Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, WhatTheBuck said:

3 seconds seems generous. 

not at all. it probably should have been more. they snapped the ball with :02. it could only be :03 or more.

Posted
1 minute ago, dcar00 said:

not at all. it probably should have been more. they snapped the ball with :02. it could only be :03 or more.

 

Just now, Firemans4Horn said:

Thankfully the game ended as it should have. Smith spiked it with time on the clock the first time so all the review shit really shouldn’t have mattered. 

These are both correct. In the end the replay booth's stupidity didn't matter. Only possible thing you could argue is that it iced the Seattle kicker to have to wait an extra 3 minutes.

Posted

Against the number 2 rushing defense, without their starting left tackle, that play where he just bulldozed Poyer is the perfect example, he just wears people the fuck down and no one that big should be that fast

Posted
16 minutes ago, Beantown Express 2.0 said:

No reason to not kick the FG there.  

I like the decision. Go for the win. Playing for OT where you might not even get the ball is not the way to win games. they needed an inch and have a 240lb, tall QB. And talent all over. If you can't pick that up to have 4 shots at the endzone less than 5 yards away, you deserve to lose.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...