Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 4/29/2024 at 11:13 PM, Mikey4 said:

This is just amazing. We've had scoreboard on them for 13 years running, and yet they have somehow dominated us on the field. 

IMG_1085.jpeg.92bab44fd50202c68bb52d6c10d0b36c.jpeg

Expand  

Ah. 2-3 years now? Not next year? 
 

My aggy friend thinks they’re going to be a top 5 team by years end. I just texted back “yeah well we’ll see….” Wasn’t in the mood for aggy mental gymnastics. 

Posted
  On 4/29/2024 at 11:13 PM, Mikey4 said:

This is just amazing. We've had scoreboard on them for 13 years running, and yet they have somehow dominated us on the field. 

IMG_1085.jpeg.92bab44fd50202c68bb52d6c10d0b36c.jpeg

Expand  

I think there were maybe 3 seasons since they joined that I would have been genuinely concerned to play them. They haven’t dominated shit.

Posted
  On 4/30/2024 at 2:03 AM, SeattleHorn said:

What are the odds that after Texas puts up a good record in 2024 we start hearing the phrase "Old SEC" to refer to that mythically glorious period between 2012 and 2023?

Expand  

Well, obviously a 14 team SEC is much stronger than the watered-down 16-team SEC with Texas & OU.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 5
Posted
  On 4/30/2024 at 3:52 AM, texifornia said:

 

Expand  

Who in the holy fuck thought that this would EVER be a good idea? It sends SO many wrong messages and reeks of John Sharp. It's worse than their initial SEC commercial. Just atrocious and atrociously designed. God damn, those fuckers need to get a life, starting with a real identity of their own. I mean, it's their only hope of ever accompliishing anything of note not involving "inventing" maroon vegetables (that began their existance as maroon until we selectively bred them to be orange because orange will ALWAYS be more marketable than maroon, anyway)

So of course, it will never happen. I'll bet they just claim credit for "inventing" maroon beets or something. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
  On 4/30/2024 at 4:36 AM, campcrunk said:

Who in the holy fuck thought that this would EVER be a good idea? It sends SO many wrong messages and reeks of John Sharp. It's worse than their initial SEC commercial. Just atrocious and atrociously designed. God damn, those fuckers need to get a life, starting with a real identity of their own. I mean, it's their only hope of ever accompliishing anything of note not involving "inventing" maroon vegetables (that began their existance as maroon until we selectively bred them to be orange because orange will ALWAYS be more marketable than maroon, anyway)

So of course, it will never happen. I'll bet they just claim credit for "inventing" maroon beets or something. 

Expand  

I think that’s a private mascot from one of their clothing stores, like Aggie Outfitters or similar. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
  On 4/30/2024 at 2:58 PM, EastTexan said:

 When did aggy post a 13-0 record?

Expand  

Not their record. It’s the score of a game they win against us and, allegedly, branded into our mascot. They claimed it’s named Bevo because we modified the 13 - 0 to read BEVO. 

Edited by Xminus6
Posted
  On 4/30/2024 at 3:09 PM, EastTexan said:

Oh I know their bull shit. 

Expand  

One popular theory is that Cadets from Texas A&M stole the mascot to brand 13 – 0, which was the score the Aggies had won by the year before. Faced with that dilemma some UT student suggested combining the 1 and 3 to create a B, made an E out of the -, added a V, kept the 0 to create BEVO.”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bevo_(mascot)

Posted
  On 4/30/2024 at 3:31 PM, TKthunder2 said:

One popular theory is that Cadets from Texas A&M stole the mascot to brand 13 – 0, which was the score the Aggies had won by the year before. Faced with that dilemma some UT student suggested combining the 1 and 3 to create a B, made an E out of the -, added a V, kept the 0 to create BEVO.”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bevo_(mascot)

Expand  

https://www.texasexes.org/about-us/history-and-traditions/truth-about-bevo

tl;dr - The mascot was named Bevo before the 13 - 0 branding. The brand was never changed from 13 - 0 to BEVO. Texas A&M did not steal the mascot.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
  On 4/30/2024 at 4:02 PM, AP101S said:

https://www.texasexes.org/about-us/history-and-traditions/truth-about-bevo

tl;dr - The mascot was named Bevo before the 13 - 0 branding. The brand was never changed from 13 - 0 to BEVO. Texas A&M did not steal the mascot.

Expand  

Yes we know it’s literally in the wiki article I posted (I didn’t quote the whole thing) it’s also why I said this…

  On 4/30/2024 at 3:01 PM, TKthunder2 said:

You don’t know enough of the aggy bullshit lore and fairytales.

Expand  

Just was explaining why aggy put 13-0 on the dumb mascot.

Posted
  On 4/30/2024 at 4:20 PM, Tex Pete said:

Sorry. Not enough SEC.

littlebrother12.thumb.jpg.3bf3aa54e8ec9697bd83de960d4bd38b.jpg

Expand  

Everytime I see this, I see how pathetic Aggies are. Does any other school anywhere or even a hometown curio shop have an opponent's mascot in full costume? It's unthinkable anywhere else because no other rivals have a party that has declared jihad and is identified by that jihad.

You might think that we created the mascot below as satire:

spacer.png

But no, they created that idiotic thing, too.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 4
  • Drool 1
Posted
  On 4/30/2024 at 8:00 PM, RomaVicta said:

Everytime I see this, I see how pathetic Aggies are. Does any other school anywhere or even a hometown curio shop have an opponent's mascot in full costume? It's unthinkable anywhere else because no other rivals have a party that has declared jihad and is identified by that jihad.

You might think that we created the mascot below as satire:

spacer.png

But no, they created that idiotic thing, too.

Expand  

He should apply here:

 

image.thumb.png.00afc181d0bcfb97ae60f761d8f95251.png

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
  On 4/30/2024 at 8:00 PM, RomaVicta said:

Everytime I see this, I see how pathetic Aggies are. Does any other school anywhere or even a hometown curio shop have an opponent's mascot in full costume? It's unthinkable anywhere else because no other rivals have a party that has declared jihad and is identified by that jihad.

You might think that we created the mascot below as satire:

spacer.png

But no, they created that idiotic thing, too.

Expand  

Scared Baby GIF

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

image.png.ea728c37d759e55330fcc4de3733a532.png

image.png.f12612839cd91973084e3aa886e9e117.png

Faxinating.

image.png.99dd2e8be1bf9e9076c2094c2586fa47.png

Uh...

image.png.61a00f0b400c3dca0904c1f4a4582ecf.png

image.png.e5d5ba6a89661f84b21a5ebac73189fa.png

image.png.6731c770682ed52badd00d2affb00976.png

image.png.a55d0d013b620ca72e1e28130217738b.png

Bottom feeders, I tell you! That guy has no creditability! I went to college!

image.png.c4f45ab7708b1c4f33bdb6c71048aba0.png

Of course, the Aggies fall under "other than bottom feeders."

 

image.png.587e30904fc2865a1b327903294fa8af.png

Stop sucking, dumbass. Yes, when you're so sorry that you are barely ranked or not ranked, a lot of the teams you face will be ranked higher than you. You will no doubt struggle more with your schedule than we will with ours. Miss State, Michigan State, and Arizona State all feel your pain.

Edited by RomaVicta
  • Like 2
  • Haha 3
  • Drool 1
Posted
  On 5/1/2024 at 8:39 PM, JesusSweatDuck said:

image.thumb.png.2be75d7be7eafc7fee5afbde14072c73.pngimage.thumb.png.0dd790f906369b59be220286cc37c470.pngimage.thumb.png.83dc600eeebb31cd7dde5ed832ae8049.pngimage.thumb.png.826224079fe54343d60122aa0a075790.png

 

Don't schedule FCS schools and people might respect your schedule a little bit more.

Expand  

Of course that guy doesn't mention that we play Michigan in Ann Arbor.  Michigan.  The team that just won the national championship.  

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted

IMG_7212.thumb.jpeg.b02c430c5109edf45560f2bcb032e3ce.jpeg


If the author’s methodology (which I haven’t taken the time to try to understand) concludes something that is different than my completely biased preconceived expectation, then they lose all credibility! 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 5/1/2024 at 10:10 PM, Hank Chinaski said:

IMG_7212.thumb.jpeg.b02c430c5109edf45560f2bcb032e3ce.jpeg


If the author’s methodology (which I haven’t taken the time to try to understand) concludes something that is different than my completely biased preconceived expectation, then they lose all credibility! 

Expand  

ahem..... "creditablity" my good sir.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 4

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...