Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
37 minutes ago, MissingInAction said:

Loki is on a different timeline. Statue at the end should have told you.

I’ll lead with I know we’re talking about a comic show with time travel AND they mildly defined the time travel rules in Endgame and this show, but…

Where they implying the timeline is a loop?  If so, each branch becomes its own loop?

Did he get knocked back to a different branch at the “same time” or did he get knocked back to his line that had been altered?

Posted

We about to Multiverse this shit up.

Between Ant Man 3, Dr Strange 2, and Spider-man NEW Spiderverse movie, we are going to see some weird shit.

  • Like 1
Posted

Man, Marvel is throwing a shit ton of balls in the air. We’ll see if they can juggle them to make something coherent. Hope they can.

Overall, a good 6 episode series. The premier was still the best episode to me.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

Same actor is playing Kang in the new Antman movie so yeah, it's at least a version. He even said he's gone by many names, one of which was 'conquerer'.

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, MissingInAction said:

Loki is on a different timeline. Statue at the end should have told you.

Struggling to understand this.  The sacred timeline was a sort of pruned parallel universes, yeah?  So what's the difference between that and a mutiverse that Kang defines (besides order)?  No comprende.

Edited by Hmmm
Posted
44 minutes ago, Hmmm said:

Struggling to understand this.  The sacred timeline was a sort of pruned parallel universes, yeah?  So what's the difference between that and a mutiverse that Kang defines (besides order)?  No comprende.

He Who Remains used the TVA to prevent the other Kangs from attacking all the other universes.  He pruned any event that led to other Kangs. 

Now that he's dead, the other Kangs will come about and will wage war on other timelines.

Posted
Struggling to understand this.  The sacred timeline was a sort of pruned parallel universes, yeah?  So what's the difference between that and a mutiverse that Kang defines (besides order)?  No comprende.
Loki was tossed thru the door into a different universe. They're all happening now that Kang Who Remains is dead.
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, ajax said:

I hope the other Kangs are a little more menacing. This one reminded me of Willy Wonka.

That's exactly what you will see in the other Kangs. The Loki one was the practical version who wanted to maintain peace and order by ensuring the other Kangs weren't allowed back into power. The Ant Man one should be the Conqueror we see at the end or at least one like that which has been hiding out in the quantum realm. 

I loved the finale and it was great that a Disney+ show got to be the vehicle to kick off Phase 4. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

The TVA is outside of time. That’s why the stones don’t work there. Assumed to be the quantum realm between all universes. So how can there be another TVA?  That part still confuses me. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
Do think that kang might have been miscast. Hopefully the bad kang will be….badder. 

I don’t. The guy has basically lived in solitary for a long time. He is expected to be a bit touched.
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
41 minutes ago, ajax said:

I hope the other Kangs are a little more menacing. This one reminded me of Willy Wonka.

To me, there will still only be one Kang

Rick seeks help from King Ezekiel in The Walking Dead midseason premiere  promo - SYFY Wire

Posted
7 hours ago, ajax said:

I hope the other Kangs are a little more menacing. This one reminded me of Willy Wonka.

 

7 hours ago, NOMAAA said:

Do think that kang might have been miscast. Hopefully the bad kang will be….badder. 

This Kang sometimes seemed like he was channeling Bill Cosby and was about to ask if they wanted a pudding pop. Or like Willy Wonka. It was great to see a true believer villain that isn’t a zealot. 

Posted

Fucking great series. Sets up the next chapter and I am so excited to see it play out. I don’t expect Kang the Conqueror to be as friendly as He Who Remains. He basically warned Loki and Sylvie about that. When is season 2?!

Posted (edited)

Here's a long ass tutorial on who Kang is. Not sure how much of this is relevant but it gives you an idea of how Marvel has treated Kang in the comics, which is to say it's complicated as shit. MCU takes comic plots as baseline and creates new stories. Will be interesting to see what role Ravonna plays into this.

https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Nathaniel_Richards_(Kang)_(Earth-6311)

Again this is going to get damn confusing in the MCU but the writers have decades of material to inspire and guide them. 


Saw this on reddit. Marvel creative team have their shit together. 

b9xsTqd.jpeg

Edited by crash_davis
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Yeah, I'm gonna get confused as hell, but I still enjoy this stuff. Loki was the best MCU movie/show to date IMO. I thoroughly enjoyed it, and did enough research to get the importance of He Who Remains/Kang, and the multiverse stuff that's upcoming.

Posted
31 minutes ago, crash_davis said:

Here's a long ass tutorial on who Kang is. Not sure how much of this is relevant but it gives you an idea of how Marvel has treated Kang in the comics, which is to say it's complicated as shit. MCU takes comic plots as baseline and creates new stories. Will be interesting to see what role Ravonna plays into this.

https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Nathaniel_Richards_(Kang)_(Earth-6311)

Again this is going to get damn confusing in the MCU but the writers have decades of material to inspire and guide them. 


Saw this on reddit. Marvel creative team have their shit together. 

b9xsTqd.jpeg

is that imgur???

Posted
4 hours ago, NOMAAA said:

gave up on that after 3 or 4 episodes.

You missed out.   Admittedly, the first couple eps were wild but they tied everything together really well.     Its crazy as hell but coherent and an overall great show.    You should go back and finish it.

Posted

Jonathan Majors is GREAT in any role he plays.  No difference here.  Cant wait to see what he does with the character(s).

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, d2o said:

Jonathan Majors is GREAT in any role he plays.  No difference here.  Cant wait to see what he does with the character(s).

Disagree. He Who Overacts almost killed that episode for me.

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Daichee Bell said:

Disagree. He Who Overacts almost killed that episode for me.

 

To each his own.   Thoroughly enjoyed him looking off his rocker.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...