’s done, the former president has not been charged with insurrection,” Dr. Brewer said in an interview. “Even if he had been charged, he hasn’t had his day in court yet, so in the eyes of the law, he’s not guilty of anything.”

But Ethan Strimling, a former mayor of Portland and Democratic state legislator who initiated one of the challenges with two former Republican state legislators, said the Colorado court decision changes that equation.

“There is no longer any truth to that argument, because two courts have now found that he incited insurrection,” Mr. Strimling said, referring to the Colorado Supreme Court ruling and one from a lower court that preceded it. “I think that creates great clarity.”

Lawyers for Mr. Trump argued in their follow-up brief that the Colorado decision should be irrelevant to the Maine proceeding because the two challenges are separate actions under different laws and standards, and because the former president did not have “full and fair opportunity” to litigate the facts in Colorado.

Furthermore, they reiterated, the secretary of state does not have legal standing to exclude Mr. Trump from the Maine ballot.

“The Constitution reserves exclusively to the Electoral College and Congress the power to determine whether a person may serve as president,” they argued in a closing brief last week. “The challengers effectively ask the secretary to strip those institutions’ power to resolve Section Three issues.”

While two of the three challenges in Maine focus on the 14th Amendment, the third, brought by Paul Gordon, a lawyer in Portland, argues that Mr. Trump should be found ineligible for the ballot under the 22nd Amendment, which says that “no person should be elected to the office of president more than twice.” The basis for his argument is that Mr. Trump has repeatedly claimed to have won the 2020 election.

Mr. Trump could “remove this obstacle” to qualify for the ballot, Mr. Gordon said in his complaint, by “acknowledging that he lost the 2020 election and repudiating all previous statements undermining the integrity of that election.”

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 5
  • Haha 11
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
YGIFS

YGIFS 19450

Posted
Posted

Now this is an interersting plot development in the simulation.  "We'll drop all these cases in all these states.  You can appear on all ballots, unfettered.  Even grant you exclusion from any questions of insurrection or the 14th.  Just admit you lost 2020 once and for all."

 

I know, legally, it couldn't be that clean and simple...but at least float it out there through non-bench channels just to see the goofy ass look on his face.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Macanudo

Macanudo 12978

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

Now this is an interersting plot development in the simulation.  "We'll drop all these cases in all these states.  You can appear on all ballots, unfettered.  Even grant you exclusion from any questions of insurrection or the 14th.  Just admit you lost 2020 once and for all."

 

I know, legally, it couldn't be that clean and simple...but at least float it out there through non-bench channels just to see the goofy ass look on his face.  

What good is an admission at this point.   The second he says it, he'll turn around and say that it was rigged.   He can never go back on that now.   

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Horn Under a Bad Sign

Horn Under a Bad Sign 20398

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

 



You know how Biden could win the election?  During the debates, have one of the questions be a "plant" by one of the questioners.  The question:  "Mr. Trump and President Biden, Americans consistently say that one of their chief concerns about this election is your ages.  Both of you contend that you are fitter than your opponent. Knowing that an inability to stand still is one of the early-warning signs of dementia, will both of you would step out from behind the podium, stand next to one another, close your eyes, and stand there without touching or holding on to anything for 30 seconds?"

Biden, knowing the question is coming, would have practiced. Plus he'll have taken half a valium. Trump will panic, knowing that he can't do it.  He'll either have to decline to do it, at which point everybody says "what's the big manly man so afraid of?"  or he'll have to do it and his dementia unsteadiness will be exaggerated by his nervousness. He'll be swaying like I used to coming out of Maggie Mae's at two a.m. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tx 3 putt

tx 3 putt 76954

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:



You know how Biden could win the election?  During the debates, have one of the questions be a "plant" by one of the questioners.  The question:  "Mr. Trump and President Biden, Americans consistently say that one of their chief concerns about this election is your ages.  Both of you contend that you are fitter than your opponent. Knowing that an inability to stand still is one of the early-warning signs of dementia, will both of you would step out from behind the podium, stand next to one another, close your eyes, and stand there without touching or holding on to anything for 30 seconds?"

Biden, knowing the question is coming, would have practiced. Plus he'll have taken half a valium. Trump will panic, knowing that he can't do it.  He'll either have to decline to do it, at which point everybody says "what's the big manly man so afraid of?"  or he'll have to do it and his dementia unsteadiness will be exaggerated by his nervousness. He'll be swaying like I used to coming out of Maggie Mae's at two a.m. 

 

trump isn’t participating in any debates 

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Horn Under a Bad Sign

Horn Under a Bad Sign 20398

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

trump isn’t participating in any debates 


Biden should blast him over and over again. "What's he afraid of?"  "America has had four years of both of us. He's afraid to compare our economic records!"  etc....  I mean, it's the easiest, most direct, low-hanging fruit there is.  

If there is a debate, I hope the moderator asks:  Mr. Trump, for four years you've said the last election was stolen, will you cite the specific evidence you have for that position?

Just flat out. Make him produce the exact evidence on the spot. He can't. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89663

Posted
Posted (edited)
52 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

If there is a debate, I hope the moderator asks:  Mr. Trump, for four years you've said the last election was stolen, will you cite the specific evidence you have for that position?

There is no evidence, otherwise Trump would have already provided it.  He would have put it on WhiteHouse.gov after the election, he would have put it on DonaldJTrump.com or whatever.  He would have been pushing it all over Twitter and other social media.  If any of the 60+ court cases he lost had went the other way and said “yeah, you won this state” or whatever he would have been blasting that proof all over social media.

Trump voters are too fucking stupid to know that they’ve been conned.  Or they don’t care as long as all of their perceived problems are blamed on other people.

The problem is that of the people who were conned by Trump, most will never admit it either because they don’t believe they were conned, or because they don’t want people realizing how stupid they were.  

It’s just like an aggy coaching search.

edit: sorry for the ramble, I dealt with one of these people yesterday, and I told him that if Trump lost, all he had to do was provide the evidence. But he couldn’t do it in the past three years for some strange reason.

Edited by atomheartbevo
Link to comment
Share on other sites
atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 89663

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

Fucking pedophile and rapist

He’s apparently listed on other pages,

I’m assuming the blacked out names are the trafficked kids, although one person mentioned it maybe an informant.

MAGA will claim it’s fake or Trump was “investigating”.

This is also why Trump won’t be in any debates between now and November.  He won’t open himself up to any gotchas.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Eskimohorn

Eskimohorn 5635

Posted
Posted

Biden should blast him over and over again. "What's he afraid of?"  "America has had four years of both of us. He's afraid to compare our economic records!"  etc....  I mean, it's the easiest, most direct, low-hanging fruit there is.  

If there is a debate, I hope the moderator asks:  Mr. Trump, for four years you've said the last election was stolen, will you cite the specific evidence you have for that position?

Just flat out. Make him produce the exact evidence on the spot. He can't. 

 

“…At first I was up in Michigan and Georgia. The biggest lead in history. Nobody’s ever had a bigger lead. Then the democrats in Detroit, Philly, and Atlanta found ballots and people say there were problems. Huge problems caused by Chinese ballot boxes. The economy was perfect. My phone calls were perfect. The best economy in history. And it was stolen by Obama and Hilary. Were you better with me or with sleepy Joe? Not Sleepy Joe. We built the wall. And Joe tore it down. Open borders…”
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Blotto

Blotto 23501

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, Eskimohorn said:


“…At first I was up in Michigan and Georgia. The biggest lead in history. Nobody’s ever had a bigger lead. Then the democrats in Detroit, Philly, and Atlanta found ballots and people say there were problems. Huge problems caused by Chinese ballot boxes. The economy was perfect. My phone calls were perfect. The best economy in history. And it was stolen by Obama and Hilary. Were you better with me or with sleepy Joe? Not Sleepy Joe. We built the wall. And Joe tore it down. Open borders…”

And that's all it will take for 100% of the rubes that have voted for that dipshit to feel validated. Things like actual evidence have no place in the realm of alternative facts. It's why the campaign started spouting lies from day 1. Ignoring reality is the cornerstone of the GQP. Nobody is changing their mind about Trump at this point. The election is just a turnout contest. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Blotto

Blotto 23501

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, Hornius Emeritus said:

 

 

The document referenced in that tweet has been floating around for  a couple years now as evidenced by this article  dated 12/21:   https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article256740662.html  

This hyperlink in the article leads to the exact same URL/document. 

image.png.819d4a7938588dc7e9269c2a0fef3e24.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RomaVicta

RomaVicta 29907

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, Hornius Emeritus said:

 

 

That's got to be one of the worst lists to find your name on in the world outside of fatwahs. I see Clinton's name and try to refuse to believe he raped underage girls. I do think it's not likely, but who knows for sure?

It is hard to believe that persons who took multiple flights with Epstein were totally unaware of what he was up to. Tolerating it isn't as bad as participating, but it's pretty fucking bad. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Neonmoon

Neonmoon 38129

Posted
Posted
59 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

For flying on a plane with Epstein?

Don’t be fatuous Jeffrey 

Obviously I don’t believe anyone should be imprisoned for flying on a plane. I was skipping past the investigation, the testimony from victims, and the probable conclusion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...