Jump to content

Sark after dark COACHING STAFF thread

closetohumping

By closetohumping
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

Recommended

Posted by Teryor,

HOLY SHIT WE'RE ROOTING FOR BRIAN FUCKING DAVIS TO BE RIGHT
Recommended by immamac
  • Rage+1
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Hook 'Em

22 reactions

Go to this post
  • Replies 15.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Sheep Have Wool
Sheep Have Wool

https://www.captiongenerator.com/2107502/SurlyHorns-Reacts-to-the-Coaching-Search Enable subtitles if you're watching embedded.  

closetojumping
closetojumping

Just got a text from my friend in the Bama program that Flood and Wiggins are going with Sark. It's done.

2578
2578

nope, reposding to other posters. You want an asshole? I'll show you an asshole I'm gonna lose to OU THIS many times   Texas fucking sucks now, and you ALLLLLLL know it. Good

Posted Images

Chuckie Finster

Chuckie Finster 22694

Posted
Posted
Cashing in literally all of your goodwill to hire cokehead regard Stoops is in and of itself indefensible.

He could have our players looking like Urlacher out there and the fanbase would still (justifiably) want him gone from our sidelines. Just an indefensible, tone-deaf decision, especially if the rumors are true that the boosters nixed Stoops to Sark a few weeks ago.
  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
satyanash

satyanash 14480

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Chuckie Finster said:

He could have our players looking like Urlacher out there and the fanbase would still want (justifiably) him gone from our sidelines. Just an indefensible, tone-deaf decision, especially if the rumors are true that the boosters nixed Stoops to Sark a few weeks ago.

Not to mention Sark could simply have kept Hutzler. He went out of his way to hire Stoops instead. WTF

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
gmr548

gmr548 16576

Posted
Posted

He was always going to bring Stoops, just built out the staff first for cover. It's not a Watson level fuckup because it's not a coordinator position (though I bet he gets a run game coordinator tag) but it's worse than any of Herman's position coach hires because of the context. Definitely strike one for Sark. Can't wait to be part of the meltdown every time a LB misses a tackle next year (and there will be a lot).

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ausjala

ausjala 101

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, HornyPony69 said:

This isn’t a horrible hire at this particular position.

1. He isn’t DC like he was at OU.
2. He will only be coaching inside linebackers. That’s at most 2 players on the field at any given time.
3. He’s been in the Saban coaching career rehabilitation facility for years.
4. His 247 profile shows he’s not a bad recruiter.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

IMG_5464.png

What? Are you trying to use logic on surlies? EEEEEJJJIIIITTTTT Where is CTJ when we need him

Link to comment
Share on other sites
satyanash

satyanash 14480

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ausjala said:

What? Are you trying to use logic on surlies? EEEEEJJJIIIITTTTT Where is CTJ when we need him

"Logic", lol. You realize Stoops is a defensive backs coach by background, right? He never coached LBs even when he was a position coach at K-State.

This hire makes no sense.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
thunderlounge

thunderlounge 7815

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, gmr548 said:

He was always going to bring Stoops, just built out the staff first for cover. It's not a Watson level fuckup because it's not a coordinator position (though I bet he gets a run game coordinator tag) but it's worse than any of Herman's position coach hires because of the context. Definitely strike one for Sark. Can't wait to be part of the meltdown every time a LB misses a tackle next year (and there will be a lot).


His position misses any in October and it’s game on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Burt Macklin

Burt Macklin 19020

Posted
Posted

Well, I take back everything I said this morning about Joseph being the most questionable hire. 

tenor.gif 
 

2 minutes ago, Hiphopopotamos said:

Wiki says Stoops last coached LB’s 30 years ago. 

WTF. I didn’t even realize he’s been a DBs coach his whole career, which is even worse cuz OU DBs were always traaaaaash. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TenCarryTom

TenCarryTom 398

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, gmr548 said:

He was always going to bring Stoops, just built out the staff first for cover. It's not a Watson level fuckup because it's not a coordinator position (though I bet he gets a run game coordinator tag) but it's worse than any of Herman's position coach hires because of the context. Definitely strike one for Sark. Can't wait to be part of the meltdown every time a LB misses a tackle next year (and there will be a lot).

I’m going to lose my shit every time a LB misses a tackle and be fucking proud of it. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gil Bang

Gil Bang 25922

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Burt Macklin said:

Well, I take back everything I said this morning about Joseph being the most questionable hire. 

tenor.gif 
 

WTF. I didn’t even realize he’s been a DBs coach his whole career, which is even worse cuz OU DBs were always traaaaaash. 

yeah, Roy Williams wasn't worth a shit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gmr548

gmr548 16576

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Hiphopopotamos said:

Wiki says Stoops last coached LB’s 30 years ago. 

 

1 minute ago, satyanash said:

"Logic", lol. You realize Stoops is a defensive backs coach by background, right? He never coached LBs even when he was a position coach at K-State.

This hire makes no sense.

 

1 minute ago, Burt Macklin said:

WTF. I didn’t even realize he’s been a DBs coach his whole career, which is even worse cuz OU DBs were always traaaaaash. 

I did not know this. Didn't realize I could feel worse about this hire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
90's_Horn

90's_Horn 175

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, satyanash said:

"Logic", lol. You realize Stoops is a defensive backs coach by background, right? He never coached LBs even when he was a position coach at K-State.

This hire makes no sense.

please tell me this actually another agent ploy/leak to get Stoops a job elsewhere (other than on the forty) ???

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CHIEF

CHIEF 5079

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, HornyPony69 said:

This isn’t a horrible hire at this particular position.

1. He isn’t DC like he was at OU.
2. He will only be coaching inside linebackers. That’s at most 2 players on the field at any given time.
3. He’s been in the Saban coaching career rehabilitation facility for years.
4. His 247 profile shows he’s not a bad recruiter.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

IMG_5464.png

He has definitely recruited some studs at LB and DE, Ronnie Perkins, Nik Bonitto, Ron Tatum, and J Redmond. he gets who he is supposed to get from close to home as well. The only silver lining could be he hates Lincoln Riley for firing him. He needs a muzzle and a shock collar. Not happy, but, maybe a chickenshit to chicken salad situation, if true.

Trying to be a glass half full kinda guy.

CHIEF

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...