Jump to content

Texas Recruiting Notes 2022 - Idiotic Slapfights Unrelated To 2022 Recruiting

closetojumping

By closetojumping
in 🤫$9.95🤫

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 59.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Machinator

    2295

  • texifornia

    2140

  • BurntOrange&White

    1767

  • SydneyCarton

    1150

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

closetojumping
closetojumping

Thanks. I have been on the boards since 1997 when I was a student at Texas. We've spent decades as fans and board patrons feeling powerless to create any real change. The Internet, social media,

Mikey4
Mikey4
ChonkySalmon666
ChonkySalmon666

I work closely with a certain previously committed 5 star QB's father (hint: its Quinn Ewers, for those who haven't been following recruiting closely like I have) and chatted with him a bit this after

Posted Images

TommyGufano

TommyGufano 6021

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, Tex-19 said:

I'm sure this is true, and the data does look bad, but you'd think the coaches could counter it by pointing to development at their recent jobs which is exceptional. It's not like the Longhorn logo is doing the development. Sark/Flood have had shit loads of 1st/2nd rounders the last 2 years alone (and Saban isn't an offensive coach). PK has had a bunch at UW. 

Meanwhile Aggy hasn't had a single first rounder in their 3 years under Jimbo (only one 2nd rounder) so what the hell are they pointing to that's any better. Probably just using Sumlin-era numbers which are irrelevant. Our staff should be able to sell development as a positive but they're clearly getting outmaneuvered. 

Should be pretty easily spun. His first class hasn't graduated yet and they have a few guys mocked to be 1st rounders in '22. I'd say they have a pretty great pitch for some positions and a very difficult one at a few others

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UtBlaw

UtBlaw 32

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, ousux said:
2 hours ago, Bamboozled73 said:
Bags >>> NIL especially in this current climate

I'm afraid you're right. Commits seemed easy to come by early on when visits were prohibited and it wasnt clear if the wealthiest program in the country would be in the bag game or not. Guess the answer to the last part is self evident.

Agree. It’s going to take at least a couple of years for NIL supremacy to be established. Hopefully, Texas can leverage it by being aggressive in its grey areas. That’ll reduce the importance of traditional bag men.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Blackcat00

Blackcat00 759

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, Hank Scorpio said:

After losing Williams and Banks but landing 2 white linemen you have to think that Sark can’t close with black players. You would think he would be great relating to POC players because he’s Armenian. 

Jamarion Miller is white?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TotallyLegit

TotallyLegit 3050

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, UtBlaw said:

Agree. It’s going to take at least a couple of years for NIL supremacy to be established. Hopefully, Texas can leverage it by being aggressive in its grey areas. That’ll reduce the importance of traditional bag men.

The way the NCAA works, I feel like traditional bag men are already a grey area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tex-19

Tex-19 2869

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, TommyGufano said:

 

 

This is an interesting one. Read that he wants to do pre-Med, grew up a CU fan (we've seen how much that usually matters in the end), but obv lives in Alabama. Love seeing Michigan left out. Guess we'll find out how serious they really are about academics but if they really are, this sure seems like one we'd make sense for

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
victory88

victory88 5654

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Tex-19 said:

I'm sure this is true, and the data does look bad, but you'd think the coaches could counter it by pointing to development at their recent jobs which is exceptional. It's not like the Longhorn logo is doing the development. Sark/Flood have had shit loads of 1st/2nd rounders the last 2 years alone (and Saban isn't an offensive coach). PK has had a bunch at UW. 

Meanwhile Aggy hasn't had a single first rounder in their 3 years under Jimbo (only one 2nd rounder) so what the hell are they pointing to that's any better. Probably just using Sumlin-era numbers which are irrelevant. Our staff should be able to sell development as a positive but they're clearly getting outmaneuvered. 

Right now, our message is not resonating.  While yes, they can point to their previous resume… our rivals are hitting them with the same pitch.  Here’s how this conversation goes.

 

”Look at all the good coaches and staffs that have been there that have gotten fired.  Mack Brown, Charlie Strong, Tom Herman.  None of them succeeded there and none were able to develop blue chip players.  Sark is a good coach but wait to see if he can actually put players in the league at Texas.  His success is because of Nick Saban and Bama.  He doesn’t have a good record as a head coach.  Why commit to Texas when you can come here and we will develop you.  Don’t risk your future betting on Texas until they prove it.”
 

Then they back it up with the articles showing Texas with the lowest blue chip development rate of all power 5 programs.  Most of the current recruits have no memories of Texas being a top program.  I follow a bunch of Instagram recruiting accounts that interact with high school and college athletes.  Most of them have Texas on the same tier program wise as TCU, Baylor, Arkansas, Tennessee, etc.  Sark needs to change that perception fast by winning.  It’s a simple solution… just win.  Apparently that seems impossible for all the coaches we have hired the last decade for whatever reason.

  • Hook 'Em 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Askew

Askew 362

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, BornAndRaised said:

I'm all for harping on the staff for fucking this recruitment up, but I think theres 2 pretty critical pieces to this that more people aren't taking into consideration.

2) I don't think its fair to say "well we passed on Sexton because we thought we had banks." alot of posters have pointed out, and I think it was Gerry that said the staff viewed him on the interior and we already had the bash bros. It's not apples to apples.

This is incorrect and part of the revisionist fabrication that Gerry and IT are using to cover their ass. Here's the breakdown:

1) Gerry and IT say that Texas is feeling very confident in Williams, Hutson, Robertson, Banks, Campbell. So confident that they may not have space for Sexton. 

2) Poster asks whether this has been relayed to Sexton. Gerry responds that "it is known" by the Sexton side and elaborates that the staff views Williams as the take over Sexton. I.e., we are full at OT. 

3) The 'Williams over Sexton' theory gets cemented all throughout last week and into the Williams decision. The posters are now frothing at the mouth at the possibility of that OL class. The 'Sexton was told no' story really gets the posters believing that that OL class is happening for sure. How could the staff tell Sexton no if they arent confident?

4) Williams spurns Texas and people start to question the Sexton story. 

5) Banks looks like he will spurn Texas. One poster now posits that the staff 'probably sees Sexton as an OG and redundant with Robertson/Hutson.' Gerry replies "this is it." 

6) Now Gerry and the rest of IT are running with the theory that it was actually 'Hutson/Robertson over Sexton' the entire time, and that their intel was credible. 

So, Gerry spins a yarn that the staff is super confident. He cements that yarn with the 'Sexton told no' story. Williams and Banks go elsewhere and now either Gerry's story looks like bullshit or the staff looks stupid. Gerry adopts a revisionist theory to clean up for both sides. 

Regardless, we need to hit on some OTs.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Rage+1 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Newy25

Newy25 7638

Posted
Posted

Also during that timeline, Bobby Burton gives a self righteous “trust the coaches” spiel after the Williams miss.  The IT guys were fully bought into the errbody narrative and anything said differently after is a fucking lie. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Don Hornleone

Don Hornleone 530

Posted
Posted

Just skimmed over the 247 list of OT’s. Aside from the fact that the pickings are razor thin now for uncommitteds, the fact that Kentucky has 2 Top30 OT and we’re struggling like fuck to land one (rank obsolete) is a real kick to the dick. 
 

Related, other than staying on top of the recently missed on guys like Banks and Williams until NSD, does anybody know what the plan is moving forward? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dbeasy

Dbeasy 14953

Posted
Posted

Just throwing sh*t against the wall, but the sudden Oregon surge is suspicious and perhaps points to some sort of collaboration with Nike that takes advantage of the NIL in a better way than what Texas and other schools have setup. If so, that should make the Nike relationship with other schools interesting. No facts, just speculating. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MichaelDicksonFanClub

MichaelDicksonFanClub 2861

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Don Hornleone said:

Just skimmed over the 247 list of OT’s. Aside from the fact that the pickings are razor thin now for uncommitteds, the fact that Kentucky has 2 Top30 OT and we’re struggling like fuck to land one (rank obsolete) is a real kick to the dick. 
 

Related, other than staying on top of the recently missed on guys like Banks and Williams until NSD, does anybody know what the plan is moving forward? 

Maybe we can get back into with George Fitzpatrick, went to the same school as Gunnar Helm

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MonkeyDoughnut

MonkeyDoughnut 10134

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Don Hornleone said:

Just skimmed over the 247 list of OT’s. Aside from the fact that the pickings are razor thin now for uncommitteds, the fact that Kentucky has 2 Top30 OT and we’re struggling like fuck to land one (rank obsolete) is a real kick to the dick. 
 

Related, other than staying on top of the recently missed on guys like Banks and Williams until NSD, does anybody know what the plan is moving forward? 

Transfer portal will prove to be very valuable for situations like this for school like Texas.  Between kids that over perform the school they selected looking to move up, to kids that decide they don't like they school/staff they chose to grad transfers.  There will be options.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Texas73

Texas73 420

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Don Hornleone said:

Just skimmed over the 247 list of OT’s. Aside from the fact that the pickings are razor thin now for uncommitteds, the fact that Kentucky has 2 Top30 OT and we’re struggling like fuck to land one (rank obsolete) is a real kick to the dick. 
 

Related, other than staying on top of the recently missed on guys like Banks and Williams until NSD, does anybody know what the plan is moving forward? 

Winning

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BurntOrange&White

BurntOrange&White 39486

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Dbeasy said:

Just throwing sh*t against the wall, but the sudden Oregon surge is suspicious and perhaps points to some sort of collaboration with Nike that takes advantage of the NIL in a better way than what Texas and other schools have setup. If so, that should make the Nike relationship with other schools interesting. No facts, just speculating. 

Seems like our NIL is based off player branding instead of endorsements. If so we’ve dropped the ball. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gmr548

gmr548 16463

Posted
Posted
Both have underperformed based on rankings, which might speak more to recent California player rankings being off than anything else. 

Or, and this is just wild, baseless speculation here, perhaps Cristobal and Helton aren’t great at the “football coaching” part of their jobs.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
golfclap

golfclap 6903

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Don Hornleone said:

Just skimmed over the 247 list of OT’s. Aside from the fact that the pickings are razor thin now for uncommitteds, the fact that Kentucky has 2 Top30 OT and we’re struggling like fuck to land one (rank obsolete) is a real kick to the dick. 

Kentucky has an elite S&C program with 2 of the best young guys in the business in Edmond and Hill. Schlarman’s death appears to have not slowed them at all with OL recruiting — players are bought into the development at UK. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Duane Moore

Duane Moore 5236

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Dbeasy said:

Just throwing sh*t against the wall, but the sudden Oregon surge is suspicious and perhaps points to some sort of collaboration with Nike that takes advantage of the NIL in a better way than what Texas and other schools have setup. If so, that should make the Nike relationship with other schools interesting. No facts, just speculating. 

Getting Penei Sewell drafted in the top ten gives them a great pitch to O-linemen right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...