Jump to content

Trump Impeachment 2: Insurrection Boogaloo


Sawbonz

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, B00M said:

Of course his defense can't just say when trump called for the NG. Must be damning.

He never did.   Never called for the NG.

 

The acting SecDef delayed it and never called for it.

 

An undersecretary of the Army finally ignored the chain of command and did it.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, tantric superman said:

What's that?

Oh it's Latin, isn't it?

That's Latin, darlin', evidently @Bozo_Casanova here's an educated man. Now I really hate him. 

In answer to the question, I don't really think this is something to which res ipsa would apply.  You really need to prove the causal connection.

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ghost of LL said:

That's Latin, darlin', evidently @Bozo_Casanova here's an educated man. Now I really hate him. 

In answer to the question, I don't really think this is something to which res ipsa would apply.  You really need to prove the causal connection.

 

I had a few casual connections in my day.

Wait, what?

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, deech said:

They can't impeach the President because he's not the President anymore, but they should have spent weeks and months developing evidence.  Love the stupidity.

This is the Racehorse Haynes tactic:

 

Say you sue me because you claim my dog bit you. Well now, this is my defense: My dog doesn't bite. And second, in the alternative, my dog was tied up that night. And third, I don't believe you really got bit. And fourth, I don't have a dog.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Ghost of LL said:

That's Latin, darlin', evidently @Bozo_Casanova here's an educated man. Now I really hate him. 

In answer to the question, I don't really think this is something to which res ipsa would apply.  You really need to prove the causal connection.

 

@Bozo_Casanovaand his smooth condescension is the big giveaway of his intellectual superiority to mere mortals like me. 

And to expand up your answer, res ipsa loquitur is more of a tort concept in the United States, not criminal (exceptions apply of course). But this is not a criminal trial, so . . . why not. 

Excellent issue spotting BC. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else ever dream of a plume of Novichok A-234 wafting into a Republican Cloakroom filled with McCarthy, Scalise, Jordan, Gaetz, Nunes, Gohmert, MTG, Stefanik, GunTits, Cawthorn, Roy, Cruz, Hawley, Graham, McConnell, Cornyn, Thune, Ernst, Cotton, Blackburn, Scott, Lee, Johnson, Tuberville, Inhofe and Kennedy? 

No??? Just me???  Oh, no reason ... never mind.   Guess I just need to stop watching the impeachment proceedings ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...