Jump to content

Trump Impeachment 2: Insurrection Boogaloo

Sawbonz

By Sawbonz
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

immamac
immamac

Fuck everyone in the senate. Trash american government for trash americans.  If you are a longhorn and support this, you need to find another site. I'm done fucking around with this absolute garb

tx 3 putt
tx 3 putt

he needs to be punished, not rewarded 

JohnnyRage
JohnnyRage

I’m 44 years old and have never been a member of a political party nor do I have a desire. But listening to this, God damnit, If I have to pick a fucking side and wear a badge upon my sleeve, I choose

Posted Images

Hagbard Celine

Hagbard Celine 10901

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Longhorn Fever said:

So basically, according to the Republicans are saying is this crime should not be punished because he only has another week left in office. Hmmm, so if a school principal assaults a child a week before he is due to retire he should be allowed to finish out the school year. Sounds about right...

the current talking points have transitioned to:

- kumbaya

- don't poke the kraken

- political pettiness

- there's only a week left

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Lobo

Guest Lobo

Posted
Posted (edited)

Trumpers in January of 2020:  "You can't impeach him unless it's a specific federal law he violated!  High crimes and misdemeanors?  Name one!" 

Trumpers in January of 2021 after reading that inciting a riot and insurrection against the government is not only a federal crime, it's spelled out in the Constitution and is literally one of the oldest laws we have in this country, "Okay, well...let's go back to the Ukrainian thing then."  

Also, any you attorneys wanna weigh in on how strong the defense of, "There's only a week left" is?  I'm sure that worked elegantly for Germany in April of 1945.  Look, it's April 30th---he'll probably kill himself soon, we're gonna surrender in a week anyways, do we need to go through with the whole invasion/occupation thing?  

Edited by Lobo
Link to comment
Share on other sites
AnTiM

AnTiM 1669

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Queen Bitch said:

Goddamn, it is incredibly embarrassing every time a Texas politician speaks. Can y’all stop electing so many fuckin bozos?

Hopefully that will happen when some of these republicans get their asses booted out of office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
conVINCEd

conVINCEd 21469

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Queen Bitch said:

Goddamn, it is incredibly embarrassing every time a Texas politician speaks. Can y’all stop electing so many fuckin bozos?

I would love to tell you that it’s just “East Texas gonna East Texas,” but unfortunately are senators are fucking morons as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hookah Horns

Hookah Horns 3083

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Queen Bitch said:

Goddamn, it is incredibly embarrassing every time a Texas politician speaks. Can y’all stop electing so many fuckin bozos?

It seriously makes us look terrible. Especially Gohmert's regarded ass. Rural Texas is the worst. Can't wait until this state inevitably turns blue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugo Stiglitz

Hugo Stiglitz 23367

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

Exactly. He’s not capable. If you don’t get that then you haven’t figured him out. You still don’t understand him. And that’s sad because he’s so easy to understand. 

Trump always runs away in the end.  He’s a coward and resignation is the only way he’s going to survive past the 20th. I wouldn’t put money on it though b/c he’s really fucking stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
elfenix

elfenix 34331

Posted
Posted
Just now, Hookah Horns said:

How do we square this with the reporting that Mitch supports impeachment? Is there a another reason why he wouldn't convene? 

push the impeachment into the biden admin to screw up how quickly biden can start working, also lets cruz, hawley, etc., whine about trump not even being in office anymore

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TexasIsBetter

TexasIsBetter 275

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Hookah Horns said:

How do we square this with the reporting that Mitch supports impeachment? Is there a another reason why he wouldn't convene? 

those reports are bullshit? Mitch sending a message to Trump that he needs to consider resignation? McConnell is an obsequious coward just like the rest of these GOP fucks

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SquishMitten

SquishMitten 10422

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Hookah Horns said:

How do we square this with the reporting that Mitch supports impeachment? Is there a another reason why he wouldn't convene? 

Because in a year or two, 1) he can say he supported it, and 2) by not reconvening, he doesn't have to deal with the fallout from actually bringing it.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 85451

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, PenelopeWitherspoon said:
4 minutes ago, Hookah Horns said:
How do we square this with the reporting that Mitch supports impeachment? Is there a another reason why he wouldn't convene? 

Doesn't it have to be unanimous to.bring them back early? Also, might give him more time behind the scenes to get more to vote to impeach or to abstain all together.

There's a 2004 provision that the Majority and Minority Leader can agree to bring them back without unanimous consent.  But looks like McConnell blew that up.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Post Oak

Post Oak 20254

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Hookah Horns said:

How do we square this with the reporting that Mitch supports impeachment? Is there a another reason why he wouldn't convene? 

He can still do it but he wants to throw this monkey wrench into Bidens first 100 days and let it distract.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hookah Horns

Hookah Horns 3083

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, PenelopeWitherspoon said:
5 minutes ago, Hookah Horns said:
How do we square this with the reporting that Mitch supports impeachment? Is there a another reason why he wouldn't convene? 

Doesn't it have to be unanimous to.bring them back early? Also, might give him more time behind the scenes to get more to vote to impeach or to abstain all together.

My understanding is that, under the rule Schumer is trying to use, the only consent needed is McConnell's. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 85451

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, elfenix said:

raskin bringing heat

This dude lost his 25 year old son, survived an armed mob storming the Capitol and is an impeachment manager. All in the same fucking year.  And the year is 13 days old. 

Edited by Js1
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
A-Tex Devil

A-Tex Devil 2451

Posted
Posted (edited)

I'm convinced that Gaetz is going to be the one to successfully take up the Trumpist mantle.  He has bought in more than Cruz and Hawley and he has the "he talks like us" idiocy as well to go along with no Ivy league taint like Hawley and Cruz have. 

Edited by A-Tex Devil
  • Rage+1 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...