Jump to content

Negative Recruiting Your Own School: The aggy Screenshot Megathread


texifornia

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, nnm said:

Sorry.  Here.  Read it at your own pace.

https://texags.com/forums/5/topics/3491756

It really is awesome seeing some of them grasp reality clearly, while trapped in that asylum with others. Some of the others kind of get it, but they’re always going to retreat to red ass when pressed. And then there are the pure red asses with not only the inability to grasp what they’re witnessing, and also, due to their worldview, incapable of grasping what they’re seeing even if they knew football, but also wholly convicted in their righteousness against those who dare to post otherwise. 

We’ve talked about all of this for a long time and it is all now on display so clearly. Cooper hid a lot of ugly on that defense. No one covering ATM or posting on their sites even vaguely bothered to examine this massive issue. @RomaVicta wrote more about it here than all of their write-ups combined. 

York is who he was ranked as - a 3 star who should be really turning conference heads in the Sun Belt. He’s a terrible option as a starting LB in P4. 

The only thing we’ve really collectively missed on in examining ATM heading into the season is Nick Scourton. They hyped him out of the spring game and he had a great season last year at Purdue. Thus far, he hasn’t done shit at ATM in the 2024 season. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 of aggy’s next 4 are against competent passing teams. Their schedule really is dogshit, and again based on the SEC’s scheduling formula, well earned after sucking in the SEC for a decade. 
 

If they keep Reed as the starter, 8-4 is plausible, but they’ll have to win every game they’re favored in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, closetojumping said:

The only thing we’ve really collectively missed on in examining ATM heading into the season is Nick Scourton. They hyped him out of the spring game and he had a great season last year at Purdue. Thus far, he hasn’t done shit at ATM in the 2024 season. 

He’s been good against the run, but his pass rush is nonexistent. He doesn’t have any explosiveness this year, and he looks very overweight. He was listed at 6’4, 280 lbs last year at Purdue. He looks a lot more like 3 bills this year. Maybe some of those reports about how much weight their roster gained actually were true. Moffit’s training their roster like it’s 1999.

Edited by Burt Macklin
  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Burt Macklin said:

He’s been very good against the run, but his pass rush is nonexistent. He doesn’t have any explosiveness this year, and he looks very overweight. He was listed at 6’4, 280 lbs last year at Purdue. He looks a lot more like 3 bills this year. Maybe some of those reports about how much weight their roster gained actually were true. Moffit’s training their roster like it’s 1999.

TexAgs podcasters are crying every week that he’s being held on every play and triple teamed. 

  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, closetojumping said:

The only thing we’ve really collectively missed on in examining ATM heading into the season is Nick Scourton. They hyped him out of the spring game and he had a great season last year at Purdue. Thus far, he hasn’t done shit at ATM in the 2024 season. 

Beg to differ…..he’s collecting a bigger paycheck for not doing shit at ATM.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
  • Haha 3
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought he had a great game against Notre Dame. I'd say he was a key factor in the Aggies being close. I expected to see that monster all year, but maybe he got one of the greenest of the Notre newbies on the line.

In what I've watched since that game, his name comes up just a few times a game.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, billfromlaketravis said:

TexAgs podcasters are crying every week that he’s being held on every play and triple teamed. 

Why do you know this? I have always suspected that you are actually an aggie, and this kind of cements it. 

  • Haha 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, RomaVicta said:

I thought he had a great game against Notre Dame. I'd say he was a key factor in the Aggies being close. I expected to see that monster all year, but maybe he got one of the greenest of the Notre newbies on the line.

In what I've watched since that game, his name comes up just a few times a game.

Notre Dame was definitely his best game, but he was also going up against a true freshman in his first ever start with a QB who holds the ball forever. He hasn’t been anywhere near as good as he was last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Burt Macklin said:

He’s been good against the run, but his pass rush is nonexistent. He doesn’t have any explosiveness this year, and he looks very overweight. He was listed at 6’4, 280 lbs last year at Purdue. He looks a lot more like 3 bills this year. Maybe some of those reports about how much weight their roster gained actually were true. Moffit’s training their roster like it’s 1999.

100% Moffitt put on too much weight with this team, but Elko also literally directed that. It cracks me up. 

I think the guy gets drafted and reshapes his body for the combine if he’s smart. It’s just kind of absurd that they fucked it up even with this guy. I guess he could still go on a run with what they have in front of them. 

44 minutes ago, billfromlaketravis said:

TexAgs podcasters are crying every week that he’s being held on every play and triple teamed. 

He’s not though. Watch the Bowling Green footage if you want to debunk that claim for yourself. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sgt Hulk said:

Sark has done a good job with all brakes in these games to stop us from score 70 multiple times.  But if there’s one game I can donate to that sark will keep all the starters in until the final whistle it’s aggy. The goal should be a modern record for yards and points. Going for 2 after every TD. Onside kicks in the 4th. A 75 point win would be something these fuckers will literally never ever recover from. 

I agree about running up the score but it has to be pretty demoralizing to see the other team (up by 40) with their 2nd stringers in and still running all over you. Put them in but continue running offense.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Sgt Hulk said:

Sark has done a good job with all brakes in these games to stop us from score 70 multiple times.  But if there’s one game I can donate to that sark will keep all the starters in until the final whistle it’s aggy. The goal should be a modern record for yards and points. Going for 2 after every TD. Onside kicks in the 4th. A 75 point win would be something these fuckers will literally never ever recover from. 

Sark: "Excuse me, Mr. Referee. Can we stop the clock on every play? We want to see if we can get to 120."

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, irishtexan said:

This was my favorite exchange. Reality-based aggy makes objective and accurate observation on struggling position groups supported by facts. First response is "this is just wrong" with zero supporting data. 

 

Screenshot (13).png

No shit.  Braxton might as well have said "Nuh uh!"  😂

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sgt Hulk said:

Sark has done a good job with all brakes in these games to stop us from score 70 multiple times.  But if there’s one game I can donate to that sark will keep all the starters in until the final whistle it’s aggy. The goal should be a modern record for yards and points. Going for 2 after every TD. Onside kicks in the 4th. A 75 point win would be something these fuckers will literally never ever recover from. 

And then we could all write letters to the aggies for being such gracious and wonderful hosts.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sgt Hulk said:

Sark has done a good job with all brakes in these games to stop us from score 70 multiple times.  But if there’s one game I can donate to that sark will keep all the starters in until the final whistle it’s aggy. The goal should be a modern record for yards and points. Going for 2 after every TD. Onside kicks in the 4th. A 75 point win would be something these fuckers will literally never ever recover from. 

If the season goes as I think it will by the time we get to the A&M game it won’t mean jack shit for us as we’ll already have a spot in the SEC title game. Will be interesting to see how we approach that game in that case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sgt Hulk said:

Sark has done a good job with all brakes in these games to stop us from score 70 multiple times.  But if there’s one game I can donate to that sark will keep all the starters in until the final whistle it’s aggy. The goal should be a modern record for yards and points. Going for 2 after every TD. Onside kicks in the 4th. A 75 point win would be something these fuckers will literally never ever recover from. 

But, come Thanksgiving, according to aggy they will be hitting all 4-cyl and kicking ass.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SarkAfterDark said:

If the season goes as I think it will by the time we get to the A&M game it won’t mean jack shit for us as we’ll already have a spot in the SEC title game. Will be interesting to see how we approach that game in that case.

Sarkisian has been told to deliver a similar beatdown we gave to Tech on our way out. We are going to beat the shit out of them. I think Sarkisian wants to send a similar message to Venables and ou after the sign stealing shenagins from last year.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

Can you refresh my memory here?

I don’t remember there being a specific incident but Venables is known for being well versed at decoding signals in game

https://www.si.com/college/ohiostate/football/ohio-state-football-acutely-aware-of-clemson-stealing-signs

 

it will be interesting to see how in helmet communication changes things

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, closetojumping said:

It really is awesome seeing some of them grasp reality clearly, while trapped in that asylum with others. Some of the others kind of get it, but they’re always going to retreat to red ass when pressed. And then there are the pure red asses with not only the inability to grasp what they’re witnessing, and also, due to their worldview, incapable of grasping what they’re seeing even if they knew football, but also wholly convicted in their righteousness against those who dare to post otherwise. 

We’ve talked about all of this for a long time and it is all now on display so clearly. Cooper hid a lot of ugly on that defense. No one covering ATM or posting on their sites even vaguely bothered to examine this massive issue. @RomaVicta wrote more about it here than all of their write-ups combined. 

York is who he was ranked as - a 3 star who should be really turning conference heads in the Sun Belt. He’s a terrible option as a starting LB in P4. 

The only thing we’ve really collectively missed on in examining ATM heading into the season is Nick Scourton. They hyped him out of the spring game and he had a great season last year at Purdue. Thus far, he hasn’t done shit at ATM in the 2024 season. 

I think one interesting illustration of their general mindset, versus ours, is how we reacted to our big transfers. Scourton was already pencilled in as a 1st round draft pick for a decent season at Purdue, and we were just cautiously optimistic about Moore. Even when we heard good things in practice, we didn't crown him a first round draft pick. When we started hearing about Isiah Bond dropping balls, we didn't dismiss any of that shit. But every transfer they've taken is a net upgrade, to them, meanwhile we're generally speaking from Missouri on everything, because we try to evaluate things based on data, and not our fee fees. 

3 hours ago, Da Fino said:

Why do you know this? I have always suspected that you are actually an aggie, and this kind of cements it. 

He just goes there for the politics. 

1 hour ago, Hornlover said:

nah_bruh.thumb.png.9ee94a02fc598d6a57fbd1ea36a47d9a.png

Weigman legit looks like a chubby kid there. Not a collegiate athleye. 

16 minutes ago, TheRRKid said:

I don’t remember there being a specific incident but Venables is known for being well versed at decoding signals in game

https://www.si.com/college/ohiostate/football/ohio-state-football-acutely-aware-of-clemson-stealing-signs

 

it will be interesting to see how in helmet communication changes things

I mean, in helmet communication doesn't mean we still shouldn't whip his ass for his lifetime of histrionic bullshit. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HtownHorn said:

Sarkisian has been told to deliver a similar beatdown we gave to Tech on our way out. We are going to beat the shit out of them. I think Sarkisian wants to send a similar message to Venables and ou after the sign stealing shenagins from last year.

I get it, but if the game is meaningless to us, it ain’t worth the injury risk. Although I think we could start our entire second string and still beat them handily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SarkAfterDark said:

I get it, but if the game is meaningless to us, it ain’t worth the injury risk. Although I think we could start our entire second string and still beat them handily.

In what world do you live in where they aggy game is ever meaningless to us?

  • Hook 'Em 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, HtownHorn said:

In what world do you live in where they aggy game is ever meaningless to us?

In a world where I don’t have an Aggie-like mind. Our goal this season is winning the championship, not beating Aggie. If we are guaranteed a spot in the SEC title game prior to the Aggie game then the game is essentially meaningless and based on how this season has gone thus far I don’t think we should risk injury going all out to beat the shit out of Aggie just for bragging rights when it could possibly derail our chance at winning a championship. Fuck that game if it doesn’t count for anything and fuck Aggie too. I’ll find humor in that game meaning everything to them and nothing to us.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, SarkAfterDark said:

In a world where I don’t have an Aggie-like mind. Our goal this season is winning the championship, not beating Aggie. If we are guaranteed a spot in the SEC title game prior to the Aggie game then the game is essentially meaningless and based on how this season has gone thus far I don’t think we should risk injury going all out to beat the shit out of Aggie just for bragging rights when it could possibly derail our chance at winning a championship. Fuck that game if it doesn’t count for anything and fuck Aggie too. I’ll find humor in that game meaning everything to them and nothing to us.

It does count for something, though. And crushing the skull of an in-state conference team isn’t just bragging rights. 

Sarkisian has his eye on a championship and preserving and building depth, but you can bet your ass he won’t be following your thought process here. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

Perception wise, not showing up against an in state recruiting rival, resuming a rivalry after over a decade apart, and starting your 3rd stringers beccause you've got a chance at a national title run later in the year is a bad message to recruits, a bad message to fans, and a bad message to our own players. Fuck no. 

You play your starters for a half and go up appropriately and yank everyone. 

So basically you agree. Cool.

Some of you are adding your own context and arguing a points I’m not making. 

 

Edited by SarkAfterDark
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HtownHorn said:

Sarkisian has been told to deliver a similar beatdown we gave to Tech on our way out. We are going to beat the shit out of them. I think Sarkisian wants to send a similar message to Venables and ou after the sign stealing shenagins from last year.

I want to beat Venable's ass for this crap too.

On3 on X: "Brent Venables posed with Danny Stutsman to help promote his new  NIL tshirts🔥 "Oklahoma only fears God. Texas fears Oklahoma"  https://t.co/HuAhQOWGjr https://t.co/xsdzKj9wLI" / X

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Rage+1 3
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SarkAfterDark said:

So basically you agree. Cool.

Some of you are adding your own context and arguing a points I’m not making. 

 

Actually, I don't agree, based on your exact quote and my exact response below:

 

1 hour ago, SarkAfterDark said:

In a world where I don’t have an Aggie-like mind. Our goal this season is winning the championship, not beating Aggie. If we are guaranteed a spot in the SEC title game prior to the Aggie game then the game is essentially meaningless and based on how this season has gone thus far I don’t think we should risk injury going all out to beat the shit out of Aggie just for bragging rights when it could possibly derail our chance at winning a championship. Fuck that game if it doesn’t count for anything and fuck Aggie too. I’ll find humor in that game meaning everything to them and nothing to us.

 

1 hour ago, SydneyCarton said:

Perception wise, not showing up against an in state recruiting rival, resuming a rivalry after over a decade apart, and starting your 3rd stringers beccause you've got a chance at a national title run later in the year is a bad message to recruits, a bad message to fans, and a bad message to our own players. Fuck no. 

You play your starters for a half and go up appropriately and yank everyone. 

To start, the game will never "Not count for anything." The second part, you implied that losing the game doesn't matter at all, which would mean rolling over or starting our third stringers to risk injury. If that ISN"T what you meant, fine, but I fail to see how you reconcile if the game isn't an early buttfucking, and it ends up competitive, at some point we should pull our starters to not risk injury versus finishing a close game with our starters.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...