Meta World Least

[956 Worldwide 35589]

7 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

I dabbled with myspace but have never signed up for the facing book because I didn't get into myspace at all.

Was it functionality? Widespread adoption? Or the algorithms that made facebook take off where myspace failed?  Some combination?  I never saw them as that fundamentally different at the beginning. Obviously facebook far outstripped it.

The .edu address was key. Facebook became known as a site that was cool among a critical demographic, which was not just the youths, but the youths in college. The artificial scarcity and the illusion of exclusivity made it a more desirable place to be than MySpace, which was for Tila Tequila. There was some greed and mismanagement but what it really boiled down to was influencers before influencers were a thing. The behavior and preferences of college kids is an outsize driver of culture. 

[atomheartbevo 90636]

 

[atomheartbevo 90636]

12 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

I dabbled with myspace but have never signed up for the facing book because I didn't get into myspace at all.

Was it functionality? Widespread adoption? Or the algorithms that made facebook take off where myspace failed?  Some combination?  I never saw them as that fundamentally different at the beginning. Obviously facebook far outstripped it.

4 hours ago, 956 Worldwide said:

The .edu address was key. Facebook became known as a site that was cool among a critical demographic, which was not just the youths, but the youths in college. The artificial scarcity and the illusion of exclusivity made it a more desirable place to be than MySpace, which was for Tila Tequila. There was some greed and mismanagement but what it really boiled down to was influencers before influencers were a thing. The behavior and preferences of college kids is an outsize driver of culture. 

Facebook had a better/easier-to-use-and-understand interface than MySpace.  FB was always tweaking the interface/testing new stuff.  MySpace could sometimes get into a rut.

Pretty good article on the evolution of FB's interface - the newsfeed was added in 2006 (and the newsfeed can't be overstated) along with them opening it up to the public.  They added a mobile interface in 2007 when smartphones were barely a thing - 2007 was when the original iPhone launched.  Prior to 2007, smartphones had really shitty screens/interfaces, cell phone data use was....poor, and they were really confined to businesses.

https://medium.com/@siddartha.kandikonda/when-we-start-designing-any-project-i-was-told-by-the-clients-to-refer-to-facebook-and-they-would-9ce4c980a9bd

MySpace wasn't quite GeoCities, but FB seemed to be running ahead of them in adapting new technologies.

I could be very wrong though, but I remember when I got on FB, that the design was much better than MySpace (particularly for my older relatives when they were able to join FB later on).

 

[atomheartbevo 90636]

On 10/28/2021 at 3:03 PM, Goofyboy said:

Didn’t we already do Second life or Half Life or some other game thing?

I still login to Second Life once or twice a year, just to see if anything has drastically changed.

Also to see if the Gor communities are still going strong.

[Biff Tannen 46150]

On 10/29/2021 at 9:31 PM, atomheartbevo said:

Facebook had a better/easier-to-use-and-understand interface than MySpace.  FB was always tweaking the interface/testing new stuff.  MySpace could sometimes get into a rut.

Pretty good article on the evolution of FB's interface - the newsfeed was added in 2006 (and the newsfeed can't be overstated) along with them opening it up to the public.  They added a mobile interface in 2007 when smartphones were barely a thing - 2007 was when the original iPhone launched.  Prior to 2007, smartphones had really shitty screens/interfaces, cell phone data use was....poor, and they were really confined to businesses.

https://medium.com/@siddartha.kandikonda/when-we-start-designing-any-project-i-was-told-by-the-clients-to-refer-to-facebook-and-they-would-9ce4c980a9bd

MySpace wasn't quite GeoCities, but FB seemed to be running ahead of them in adapting new technologies.

I could be very wrong though, but I remember when I got on FB, that the design was much better than MySpace (particularly for my older relatives when they were able to join FB later on).

 

MySpace held true to its original vision of being an online version of some kid’s diary. Facebook decided to go the more rapey route. 

[atomheartbevo 90636]

 

[atomheartbevo 90636]

On 10/30/2021 at 9:41 PM, Biff Tannen said:

MySpace held true to its original vision of being an online version of some kid’s diary. Facebook decided to go the more rapey route. 

They are planning retail stores, so now they are going the Apple/Microsoft route.

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/05/meta-is-reportedly-planning-retail-stores-as-it-pushes-into-metaverse.html

Quote

The stores, which have no slated opening date, will allow the company to showcase devices like virtual reality headsets and teleconferencing gadgets that allow people to video chat through Facebook, the Times reported. It would be the social media company’s first physical store.

News of the company’s vision comes about a week after Facebook changed its name to Meta. It said it’s shifting focus to building a virtual world or metaverse where users can socialize, work and play. The retail plans, which The Times said could be scrapped, indicate Meta is in need of a real-world presence to showcase what it can do in the virtual world.

I can just picture a store full of old people with VR headsets on, and they are living out what we all experienced 10-15 years ago in Second Life. 

It'll be an R-rated version of this:

Also, I'm claiming dibs on setting up the new GOR world in Facebook's Metaverse, it'll be superior to Second Life's GOR world.

[Nice Guy Eddie 13725]

Too many are missing out on the reason for this change.  Zuckerberg will claim to CEO of Meta and be at an arms length away from Facebook or Instagram apps. “Congress - you want me to testify about Facebook’s impact on children, I’m not involved in day to day operations or decisions so my testimony will be limited.” He’ll pay someone big bucks to take the heat about Facebook or Instagram.

[Fudge Nuggets 19453]

1 hour ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

He’ll pay someone big bucks to take the heat about Facebook or Instagram.

I’ll do it for $10MM per year.  They can haul me in front of Congress as many times as they want. 

Hell, I’d probably do it for $2MM but not a penny less.

[TwiceHorn 32071]

1 hour ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Too many are missing out on the reason for this change.  Zuckerberg will claim to CEO of Meta and be at an arms length away from Facebook or Instagram apps. “Congress - you want me to testify about Facebook’s impact on children, I’m not involved in day to day operations or decisions so my testimony will be limited.” He’ll pay someone big bucks to take the heat about Facebook or Instagram.

Well that, and it's probably setting up structures to prepare to divest, and/or give the illusion of divestiture.

[elfenix 34743]

Zuck says he's not considered stepping down from Facebook:

https://www.theinformation.com/articles/mark-zuckerberg-on-why-he-wont-step-down-as-ceo-and-facebooks-new-name

[atomheartbevo 90636]

4 hours ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Too many are missing out on the reason for this change.  Zuckerberg will claim to CEO of Meta and be at an arms length away from Facebook or Instagram apps. “Congress - you want me to testify about Facebook’s impact on children, I’m not involved in day to day operations or decisions so my testimony will be limited.” He’ll pay someone big bucks to take the heat about Facebook or Instagram.

Maybe if he knew how to read the room.  But he doesn't, which is why he's staying.

I honestly have been expected something like this (a reorg plus a push into metaverse stuff) for several years. Facebook didn't buy into VR/Oculus for shits and giggles, and Oculus wasn't a potential FB competitor.

Zuckerberg seems exactly like the type to have thought about Second Life for years, probably even obsessed over it.  He's probably read Snowcrash and Neuromancer a few dozen times.

[Godzillatron 295]

Well this is predictable.

http://meta.company


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Godzillatron 295]

Well this is predictable.

http://meta.company


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Here’s the text if you don’t want to click through.

For Immediate Public Release
Facebook Stole Our Name and Livelihood

Hello, World!

We are Meta Company.

Original Flavor.

For the last three months, Facebook lawyers have been hounding us to sell our name to them. We refused their offer on multiple bases. Namely, the low offer wouldn’t cover the costs of changing our name, and we insisted on knowing the client and intent, which they did not want to disclose.

At least two law firms were involved: One in the USA that requested our trademark and domains (Kilpatrick, Townsend & Stockton), and the other in Europe aggressively contacting trying to get us to sell our domain registrations (Hogan Lovells).

On October 20th, 2021, during a phone call with Facebook attorneys, we declined their low offer and maintained our requirements. At this point, we presumed it was Facebook and identified them on the call. The attorney representing Facebook declared they would respect our existing right and registration.

On October 28th, 2021, Facebook decided to commit trademark infringement and call themselves “Meta”.

They couldn’t buy us, so they tried to bury us by force of media. We shouldn't be surprised by these actions — from a company that continually says one thing and does another. Facebook and its operating officers are deceitful and acting in bad faith, not only towards us, but to all of humanity.

It's unfortunate to have been associated with a company so rooted in controversy and fixated on domination. We aim to be distinguished from Facebook's totalitarian view of the future. We hope the negative association with Facebook and its founder will be forgotten — but we won't ignore the damages done.

We have proceeded to file the necessary legal actions. This message may be regarded as a public cease and desist. We welcome your support.

One more thing: Our new product launch just got delayed because of Facebook. We must deal with these matters. In the coming weeks, we will make an announcement earlier than we expected. We promise it will be good. Stay tuned.



Thank You.

Sincerely,
Nate Skulic
Founder, MetaCompany


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[pacman 7502]

Shitty company with no integrity or concern for national security and nuclear energy, what could go wrong?

[Brisketexan 106874]

9 hours ago, pacman said:

Shitty company with no integrity or concern for national security and nuclear energy, what could go wrong?

Just remember, any company that invests at least $1 billion in something will get "fully expedited approvals and permits."

For nuclear facilities.

What could go wrong?

[Pescado_Rojo 19583]

2 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

Just remember, any company that invests at least $1 billion in something will get "fully expedited approvals and permits."

For nuclear facilities.

What could go wrong?

The real question is when do Brisket and Pescado open freedom eagle 'merica nukular reactor construction.. I think @Schulz2.0 works in the field. He can be our SME for the bid. 

Edited Wednesday at 05:50 PM by Pescado_Rojo

[Brisketexan 106874]

5 minutes ago, Pescado_Rojo said:

The real question is when do Brisket and Pescado open freedom eagle 'merica nukular reactor construction.. I think @Schulz2.0 works in the field. He can be our SME for the bid. 

First, we need a giant slug of money to funnel to the administration by renting out a block of 100 rooms for a year at MAL or somesuch.  Bottom line, unless you're already an oligarch, the barriers to entry are insurmountable.

I promise you, though, Elon Musk's NuXlear Energy business will be booming by the end of Q1 next year.

[Pescado_Rojo 19583]

1 minute ago, Brisketexan said:

First, we need a giant slug of money to funnel to the administration by renting out a block of 100 rooms for a year at MAL or somesuch.  Bottom line, unless you're already an oligarch, the barriers to entry are insurmountable.

I promise you, though, Elon Musk's NuXlear Energy business will be booming by the end of Q1 next year.

Is this something we could use the wreath fund for? We could also put Barron on the BOD. I'm sure his knowledge of the cyber will come in handy. 

Edited Wednesday at 05:59 PM by Pescado_Rojo

[Brisketexan 106874]

Just now, Pescado_Rojo said:

Is this something we could use the wreath fund for? 

No.  We're going to go with the only thing that matters anymore......

 

 

 

CRYPTO!

[Schulz2.0 29280]

24 minutes ago, Pescado_Rojo said:

The real question is when do Brisket and Pescado open freedom eagle 'merica nukular reactor construction.. I think @Schulz2.0 works in the field. He can be our SME for the bid. 

My wife and I were both Navy nukes but have worked in different fields for almost 10 years now. We both have a decent amount of friends that still work in the industry.

[Vegas64 713]

16 hours ago, pacman said:

Shitty company with no integrity or concern for national security and nuclear energy, what could go wrong?

Firstly, Nuclear Power Plants are the way to go. Energy Grid thread out front shoulda told ya.

Secondly, having worked in/around the power and utilities industry. I'm not so sure that you can tell a difference in integrity for energy companies and tech companies like meta. It's the meme of Pam saying they are the same picture.

Thirdly, I thought Meta was building or investing in SAMs. I could be thinking of Google. or Microsoft.

I mean all big tech is adding power (nuclear) to their portfolios due to the greedy power hog known as AI.

[wild_turkey 3296]

Just remember, any company that invests at least $1 billion in something will get "fully expedited approvals and permits."
For nuclear facilities.
What could go wrong?

I’m conflicted. We do need to be investing in nuclear energy, but it also seems like the Trump administration will not be the best time to launch these plans.

[FartingMonk 3614]

So I work for Meta.  The data center side of it is probably about 70 percent Navy and commercial nukes.  About 40 percent are licensed SROs by the DOE.  The investment into nuclear power is just that.  We are paying someone to build and run the nuclear side of it.  We just want the energy.  AI is power hungry.