Jump to content

2021 NBA Offseason Thread: Business as Usual? -- Trades/Free Agency/Retirements/Etc.

Patrick Bateman

By Patrick Bateman
in Basketball

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Mitch Cumsteen
Mitch Cumsteen

Just another genius take from you.... we should celebrate an ignorant man doubling down his ignorance and further propagate misinformation about something that would save lives.  Good for him, indeed,

Jhawk
Jhawk

You have to understand that a vaccine that was developed in 6 months could warrant some hesitancy over a vaccine that was developed 60 years ago and has had trials upon trials upon trials. You can be

Mitch Cumsteen
Mitch Cumsteen

This post has no place on the basketball board and I'm furious at myself for even replying...  but if you think that MRNA vaccines were only been developed for 6 months and that's all the research beh

Posted Images

d2o

d2o 1602

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, Llogg said:

Lowry was the 3rd or 4th best player on a team that didn't do shit last year. He's worth $30M per for multiple years? Tfoh

Yeah, this really seems to be teams thinking he will bring a  CP3 impact to their team.    Which is wild cause I would have serious reservations giving CP3 that kinda contract at his age so I damn sure wouldn't be anxious to do it for the knock-off version of CP3

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Drew

Drew 2331

Posted
Posted

And someone will do it, and I suspect it’ll help some you team that needs a veteran. Maybe not quite as impactful as Paul.

I wouldn’t want him for 35 for multiple years. But 2 years at 30? Like for my team Dallas? He’d help fix a few flaws for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
d2o

d2o 1602

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, Drew said:

And someone will do it, and I suspect it’ll help some you team that needs a veteran. Maybe not quite as impactful as Paul.

I wouldn’t want him for 35 for multiple years. But 2 years at 30? Like for my team Dallas? He’d help fix a few flaws for sure.

I dont really get why DAL would need him anyway.   He's not going to have the ball and that would be the way for him to be most effective.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Loch Ness Monster

Loch Ness Monster 3533

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Llogg said:

I'd give Lowry 3 years at 20 per but I wouldn't smile doing it. Dallas isn't one player away, so bringing him in on that salary for 2 years is meaningless.

Would get us through the KP years. Don't see how the Mavs win big until KP is gone.

Lowry shoots 40% from 3, is a secondary ball handler and not a complete liability on defense. 

The other options are overpaying Lonzo or maybe John Collins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HtownHorn

HtownHorn 14468

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Loch Ness Monster said:

Would get us through the KP years. Don't see how the Mavs win big until KP is gone.

Lowry shoots 40% from 3, is a secondary ball handler and not a complete liability on defense. 

The other options are overpaying Lonzo or maybe John Collins. 

If Lonzo's reworked shooting motion carries over, I would take him over Lowry right now. Though, he might be able to play off the ball as well as Lowry can right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
d2o

d2o 1602

Posted
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Message Board User said:

🤣

 

Morey is really wilding.   Its like he thinks no one watched the playoffs or that the whole world has amnesia.   And I like Simmons.  A LOT!

Edited by d2o
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Message Board User

Message Board User 12389

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Aqua Buddha said:

Or they're not serious about trading him.

If they’re not, they should be.

After what happened vs Atlanta, Philly cannot go into next season with him on the roster.  They just can’t.  Philly fans would be absolutely brutal towards him at home games and it would be a circus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
d2o

d2o 1602

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, Message Board User said:

If they’re not, they should be.

After what happened vs Atlanta, Philly cannot go into next season with him on the roster.  They just can’t.  Philly fans would be absolutely brutal towards him at home games and it would be a circus.

Not so much.   Fans are fickle.   If he actually works on his game and comes out playing well next yr all will be forgiven.........until he stinks again of course

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BigOrange1

BigOrange1 6422

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, d2o said:

Not so much.   Fans are fickle.   If he actually works on his game and comes out playing well next yr all will be forgiven.........until he stinks again of course

supposedly the philly front office hasn't been able to reach him this summer.  doesn't feel like he's spending the summer working on his game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
d2o

d2o 1602

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, BigOrange1 said:

supposedly the philly front office hasn't been able to reach him this summer.  doesn't feel like he's spending the summer working on his game. 

Thats been the persistent rumor that he doesnt work on his game so its definitely possible.

He's prolly been somewhere laid up with her:

 

 

Maya Jama

 

And I cannot be totally mad at that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 85085

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, d2o said:

Not so much.   Fans are fickle.   If he actually works on his game and comes out playing well next yr all will be forgiven.........until he stinks again of course

I mean, he barely looks like he's worked on his game since his one year at LSU, so why start now? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Patrick Bateman

Patrick Bateman 3903

Posted
  • Author
Posted
12 minutes ago, Patrick Bateman said:

Lakers get some great shooting.....

 

Wait just a minute!!!!  Westy is owed 91-92m over the next 2 years (assuming he takes advantage of his PO), which is a ton, but man that's a light load coming back.  I guess financial flexibility.  Shows the Supermax doesn't always help these mid-market teams.

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UpperWestside

UpperWestside 6126

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, BigOrange1 said:

wonder where lonzo will end up?  if i was a team with some cap space, i'd take a shot on him.

I would gladly take him back on the Lakers. I did not want him shipped out in the Davis trade because I do not believe you give up on point guards that early. I realize he had to be included in that deal, but I’d take him back yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
d2o

d2o 1602

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, Patrick Bateman said:

Wait just a minute!!!!  Westy is owed 91-92m over the next 2 years (assuming he takes advantage of his PO), which is a ton, but man that's a light load coming back.  I guess financial flexibility.  Shows the Supermax doesn't always help these mid-market teams.

  

We were both just saying that Russ wouldn't be in WAS much longer.   I knew the Lakers were going to be big name hunting but that is a lot to give up for a guy that WAS pretty clearly wanted out of anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
d2o

d2o 1602

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Patrick Bateman said:

Oh boy..... Morey and Brand just blasting fantasy basketball offers.

 

In a few weeks he will be coming with that Ainge shit about how close they were to getting something done.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vic Mackey

Vic Mackey 46927

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, d2o said:

We were both just saying that Russ wouldn't be in WAS much longer.   I knew the Lakers were going to be big name hunting but that is a lot to give up for a guy that WAS pretty clearly wanted out of anyway.

Lakers are all in for the next few years. They will worry about the future later on. Those guys they are getting rid of are not huge factors to them winning a title right now. Washington did not get some haul if that is all they get for RW. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
d2o

d2o 1602

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Vic Mackey said:

Lakers are all in for the next few years. They will worry about the future later on. Those guys they are getting rid of are not huge factors to them winning a title right now. Washington did not get some haul if that is all they get for RW. 

Its WAY more than they should have got for a guy they clearly didnt want.    And they can use all of those guys to make other deals.   And if they really are on Simmons for Beal this clears the way for that too.

 

EDIT:   And if you think about it further they got out of what was supposed to be an untradeable contract in John Wall and turned it into multiple guys with tradeable deals and a 1st tonight.   I bet the WAS GM couldn't accept that offer fast enough.

Edited by d2o
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...