Jump to content

Official Coach Sark Thread of Dominance—haters back off


SimkinsMan

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, WinningIsHard said:

This part made me LOL. For the first 2 or 3 years this board hated that sark was the OC. He couldn’t handle doing both jobs, he was in over his head, sarklostagain needed to focus on being HC. I’m not saying you were one of those assholes but there were a lot of those assholes on here. 

There were many here against Sark for so many reasons.

There were also many favorable data points that were overwhelmingly positive, and a lot of supposedly smart people overlooked those facts and memorialized their idiocy for eternity. 

20 hours ago, WelfareBuysMyWeed said:

Re: VY being the greatest ever

the thing about that is the circumstance which he delivered. It's not something that's really fair to other QBs, because they don't get to pick their challenger, but VY had an all-time great foe to conquer, which is exactly why his heroics are so memorable. It's not just that VY was amazing at what he did, he did it against the "greatest of all time" USC. Arch and Quinn don't have a foe like that to vanquish, because USC's reputation wasn't built in a single year. It was a multi-year dynasty that was looking like the best ever. The closest you could get would be Quinn beating Saban in Tuscaloosa, but that wasn't for all the marbles. Georgia today doesn't have the mystique that 2005 USC had. There's simply no all-time villains for our current QBs to slay. Even if quinn or arch winds up winning the title and heisman, it still can't compare to what VY did because it felt like VY single-handedly dismantled a dynasty. USC has never been the same since that night.

No one will have the stage set up like VY had.

USC was the 2 time defending National Champions w/ 2 Heisman Trophy winners, and USC and Texas were ranked 1 and 2 in every poll, all year long. No question who the best 2 teams were. Texas v. Hollywood. The Rose Bowl.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, PTINS said:

There were many here against Sark for so many reasons.

There were also many favorable data points that were overwhelmingly positive, and a lot of supposedly smart people overlooked those facts and memorialized their idiocy for eternity. 

No one will have the stage set up like VY had.

USC was the 2 time defending National Champions w/ 2 Heisman Trophy winners, and USC and Texas were ranked 1 and 2 in every poll, all year long. No question who the best 2 teams were. Texas v. Hollywood. The Rose Bowl.

No, they weren't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Doc Daneeka said:

Yes, they were. On a 34 game winning streak. 

No, they weren't.  In the BCS era, there was only one recognized national champion in NCAA football, and it was the BCS national champion.  Texas won the 2005 BCS national championship, USC won the 2004 BCS national championship and LSU won the 2003 BCS national championship.  The confusion stems from the fact that the BCS fucked up royally in 2003 when they put ou in the BCS championship game against LSU after getting completely fuck stomped in the Big XII championship game.  That BCS championship game should have been between LSU and USC, but it wasn't, and LSU won.  USC got their revenge against ou the following year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 83Horn said:

No, they weren't.  In the BCS era, there was only one recognized national champion in NCAA football, and it was the BCS national champion.  Texas won the 2005 BCS national championship, USC won the 2004 BCS national championship and LSU won the 2003 BCS national championship.  The confusion stems from the fact that the BCS fucked up royally in 2003 when they put ou in the BCS championship game against LSU after getting completely fuck stomped in the Big XII championship game.  That BCS championship game should have been between LSU and USC, but it wasn't, and LSU won.  USC got their revenge against ou the following year.

Says who? Only the coaches’ poll was obligated to choose the BCS winner.

IMG_6363.jpeg

Edited by Doc Daneeka
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Doc Daneeka said:

Says who?

IMG_6363.jpeg

The AP poll was irrelevant in naming the national champions.  As stated in my previous reply, the only official national champion for football during the BCS era was the BCS champion, and USC did not win BCS championship two years in a row.  They were no more national champions in 2003 than Central Florida was national champions back in 2017, or whenever it was that they went undefeated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 83Horn said:

The AP poll was irrelevant in naming the national champions.  As stated in my previous reply, the only official national champion for football during the BCS era was the BCS champion, and USC did not win BCS championship two years in a row.  They were no more national champions in 2003 than Central Florida was national champions back in 2017, or whenever it was that they went undefeated.

Says who? Your previous reply also lacked support. Who says the AP poll doesn’t count? Be specific.

There was no “official” National champion and only the coaches’ poll was obligated to vote for the BCS winner. 

You’re just making up stuff. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 83Horn said:

The AP poll was irrelevant in naming the national champions.  As stated in my previous reply, the only official national champion for football during the BCS era was the BCS champion, and USC did not win BCS championship two years in a row.  They were no more national champions in 2003 than Central Florida was national champions back in 2017, or whenever it was that they went undefeated.

 

IMG_6364.jpeg

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2003 was a split national championship.  The AP national championship was just as valid as the Coaches Poll, because there was nothing official about the Coaches Poll.

One could argue that USC had 1.5 championships, I guess, but to argue that they only had 1 is to really not understand the state of college football at that time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 83Horn said:

The AP poll was irrelevant in naming the national champions.  As stated in my previous reply, the only official national champion for football during the BCS era was the BCS champion, and USC did not win BCS championship two years in a row.  They were no more national champions in 2003 than Central Florida was national champions back in 2017, or whenever it was that they went undefeated.

r35gdg4prcz11.jpg

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...