Jump to content

All Encompassing Mortgage and Real Estate Thread


UTPhil2006

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Dbeasy said:

These massive insurance price increases push down real estate prices. If it doesn’t get under control soon, we have a serious serious problem.

Not sure I agree with this one, either.  I think the rise in insurance cost will be changing the cost/benefit in certain areas but Austin should be a winner there compared to Houston (hurricanes) and Dallas (the enormous sucking due to proximity to Oklahoma).

Also, I’m not seeing any health insurers struggling to make a profit.  
 

3 hours ago, Dbeasy said:

1. Elon - he will single handedly lift Central Texas real estate over the next 10 years.

Be honest, you drive a Cybertruck, right? 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, horn4life said:

Honestly I hadn't really thought about a more weighted downturn in Austin because of tech.  I guess I have lived here so long I don't even really think of it as a "class" as it's so much of the Austin landscape.  But if Austin falls... What about all the ticks that have been sucking on the big dog, like Buda, Cedar Park/Leander, Georgetown? Are their markets not also largely dependent on tech's rise or fall?

 

 

24 minutes ago, LCHorn said:

Not sure I agree with this one (in that a recession hurts tech worse than other industries)-care to elaborate?

I come out of high tech management and Austin historically had been a weak tech location as compared to other areas around the country. Dallas actually for many years had better tech than Austin, believe it or not. But then in the 2000's+ Austin really started to get much more solid in tech. Part of the reason for this was the creation of new VC funds in Austin after Austin Ventures imploded.  Plus, Austin got discovered as being hip due to SXSW, etc.  So, the tech industry here has really started to become a solid, but still behind the bay area, and spots on the East Coast. The long-term outlook is very good.

If you dig into tech here a bit deeper, it's still driven today quite a bit by being the 2nd/3rd/4th location for tech companies on the west coast. They setup here as a lower cost location to supplement other higher cost centers. Some of those cost advances are waning. When recessions hit, 2nd locations are always hit harder. Whenever I went thru a recession over the years, I'd always cut other locations ahead of key, prime locations, for many reasons. Austin actually has never seen what a recession will do to it because of tech, because the tech industry here didn't get strong enough until after the last recession in 2008. People don't know what's coming, if we do hit a hard recession. Now of course the activity by Apple and Elon will blunt the impact, but even they will put the brakes on activity during a recession.

The surrounding suburbs will also feel it. You'd be amazed at how many tech industry workers live in Buda, Leander, etc. The State government and University will also limit the damage obviously.

 

15 minutes ago, LCHorn said:

Not sure I agree with this one, either.  I think the rise in insurance cost will be changing the cost/benefit in certain areas but Austin should be a winner there compared to Houston (hurricanes) and Dallas (the enormous sucking due to proximity to Oklahoma).

Also, I’m not seeing any health insurers struggling to make a profit.  
 

Be honest, you drive a Cybertruck, right? 😉

I can't talk personally to the health insurers but got off the phone yesterday with a health insurance broker who told me the whole industry is in complete turmoil.  I could go into more detail on the conversation, but you can google it. They are making money because they all raised rates dramatically.  The fear is that costs are spiraliing out of control so fast they may keep having to do it.

I can't stand Elon Musk. I think the Cybertruck is the dumbest vehicle created in history.  But, you have to acknowledge when the world's richest man wants to spend a lot of money in your city and build a lot of businesses.  If you look at the history of cities around the country, many of them were "made" by one or a few key companies or people.  For example, Portland was made by Nike, Tektronix and a few other companies. Elon's impact here, if he doesn't waver, will be substantial over time.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, LCHorn said:

Not sure I agree with this one (in that a recession hurts tech worse than other industries)-care to elaborate?

I thought the same thing, I guess it depends on the definition of "tech".  I work in a technology realm but it is very hardware oriented -- steel, copper, magnets.  We are likely much more susceptible to economic pressures related to a reduction of imported goods, etc. than the average social media company.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting takes bay all - Interesting to consider the "satellite location" aspect of a tech downturn.  I was thinking more related to the super elevated valuations in the NASDAQ effecting tech more, and that housing markets that rise highest, tend to pull back the most percentage wise.  

The one thing I will say that if I were advising anyone, especially younger folks without kids, is look CAREFULLY at school districts when buying.  Simply as I remember the RE crash and it was fascinating to see the houses hold their value better, and turn more often in the better school districts.  If I am looking at two very similar houses, the ISD might be the deciding factor.  It's not a huge thing, but when you need to sell in a tough market you need every edge you can get.  And even in shitty markets parents are willing to spend a little more to get their kids a better education.  IMHO.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, UTPhil2006 said:

Them moving the target from 2.9 to 3.1 is prob the underlying reason for the jump(s)

Either that or because I touch myself. One or the other. 
oh well. I have no rate exposure right now. I have no upcoming rate exposure other than the deals we won’t do bc people won’t buy. It would have been really nice if that 6.1 national average didn’t turn into a 7.05 national average in 3 months after 100 bips of fed rate cuts, but it is what it is I guess. 
 

Edited by Wulaw Horn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Wulaw Horn said:

Because of course. 

This should be no surprise. I’ve been hinting at this for months. The yield curve was inverted and it MUST un-invert, which it finally did this week. 

I’ve personally felt that this switch in Fed thinking about 2025 was definitely going to happen because inflation data is still a bit high and the economy is still relatively strong. But things will likely change next year, and create new Fed views. 

If you dig deeper into the inflation data from the most recent report, it’s actually very good. Most categories are down into the 2% range. That leaves the incoming administration as the main influence for the economy and inflation. 

There is a ton of uncertainty over that. Trump has been throwing out all sorts of policies. My personal opinion is that excess government spending is the main inflationary item, so even if Trump uses tariffs and other inflationary policies, it will be offset by significant cuts in government spending, leading to a slowing of the economy and less inflation pressure. 

But because his policies are so radical, it could have very unintended effects, such as re-ignition of inflation. If I were a home buyer I would buy now. Why? Because not owning a home in a higher inflation environment is a financially very bad decision. Two, rates could end up higher to fight unintended inflation. Three, even if you lock in higher rates now, you can refinance later. This unidirectional option is a powerful financial tool for borrowers. 

In the tech company discussion above, tariffs aren’t the main influence on employment. All tech companies keep excess employment during good economic times. Why? 

They are hitting their numbers and want to spend money on various less critical projects and products to drive future growth. When times get tough, they all cut. It’s a formula used by every single tech company out there. 

For those companies that are growing spectacularly, obviously they don’t reduce headcount, but they do slow hiring of planned growth. That could be the scenario with Apple. Austin has priced in the opening of the Apple campus and a certain number of employees. That growth plan may change. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I made my arguments pretty clear a month ago.  Markets do not like instability, they like predictability.  Try to find a post election market collapse. You can't.  Because elections give clarity going forward.  Unpredictability, makes any reasonable forecasting extremely difficult.  The stock market is a forward looking beast, and I nearly came in yesterday saying how well I thought the markets were reacting to exactly what I expected from Powell.  A rate cut, followed by a speech talking about the strength of the economy, concerns about hiring, but no need for action at current levels.  The kill shot was when he said "it could take two more years to get inflation under control." (might be paraphrasing here)

I actually put my money where my mouth was a month ago, and sold off some of my Palantir, and put 1/3 of my risky portfolio into UVIX.  I also rebalanced the 401K Monday and shifted it from 90% stocks, to about 20% stock funds and 80% into bonds.  That actually went up yesterday as well, which was amazing.  So while I am not cutting and running from the stock market, I feel that it's wise to assume extreme unpredictability in the first few months of 2025 as political rhetoric becomes policy (or doesn't). That's the unpredictability part of the equation.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oops hit send accidentally - 

Valuations of stocks are sky high, and economic optimism is raging.  But if in two months the tariff and deficit side of the coin is played then that means increased inflation.  Massive increase in the deficit (which is what happened last time) is inflationary, whether it's spending or tax cuts.  At this point I simply don't see anything but a collision between what Trump has promised and what he needs to deliver. One promise on immigration is going to squeeze employment in an inflationary manner more than we have ever seen in the home construction industry.  Unless I am mistaken and the labor force building homes, at least in Texas are non-english speakers.  I don't think I have had any work done on my house other than AC that was by predominantly english speakers.

It may be great in 6 months, but I am hedging big that history repeats itself, and the unpredictability of the marketplace in so many areas will keep rates high as folks seek safe haven of US treasuries.  I think we are in for a period of Governmental disruption the likes of nothing we have ever seen.  I simply fail to see how such disruption, even if wildly successful, is going to lead to lower interest rates that folks were predicting for 2025 in September.  

But what I do predict is that buyers will indeed start buying again reluctantly.  As they realize that the Fed is not going to be able to push rates lower, combined with a time sense of urgency among those who may have been waiting for rates to fall.  And if the Stock market keeps climbing I believe that will help push net worth of potential buyers into the market as well. Not to the level that low interest rates would, but a gradual increase, slow but steady (too slow and unsteady for the industry).  First time buyers will be fucked because they don't have money in the markets to see their down payment funds surging.   I go back to what a lot of you guys got pissed at me for.  The folks that wil make the most money in home industry will be folks that can convince buyers that these rates probably are not coming down much.  How many buyers who really want to buy will wait 6 months to a year for the HOPE of a half point decrease?   

Trump for example just endorsed no longer having a debt ceiling. The bond market might view that as potentially inflationary.

Hope I am wrong and my hedge is just a safety play.  But I did not follow my gut on Covid and I literally missed out on an easy fortune.

Edited by horn4life
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is my wag under Trump.

We all know Trump will do anything and everything to juice the economy for the next four years, so that he can take credit for it. But, there are conflicting policies right now that would significantly hurt the economy.

He will definitely extend the tax cuts. That’s a given. But letting Elon loose to reduce spending by any significant amount? The only thing they will do is make sure the spending cuts take effect four to five years from now, so that it doesn’t torpedo the economy in the next four years. He will then make a bunch of speeches about getting government spending and deficits under control while not actually delivering anything. At this point Elon will realize he’s been snookered. Elon actually believes he will accomplish something.

To be fair, they will fix social security and medicare by extending the retirement age, reducing benefits, and modestly increasing the SS cutoff point.

Then, he will implement some lame tariffs with a bunch of loopholes to make it seem like he did something when he won’t have. Same with immigration. Same with every policy. Just like his first term, he will talk a big game but actually not deliver any real impact.

So then inflation will creep up because he’s really done nothing. He will blame Biden and let inflation run a little hot, which it needs to do in order for debt as a percentage of gdp to get under control. 

By year 3-4 of his administration, the inflation effects will put the economy in danger, finally slowing inflation and forcing rates cuts. The rate cuts will get him through the end of his presidency. 

He will have served another four years and really not done anything other than benefit from the current government overspending that is partially responsible for driving the economy.  Our debt level will be scary large for the next administration. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dbeasy said:

Here is my wag under Trump.

We all know Trump will do anything and everything to juice the economy for the next four years, so that he can take credit for it. But, there are conflicting policies right now that would significantly hurt the economy.

He will definitely extend the tax cuts. That’s a given. But letting Elon loose to reduce spending by any significant amount? The only thing they will do is make sure the spending cuts take effect four to five years from now, so that it doesn’t torpedo the economy in the next four years. He will then make a bunch of speeches about getting government spending and deficits under control while not actually delivering anything. At this point Elon will realize he’s been snookered. Elon actually believes he will accomplish something.

To be fair, they will fix social security and medicare by extending the retirement age, reducing benefits, and modestly increasing the SS cutoff point.

Then, he will implement some lame tariffs with a bunch of loopholes to make it seem like he did something when he won’t have. Same with immigration. Same with every policy. Just like his first term, he will talk a big game but actually not deliver any real impact.

So then inflation will creep up because he’s really done nothing. He will blame Biden and let inflation run a little hot, which it needs to do in order for debt as a percentage of gdp to get under control. 

By year 3-4 of his administration, the inflation effects will put the economy in danger, finally slowing inflation and forcing rates cuts. The rate cuts will get him through the end of his presidency. 

He will have served another four years and really not done anything other than benefit from the current government overspending that is partially responsible for driving the economy.  Our debt level will be scary large for the next administration. 

Debt level is such a joke now a days as no one has any interest in a balanced budget. Just keep printing money and kicking that can down the line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so yesterday, I show a house, lock up, chat with my client a bit in the driveway, and leave.

2 hours later I get a call from the listing agent...I'm the last person to use the lockbox, and I left the house wide open and the lockbox open.  didn't even close the doors.

I call my client.   Do you recall me locking up?   Of course, she says.  You locked the doors and then returned the key to the lockbox while we were chatting.


I don't know what the fuck happened, but some agent out their thinks i'm an irresponsible asshole.  I will stipulate to being an asshole, but I'm at least responsible. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Gil Bang said:

so yesterday, I show a house, lock up, chat with my client a bit in the driveway, and leave.

2 hours later I get a call from the listing agent...I'm the last person to use the lockbox, and I left the house wide open and the lockbox open.  didn't even close the doors.

I call my client.   Do you recall me locking up?   Of course, she says.  You locked the doors and then returned the key to the lockbox while we were chatting.


I don't know what the fuck happened, but some agent out their thinks i'm an irresponsible asshole.  I will stipulate to being an asshole, but I'm at least responsible. 

 

Doesn't it register when you enter and leave along with your name and info? Our SUPRA boxes do here 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, UTPhil2006 said:

Doesn't it register when you enter and leave along with your name and info? Our SUPRA boxes do here 

Yes, ought to be able to prove it with a 10 second check of the log, unless the selling agent cheaped out with some lame box that isn’t internet connected. In which case the seller agent and seller are learning a valuable lesson about saving $100 and potentially losing thousands. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Almost half of Americans don’t have a dedicated retirement savings account, according to the Federal Reserve’s 2022 Survey of Consumer Finances. The survey, which includes the latest government data, reveals only 54.4% of American families reported having dedicated retirement accounts such as a 401(k) or IRA.      

On average, Social Security is considered to replace around 40% of a person's pre-retirement income, meaning it typically makes up about 40% of a retiree's total retirement income. 

As the median 401(k) is less than 90 K, most retirees will be depending heavily on Social Security (and the sale of their home if they have problems meeting their nut on Social Security). I’m not sure the political will of our country will accept more tax cuts to rich people at the same time we cut Social Security benefits to the olds.  If there is a line in the sand for Democrats, that would be it, and I don’t think Republicans who wanna be reelected are going to go all in on reducing Social Security and Medicare.  

American voters are generally fine with fucking other people, but not so keen on fucking themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dbeasy said:

Yes, ought to be able to prove it with a 10 second check of the log, unless the selling agent cheaped out with some lame box that isn’t internet connected. In which case the seller agent and seller are learning a valuable lesson about saving $100 and potentially losing thousands. 

He's in San Diego IIRC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we use sentrilock, which, IMO, is a superior system.   Orange County and I.E. use Supra.   No idea what they are doing in Los Angeles. 

The advantage to Sentrilock is the keypad.  I can give vendors, appraisers, whatever, a "1 day code" which they can enter in the keypad to get access.  The code is generated by the phone app. 

In this case, I was the last agent who opened the lockbox per the entry log.  BUT, if she had given somebody a 1 day code, that entry won't show until the next sentri subscriber opens the box.  The lockbox communicates with the app, and tells the app "hey, I was opened with a code entry at 2:24 PM (or whenever).  Once the box communicates that with somebody's app, the listing agent's log will be updated.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dbeasy said:

Yes, ought to be able to prove it with a 10 second check of the log, unless the selling agent cheaped out with some lame box that isn’t internet connected. In which case the seller agent and seller are learning a valuable lesson about saving $100 and potentially losing thousands. 

these boxes are NOT internet connected.  They communicate via bluetooth to a subscribers phone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Gil Bang said:

these boxes are NOT internet connected.  They communicate via bluetooth to a subscribers phone. 

That’s what I mean. The box tells the phone who entered, what time, and left and the time. 

Edited by Dbeasy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/13/2024 at 10:12 AM, Dbeasy said:

 

I come out of high tech management and Austin historically had been a weak tech location as compared to other areas around the country. Dallas actually for many years had better tech than Austin, believe it or not. But then in the 2000's+ Austin really started to get much more solid in tech. Part of the reason for this was the creation of new VC funds in Austin after Austin Ventures imploded.  Plus, Austin got discovered as being hip due to SXSW, etc.  So, the tech industry here has really started to become a solid, but still behind the bay area, and spots on the East Coast. The long-term outlook is very good.

If you dig into tech here a bit deeper, it's still driven today quite a bit by being the 2nd/3rd/4th location for tech companies on the west coast. They setup here as a lower cost location to supplement other higher cost centers. Some of those cost advances are waning. When recessions hit, 2nd locations are always hit harder. Whenever I went thru a recession over the years, I'd always cut other locations ahead of key, prime locations, for many reasons. Austin actually has never seen what a recession will do to it because of tech, because the tech industry here didn't get strong enough until after the last recession in 2008. People don't know what's coming, if we do hit a hard recession. Now of course the activity by Apple and Elon will blunt the impact, but even they will put the brakes on activity during a recession.

The surrounding suburbs will also feel it. You'd be amazed at how many tech industry workers live in Buda, Leander, etc. The State government and University will also limit the damage obviously.

 

I can't talk personally to the health insurers but got off the phone yesterday with a health insurance broker who told me the whole industry is in complete turmoil.  I could go into more detail on the conversation, but you can google it. They are making money because they all raised rates dramatically.  The fear is that costs are spiraliing out of control so fast they may keep having to do it.

I can't stand Elon Musk. I think the Cybertruck is the dumbest vehicle created in history.  But, you have to acknowledge when the world's richest man wants to spend a lot of money in your city and build a lot of businesses.  If you look at the history of cities around the country, many of them were "made" by one or a few key companies or people.  For example, Portland was made by Nike, Tektronix and a few other companies. Elon's impact here, if he doesn't waver, will be substantial over time.

This is a really good post and you are absolutely right, but “if he doesn’t waver” is doing some very heavy lifting at the end. 
Austin’s biggest issues in no particular order are 

1) Texas <25 brain drain

2) Water scarcity 

3) affordability and its impact on public sector employees and young families

4) loss of young families in urban core, and negative feedback loop w/r/t public school funding

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, UTPhil2006 said:

It's not sustainable to have the market this high currently

Or perhaps the problem isn't with lending, but rather supply? Home building never recovered after 2008, and any excess value is immediately captured by shareholders and investors rather than going to the people buying a home.

Plus, if/when we do mass deportations that's gonna really fuck up build timelines

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Captainant said:

Or perhaps the problem isn't with lending, but rather supply? Home building never recovered after 2008, and any excess value is immediately captured by shareholders and investors rather than going to the people buying a home.

Plus, if/when we do mass deportations that's gonna really fuck up build timelines

Can you provide real life anecdotes to the investors buying up everything? Seems it was pretty easy (you're welcome) to get in to your home with a great price and a great rate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, UTPhil2006 said:

Can you provide real life anecdotes to the investors buying up everything? Seems it was pretty easy (you're welcome) to get in to your home with a great price and a great rate. 

The houses were looking around at now were $300-400k in 2019, and all over $550k or $600k in 2024. Something has gotta be driving up those costs, 100% price growth in 5 years is outrageous and a strong indicator of artificial supply constraints - or demand boosting. Both of which are driven by price-insensitive investment buyers

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The movement of corporations into single family housing the last few years certainly has had some affect on demand.  I remember when folks were getting stupid high prices and saying, "How the fuck can an investor make money, when the gap between the potential rent for the house if $2400 and the note would be $4300?  Unless your paper losses are offset by income someplace else?  Who else but a corporation or extremely wealthy individual can repetitively invest in this manner, where the only seeming potential actual gain will take years to realize without massive continued appreciation?

Deportations will not only kill lead times, but increase the costs and put additional squeeze on homebuilders.  If I was a small to medium homebuilder looking forward, I would be scared shitless.  As rates are not coming down markedly anytime soon.  I could, of course, be wrong here, but it's hard to see the rays of light that are going to provide downward rate pressure at least in the near term. At the same time the supply side of the equation is the traditional mechanism to create downward pressure on pricing.  So we NEED builders to produce more homes!  But for the small and medium builders the risk/reward scenario is getting more, rather than less risky.  Would you guys agree or disagree with this statement?  Obviously you guys talk to builders all the time.

17 hours ago, UTPhil2006 said:

I know this isn't what you're getting at but the whole term "it could be a worse" is pretty outdated and this shows that. 
 

It's not sustainable to have the market this high currently 

Unfortunately I think the real estate business "herd" is going to be further thinned.  In the strong markets there are a lot of hangers on, that are not really making a good living in the business, but still producing enough income to make participation worthwhile.  Same with the marginal loan writers, appraisers, home inspectors, etc.  The industry my be only sustainable for the top tier of performers in 2025.  Mainly because emotionally buyers cling to a hope for a further rate reduction, that may not be around the corner.

But when you look back at the chart on rates you see the post RE collapse period from say 1990 and 2002 rates were in excess of 7% and the market was sustainable. Largely because that higher rate have become mentally acceptable to buyers.   I fervently hope that buyers capitulate and accept the higher for longer that appears to be the case on rates. Right now that's the best single hope I can point to in the marketplace.  RE is a great business, but you need to always have a fairly large war chest to come out the other side when things go south as they always do at some point on the graph.  The good news is, that on the backside of the downturns, the survivors usually really bank! 

****** One law I wish congress would consider this year might be something like a 100% tax credit on any capital gains going back 2 years(?) if those profits were part of a downpayment for a first time buyer.   Or come up with some other mechanism for younger first time buyers to create tax free investment wealth to help with down payments.  There would need to be some limits on income, but right now the first time buyers have the toughest path to ownership.  Anything that would help widen the base of potential buyers with adequate down payments would be good for the economy long term, good for families, and worth the cost the loss of cap gain revenue economically for the country IMHO.

Right now the combination of higher prices and higher rates is suffocating for many potential buyers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, horn4life said:

Or come up with some other mechanism for younger first time buyers to create tax free investment wealth to help with down payments.  There would need to be some limits on income, but right now the first time buyers have the toughest path to ownership

Anecdotal, but that’s actually not the problem and it seems like policy makers make gestures in this direction because it SEEMS like it would be helpful.  I bet 75% or more of my purchase lending over the past two years has been to first-time homebuyers.  Caveat, I’m not stealing deals often from the KB Homes of the world and they are building the housing stock priced more affordably for working class first-time homebuyers and that are larger users of down-payment assistance, seller incentives and rate buydowns.  
 

Anyway, I can’t think of anything on the demand side that doesn’t have predictable consequences I don’t like.  Bear in mind, too, that a lot of the ways that the government addresses affordability end up a tax on middle-class or more mature buyers/borrowers, it just doesn’t get publicized that way.  That doesn’t make it a bad deal on the face, but it does give me a little heartburn knowing someone selling a home and buying a small upgrade is subsidizing a first-time homebuyer, and they are both otherwise identical in terms of wealth, income, and credit qualification.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, LCHorn said:

Anecdotal, but that’s actually not the problem and it seems like policy makers make gestures in this direction because it SEEMS like it would be helpful.  I bet 75% or more of my purchase lending over the past two years has been to first-time homebuyers.  Caveat, I’m not stealing deals often from the KB Homes of the world and they are building the housing stock priced more affordably for working class first-time homebuyers and that are larger users of down-payment assistance, seller incentives and rate buydowns.  
 

Anyway, I can’t think of anything on the demand side that doesn’t have predictable consequences I don’t like.  Bear in mind, too, that a lot of the ways that the government addresses affordability end up a tax on middle-class or more mature buyers/borrowers, it just doesn’t get publicized that way.  That doesn’t make it a bad deal on the face, but it does give me a little heartburn knowing someone selling a home and buying a small upgrade is subsidizing a first-time homebuyer, and they are both otherwise identical in terms of wealth, income, and credit qualification.  

I hear ya. But my thought is incentivizing investment in vehicles that have had good historical returns as potential future down payments for homes.  Sort of like they have 529 plans for education.  With the end game being a greater pool over time of actually qualified applicants.  Of course then we turn our heads back to supply... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, horn4life said:

But when you look back at the chart on rates you see the post RE collapse period from say 1990 and 2002 rates were in excess of 7% and the market was sustainable. Largely because that higher rate have become mentally acceptable to buyers.   I fervently hope that buyers capitulate and accept the higher for longer that appears to be the case on rates. Right now that's the best single hope I can point to in the marketplace.  

...

..

.

Right now the combination of higher prices and higher rates is suffocating for many potential buyers.

"Higher for longer" can go fuck themselves.  The market will remain dead as long as the forces of affordability remain high, relative to income:  high price plus high cost of capital. 

The Median Multiple between 1990-2002 plateaued at a level between 3.5x-4.0x, where 3.0 and under is considered affordable, and 3.1 to 4.0 is mildly unaffordable.  Today, that figure is trending close to 6.0 or worse in many markets.

Inventory in many markets has returned to 4 month averages, with 1/4 of the top 200 DMAs now returning to 2019-era inventories, and the NAR is marking down 2024 as its worst year in sales volume since 2008:

image.png.85b020e0c26b6a5393d8672947d057f4.png

Homebuilders are fucked too-- they've posted more new, unsold inventory than any time since 2009.  They're running out of land near our largest employment centers at a time when enterprise executives and political incumbents are enforcing RTO policies, most of which seem to be leveraged RIF functions and do not offer relocation expense. 

I don't know how this trainwreck ends, but price, the US10Y, and wages seem to be immovable objects, and the average homebuyer is already broke and can't afford another dollar in their monthly coupon or rent check.  

Edited by Gravy Train
  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Gravy Train said:

"Higher for longer" can go fuck themselves.  The market will remain dead as long as the forces of affordability remain high, relative to income:  high price plus high cost of capital. 

The Median Multiple between 1990-2002 plateaued at a level between 3.5x-4.0x, where 3.0 and under is considered affordable, and 3.1 to 4.0 is mildly unaffordable.  Today, that figure is trending close to 6.0 or worse in many markets.

Inventory in many markets has returned to 4 month averages, with 1/4 of the top 200 DMAs now returning to 2019-era inventories, and the NAR is marking down 2024 as its worst year in sales volume since 2008:

image.png.85b020e0c26b6a5393d8672947d057f4.png

Homebuilders are fucked too-- they've posted more new, unsold inventory than any time since 2009.  They're running out of land near our largest employment centers at a time when enterprise executives and political incumbents are enforcing RTO policies, most of which seem to be leveraged RIF functions and do not offer relocation expense. 

I don't know how this trainwreck ends, but price, the US10Y, and wages seem to be immovable objects, and the average homebuyer is already broke and can't afford another dollar in their monthly coupon or rent check.  

Worst market ina generation tracks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just want to drop in to the circle jerk to thank @UTPhil2006 for working my refinance when a lot of the action happened during the last two holiday weeks. We were able to drop a point from when we bought our house over the summer through UWM. Dude is always ahead of the game - very good at walking through the process and letting me know what was coming ahead of time. He was also super patient while explaining things to me like I’m a 5 year old. Thanks dude!

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Etexhorn13 said:

Just want to drop in to the circle jerk to thank @UTPhil2006 for working my refinance when a lot of the action happened during the last two holiday weeks. We were able to drop a point from when we bought our house over the summer through UWM. Dude is always ahead of the game - very good at walking through the process and letting me know what was coming ahead of time. He was also super patient while explaining things to me like I’m a 5 year old. Thanks dude!

But did he leer at your wife's tits?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok I’ve been waiting for three things, and all three have happened. The yield curve uninverted, the commercial real estate defaults are soaring, and credit card defaults are soaring. This will result in major spending pullbacks to offset the current government overspending. Signs of a recession, job cuts, and more rate cuts ought to happen this year, dampening inflation fears. Finally! Now hopefully we don’t go into a deep recession.

https://www.newsweek.com/credit-card-defaults-skyrocket-americans-unable-pay-their-debts-2007843

https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1874574095104295155

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Dbeasy said:

Signs of a recession, job cuts, and more rate cuts ought to happen this year, dampening inflation fears.

Gimme a buyers market and 5%, and inshallah, me with dry powder coming into the second half of the year. I bought my current home in 2009 and I want to run that play again.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Dbeasy said:

Ok I’ve been waiting for three things, and all three have happened. The yield curve uninverted, the commercial real estate defaults are soaring, and credit card defaults are soaring. This will result in major spending pullbacks to offset the current government overspending. Signs of a recession, job cuts, and more rate cuts ought to happen this year, dampening inflation fears. Finally! Now hopefully we don’t go into a deep recession.

https://www.newsweek.com/credit-card-defaults-skyrocket-americans-unable-pay-their-debts-2007843

https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1874574095104295155

I still think it's more likely we end up at 5.5% conventional than 7.5%. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...