Jump to content

UT's next basketball coach - discussion/debate [Sean Miller Hired]


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, David Dennison said:

Where are we with NIL in relation to other SEC teams?

It’s evolving. I think we were middle of the pack-ish under Terry. I’m not as connected anymore as I was but I know there were people that wanted nothing to do with NIL under Terry. This played out exactly as it was expected. Beard set this program back 5-7 years and Terry was never going to succeed. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
6 minutes ago, Sbbruin said:

This hire is very reminiscent of the Sark hire.  Good coach with a checkered past.  Reclamation project.  Having played against him for years in the P12, I personally think he’s a really good coach.

Sark at least mentored under Saban and won a title there. Miller ran back to Xavier and regularly got beat by Shaka Smart.

  • Haha 1
  • Fuck You 11
Posted

I think CDC's goal was to get a coach who would raise the floor. Then if you pair that with NIL, good assistants, and local talent, you can reach higher, and get lucky with E8 or FF every now and then. Absent a few coaches who are already at bluebloods, that's all you can ask for in mens CBB. I think I see the logic behind the hire.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
1 hour ago, Beau Vine said:

Texas can afford that buyout, they're just smart enough to direct that money to a different place, like NIL.  

If it were modern-day John Wooden with the buyout, the story would be different. 

No "modern day Wooden" will ever exist.   It used to be that the tournament  regions were the actual regions.  No one in the West Region was any good except UCLA.  He had an annual cake walk to the Final Four, which made recruiting easy.  He was an excellent coach, but so many of those UCLA tournament wins would not have happened in today's set up. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, trythisathome said:

I'd take Pierce level results in basketball honestly 

No kidding.  He made Omaha 3 years out of 6.  That's like Elite 8 half the time or something similar.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

Miller is coming in as the most credentialed hire in Texas men’s basketball history with 4 EEs and 4S16s.

I don’t follow baseball so did David Pierce come to Texas with that type of record?

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Drool 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Jon Bovi said:

No "modern day Wooden" will ever exist.   It used to be that the tournament  regions were the actual regions.  No one in the West Region was any good except UCLA.  He had an annual cake walk to the Final Four, which made recruiting easy.  He was an excellent coach, but so many of those UCLA tournament wins would not have happened in today's set up. 

Wrong, Long Beach and USF used to have great programs.  U$C was also damn good under Bob Boyd.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Hookem2147 said:

Gerry on NIL

Was told about 20 minutes ago that Texas is expected to see a basketball all together NIL increase into the 4.8-5 million range for next season. 

This season's roster was 3.7-3.8 million.

That increase would place Texas in the top 15 range nationally based on numbers currently

image.gif.6351571e49a4c726b39e2d64651e31bd.gif

  • Rage+1 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Jon Bovi said:

No "modern day Wooden" will ever exist.   It used to be that the tournament  regions were the actual regions.  No one in the West Region was any good except UCLA.  He had an annual cake walk to the Final Four, which made recruiting easy.  He was an excellent coach, but so many of those UCLA tournament wins would not have happened in today's set up. 

Wooden had the original NIL setup.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
7 minutes ago, Hookem2147 said:

Gerry on NIL

Was told about 20 minutes ago that Texas is expected to see a basketball all together NIL increase into the 4.8-5 million range for next season. 

This season's roster was 3.7-3.8 million.

That increase would place Texas in the top 15 range nationally based on numbers currently


It’s not just NIL compared to other schools. Terry spent a ton of his budget on a one and done player at the expense of the rest of the roster. We need someone to build a complete roster and to know what that should look like. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Pancho said:

Miller is coming in as the most credentialed hire in Texas men’s basketball history with 4 EEs and 4S16s.

I don’t follow baseball so did David Pierce come to Texas with that type of record?

Oh hell no. His main credential was that he said “yes” after we were to “no” 5 or 6 times. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, UTEE97 said:

I think CDC's goal was to get a coach who would raise the floor. Then if you pair that with NIL, good assistants, and local talent, you can reach higher, and get lucky with E8 or FF every now and then. Absent a few coaches who are already at bluebloods, that's all you can ask for in mens CBB. I think I see the logic behind the hire.

This.    Also there’s no guarantee that Oats would’ve said yes.   Bill self?  Come on.  I’m not sure Lloyd is worth a 9m buyout.  Give miller some resources and let’s see what happens

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
17 minutes ago, Hookem2147 said:

Gerry on NIL

Was told about 20 minutes ago that Texas is expected to see a basketball all together NIL increase into the 4.8-5 million range for next season. 

This season's roster was 3.7-3.8 million.

That increase would place Texas in the top 15 range nationally based on numbers currently

Doesn’t seem ideal if that total includes revenue sharing, right?

IMG_5910.jpeg

Posted
34 minutes ago, justhookit said:

It’s evolving. I think we were middle of the pack-ish under Terry. I’m not as connected anymore as I was but I know there were people that wanted nothing to do with NIL under Terry. This played out exactly as it was expected. Beard set this program back 5-7 years and Terry was never going to succeed. 

 

7 minutes ago, Newy25 said:


It’s not just NIL compared to other schools. Terry spent a ton of his budget on a one and done player at the expense of the rest of the roster. We need someone to build a complete roster and to know what that should look like. 

The thing with NIL and Terry is that he chose the socialist approach in 2023-2024 and the capitalist approach in 2024-2025 (no CR, just the easiest way to frame it). Neither made a ton of sense in either cycle. Then, the guy was a terrible money raiser with the backers. He was uninspiring and lacked charisma. Guys who often say “yes” said “not right now”.  

It wasn’t like Texas was a have-not, but very much not a big time “have” with him at the helm. 

The update on NIL from Gerry is tempered with his own skepticism of the actual NIL talk right now. I’m not going to say that anyone is energized by Miller, because I simply do not know yet. What I do know is that the committed floor is the range Gerry quoted. If Miller comes in and shows that he can put together a final four-esque team quickly, the support is there. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted

This hire seems fine. I don’t love it, but I get it. He’s better than Terry and I’m sure there are good reasons for taking him over some other potential hires. I’m whelmed and willing to see how he does before reacting. 
 

It’s like getting a really nice new fleece for Christmas. Not exciting but you can’t complain. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
Posted
8 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

Doesn’t seem ideal if that total includes revenue sharing, right?

IMG_5910.jpeg

It’s about a 25% over last year so I don’t see how that isn’t a good thing. Of course other teams will probably be increasing too but Gerry has mentioned that some coaches are already nervous about what their share of the house settlement money will be.

Posted

He's got a son named Austin, so there's that...

a bit of a red flag he couldn't get to one final four at Arizona 

his checkered past is stuff that is all legal now and tons of coaches were doing.   I agree this is a high floor hire.  we'd kill for the Arizona run he had for the first 10 years.

If Miller was his guy, CDC had to be shitting bricks when we got matched up with Xavier on the play in.  that would be damn funny to be a fly on the wall there.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
4 minutes ago, Hookem2147 said:

It’s about a 25% over last year so I don’t see how that isn’t a good thing. Of course other teams will probably be increasing too but Gerry has mentioned that some coaches are already nervous about what their share of the house settlement money will be.

Yeah but it includes revenue sharing. 

 

image.thumb.png.097a78d3b36777fdfee3ad1a2727b520.png

Plus whatever the oil douche puts on top of that. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

Yeah but it includes revenue sharing. 

 

image.thumb.png.097a78d3b36777fdfee3ad1a2727b520.png

Plus whatever the oil douche puts on top of that. 

Well yeah I don’t think any NIL budget we have is going to preclude the oil bros from just dropping random 7 figure bags for ones they want like they’ve shown they will do in multiple sports.

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Hookem2147 said:

Well yeah I don’t think any NIL budget we have is going to preclude the oil bros from just dropping random 7 figure bags for ones they want like they’ve shown they will do in multiple sports.

It’s not even that. We’re under 5 million all in(including revenue sharing and additional NIL). Seems like we are going into next year with a top 15 budget for this year. Makes no sense. Perhaps @David Dennisonis right and the money just doesn’t give a fuck about basketball enough to actually compete at highest levels. 

Edited by BurntOrange&White
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Al_4_ISU said:

So I was looking at McCollum’s story deeper, and he has literally based his entire life within a 5.5 hour radius of Storm Lake, Iowa.  He’s been biding his time for one of about 5 or 6 jobs in the western Midwest.  Kind of a momma’s boy in the most admirable sense.

i hate that he’s going to Iowa, but I respect the hell out of him 

Hah, I read all of that and was like "what an odd fucking duck," but to each their own.

Posted
27 minutes ago, closetojumping said:

 

The thing with NIL and Terry is that he chose the socialist approach in 2023-2024 and the capitalist approach in 2024-2025 (no CR, just the easiest way to frame it). Neither made a ton of sense in either cycle. Then, the guy was a terrible money raiser with the backers. He was uninspiring and lacked charisma. Guys who often say “yes” said “not right now”.  

It wasn’t like Texas was a have-not, but very much not a big time “have” with him at the helm. 

The update on NIL from Gerry is tempered with his own skepticism of the actual NIL talk right now. I’m not going to say that anyone is energized by Miller, because I simply do not know yet. What I do know is that the committed floor is the range Gerry quoted. If Miller comes in and shows that he can put together a final four-esque team quickly, the support is there. 

Is there any Intel on the hiring process? Sounds like no one wanted to step up for buyouts. 

  • Fuck You 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

It’s not even that. We’re under 5 million all in(including revenue sharing and additional NIL). Seems like we are going into next year with a top 15 budget for this year. Makes no sense. Perhaps @David Dennisonis right and the money just doesn’t give a fuck about basketball enough to actually compete at highest levels. 

 Basketball really only has 2-3 big time benefactors from the business world.  Other than Durant’s shoe contract that diverted money to Texas Basketball I’ve never really heard of the former players who went on to the NBA doing anything.  Im not saying they don’t or haven’t, but I’ve just never heard it. 
All I can say is that if you want more money diverted to basketball, then drink more Tito’s, I guess. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

My long standing conspiracy theory is several BMDs (and a lot of our fans) don’t want basketball to be so successful that it could rival baseball. 

But, basketball can’t be so shameful that it embarrasses The University. 

With this new setup, I’m wondering how all of that will change if we come close to emulating the Barnes 2000s success. 

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, CTC2 said:

 Basketball really only has 2-3 big time benefactors from the business world.  Other than Durant’s shoe contract that diverted money to Texas Basketball I’ve never really heard of the former players who went on to the NBA doing anything.  Im not saying they don’t or haven’t, but I’ve just never heard it. 
All I can say is that if you want more money diverted to basketball, then drink more Tito’s, I guess. 

Durant dropped $3* mil on the practice facility...

Edited by ztejas
  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
Just now, ztejas said:

Durant dropped $10 mil on the practice facility...

And that’s what referenced in my post. I vote for Reading is Fundamental as your new name. 

Posted
1 minute ago, ztejas said:

Durant dropped $10 mil on the practice facility...

Need KD to be the NIL ambassador, a la Curry and Davidson 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, WineGuy69 said:

fucking nerd

hasan minhaj netflix GIF by Patriot Act

Star Trek GIF

 

1 hour ago, Derka said:

i know just what you’re saying.

so please stop explainin'

 

1 hour ago, ATXbronco said:

Gotta assume his style of play will put more butts in the arena next season. 

winning will put more butts in the arena next season

 

20 minutes ago, Fudge Nuggets said:

If you’re going to compete in the SEC you’re going to have to sacrifice a few ethics along the way.  Good hire.

Dunno if you've kept up with the news lately...

jim carrey disbelief GIF

...but all that shit that used to be "unethical" is legal now.

Posted

Texas wanted to hire Miller last time but circumstances and the fact he lost to Texas and Terry it didn't happen.

This time Miller beat Texas and Terry, and he got the job.

So, if Texas and Terry had beaten Miller and Xavier, which they should have.

Then Texas loses to Illinois in the first round, which most likely would have happened.

Does Texas still name Miller as head coach, if Terry was fired.

Would seem a little awkward.

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, CTC2 said:

And that’s what referenced in my post. I vote for Reading is Fundamental as your new name. 

My bad it was $3 mil think I had it confused with a different KD donation. 

You didn't make it clear that that was what you were referring to - and who gaf where the money came from it's KD's money.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...