Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, ztejas said:

Yes but there is no "argument" in an 8 team playoff. 4, 5 and 6 all get in. As do 7 and 8. So you would actually see which of them are worth a shit before the semifinal round. You wouldn't have years like 2014 where the 4th seed was the best team in the country and the left-out 6th seed was probably no worse than 3rd.

I guess it depends what you are looking for. I don't think aggy or Notre Dame have any business being in the playoffs having been shredded by two teams already in the playoffs. Oklahoma is a conference champ who hasn't been blown out by a team already in the playoffs. Nobody else deserves to be in. If we are just looking for wacky adventures, let's make an nfc and an afc and have a 16 team playoffs

  • Replies 728
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted

This is an impressive drive that is highlighting the nD line.  But I don’t like the game plan.   You have to spread these Alabama defenders out like Florida did.  ND is playing to their strength which is fighting in a phone booth.

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, SDG said:

So the solution to your complaint isn't to add more it's to find the correct 4.  

Finding the correct 4 involves expanding the playoff, imo. If you had 8 or 16 teams, with a set of rules on how to qualify, then when the final 4 came around, those teams will have truly earned their way in. Imagine a December full of college football playoff games.....and you could have an NIT style tourney for the rest of CFB, as a way of keeping all the existing bowl games....it would be fucking awesome.

Edited by Pam Cummings
Posted
4 minutes ago, F250 said:

This plus the 8-1 game will not be a hyped semifinal game just a first round underdog game.

Notre Dame in the semifinals is a polished turd.

Yeah you get one round to sort out the political nonsense and get 4 good teams.  Could be 1-4 or could be 1 vs 5 and 2 vs 6 but 5 and 6 would have handled the 3 and 4 seeds to earn the semi spot. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Pam Cummings said:

Finding the correct 4 involves expanding the playoff, imo. If you had 8 or 16 teams, with a set of rules on how to qualify, then when the final 4 came around, those teams will have truly earned their way in. Imagine a December full of college football playoff games.....and you could have an NIT style tourney for the rest of CFB, as a way of keeping all the existing bowl games....it would be fucking awesome.

Go back and read the op that I responded to.  the complaint was ND shouldn't be in the game which is dumb knowing that moving to 8 teams would still include ND...  There are a million arguments for expanding but that logic isn't one of them.  

Posted
1 minute ago, dcar00 said:

thats a TD but they wont overturn.  quit showing the backside replay you idiots.

Yea that was the dumbest angle to show while arguing about it 

Posted
Just now, dcar00 said:

thats a TD but they wont overturn.  quit showing the backside replay you idiots.

stupid us fucktard media

the prem has triangulation and 360-degree freeze/pan/xyz-axis between all camera angles

it was clear from the far side replay that the ball was across the plane before his butt hit and it is possible to go up over and spin the pov to match the butt-side replay to prove it

why do we have to have idiot refs on the field waste time looking at micro-monitors with nothing but the raw video with no science?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...