Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 9/23/2024 at 12:59 AM, WinningIsHard said:

This part made me LOL. For the first 2 or 3 years this board hated that sark was the OC. He couldn’t handle doing both jobs, he was in over his head, sarklostagain needed to focus on being HC. I’m not saying you were one of those assholes but there were a lot of those assholes on here. 

Expand  

There were many here against Sark for so many reasons.

There were also many favorable data points that were overwhelmingly positive, and a lot of supposedly smart people overlooked those facts and memorialized their idiocy for eternity. 

  On 9/23/2024 at 1:13 AM, WelfareBuysMyWeed said:

Re: VY being the greatest ever

the thing about that is the circumstance which he delivered. It's not something that's really fair to other QBs, because they don't get to pick their challenger, but VY had an all-time great foe to conquer, which is exactly why his heroics are so memorable. It's not just that VY was amazing at what he did, he did it against the "greatest of all time" USC. Arch and Quinn don't have a foe like that to vanquish, because USC's reputation wasn't built in a single year. It was a multi-year dynasty that was looking like the best ever. The closest you could get would be Quinn beating Saban in Tuscaloosa, but that wasn't for all the marbles. Georgia today doesn't have the mystique that 2005 USC had. There's simply no all-time villains for our current QBs to slay. Even if quinn or arch winds up winning the title and heisman, it still can't compare to what VY did because it felt like VY single-handedly dismantled a dynasty. USC has never been the same since that night.

Expand  

No one will have the stage set up like VY had.

USC was the 2 time defending National Champions w/ 2 Heisman Trophy winners, and USC and Texas were ranked 1 and 2 in every poll, all year long. No question who the best 2 teams were. Texas v. Hollywood. The Rose Bowl.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
  On 9/23/2024 at 10:17 PM, PTINS said:

There were many here against Sark for so many reasons.

There were also many favorable data points that were overwhelmingly positive, and a lot of supposedly smart people overlooked those facts and memorialized their idiocy for eternity. 

No one will have the stage set up like VY had.

USC was the 2 time defending National Champions w/ 2 Heisman Trophy winners, and USC and Texas were ranked 1 and 2 in every poll, all year long. No question who the best 2 teams were. Texas v. Hollywood. The Rose Bowl.

Expand  

No, they weren't.

Posted
  On 9/23/2024 at 10:29 PM, Doc Daneeka said:

Yes, they were. On a 34 game winning streak. 

Expand  

No, they weren't.  In the BCS era, there was only one recognized national champion in NCAA football, and it was the BCS national champion.  Texas won the 2005 BCS national championship, USC won the 2004 BCS national championship and LSU won the 2003 BCS national championship.  The confusion stems from the fact that the BCS fucked up royally in 2003 when they put ou in the BCS championship game against LSU after getting completely fuck stomped in the Big XII championship game.  That BCS championship game should have been between LSU and USC, but it wasn't, and LSU won.  USC got their revenge against ou the following year.

Posted (edited)
  On 9/23/2024 at 10:36 PM, 83Horn said:

No, they weren't.  In the BCS era, there was only one recognized national champion in NCAA football, and it was the BCS national champion.  Texas won the 2005 BCS national championship, USC won the 2004 BCS national championship and LSU won the 2003 BCS national championship.  The confusion stems from the fact that the BCS fucked up royally in 2003 when they put ou in the BCS championship game against LSU after getting completely fuck stomped in the Big XII championship game.  That BCS championship game should have been between LSU and USC, but it wasn't, and LSU won.  USC got their revenge against ou the following year.

Expand  

Says who? Only the coaches’ poll was obligated to choose the BCS winner.

IMG_6363.jpeg

Edited by Doc Daneeka
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
  On 9/23/2024 at 10:37 PM, Doc Daneeka said:

Says who?

IMG_6363.jpeg

Expand  

The AP poll was irrelevant in naming the national champions.  As stated in my previous reply, the only official national champion for football during the BCS era was the BCS champion, and USC did not win BCS championship two years in a row.  They were no more national champions in 2003 than Central Florida was national champions back in 2017, or whenever it was that they went undefeated.

Posted
  On 9/23/2024 at 10:42 PM, 83Horn said:

The AP poll was irrelevant in naming the national champions.  As stated in my previous reply, the only official national champion for football during the BCS era was the BCS champion, and USC did not win BCS championship two years in a row.  They were no more national champions in 2003 than Central Florida was national champions back in 2017, or whenever it was that they went undefeated.

Expand  

Says who? Your previous reply also lacked support. Who says the AP poll doesn’t count? Be specific.

There was no “official” National champion and only the coaches’ poll was obligated to vote for the BCS winner. 

You’re just making up stuff. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
  On 9/23/2024 at 10:42 PM, 83Horn said:

The AP poll was irrelevant in naming the national champions.  As stated in my previous reply, the only official national champion for football during the BCS era was the BCS champion, and USC did not win BCS championship two years in a row.  They were no more national champions in 2003 than Central Florida was national champions back in 2017, or whenever it was that they went undefeated.

Expand  

 

IMG_6364.jpeg

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

2003 was a split national championship.  The AP national championship was just as valid as the Coaches Poll, because there was nothing official about the Coaches Poll.

One could argue that USC had 1.5 championships, I guess, but to argue that they only had 1 is to really not understand the state of college football at that time.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
  On 9/23/2024 at 10:42 PM, 83Horn said:

The AP poll was irrelevant in naming the national champions.  As stated in my previous reply, the only official national champion for football during the BCS era was the BCS champion, and USC did not win BCS championship two years in a row.  They were no more national champions in 2003 than Central Florida was national champions back in 2017, or whenever it was that they went undefeated.

Expand  

r35gdg4prcz11.jpg

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 1
Posted

excellent

good to hear

and i hope he chewed ass in the locker room over PENALTIES PENALTIES PENALTIES

the game was called equally....  by the book

we have been blessed this season with few drops before today

and the fumbles were very close to not being so

but one thing we have some control over is the laundry

playing in january requires a cleanup on aisle 7

chew ass sark

give 'em hell and make 'em eat shit

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
  On 9/29/2024 at 4:58 AM, Hagbard Celine said:

excellent

good to hear

and i hope he chewed ass in the locker room over PENALTIES PENALTIES PENALTIES

the game was called equally....  by the book

we have been blessed this season with few drops before today

and the fumbles were very close to not being so

but one thing we have some control over is the laundry

playing in january requires a cleanup on aisle 7

chew ass sark

give 'em hell and make 'em eat shit

Expand  

You want him to tell the players the game was called equally or you actually believe the game was called equally? 

Posted
  On 9/29/2024 at 10:56 AM, GTJ1982 said:

You want him to tell the players the game was called equally or you actually believe the game was called equally? 

Expand  

i need to rewatch the game so i can pay attention to line play, but in real time, based on the replays, it looked to me like all the flags on us were by the book

i can't answer your question without more data

Posted (edited)
  On 9/30/2024 at 2:38 AM, LTtxfan said:

No doubt Sark was frustrated yesterday.  But I did like his perspective about facing some adversity and how that was good for this team.  

 

Expand  

I wasn’t a math major, but does new math say that 13 is less than 13?

fuck, I meant to quote the post above that.  I guess I wasn’t a social media major either.

Edited by NeverMarryAStripper
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
  On 9/23/2024 at 10:36 PM, 83Horn said:

No, they weren't.  In the BCS era, there was only one recognized national champion in NCAA football, and it was the BCS national champion.

Expand  

This is simply not true. When did you start watching college football? 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
  On 10/2/2024 at 3:22 PM, Gandalfish said:

Could we get a transcript of this 🙏

stuck at the paywall.

Expand  

If you're using chrome (at least on Win 10/11), the "Just Read" extension not only cleans up horrible layouts and colors, but also ignores most paywalls. Worth a try.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
  On 10/2/2024 at 3:22 PM, Gandalfish said:

Could we get a transcript of this 🙏

stuck at the paywall.

Expand  
  Reveal hidden contents

archive.is is your friend.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
  On 10/10/2024 at 4:20 PM, Doc Daneeka said:

Because it’s a chickenshit thing to be doing. However “amusing” or “salacious” you find it, it’s just straight up chickenshit. And pretty fucking oblivious to irony. 

Expand  

This is where I am.

Keep it to yourself especially when "it has nothing to do with you".

Edited by Davis Lane

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...