Jump to content

Things Not Going Well in Venezuela, 2.0


PittsburghTiger

Recommended Posts

  On 1/31/2019 at 4:03 PM, Jhawk said:

Bloomberg

and we should absolutely not get the CIA involved. If true and maduro is going to steal the gold and run then that could be the lesson that the citizens need to understand that dictators like him should be ousted immediately and violently. You can’t give someone democracy, they have to realize that they need to demand it as people. 

Expand  

Well democracy promotion has never been an interest of the CIA. They act at the behest of the Executive Branch, who again if you'll just look a bit up the thread, are openly admitting that their end game is to re-assert American corporate interests in control of Venezuela's oil reserves. Whatever our concern for Venezuela is, it is not for common Venezuelans and it's not for promoting democracy. Those are just pretexts that are offered to mobilize popular opinion in the United States. The timing of this whole thing has a very "wouldn't you know who won the pony?" stench to it because this is just in the wake of Trump caving to the Democrats on the wall issue.

That's what Republican presidents, in particular, typically do when their domestic policies blow to shit: they let the tail wag the dog and wage some phony "war" and try to frame it as a national security issue.

 

Edited by hpslugga
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 4:39 PM, Hugo Stiglitz said:

South Korea 

There’s also been some success stories in Africa with democracy 

Expand  

Yeah forgot about SK, and moderate success in Africa, but I think they're always a one strong man away from toppling in so many of those places.  I don't think it's a coincidence that Japan and Korea are the two most successful examples. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There aren't a lot of people on this thread calling for intervention.  There are a lot more people saying that people are calling for intervention.  Most people in this thread that think Maduro has to go aren't advocating for anything with the US actively trying to topple him (boots on ground/CIA).  The US has taken the same position as many other countries have.  Maduro's clock is ticking and it is wholly his own doing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 5:21 PM, bad_teammate said:

Boots on the ground is the only thing that is considered "intervention". lol ok sure

Expand  

We sanctioned their oil.  Big deal.  We have sanctions on half the countries on the planet or companies within those countries and no one is accusing us of intervening in an effort to topple a government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 5:30 PM, Jhawk said:

We sanctioned their oil.  Big deal.  We have sanctions on half the countries on the planet or companies within those countries and no one is accusing us of intervening in an effort to topple a government.

Expand  

which is why we colonize protectorate intervene sanction in order to protect democracy, it's totally not about serving our own imperial interests, not at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 5:33 PM, elfenix said:

which is why we colonize protectorate intervene sanction in order to protect democracy, it's totally not about serving our own imperial interests, not at all

Expand  

What country ever acts in anything less than its own interests (SEE: Vatican City as a shining example of always looking out for its own) ??

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 5:35 PM, Onboard 2.0 said:

What country ever acts in anything less than its own interests (SEE: Vatican City as a shining example of always looking out for its own) ??

Expand  

none.  but the US is this weird place where we can't admit that we're not a shining city on a hill, so we have to tell ourselves that we're declaring war on spain and taking all of its colonies and adding them to our own empire without the consent of the governed while killing plenty of them in order to protect the people we're killing.  not for the benefit of United Fruit.  or Conoco.

Edited by elfenix
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 5:44 PM, elfenix said:

none.  but the US is this weird place where we can't admit that we're not a shining city on a hill, so we have to tell ourselves that we're declaring war on spain and taking all of its colonies and adding them to our own empire without the consent of the governed while killing plenty of them in order to protect the people we're killing.  not for the benefit of US Fruit.

Expand  

All true, but as horrible countries go, we do a lions share of giving around the globe.  Ain't no way that's all in self interest. 

What's the alternative to a world without an American super power ?  I've said it before, we're the modern day Roman empire.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 5:48 PM, Onboard 2.0 said:

All true, but as horrible countries go, we do a lions share of giving around the globe.  Ain't no way that's all in self interest. 

What's the alternative to a world without an American super power ?  I've said it before, we're the modern day Roman empire.

Expand  

no one is saying the american middle class is stingy with its charity dollars.  that's different from american leadership's empire building.

dan carlin summarizes america's duality with empire in the american peril episode.  interesting listen.

Edited by elfenix
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 5:55 PM, elfenix said:

no one is saying the american middle class is stingy with its charity dollars.  that's different from american leadership's empire building.

Expand  

I'm not talking about charity, I'm talking about the billions in aid the gov't gives (which I think should be spent at home first).  That could be to keep the barbarians at bay, and it could be just humanitarian aid for the sake of aid, but I'm optimistic at times when I shouldn't be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 5:59 PM, Onboard 2.0 said:

I'm not talking about charity, I'm talking about the billions in aid the gov't gives (which I think should be spent at home first).  That could be to keep the barbarians at bay, and it could be just humanitarian aid for the sake of aid, but I'm optimistic at times when I shouldn't be.

Expand  

a) empire upkeep is self-interested.

b) lots, and i'd imagine the vast majority, of US government aid is being spent at home.  we're not handing people bags of cash.  we're buying f-15s from boeing.

Edited by elfenix
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 6:06 PM, elfenix said:

a) that's empire upkeep.

b) lots, and i'd imagine the vast majority, of US government aid is being spent at home.  we're not just handing people bags of cash.  we're buying f-15s from boeing.

Expand  

A. Yep pretty much.

B ?  Yeah we send billions over seas for humanitarian aid that's not an F-18. Never said it was in bags of cash.  If we're spending that much here, it's not showing or working.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the NYT piece by the new President of Venezuela Juan Guaidó. I can’t comprehend how bad teammate, Fozz, hpslugga and Hugo can complain about our actions in recognizing Pres. Guaidó as the interim president which is authorized by the Venezuelan Constitution. Virtually every country in the Western Hemisphere is acting in concert with what we have done. To be opposed to relieving the suffering of the Venezuelan people is deranged and heartless. You all hate Trump so badly that his actions here which the progressive Trudeau of Canada also supports makes y’all seem truly deranged. Anything to change the status quo of starving Venezuelans should be supported. I am excited for the Venezuelan people as they have a realistic shot in liberating their country. I hope I’m alive to see the day that Iran is liberated with US support. Elliot Abrams knows what he is doing. With him and Bolton we have guys who can help effectuate regime change and fulfill our role as the defender of the Americas by promoting free markets and democracy 

  Reveal hidden contents

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the Article of Venezuela's Constitution on which Guaidó bases his claim:

  Quote

The President of the Republic shall become permanently unavailable to serve by reason of any of the following events: death; resignation; removal from office by decision of the Supreme Tribunal of Justice; permanent physical or mental disability certified by a medical board designated by the Supreme Tribunal of Justice with the approval of the National Assembly; abandonment of his position, duly declared by the National Assembly; and recall by popular vote.

When an elected President becomes permanently unavailable to serve prior to his inauguration, a new election by universal suffrage and direct ballot shall be held within 30 consecutive days. Pending election and inauguration of the new President, the President of the National Assembly shall take charge of the Presidency of the Republic.

When the President of the Republic becomes permanently unavailable to serve during the first four years of this constitutional term of office, a new election by universal suffrage and direct ballot shall be held within 30 consecutive days. Pending election and inauguration of the new President, the Executive Vice-President shall take charge of the Presidency of the Republic.

In the cases describes above, the new President shall complete the current constitutional term of office. If the President becomes permanently unavailable to serve during the last two years of his constitutional term of office, the Executive Vice-President shall take over the Presidency of the Republic until such term is completed. 

Expand  

http://venezuela-us.org/live/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/constitucioningles.pdf

Maduro was inagurated on January 10, so, even if the National Assembly declared that Maduro has abandoned his position (i'm not aware that this has actually happened), it would be the Executive Vice-President who would take charge, not Guaidó.

Edited by Fozzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 6:09 PM, Iconoclast Texan said:

This is the NYT piece by the new President of Venezuela Juan Guaidó. I can’t comprehend how bad teammate, Fozz, hpslugga and Hugo can complain about our actions in recognizing Pres. Guaidó as the interim president which is authorized by the Venezuelan Constitution. Virtually every country in the Western Hemisphere is acting in concert with what we have done. To be opposed to relieving the suffering of the Venezuelan people is deranged and heartless. You all hate Trump so badly that his actions here which the progressive Trudeau of Canada also supports makes y’all seem truly deranged. Anything to change the status quo of starving Venezuelans should be supported. I am excited for the Venezuelan people as they have a realistic shot in liberating their country. I hope I’m alive to see the day that Iran is liberated with US support. Elliot Abrams knows what he is doing. With him and Bolton we have guys who can help effectuate regime change and fulfill our role as the defender of the Americas by promoting free markets and democracy 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Expand  

Seriously how much fucking meth do you have to smoke before you become this fucking stupid?

  • Like 3
  • Fuck You 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 6:55 PM, Iconoclast Texan said:

Care to retort you fucking moron. I have a coherent world view. What the fuck is yours .

Expand  

your world view is that the US should meddle in internal iranian affairs to get rid of the mullahs when it was US meddling in internal iranian affairs that brought you the fucking mullahs to begin with.  how the fuck does that make sense?  US meddling brought you the mullahs and british meddling brought you the saudis.  that's a great fucking track record.

Edited by elfenix
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 6:09 PM, Iconoclast Texan said:

Anything to change the status quo of starving Venezuelans should be supported.

Expand  

What if we lifted all economic sanctions against Venezuela right now and normalized relations with them as much as possible?

Do you really mean "anything" or do you actually mean, "Open Venezuela back up for exploitation"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 6:59 PM, elfenix said:

your world view is that the US should meddle in internal iranian affairs to get rid of the mullahs when it was US meddling in internal iranian affairs that brought you the fucking mullahs to begin with.  how the fuck does that make sense?  US meddling brought you the mullahs and british meddling brought you the saudis.  that's a great fucking track record.

Expand  

Our ability to meddle into the affairs of Iran under mullah control are a lot different than 1953 Iran with Mossadegh. No doubt engineering a coup against him was a mistake in hindsight. Iran was the first Islamist government to come to power in the world. It was a wildcard not foreseen in 1953 in the middle of the Cold War with 2 opposing worlds going at it. We can apply economic pressure on Iran and try to influence a change through our soft power. As for the British, what was the alternative besides the al-Saud family in the Arabian peninsula? From a geopolitical perspective, Saudi rule has been stable and has allowed for reliable source of hydrocarbon production.

Edited by Iconoclast Texan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 7:05 PM, Iconoclast Texan said:

Our ability to meddle into the affairs of Iran under mullah control are a lot different than 1953 Iran with Mossadegh. No doubt engineering a coup against him was a mistake in hindsight. Iran was the first Islamist government to come to power in the world. It was a wildcard not foreseen in 1953 in the middle of the Cold War with 2 opposing worlds going at it. We can apply economic pressure on Iran and try to influence a change through our soft power. As for the British, what was the alternative besides the al-Saud family in the Arabian peninsula? From a geopolitical perspective, Saudi rule has been stable and has allowed for reliable source of hydrocarbon production.

Expand  

Say what?  What are the Saudis? Baptists?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 7:05 PM, bad_teammate said:

What if we lifted all economic sanctions against Venezuela right now and normalized relations with them as much as possible?

Do you really mean "anything" or do you actually mean, "Open Venezuela back up for exploitation"?

Expand  

That’s not a realistic course of action under any US President. Hillary or Obama wouldn’t do that. I don’t get why you would hamstring your country in pursuing its national interests when every other country in the world is trying to further theirs vis a vis nations of interest. A socialist dictatorship in Venezuela is one that is antithetical to America as the vanguard of liberal democracy and free markets. We have never had normal relationships with a country like that, witness our position with Cuba, especially if it is in our own hemisphere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are zero winning moves in Venezuela for the United States.  There are things we can do to ease the pain like take in refugees and offer aid.

The Venezuelan people need to determine their own fate and if that means a bloody civil war so be it.  As history has shown, only true revolutions provide the best path to long term stability. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 2:10 AM, Hugo Stiglitz said:

I suppose but it almost seems like it would be a waste of resources.  

Expand  

For whom? The fact that Russia backs Maduro should tell you all you need about what side we're on. The fact that Trump is calling out his own intelligence community as "naive"...

 

...heh, heh, heh. That's fucking chutzpah, isn't it? The goddamned ignoramus doesn't even know what the damned word means.

Unless you're thinking this is a Clone Wars-era deal where Trump is Dooku and Putin is Palpatine and they're working both ends to squeeze the middle or something. I can see Putin smart enough to do that, but I don't see Trump as being smart enough to pull off the Dooku role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think Putin values Venezuela that much, at least not like Syria or Iran.

Seems like he helped orchestrate a disaster and wants to cash out before sinking serious resources to clean it up.  Russia is still a relatively weak state when it comes to flexing those military hegemony muscles on a global scale.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And by the way, fuck all of you who have me agreeing with Iconoclast Texan.

I'm well aware of the USA's history in South America. What you need to understand is that South America has had these problems with or without USA intervention.

Interventionist policy is not always a bad thing. I'm not saying we should send in troops or use covert CIA ops. But what we're doing with Venezuela mirrors what countries who still have grown-ups in charge are also doing. And it's pretty obvious to me that the State Department is likely doing this while Trumps' back is turned. 

I mean... do any of y'all who are getting antsy about this even know anyone from Venezuela, or with family there right now? Do you realize what's going on there?

Also, you should read up:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 7:15 PM, Hugo Stiglitz said:

There are zero winning moves in Venezuela for the United States.  There are things we can do to ease the pain like take in refugees and offer aid.

The Venezuelan people need to determine their own fate and if that means a bloody civil war so be it.  As history has shown, only true revolutions provide the best path to long term stability. 

Expand  

No dude interventionism is the way to go, despite our abysmal track record with it. 150th time's a charm!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 7:15 PM, Hugo Stiglitz said:

There are zero winning moves in Venezuela for the United States.  There are things we can do to ease the pain like take in refugees and offer aid.

The Venezuelan people need to determine their own fate and if that means a bloody civil war so be it.  As history has shown, only true revolutions provide the best path to long term stability. 

Expand  

Si, senor.  Ingobiernable.

I think the sad reality is that most Central and South American countries, like Russia, are going to cycle through governments that turn totalitarian (if they arent established that way), with associated economic instability as natural resources similarly whipsaw between national and semi-private ownership, for a good long while.  The American contributions to those cycles, while certainly regrettable, may have been fairly inevitable, with or without US intervention.

Edited by TwiceHorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 7:15 PM, Hugo Stiglitz said:

There are zero winning moves in Venezuela for the United States.  There are things we can do to ease the pain like take in refugees and offer aid.

The Venezuelan people need to determine their own fate and if that means a bloody civil war so be it.  As history has shown, only true revolutions provide the best path to long term stability. 

Expand  

Agree 100%, but if there is a war, it needs to be allowed to play out instead of a fake peace with no real winner. 

That said, if there was a war I do not think Colombia would sit idly by. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 5:30 PM, Jhawk said:

We sanctioned their oil.  Big deal.  We have sanctions on half the countries on the planet or companies within those countries and no one is accusing us of intervening in an effort to topple a government.

Expand  

They may not be a big deal if you believe killing Venezuelans isn't a big deal.

  Quote

The effects of sanctions imposed by Presidents Obama and Trump and unilateral measures by Canada and the European Union have directly and indirectly aggravated the shortages in medicines such as insulin and anti-retroviral drugs. To the extent that economic sanctions have caused delays in distribution and thus contributed to many deaths, sanctions contravene the human rights obligations of the countries imposing them.  Moreover, sanctions can amount to crimes against humanity under Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. An investigation by that Court would be appropriate, but the geopolitical submissiveness of the Court may prevent this

Expand  

https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G18/239/31/pdf/G1823931.pdf?OpenElement

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 8:04 PM, Fozzz said:

They may not be a big deal if you believe killing Venezuelans isn't a big deal.

https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G18/239/31/pdf/G1823931.pdf?OpenElement

Expand  

Who killed them first?  Maduro started the madness.  Now his sympathizers want to blame the sanctions that were just placed on oil on the problems that have been culminating for years.  Sounds legit.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

  On 1/31/2019 at 8:14 PM, Jhawk said:

Who killed them first?  Maduro started the madness.  Now his sympathizers want to blame the sanctions that were just placed on oil on the problems that have been culminating for years.  Sounds legit.

Expand  

Well, shit.  I guess you can sore it - 

UN Human Rights Council: 0

Internet messageboard poster Jhawk: 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 6:09 PM, Iconoclast Texan said:

This is the NYT piece by the new President of Venezuela Juan Guaidó. I can’t comprehend how bad teammate, Fozz, hpslugga and Hugo can complain about our actions in recognizing Pres. Guaidó as the interim president which is authorized by the Venezuelan Constitution.

Expand  

You think this is just about recognizing Guaido. It's not. Again, the Americans are already revealing their intention to re-establish dominance of Venezuelan oil reserves, which is in stark contradiction to the wishes of their people who supported Chavez' move to nationalization by a factor of around 95% (and are still strongly in favor of it on principle). Venezuelans are also overwhelmingly against American intervention on this issue, and there isn't a goddamned thing that you can do or say that's going to change that reality. You think that we want to get in on this in some sort of benign, humanitarian capacity and that's a fucking joke, just like it was a fucking joke when we tried it and failed in 2002. That has fuck all to do with "recognizing Pres. Guaido," that has to do with not trusting a single syllable from anyone in the Executive Branch on these issues even if their fucking tongues were notarized, and that's even been true of Democratic administrations, so fuck off with that pissy-assed bullshit about this being about contradicting Trump.

  Quote

Virtually every country in the Western Hemisphere is acting in concert with what we have done.

Expand  

And of those countries, how many are calling for the US to intervene? You're once again conflating two different issues, and you do it so readily because you're dishonest.

  Quote

To be opposed to relieving the suffering of the Venezuelan people is deranged and heartless.

Expand  

No one is opposed to that. That's just you lying again.

  Quote

You all hate Trump so badly that his actions here which the progressive Trudeau of Canada also supports makes y’all seem truly deranged.

Expand  

This isn't about "hating Trump." That's just you lying again.

This is why I say that I think your recent schtick here has been nothing more than a trollish ruse and that there's no possible way you could believe a single syllable of what you type: because I can't even say that what you say is wrong. It's actually less than wrong. At this point, you're either trolling or you've suffered a massive brain injury recently.

  Quote

Anything to change the status quo of starving Venezuelans should be supported. I am excited for the Venezuelan people as they have a realistic shot in liberating their country.

Expand  

They'll have no such shot if Bolton, Trump, the CIA, et al get involved, and that's the course of action you support. You are lying again.

  Quote

I hope I’m alive to see the day that Iran is liberated with US support.

Expand  

Iran was liberated once in the 20th century and the US was adamantly opposed to it. And it wasn't about "hindsight," either. Their opposition to Mossadegh was fundamentally wrong and immoral from the very outset, and they knew it. Why else do you think a priority of the CIA was to, among other things, disseminate "black propaganda" about him and his mythological "alliance" with the Tudeh Party? You're lying again.

  Quote

Elliot Abrams knows what he is doing.

Expand  

He does. It's just that he's not doing what you think he's doing. He's a war criminal, not a humanitarian. The idea that Elliott fucking Abrams, the guy who once said that "the purpose of U.S. aid is to permit people who are fighting on our side to use more violence" in a case where the US was convicted of what the ICJ called "unlawful use of force," is some sort of bleeding-hearted humanitarian is a flat out fraud. He's Exhibit A of what it is to be a hoodlum, hooligan and a racketeer. You think he's a hero. That speaks either to your prowess at trolling or to your ignorance, and I couldn't care less which one is the case.

  Quote

With him and Bolton we have guys who can help effectuate regime change and fulfill our role as the defender of the Americas by promoting free markets and democracy 

Expand  

We've never promoted democracy in the Americas. Ever. That's just you lying again.

That entire screed you just posted is nothing more than an embarrassingly shallow and pedantic Gish Gallop and an astonishing display of what I accused you of earlier: this is pure, 100% Dunning-Kruger effect. You claim to have a "coherent world view," yet every single syllable you post is laughably wrong.

Edited by hpslugga
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 7:28 PM, Rimbo said:

I'm well aware of the USA's history in South America. What you need to understand is that South America has had these problems with or without USA intervention.

Expand  

White Man's Burden, 2019

  Quote

I mean... do any of y'all who are getting antsy about this even know anyone from Venezuela, or with family there right now? Do you realize what's going on there?

Expand  

There is an rampant malnutrition because of tremendous economic disruption. There is an illegitimate president, Maduro, who hates the Western/European powers. He is refusing aid. Western powers are making the tremendous economic disruption far worse in order to try and force the illegitimate president from power. As Brisket advocated earlier before disappearing, we are trying to starve the Venezuelan people into overthrowing Maduro (this is what you advocate, as well, I think).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 6:09 PM, Iconoclast Texan said:

This is the NYT piece by the new President of Venezuela Juan Guaidó. I can’t comprehend how bad teammate, Fozz, hpslugga and Hugo can complain about our actions in recognizing Pres. Guaidó as the interim president which is authorized by the Venezuelan Constitution. Virtually every country in the Western Hemisphere is acting in concert with what we have done. To be opposed to relieving the suffering of the Venezuelan people is deranged and heartless. You all hate Trump so badly that his actions here which the progressive Trudeau of Canada also supports makes y’all seem truly deranged. Anything to change the status quo of starving Venezuelans should be supported. I am excited for the Venezuelan people as they have a realistic shot in liberating their country. I hope I’m alive to see the day that Iran is liberated with US support. Elliot Abrams knows what he is doing. With him and Bolton we have guys who can help effectuate regime change and fulfill our role as the defender of the Americas by promoting free markets and democracy 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Expand  

Man you fit a lot of bullshit into one paragraph.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 8:51 PM, bad_teammate said:

White Man's Burden, 2019

There is an rampant malnutrition because of tremendous economic disruption. There is an illegitimate president, Maduro, who hates the Western/European powers. He is refusing aid. Western powers are making the tremendous economic disruption far worse in order to try and force the illegitimate president from power. As Brisket advocated earlier before disappearing, we are trying to starve the Venezuelan people into overthrowing Maduro (this is what you advocate, as well, I think).

Expand  

No, what I'm advocating is that we recognize Guaidó as the current acting president, which is what we're doing, because that is what Venezuela's own constitution demands, and it's been made pretty clear that Maduro's leadership is a dead-end for Venezuela.

And they would be starving without our sanctions. Venezuela has actually turned back ships full of food and medical aid at the ports.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/31/2019 at 6:09 PM, Iconoclast Texan said:

Elliot Abrams knows what he is doing. With him and Bolton we have guys who can help effectuate regime change and fulfill our role as the defender of the Americas by promoting free markets and democracy

Expand  

in your long history of insane shit, this one may actually take the cake. 

one of oliver north's errand boys during iran-contra and one of the biggest hawks surrounding the push into iraq in 2003...

we have the guys for regime change and promoting free markets and democracy!!!

fuckers never learn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...