Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 3/13/2022 at 4:32 AM, Underdog said:

Can’t say I’ve paid much attention to them this season but impressive tonight.  Bruins will be a tough out also. 

Expand  

Yes, we will definitely be a tough out.  We can get to the final four.  Or lose in the first round.  We won 10 of our last 12, and can cause havoc in the tourney.

Posted

that was a really high level game and i expect both teams to make deep runs in the tournament*.  arizona is gonna be the #2 overall seed.

*of course, i thought the same thing about the big ten title game last year and my bracket was ruined due to that thinking.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
  On 3/13/2022 at 4:45 AM, BigOrange1 said:

that was a really high level game and i expect both teams to make deep runs in the tournament*.  arizona is gonna be the #2 overall seed.

*of course, i thought the same thing about the big ten title game last year and my bracket was ruined due to that thinking.

Expand  

You are high if you think Arizona will be a #2.  I will bet you any amount they will be a#1.

Posted

my guess for the 1 seeds is: 1 - gonzaga (west), 2 - arizona (south), 3 - kansas (midwest), 4 - baylor (east)

two seeds should be kentucky, purdue, auburn and tennessee if they beat aggy tomorrow.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
  On 3/13/2022 at 5:01 AM, BigOrange1 said:

my guess for the 1 seeds is: 1 - gonzaga (west), 2 - arizona (south), 3 - kansas (midwest), 4 - baylor (east)

two seeds should be kentucky, purdue, auburn and tennessee if they beat aggy tomorrow.

Expand  

Tech if Tennessee doesn’t win tomorrow imo. 

Posted
  On 3/13/2022 at 4:45 AM, BigOrange1 said:

that was a really high level

Expand  

It really was, that stretch where both teams were trading haymakers like a heavyweight fight trading baskets.  Fun game to watch. 
 

A Zona/Zags finals would be fun on several levels.  

Posted (edited)
  On 3/13/2022 at 4:20 AM, LTtxfan said:

Ucla has guys that can go one-on-one and score...  DAMN

 

Zona is about execution, assists and damn athletic...   WOW

Expand  

Just a quick look at the stats bears out what you said. 

UCLA took 69 shots, made 29. Arizona took 52 shots, made 27.

Arizona: 7/14 from 3. UCLA 5/22 from 3

Campbell/Juzang/Bernard were a combined 19/43 & 5/15 from 3.

Fouls: UCLA 21.  Arizona 19

FT: UCLA 13/17.   Arizona 23/28

Assists: UCLA 9. Arizona 20

Every basket Arizona made, that was not one of the 7 three-pointers, was from inside the paint. That leads me to also think the fouls committed by UCLA were much more costly, as evidenced by the disparity in free throws.

 

Edited by PittsburghTiger
  • Like 1
Posted
  On 3/13/2022 at 5:57 PM, Underdog said:

Ivy League Finals on the Deuce for those interested. 

Expand  

Just an awful end game by Princeton not getting a shot up after Yale tries to blow the game with a stupid pass to a big for a dunk that was never going to happen because of fouls, and then said big putting up two absurdly awful ft’s. 

Posted
  On 3/13/2022 at 7:20 PM, The Ace of Aces said:

The Spiders might’ve just knocked out aggy. You hate to see it. 

Expand  

That’s what I was thinking but then they showed Xavier as the bubble team.

Is aggy in one of the play-in games?

Never thought about it before now but are the play-in games only for at-large teams?

Posted
  On 3/13/2022 at 7:26 PM, BluTechsan said:

That’s what I was thinking but then they showed Xavier as the bubble team.

Is aggy in one of the play-in games?

Never thought about it before now but are the play-in games only for at-large teams?

Expand  

I personally think Va Tech knocked out Xavier a few days ago. I think it’ll be aggy or SMU out. 

Posted
  On 3/13/2022 at 7:26 PM, BluTechsan said:

That’s what I was thinking but then they showed Xavier as the bubble team.

Is aggy in one of the play-in games?

Never thought about it before now but are the play-in games only for at-large teams?

Expand  

No 4 at large for 2 spots on the 11 or 12 line, 4 AQ’s for 2 spots on the 16 line. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
  On 3/13/2022 at 7:35 PM, Wulaw Horn said:

No 4 at large for 2 spots on the 11 or 12 line, 4 AQ’s for 2 spots on the 16 line. 

Expand  

Thanks. Like I said I never really paid attention to it before. But now that I know, I gotta say, that’s kinda messed up.

AQs should be in the field of 64. Don’t care if were upset winners of their conference tourneys - automatic should mean just that. I’d have no problem giving them 16 seeds but they should be in.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
Posted
  On 3/13/2022 at 8:14 PM, BluTechsan said:

Thanks. Like I said I never really paid attention to it before. But now that I know, I gotta say, that’s kinda messed up.

AQs should be in the field of 64. Don’t care if were upset winners of their conference tourneys - automatic should mean just that. I’d have no problem giving them 16 seeds but they should be in.

Expand  

Yup I agree 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...