Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Teryor said:

Bama fans are pissed Sark is taking more coaches than he should be allowed but it's ok because they suck and Nick always lands on his feet


If Alabama tries to match our offer, we will find out how full of shit they were. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
45 minutes ago, RGBIII said:

My venmo remains open...usernames the same

Oh shit! I accidentally sent $995.00! 
can you hit me back with a refund??

  • Haha 1
Posted
Bama fans are pissed Sark is taking more coaches than he should be allowed but it's ok because they suck and Nick always lands on his feet

Unless Saban is coming to be Sark’s DC they’re 100 percent correct.
Posted
1 minute ago, closetohumping said:

Yet he's pissed about Banks and wants to keep Golding?

No, when they say Saban will fight to keep Golding, I'm sure they mean fight to keep Golding FROM TURNING DOWN THE TEXAS OFFER.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Newy25 said:


It amazes me how incredibly shitty your opinions are. 

Lol Saban loses assistant every year yet he has 6 championships. Nothing can slow that machine down 

Posted
10 minutes ago, NTVTXN said:

Oh shit! I accidentally sent $995.00! 
can you hit me back with a refund??

Sorry my venmo is now closed. Will advise when it reopens

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, 6th Street said:

Lol Saban loses assistant every year yet he has 6 championships. Nothing can slow that machine down 


I cannot believe I’m engaging in this discussion. God help me. A big part of the machine is their unapologetic, ridiculous financial commitment to their coaching staff. Do a quick google search and see who the top paid assistant coach was in college football last year. It isn’t Saban doing it all by himself. The notion that he just sprinkles his Saban dust on the players and game plan and they win is as laughable as your negative view on everything, Will Alabama recover and be a great team next year? Most likely because they will money whip more great assistant coaches. But they are going to miss Sark and Banks and if we hire Golding that is also going to put a lot a pressure on them. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Newy25 said:


.... It isn’t Saban doing it all by himself. The notion that he just sprinkles his Saban dust on the players and game plan and they win is as laughable....

tenor.gif?itemid=17013048

I was there it is ALL Saban!

 

Posted

Good grief, before this is all said and done, Sexton will have worked a raise for everyone in college football.

Word has it he reps Monkey Gia as well.

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Newy25 said:


I cannot believe I’m engaging in this discussion. God help me. A big part of the machine is their unapologetic, ridiculous financial commitment to their coaching staff. Do a quick google search and see who the top paid assistant coach was in college football last year. It isn’t Saban doing it all by himself. The notion that he just sprinkles his Saban dust on the players and game plan and they win is as laughable as your negative view on everything, Will Alabama recover and be a great team next year? Most likely because they will money whip more great assistant coaches. But they are going to miss Sark and Banks and if we hire Golding that is also going to put a lot a pressure on them. 

Alabama will reload and be fine. Saban lost guys like Kirby Smart, Jeremy Pruitt, Lane Kiffin, Billy Napier, Mario Cristobal etc and never missed a beat.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Newy25 said:


I cannot believe I’m engaging in this discussion. God help me. A big part of the machine is their unapologetic, ridiculous financial commitment to their coaching staff. Do a quick google search and see who the top paid assistant coach was in college football last year. It isn’t Saban doing it all by himself. The notion that he just sprinkles his Saban dust on the players and game plan and they win is as laughable as your negative view on everything, Will Alabama recover and be a great team next year? Most likely because they will money whip more great assistant coaches. But they are going to miss Sark and Banks and if we hire Golding that is also going to put a lot a pressure on them. 

Re: ridiculous financial commitment: As the genius football mind SEAL once sagely opined, "You're never going to survive unless you get a little bit crazy." I'm just glad we barged into the asylum, stole Saban's tapioca pudding and slapped his favorite candy striper on the ass.  LFG.gif

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Newy25 said:


I cannot believe I’m engaging in this discussion. God help me. A big part of the machine is their unapologetic, ridiculous financial commitment to their coaching staff. Do a quick google search and see who the top paid assistant coach was in college football last year. It isn’t Saban doing it all by himself. The notion that he just sprinkles his Saban dust on the players and game plan and they win is as laughable as your negative view on everything, Will Alabama recover and be a great team next year? Most likely because they will money whip more great assistant coaches. But they are going to miss Sark and Banks and if we hire Golding that is also going to put a lot a pressure on them. 

On top of Flood/Huff/Wiggins and any other assistants that may still get poached.

Picking a couple new assistants is no big deal, rinse and repeat. Picking 3/4 of a new staff is not ideal. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, 6th Street said:

Alabama will reload and be fine. Saban lost guys like Kirby Smart, Jeremy Pruitt, Lane Kiffin, Billy Napier, Mario Cristobal etc and never missed a beat.  

He's never had to deal with Bill O'Brien before either. Don't underestimate that level of shittiness.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
I’ll probably get flamed, but I’d cut Carrington loose. Sark wants to build an Alabama style recruiting/personnel department. He’s going to have to tear it down and rebuild to accomplish this. 
I think Carrington has proven he can be a valuable part of that. It's not like he's been doing it for 20 years and set in his ways...and dont forget he was huge in keeping Ossai from going full aggy, and other big names on our roster.
Posted
1 minute ago, billfromlaketravis said:

I believe BamaInsider is the most reputable of the Bama sites. @Fud can probably corroborate. 

No idea which sites are, but I think Hank South is supposed to be a good one 

Posted
18 minutes ago, Newy25 said:


I cannot believe I’m engaging in this discussion. God help me. A big part of the machine is their unapologetic, ridiculous financial commitment to their coaching staff. Do a quick google search and see who the top paid assistant coach was in college football last year. It isn’t Saban doing it all by himself. The notion that he just sprinkles his Saban dust on the players and game plan and they win is as laughable as your negative view on everything, Will Alabama recover and be a great team next year? Most likely because they will money whip more great assistant coaches. But they are going to miss Sark and Banks and if we hire Golding that is also going to put a lot a pressure on them. 

The other being the ridiculous amount of talent in the 3 deep haha

Posted

If the Golding report is true, that is a very odd turn of events. I don’t see how Sark can try to take so many coaches when Saban pulled him off the scrap heap and gave him a shot. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, RaysBoomBoomRoom said:

Does a Golding hire rule out Lupoi?

Stop this madness. He isn’t going anywhere in college without being a play calling dc. We won’t dare give him that responsibility. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
Does a Golding hire rule out Lupoi?

The generally accepted belief is that we only get Tosh if he’s a play calling DC.

That’s been covered several times in this thread, albeit fewer times than folks have shared either their fajitas recipe or their favorite ice cream.
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Dbeasy said:

If the Golding report is true, that is a very odd turn of events. I don’t see how Sark can try to take so many coaches when Saban pulled him off the scrap heap and gave him a shot. 

Maybe they are the ones that said they want to coach under/with Sark... and also love money 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, RichUT said:


The generally accepted belief is that we only get Tosh if he’s a play calling DC.

That’s been covered several times in this thread, albeit fewer times than folks have shared either their fajitas recipe or their favorite ice cream.

Or pumped up the podcast.

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Stop this madness. He isn’t going anywhere in college without being a play calling dc. We won’t dare give him that responsibility. 

Makes sense. I bet it won't matter anyway because he will bring over the CB coach too.

Edited by RaysBoomBoomRoom
Posted (edited)

I know I'm a bit late to the discussion but since people seem genuinely confused:

Director of player personnel: (Chang's old role now filled by Hughes) This is the married friend who identifies all the hot fuckable women who will be at the party and warns you which ones are crazy and which ones have herpes 

Director of recruiting: (Carrington) This is the female friend who plays wingman and helps talk up the single friend to the non-crazy / preferably disease free fuckable women

Coaches: The single friend who actually has to close the deal and gets to fuck 

 

Carrington has very little say/role in actually identifying the targets just as the personnel director has basically no role in trying to close on them. Evaluate Carrington by *how many targets walk through the door and evaluate Hughes by which targets were given the invitations. Two very different roles. 

Edited by HateYouAndMyself
  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Dbeasy said:

If the Golding report is true, that is a very odd turn of events. I don’t see how Sark can try to take so many coaches when Saban pulled him off the scrap heap and gave him a shot. 

Because sark is competitive and knows those guys best?  They don’t have to say yes. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Dbeasy said:

If the Golding report is true, that is a very odd turn of events. I don’t see how Sark can try to take so many coaches when Saban pulled him off the scrap heap and gave him a shot. 

Because all gas and no brakes? Can’t stop won’t stop? 

In other news, Gerry hinting we getting LJ. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
Posted
9 minutes ago, Dbeasy said:

If the Golding report is true, that is a very odd turn of events. I don’t see how Sark can try to take so many coaches when Saban pulled him off the scrap heap and gave him a shot. 

image.png.3e87ba63effa705064ebcb7765d7345c.png

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, TexasEx said:

Because all gas and no brakes? Can’t stop won’t stop? 

In other news, Gerry hinting we getting LJ. 

Fong wrong?  That would mean even Elko doesn’t know that this kid is thinking?

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Dbeasy said:

If the Golding report is true, that is a very odd turn of events. I don’t see how Sark can try to take so many coaches when Saban pulled him off the scrap heap and gave him a shot. 

Because he's getting paid 5 and a half million a year to try to hire the best coaching staff he can. Saban can be pissed off all he wants, but I'm sure understands the business and holds no ill will toward sark.

Edited by Lou_Sassle
  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
12 minutes ago, Dbeasy said:

If the Golding report is true, that is a very odd turn of events. I don’t see how Sark can try to take so many coaches when Saban pulled him off the scrap heap and gave him a shot. 

Maybe some of them want to leave?  

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...