Jump to content

2020 Peach Bowl - #8 Cincinnati vs. #9 Georgia @ Atlanta - 11am ESPN


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, immamac said:

If he was possessing the ball in the end zone why wouldn't it automatically have been a touchback? The end zone has special rules. He was clearly not trying to leave the end zone. 

 

6 minutes ago, EuroHorn said:

They said he’s knee touched at the one 

Prior to the “fumble.”

He had possession. He was not trying to run it out. Unless he is is required to down the ball, should have been a touchback.

Edited by Tonesky
English
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, texifornia said:

UGA demonstrating how to fuck up a plain black/red/white uniform. The dog collar and shoulder head are some candy-ass shit.

Yeah, and UGA is usually clean. This looks like a 16 year old with a design program was allowed to make something “awesome.”

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Just me or does UGA seem low energy/intensity in every game they play in, even when they win. One of the most talented teams in the country but they rarely really impress (Pickens is a beat though). 

Smart coaches exactly to his talent and no further. Good thing he can recruit. 

Classic coaching-vs-talent matchup in this game.

Posted
Alternative productions available on ESecPN2 and ESecPNU if you’d rather not listen to Jones and Dvorcak 

The Skycast broadcast on
ESPNU is cool but the goddamn music after every snap is irritating. Very NFL.
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Handcruser said:

I’m really interested to see how this game plays out. I think Luke might be a special coach. We shall see.

Go Cincy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I will tell you how it's going to play out: if Georgia doesn't show up Cincy is going to beat their ass.

Posted
Just now, Underdog said:

Sure wish this football game would quit interrupting these reviews. 

This bowl season has been particularly bad, can’t get a good game flow going with all these long reviews 

Posted (edited)

Not a 1st down -- side judge lost track of Cincy RB... should be 4th down

Edit:  My bad, ref got it right.  

5 min penalty for me... 😋 

 

Edited by LTtxfan
Posted
1 minute ago, Boogaloo said:

This bowl season has been particularly bad, can’t get a good game flow going with all these long reviews 

Give coaches 2 challenges... get to keep when right.

booth review only on scores, turnovers, and targeting calls

Posted
2 minutes ago, cafe society said:

Before everyone commences sucking off Fickell, remember that Herman beat Georgia, too, and we've seen how that turned out.

He also lost like 1-2 games to bad opponents going back through his time at UH.

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Spider2YBanana said:

Did they just call Georgia a blue blood? Don't you need more than 1 NC in your history to be even close to that?

They claim 2: 1942 and 1980

They have over 800 wins, a lot of bowl wins and 2 Heismans. Those are their only "blue blood" water marks.

They fall pretty far short in conference titles (15) and consensus AAs (35).

Their history is almost identical to Auburn's, ironically. More wins and bowl wins, one less MNC and Heisman, a few more AAs, one less conference title.

Edited by ztejas
  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, ztejas said:

They claim 2: 1942 and 1980

They have over 800 wins, a lot of bowl wins and 2 Heismans. Those are their only "blue blood" water marks.

They fall pretty far short in conference titles (15) and consensus AAs (35).

Their history is almost identical to Auburn's, ironically. More wins and bowl wins, one less MNC and Heisman, a few more AAs.

Going full aggy with that 1942 claim, I see. Typical 

Posted
They claim 2: 1942 and 1980
They have over 800 wins, a lot of bowl wins and 2 Heismans. Those are their only "blue blood" water marks.
They fall pretty far short in conference titles (15) and consensus AAs (35).
Their history is almost identical to Auburn's, ironically. More wins and bowl wins, one less MNC and Heisman, a few more AAs, one less conference title.


For reference: Georgia Tech has four nattys (one split, but still 10 years more recent than dwag).
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, ztejas said:

They claim 2: 1942 and 1980

They have over 800 wins, a lot of bowl wins and 2 Heismans. Those are their only "blue blood" water marks.

They fall pretty far short in conference titles (15) and consensus AAs (35).

Their history is almost identical to Auburn's, ironically. More wins and bowl wins, one less MNC and Heisman, a few more AAs, one less conference title.

UGA is the most underachieving team in the SEC. Great state for talent, very good school, resources, beautiful campus and town.  They should be a major power.  Their boosters and alumni are not as crazy though.

Its nuts that Georgia Tech had won a MNC more recently than UGA.

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Buzzrock said:

Dwag, always champs of “next year”
 

Bwhahahahahahahha. I'm sure he's gonna be just like Jaylen Waddle. M'kay. 

 

I expect nothing less than a glowing report of a Georgia player from none other than David Pollack, who has zero bias whatsoever. 

Edited by Spider2YBanana
Posted

Cincy has dicked around too much on this drive. I get you don't want to give Jawja the ball back but making sure you have time to score should be the first priority.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...