Jump to content

TEXAS QB TALK

LTtxfan

By LTtxfan
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

RGBIII
RGBIII
immamac
immamac

Yeah because bijan sucks and card is a noodle arm INT machine with small hands and the entire defense is a bunch of underweight and slow anemic players. The majority of this team is returning tal

Helobious
Helobious

I’ll say it again, players that want to transfer or have checked out on the team or don’t give a shit don’t run over two defenders on 4th down in a blowout to get in the end zone. All this “Casey is a

Posted Images

Auto Driller

Auto Driller 2504

Posted
Posted

It seems like Card doesn’t have good football instincts. In the first quarter against ULaLa it was 3rd and 7ish and he broke the pocket and could have easily gone for 10+ by just running straight up the field. Instead he turned parallel to the LOS at about 5 yards and got in a foot race towards the sideline with a couple of defenders. He made it in this case, but it just seems like he doesn’t see obvious plays when they’re there.

He is also solely responsible for 3 missed TD throws and arguably a 4th TD on the turnover. After that play, they zoomed in on Sark’s face and he asked someone through the headset “was there pressure or something?” Card has no pocket presence and just looks unnatural moving around with the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Juke_Em

Juke_Em 47

Posted
Posted

It should have been Casey's job to lose. Two years more experience and development is an advantage...especially if we're talking about just year 1 of a new coaching staff and system. 

Starting a freshman/RS QB is not ideal unless you have a really great team around him already and/or he is an elite recruit/prospect. Ehlinger started for 4 years so that QBs like Casey could afford to sit and not be rushed onto the field. Even if you like Card better long-term, it is better to have Casey get through the next 1-2 years so that Card can sit and develop before being expected to take over. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Funk Doctor Spock

Funk Doctor Spock 12190

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, MaybeACoordinator said:

Looks like a whisper campaign that Thompson has an attitude problem has started....Last week he was a locker room cancer, this week he's showing up late and 'doing himself no favors" off the field. 

Fuck. Just what we need. I had a feeling that dude wasn't going to just say ok I'll have to keep proving myself. That's great that he's being a bitch (allegedly). 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Duane Moore

Duane Moore 5237

Posted
Posted

I am really hesitant to crown a guy who came in and had success when the game was already out of reach, and QB play was not the reason we lost tonight, but I’d give Casey the start against Rice and Tech. Karic and Conner need to get some run as starters on the O-line as well. 

Sadly, I’m not sure we have anyone better waiting in the wings on D  

 


 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TX Wing Fan

TX Wing Fan 132

Posted
Posted

Current QB controversy kind of reminds me of David Ash vs Case McCoy. One has better measurables and probably a better long term upside, while the other has more "moxie" but not as much as arm strength. Both QBs that we have on the roster right now appear to be better than those two, but it seems like it's in part a similar dilemma.

Casey should at least get a chance to start, but I have a feeling that Sark's pride gets in the way and he sticks with Card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FORTY NINE TO ZERO

FORTY NINE TO ZERO 2652

Posted
Posted
Just now, Duane Moore said:

I am really hesitant to crown a guy who came in and had success when the game was already out of reach, and QB play was not the reason we lost tonight, but I’d give Casey the start against Rice and Tech. Karic and Conner need to get some run as starters on the O-line as well. 

Sadly, I’m not sure we have anyone better waiting in the wings on D  

 


 

Did we watch the same game?  QB is main reason we lost. 
 

defense sucked, but was holding its own the first half before running out of gas 

 

card was a complete disaster. 

  • Like 3
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BigHornedLurker

BigHornedLurker 1936

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Duane Moore said:

I am really hesitant to crown a guy who came in and had success when the game was already out of reach, and QB play was not the reason we lost tonight, but I’d give Casey the start against Rice and Tech. Karic and Conner need to get some run as starters on the O-line as well. 

Sadly, I’m not sure we have anyone better waiting in the wings on D  

 


 

Sark should have played him about a quarter and half earlier is my biggest gripe

Edited by BigHornedLurker
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Eskimohorn

Eskimohorn 5633

Posted
Posted
It should have been Casey's job to lose. Two years more experience and development is an advantage...especially if we're talking about just year 1 of a new coaching staff and system. 
Starting a freshman/RS QB is not ideal unless you have a really great team around him already and/or he is an elite recruit/prospect. Ehlinger started for 4 years so that QBs like Casey could afford to sit and not be rushed onto the field. Even if you like Card better long-term, it is better to have Casey get through the next 1-2 years so that Card can sit and develop before being expected to take over. 
 

Thats where I was at.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Texasrocks

Texasrocks 2133

Posted
Posted
Just now, TX Wing Fan said:

Current QB controversy kind of reminds me of David Ash vs Case McCoy. One has better measurables and probably a better long term upside, while the other has more "moxie" but not as much as arm strength. Both QBs that we have on the roster right now appear to be better than those two, but it seems like it's in part a similar dilemma.

Casey should at least get a chance to start, but I have a feeling that Sark's pride gets in the way and he sticks with Card.

Ummm... Ash had actual brain damage.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hookem48

hookem48 4687

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Juke_Em said:

It should have been Casey's job to lose. Two years more experience and development is an advantage...especially if we're talking about just year 1 of a new coaching staff and system. 

Starting a freshman/RS QB is not ideal unless you have a really great team around him already and/or he is an elite recruit/prospect. Ehlinger started for 4 years so that QBs like Casey could afford to sit and not be rushed onto the field. Even if you like Card better long-term, it is better to have Casey get through the next 1-2 years so that Card can sit and develop before being expected to take over. 

 

there's no fucking way in hell it was going to be anyone's job to lose when no one had run Sark's offense.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NorthLoop

NorthLoop 14190

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Xian said:

Did we watch the same game?  QB is main reason we lost. 
 

defense sucked, but was holding its own the first half before running out of gas 

 

card was a complete disaster. 

Seriously. I will put some blame on the offensive playcalling in the first half and the shitty OL play when we tried to run the ball. But Card was a frozen child out there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
touchthemonolith

touchthemonolith 646

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Xian said:

Did we watch the same game?  QB is main reason we lost. 
 

defense sucked, but was holding its own the first half before running out of gas 

 

card was a complete disaster. 

You think there's one "main reason" we lost that game? Pass protection was bad. Run blocking was bad. WRs were bad. QBs couldn't throw. We couldn't tackle. Our secondary got beat. Our defensive line got mauled. We played undisciplined. Our game planning and coaching was bad. 

Casey has earned the start going forward, but we didn't lose that game because of Hudson: we lost that game because we were awful.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
closetohumping

closetohumping 17438

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Xian said:

This.. 

7-3 last year and rice and ku got cancelled.  Do the math.  Andover of his losses was because he didn’t sub ingram out. Another. Anime overtime loss to the thieves.  First year staff with covid?   Don’t get me wrong fucj face had to go as recruiting went south but he was going to be 9-3 with a brand new staff.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...