Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, hookem48 said:

lol, Casey looked better because he took off running faster

He looked better because he led the team to 2 TDs. I don't care if he runs, hands the ball off, checks dwn, throws hail Mary's, or whatever.  He is urgent about moving the ball, and it matters.

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Posted

Ian Boyd from IT:

Casey Thompson's work in this game, while valiant, was basically mop up duty. It doesn't appear Sark is particularly interested in making Thompson the man behind center this season given his refusal to play him when games are really still in question. However, because Thompson was able to go out there and earn a few touchdowns in garbage time, the quarterback battle will be the talk of town.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, crony said:

Ian Boyd from IT:

Casey Thompson's work in this game, while valiant, was basically mop up duty. It doesn't appear Sark is particularly interested in making Thompson the man behind center this season given his refusal to play him when games are really still in question. However, because Thompson was able to go out there and earn a few touchdowns in garbage time, the quarterback battle will be the talk of town.

Fuck Ian Boyd. 

  • Hook 'Em 9
Posted
2 minutes ago, crony said:

Ian Boyd from IT:

Casey Thompson's work in this game, while valiant, was basically mop up duty. It doesn't appear Sark is particularly interested in making Thompson the man behind center this season given his refusal to play him when games are really still in question. However, because Thompson was able to go out there and earn a few touchdowns in garbage time, the quarterback battle will be the talk of town.

Bro Ian Boyd is a dipshit 

Posted
8 minutes ago, 6th Street said:

Casey is the Garbage Mamba

Let's fuck around and find out... He looks like he didn't give a shit... And that's a good look.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Xian said:

Did we watch the same game?  QB is main reason we lost. 
 

defense sucked, but was holding its own the first half before running out of gas 

 

card was a complete disaster. 

Line play on both sides was a bigger factor, IMO. And our WR’s were completely MIA. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Duane Moore said:

Line play on both sides was a bigger factor, IMO. And our WR’s were completely MIA. 

Card missed a few throws but I blame mainly the OL for this. It was shitty against UL and it was shitty today 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, crony said:

Ian Boyd from IT:

Casey Thompson's work in this game, while valiant, was basically mop up duty. It doesn't appear Sark is particularly interested in making Thompson the man behind center this season given his refusal to play him when games are really still in question. However, because Thompson was able to go out there and earn a few touchdowns in garbage time, the quarterback battle will be the talk of town.

Shut the fuck up, Ian.

I watched.  And I've watched two QBs from Lake Travis come here and go "Oh Shit, this OL is ass."

At this point, not getting Casey in means you're committed to Card and willing to let him learn on the job. Card was really bad tonight, because the OL was bad... But the OL is bad. So figure out how to move the ball.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
2 minutes ago, Patricio Swayze said:

I refuse to read any of this thread.  Its probably some dumbass shit.  Casey should have played from the second quarter on. 

This thread mostly agrees

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
1 minute ago, Happy Gilmore said:

Card missed a few throws but I blame mainly the OL for this. It was shitty against UL and it was shitty today 

Wait, so you blame the shitty should have been a TD throw to Whit in the endzone on the OL?  Get the fuck out of here.  The OL sucks, but that was all Card.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Patricio Swayze said:

Wait, so you blame the shitty should have been a TD throw to Whit in the endzone on the OL?  Get the fuck out of here.  The OL sucks, but that was all Card.

Yeah Card had time and space for that throw... same as the other throw to Whit that was behind him for 30 yards... kid flaked under pressure. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted

Starting Casey is putting a band-aid over the bigger issue. Our OLine is terrible, our WRs can’t get open & when they do they drop the fucking ball, our TEs might as well be tackle dummies. Card is like maybe like 10% of the problem with this offense

 

  • Rage+1 1
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, A’Dam Psycho said:

Starting Casey is putting a band-aid over the bigger issue. Our OLine is terrible, our WRs can’t get open & when they do they drop the fucking ball, our TEs might as well be tackle dummies. Card is like maybe like 10% of the problem with this offense

 

But the “bandaid” will get us wins, which is all that really matters for now. Without wins, no Decent recruit is coming here 

Edited by Xian
  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, NorthLoop said:

Yeah Card had time and space for that throw... same as the other throw to Whit that was behind him for 30 yards... kid flaked under pressure. 

Yep.  I don't hate the kid and think he did the best he could, but that wasn't enough.  He missed a shit ton of wide open receivers, made a lot of bad decisions and threw some ugly balls.  Then that fucking fumble.  Thompson is far from the best QB we have every seen, but he should start.  Sark fucked up.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

It looked to me like Card panicked. He escaped pockets too early that didn't need escaping, ran laterally to try let a WR come open, and didn't hit the open deep throws. Casey looked like he went through progressions, but also when he escaped, he didn't run laterally. He got moving forward to get some yards and at least try to keep us on schedule and not behind the chains.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, crony said:

Ian Boyd from IT, which has a contract with Hudson Card:

Casey Thompson's work in this game, while valiant, was basically mop up duty. It doesn't appear Sark is particularly interested in making Thompson the man behind center this season given his refusal to play him when games are really still in question. However, because Thompson was able to go out there and earn a few touchdowns in garbage time, the quarterback battle will be the talk of town.

Fixed it for you.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
2 minutes ago, A’Dam Psycho said:

Starting Casey is putting a band-aid over the bigger issue. Our OLine is terrible, our WRs can’t get open & when they do they drop the fucking ball, our TEs might as well be tackle dummies. Card is like maybe like 10% of the problem with this offense

 

Whit dropped one that he should have caught.  But that touchdown pass was all on Card.  Whit had to turn himself into a pretzel to even get one hand on the fucking ball.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Patricio Swayze said:

Yep.  I don't hate the kid and think he did the best he could, but that wasn't enough.  He missed a shit ton of wide open receivers, made a lot of bad decisions and threw some ugly balls.  Then that fucking fumble.  Thompson is far from the best QB we have every seen, but he should start.  Sark fucked up.

yep. practice doesn't show how one handles pressure. We saw Card under pressure today and it was bad. He should be done as a starter this year. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
5 minutes ago, Patricio Swayze said:

Wait, so you blame the shitty should have been a TD throw to Whit in the endzone on the OL?  Get the fuck out of here.  The OL sucks, but that was all Card.

Lol I'm not saying Card is a saint by any stretch of the imagination and I'm not gonna blame J. Whitt like some dipshits were on IT. I'm just saying QBs feel rushed when there's pressure and put to much on a ball. That pass was on Card 100%. The OL has been sub par to our liking the last two games. Floods gotta get it figured out regardless who's QB. I don't give a fuck who's QB. If it's Kai giving Money. Just win football games 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Patricio Swayze said:

Whit dropped one that he should have caught.  But that touchdown pass was all on Card.  Whit had to turn himself into a pretzel to even get one hand on the fucking ball.

You mean when Card was yet again running for his life. Running to the right and throwing right handed is not ideal

Posted

IT has a financial interest in the outcome of the QB battle. If they had any integrity at all, they wouldn't say a fucking word about our QBs without adding a disclaimer that they have a conflict of interest.

  • Hook 'Em 8
  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, A’Dam Psycho said:

You mean when Card was yet again running for his life. Running to the right and throwing right handed is not ideal

lulz. he wasn't running for his life.  He was doing what a QB is expected to do at this level.

Posted

Man, whether Card or Thompson is the longer-term starter really shouldn't have anything to do with Card's replacement today.

For whatever reason, Card wasn't getting it done in the first half.  We know Thompson is pretty decent to damn good, whether he's better than Card or not.

Change shit up.  I think Spermin Herman and Chuckles Strong would have done that in the face of today's offensive futility.  The fuck is wrong with you, Sarkisian?

Posted
Just now, TwiceHorn said:

Man, whether Card or Thompson is the longer-term starter really shouldn't have anything to do with Card's replacement today.

For whatever reason, Card wasn't getting it done in the first half.  We know Thompson is pretty decent to damn good, whether he's better than Card or not.

Change shit up.  I think Spermin Herman and Chuckles Strong would have done that in the face of today's offensive futility.  The fuck is wrong with you, Sarkisian?

Exactly.  It was obvious, very early, that Card was struggling (despite the oline problems).  There was no downside to putting in Casey.  That is on Sark.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Patricio Swayze said:

lulz. he wasn't running for his life.  He was doing what a QB is expected to do at this level.

dude... we can't expect our qb to be able to throw balls from BOTH sides of the field. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

It doesn’t really matter much who the QB ends up being imo. They don’t have time to throw, they have WRs that can’t catch, and if they hand off the defensive line will meet the RB at the same time at lest 3/4 of the time against any team with any semblance of a defense. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, NorthLoop said:

dude... we can't expect our qb to be able to throw balls from BOTH sides of the field. 

Do you watch a lot of football? How often does scrambling throws on the run work? 

Edited by A’Dam Psycho
Posted
Tom Brady is a better QB than Lamar Jackson.  Behind our OLine, I'd take Lamar Jackson.

See this is where Joe Fan has an advantage over Genius Sark. We haven’t seen great oline play in 15 years. After week 1, we were already pissing down our pants about it.
Posted
2 minutes ago, The Ace of Aces said:

It doesn’t really matter much who the QB ends up being imo. They don’t have time to throw, they have WRs that can’t catch, and if they hand off the defensive line will meet the RB at the same time at lest 3/4 of the time against any team with any semblance of a defense. 

Exactly what I said. This very obvious point seems to be an unpopular opinion around here

Posted
1 minute ago, A’Dam Psycho said:

Do you watch a lot of football? How often does scrambling throws on the run work? 

I watch a lot of football. And there are a shitload of qb's that make it work. What football do you watch? 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
4 minutes ago, The Ace of Aces said:

It doesn’t really matter much who the QB ends up being imo. They don’t have time to throw, they have WRs that can’t catch, and if they hand off the defensive line will meet the RB at the same time at lest 3/4 of the time against any team with any semblance of a defense. 

Whitt had two drops.  What about the others?

Posted
4 minutes ago, The Ace of Aces said:

It doesn’t really matter much who the QB ends up being imo. They don’t have time to throw, they have WRs that can’t catch, and if they hand off the defensive line will meet the RB at the same time at lest 3/4 of the time against any team with any semblance of a defense. 

 But see it does matter.  Who the QB is matters even more when your Oline sucks.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Eskimohorn said:


See this is where Joe Fan has an advantage over Genius Sark. We haven’t seen great oline play in 15 years. After week 1, we were already pissing down our pants about it.

Maybe he watched our OLine dominate our DLine throughout fall practice, and assumed that meant they were solid?

Posted
5 minutes ago, The Ace of Aces said:

It doesn’t really matter much who the QB ends up being imo. They don’t have time to throw, they have WRs that can’t catch, and if they hand off the defensive line will meet the RB at the same time at lest 3/4 of the time against any team with any semblance of a defense. 

Casey scores TDs. Must test hypothesis.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
38 minutes ago, crony said:

Ian Boyd from IT:

Casey Thompson's work in this game, while valiant, was basically mop up duty. It doesn't appear Sark is particularly interested in making Thompson the man behind center this season given his refusal to play him when games are really still in question. However, because Thompson was able to go out there and earn a few touchdowns in garbage time, the quarterback battle will be the talk of town.

IT has an NIL deal with Card. Take whatever they say about the QB battle with a grain of salt.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...