Jump to content

2021-22 Big XII Basketball Thread of Fuck Baylor

El Diablo

By El Diablo
in Basketball

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Brian Fantana
Brian Fantana

Man, I could not be prouder of our team than I am right now, playing like this without Shannon and McCullar. Great stuff.

Pancho
Pancho

Let me get this straight… This is a Texas message board. Someone says “fuck tech” and the tech fan—who showed his ass on this Texas board after tech beat Texas in Austin and basically told us to

'stache
'stache

Hey we won, fuck Baylor 

Posted Images

Al_4_ISU

Al_4_ISU 12612

Posted
Posted

Jesus Christ, I am REALLY glad we have a win over Tech on the books.  When the committee looks back in March they aren't going to remember that they were down 2 starters.  

Also, I think the Pokes are in for a long damn season.  We'll still probably lose in GIA in front of 5 people.  The death of that home court advantage saddens me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SamsCorner

SamsCorner 395

Posted
Posted
On 1/12/2022 at 9:12 PM, DeadArmadillo said:


Ok State played late at WVU Tuesday night. Then at 6 on Thursday in Lubbock. Then at Waco at 4 on Saturday.

Tech has an 11am tip against K State in Manhattan on Saturday With the one home game in between

But hell. They’re young. It’ll be a growing and bonding experience

When they supposed to study for quizzes and test and such.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brian Fantana

Brian Fantana 6856

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, 'stache said:

I guess if the postseason ban had to happen this is the right year. Rebuilding and forgot to recruit someone who can make a fucking jumpshot.

Y'all at least are really athletic. It has to be real hard for Boynton to motivate the players game in and game out considering the circumstances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Al_4_ISU said:

Jesus Christ, I am REALLY glad we have a win over Tech on the books.  When the committee looks back in March they aren't going to remember that they were down 2 starters.  

Also, I think the Pokes are in for a long damn season.  We'll still probably lose in GIA in front of 5 people.  The death of that home court advantage saddens me.

Down 2 starters?  IIRC we had 7 players available for that game.

No excuses, but it was a lot different than 'down 2 starters.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Al_4_ISU

Al_4_ISU 12612

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, slorch said:

Down 2 starters?  IIRC we had 7 players available for that game.

No excuses, but it was a lot different than 'down 2 starters.'

I wasn't really trying to argue semantics.  My point was that Tech was significantly short handed in the ISU game, but the committee is unlikely to remember that when reviewing ISU's resume in March.  By the same token, assuming we finish around .500, Tech won't be penalized for the loss in Hilton.

The two starters being out were a bigger deal than the lack of depth, IMO.  Put those guys back in the line up and how many guys are playing?  Maybe 8?  I don't know how deep into the bench Tech usually goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 86939

Posted
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Al_4_ISU said:

I wasn't really trying to argue semantics.  My point was that Tech was significantly short handed in the ISU game, but the committee is unlikely to remember that when reviewing ISU's resume in March.  By the same token, assuming we finish around .500, Tech won't be penalized for the loss in Hilton.

The two starters being out were a bigger deal than the lack of depth, IMO.  Put those guys back in the line up and how many guys are playing?  Maybe 8?  I don't know how deep into the bench Tech usually goes.

Tech won't be penalized for the loss for missing players

ISU won't be penalized for winning that game against a shorthanded Tech

That's basically what they did last year.  You get a mulligan for losing when short-handed; the winning team doesn't really get dinged for the circumstances either.   It's an asterisk on Tech's resume when the committee is doing their evaluations. 

Edited by Js1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

I'd be just fine if Tech continues improving their position towards this whole seeding rigamarole.

It a certain point, you still gotta beat the team you're paired up with.  I care more about who gets sent where on the first weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Uncle Nate

Uncle Nate 2097

Posted
Posted (edited)

Al_4_ISU's original point is the correct one.  Come March, the selection committee isn't going to factor in the extenuating circumstances around that game.  If Tech continues to have a successful season, it will be a heavily weighted W in favor of ISU.  And for Tech the only way that L will be assessed favorably or unfavorably depends on how successful ISU is the rest of the season.  They are not going to factor in the "only 7 players" either way.

Edited by Uncle Nate
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 86939

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, Uncle Nate said:

Al_4_ISU's original point is the correct one.  Come March, the selection committee isn't going to factor in the extenuating circumstances around that game.  If Tech continues to have a successful season, it will be a heavily weighted W in favor of ISU.  And for Tech the only way that L will be assessed favorably or unfavorably depends on how successful ISU is the rest of the season.  They are not going to factor in the "only 7 players" either way.

You are not entirely correct.  

NCAA basketball committees will take COVID-19 absences 'into consideration' amid omicron surge - CBSSports.com

Quote

With COVID-19 issues wreaking havoc on college basketball's schedule and on rosters within the sport, NCAA leadership released a statement Thursday affirming that it is taking pandemic-created circumstances into account when it comes to evaluating NCAA Tournament resumes. 

"As we typically do, the men's and women's basketball committees will track on player and coach availability via the conference monitoring program, which is an invaluable part of the evaluation process for both championships," Division I men's basketball committee chair Tom Burnett and Division I women's basketball committee chair Nina King said in the statement. "Losses are still losses, and wins are still wins, but we will continue taking into consideration the absence of a coach or players, whether they are COVID-related or due to injury or suspension."

The reassurances come as teams throughout the country deal with COVID-19 cases that, in some cases, are forcing them to play with diminished rosters. No. 25 Texas Tech, for example, dressed just seven scholarship players in its 51-47 loss at No. 11 Iowa State on Wednesday night. Big 12 rules only allow for a "no contest" if a team has less than six scholarship players and one coach available. Other leagues such as the ACC, Big Ten and SEC have set the minimum number of scholarship players at seven.

It is entirely part of their calculation when they seed teams.  Tech will always have that loss on their resume, but the circumstances of that loss will be considered.  It if came down to Tech and another team for a seed, that loss wouldn't (and should not) ding Tech.  The conference made them play, so they played. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted (edited)

Tech's reputation and program results matter far more than the circumstances of that particular game.

Red Raiders will be fine, with regard to controlling where this goes.

My point about the initial comment was merely just to point out the roster for the tilt in Ames was a long way from just 'missing 2 starters."  Didn't mean to start seeding angle discussion.

Big XII teams are gonna have some losses.

Edited by slorch
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Js1

Js1 86939

Posted
Posted

I don't give one rat's flying ass about tech's reputation or program results.  I hope you at least took yourself to dinner before you gave yourself a wet sloppy blowjob with that comment. 

Tech played the game because the Big 12 said they had to.  They lost - it was an admirable effort with a depleted roster.  And it won't ding you at the end of the season, because the committee knows the circumstances.  That's all the convo was.  We saw it all over the country last year - teams who had to play (and lost) down 1, 2, sometimes 3 players, because their conference told them to play.  The committee will take it into account IF it came down to Tech versus another team for a particular seed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Uncle Nate

Uncle Nate 2097

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

Wow that's a horrible call on K-State, no way that was a flagrant

I have full faith that the Big 12 refs have plenty more bad calls to make in this game, so I'm sure it will even out.  But yeah, that was bad to call that a flagrant, ESPECIALLY after seeing it multiple times on replay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brian Fantana

Brian Fantana 6856

Posted
Posted
Just now, Js1 said:

KSU wanted a damn win and they got one. One of these close games had to go their way eventually. Road games in the Big 12, yo

Yup, they were fired up the whole game. Definitely well deserved and hard earned.

First time all year I've seen us where we have guys looking like they don't wanna be there. Fatigue'll do that to you, I guess. Adams has to remind the guys that it doesn't get any easier in conference play, gotta be on every game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LTtxfan

LTtxfan 49909

Posted
Posted (edited)

Scores for January 15, 2022

Oklahoma State   61

1Baylor    54

 

West Virginia  59

9Kansas      85

 

21Texas  70

15Iowa State   79

 

19Texas Tech   51

Kansas State    62

 

Final/OT

TCU            59

Oklahoma  58

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by LTtxfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...