Jump to content

This is who Steve Sarkisian is.


lilMAC25

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

It's a "blow me".  I was commenting about a post immediately preceding mine that referred to Sark as the OC.  We really don't need to belabor the point.  

And yet, you can't stop belaboring your own semantic fuckup. Rent free.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

nfl pays more than college, for now

which league has a hard salary cap and which one is the wild wild west ?

I’d leave for the nfl if I were sark.  But he’s clearly not leaving. 
 

now which school do you think has the gravitas and money to steal sark from us?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Earl Haffler said:

Time to bring this guy out of retirement.

image.thumb.png.db1b5c8b5639b55b4d73ac155e8ae231.png

Ah yes, the offensive coaching genius from Groves, TX. The one coach that Mack Brown made a millionaire because he was afraid some other school  would poach him. No thanks,  Greg Davis has taken years off my life with some of his playcalling. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, closetohumping said:

I’d leave for the nfl if I were sark.  But he’s clearly not leaving. 
 

now which school do you think has the gravitas and money to steal sark from us?

 

he's the coach here until he wants to leave or he's forced out 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tex Long said:

Likely? It's nothing but.

"Co-" anything is theoretically justification for a higher salary. 

The actual OC is the one who decides whether to run or pass and which run or pass concept to use. The co-OCs are tasked with making the choice from their implementation. This is true regardless of whether we're talking practice or game.

In game, the OC is focused on how the game plan is working and what changes might be needed to fix a problem or take advantage of opportunities.

It just is not - or at least seems to be not - possible to oversee both the whole game as HC, and also the offense as OC. I lean toward "not possible". 

Almost possible, or we wouldn't be getting to the Final Four, despite our talent advantages. Not quite is nevertheless "not". 

Would it make your semantic problem better if we call the position HOC, for Head Offensive Coordinator?

 

Andy Reid calls the plays and they seem aight. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RC Horn said:

Ah yes, the offensive coaching genius from Groves, TX. The one coach that Mack Brown made a millionaire because he was afraid some other school  would poach him. No thanks,  Greg Davis has taken years off my life with some of his playcalling. :D

No thanks, Greg Davis has taken years off my life with some of his playcalling.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andy Reid calls the plays and they seem aight. 

Andy doesn’t have to deal with 19-22 year old’s mentalities either. Sark does and has to “spread the ball around,” so they get touches. Nice problem to have to worry about, but still a “problem” when it boils down to it.

Hook’em!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, msucolt45 said:


Andy doesn’t have to deal with 19-22 year old’s mentalities either. Sark does and has to “spread the ball around,” so they get touches.

Does he though?  Seems like he settles on his guys and he's not likely to get the others very many touches.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Andy doesn’t have to deal with 19-22 year old’s mentalities either. Sark does and has to “spread the ball around,” so they get touches. Nice problem to have to worry about, but still a “problem” when it boils down to it.

Hook’em!!!

NFL players will bitch about playing time and touches too. Sark absolutely has guys that he tries to get the ball to, everyone else be damned. Seems like he’s got about 5 main ones each year.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking back on it, what the fuck was Dan Quinn thinking firing Sark? If they score on the last play from the Eagles 2 yard line, they probably win the Super Bowl in Sark's 1st year as OC. And then the offense actually improved in year 2..who the hell fires an OC with a top 10 offense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lolathon said:

Looking back on it, what the fuck was Dan Quinn thinking firing Sark? If they score on the last play from the Eagles 2 yard line, they probably win the Super Bowl in Sark's 1st year as OC. And then the offense actually improved in year 2..who the hell fires an OC with a top 10 offense?

Falcons offense was better the year before

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...