Kyle Rittenhouse

[JimmyJames 12271]

2 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

He was shot in the back because the first two bullets struck him in the front after pedo reached for his gun.  So he was toppling over and the last bullet hit him in the back.  He fired four shots in.76 seconds.  Don't try and misrepresent that he shot Rosenbaum with his back turned.  Because that is not at all what happened and you fucking know it.

Of course you are missing the point so fuck it it’s not worth it discussing it with you. Why bother.

Proceed ahead with your killer Kyle worship. 

[JimmyJames 12271]

3 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

Which witnesses testified as to his recklessness in handling the rifle?  And what specifically did they say?  Because it looks like to me he went 3-0 against his attackers and did not hit any bystanders.  Seems like he has proven he is in the top 1% in handling a weapon.  I doubt the average Navy Seal would have done much better.

Look it up yourself. 

[JimmyJames 12271]

2 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

No offense but we all saw your analogy on Rittenhouse.  One of the top three dumbest things I've ever seen posted on the internet.

Lol. No offense but I’m calling you a dumbass? Interesting.

[B00M 6280]

Sack I think this discusses the witness testimony Jimmy mentioned. 

https://www.npr.org/2021/11/05/1053018241/kyle-rittenhouse-trial-first-week-what-happened

 

[Bevo14 8272]

48 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

Which witnesses testified as to his recklessness in handling the rifle?  And what specifically did they say?  Because it looks like to me he went 3-0 against his attackers and did not hit any bystanders.  Seems like he has proven he is in the top 1% in handling a weapon.  I doubt the average Navy Seal would have done much better.

If Kyle is in the top 1%, that's a pretty damn good case for taking guns away from everybody. 

[wildcat09 29213]

10 hours ago, fattyflattie said:

DT is about hearing more than one point of view. 

Then why do they complain to the mods every time a liberal posts over there?

[B00M 6280]

28 minutes ago, Bevo14 said:

If Kyle is in the top 1%, that's a pretty damn good case for taking guns away from everybody. 

Greetings comrade

[fattyflattie 4636]

35 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

Then why do they complain to the mods every time a liberal posts over there?

Dunno.  I enjoy the visits.

[High Plains Drifter 10970]

 

I've seen Sack mention this a number of times, so I'm going to ask:

 

do we have any actual evidence that Pudge "rendered aid" to anyone?

do we have any actual evidence that he cleaned graffiti?

 

 

 

 

[DigglerontheHoof 21044]

8 hours ago, Johnny Sack said:

Which witnesses testified as to his recklessness in handling the rifle?  And what specifically did they say?  Because it looks like to me he went 3-0 against his attackers and did not hit any bystanders.  Seems like he has proven he is in the top 1% in handling a weapon.  I doubt the average Navy Seal would have done much better.

Sack of shit has now raised the little coward cunt up to Navy Seal status.  Jesus fucking Christ, you're an idiot. 

Edited November 8, 2021 by DigglerontheHoof

[wildcat09 29213]

Sack is itching to shoot some liberals nearly as hard as TTom was on 1/6. He’s going to go on the mother of all benders when Rittenhouse gets off and will make Surly uninhabitable for normal people for at least a day.

[Fletch 5799]

9 hours ago, B00M said:

*semi automatic rifle

**what a garbage thing to say

I don’t necessarily think he should be dead but the more I think about it, the more I think he’s a….

 

[PenelopeWitherspoon 19092]

11 hours ago, Johnny Sack said:

Yes there are no Penelope's over there.  Jimmy talks shit to me all the time over there.  I don't go around and neg bomb him, even though he likes to walk the line on doxxing me.  I will respond to his posts.

Almost without exception I will never neg anyone unless they first neg me in a drive by neg.  And most of the time I let that go.

 

Actually, I’m over there often.  But between you guys slobbing each other’s knobs in the Kyle Rittenhouse thread or the anti-vax stupidity, I don’t post as much as I used to, not that I post a ton anyway.  Under 6,000 posts today since the great migration.

[Mrs Whiggins 13049]

Recovering from surgery, I spent the weekend feeling sorry for myself (bad football, uncomfortable stitches) and was unexpectedly rewarded with a cinema treat on television yesterday. Relevant to this thread? Tangentially, yes, as the first movie was The Oxbow Incident (1943) and the second was Runaway Jury (2003). The film that would have completed a nice trifecta, Twelve Angry Men (the 1957 version so as to include a nice twofer on Henry Fonda) alas did not air, but I would have happily watched.

Judgement, juries, mobs, and justice—who dispenses, who are the victims, and who suffers the consequences, all on display as a snapshot of our country and its citizens. Law and order, rule of law, innocence, guilt, and it's all a sideshow.

 

If the GOP wants to laud Rittenhouse as a martyr, it is useful to point out that the medics (majority unarmed) across the country who assisted both protestors and police during the summer of 2020 with bandages, water, etc were attacked by rubber bullets, gassed, and beaten…by law enforcement. If the medical personnel were armed and going to act in self defense, they would have been shooting at the police, and we all know how that would have turned out.

 

[Cheeseweasel 26437]

Cool. Still didn't break the law.

[Incredulity 11541]

2 minutes ago, Cheeseweasel said:

Cool. Still didn't break the law.

[Cheeseweasel 26437]

Penelope mad. Sorry the protests for the justified shooting of a rapist goes against your narrative.

[Johnny Sack 8397]

 

[PenelopeWitherspoon 19092]

1 minute ago, Cheeseweasel said:

Penelope mad. Sorry the protests for the justified shooting of a rapist goes against your narrative.

Keep choking that chicken.  Last I checked, Kyle Rittenhouse wasn't a judge, he didn't serve on the jury (he isn't old enough), yet he acted as executioner.  This is a dumbass kid who WANTED to kill people.  The deification of him by Johnny Sack of Shit and the rest of you dipshits is fucking ridiculous.

 

[tx 3 putt 76296]

26 minutes ago, Cheeseweasel said:

Cool. Still didn't break the law.

minor in possession of a firearm 

[Cheeseweasel 26437]

Why do you support rape?

[Cheeseweasel 26437]

2 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

minor in possession of a firearm 

Cool. Charge him with a misdemeanor, let him pay the fine,  and move on.

[PenelopeWitherspoon 19092]

1 minute ago, Cheeseweasel said:

Why do you support rape?

Just because I think Kyle Rittenhouse murdered people, doesn't mean that I support rape.  Vigilante justice is against the law.  And, please do me a fucking favor and prove to me that Rittenhouse knew the guy he murdered was a rapist.  He didn't.  So shut the fuck up and stop being a disingenuous shitbag.

[Cheeseweasel 26437]

Just now, PenelopeWitherspoon said:

Just because I think Kyle Rittenhouse murdered people, doesn't mean that I support rape.  Vigilante justice is against the law.  And, please do me a fucking favor and prove to me that Rittenhouse knew the guy he murdered was a rapist.  He didn't.  So shut the fuck up and stop being a disingenuous shitbag.

Not talking about Rittenhouse. Talking about Jacob Blake.  Post less.

[PenelopeWitherspoon 19092]

1 minute ago, Cheeseweasel said:

Not talking about Rittenhouse. Talking about Jacob Blake.  Post less.

Wow, talk about a fucking reach.  The mental gymnastics you guys go through.  Fucking unreal.  How are you a functioning adult?  

[Cheeseweasel 26437]

Just now, PenelopeWitherspoon said:

Wow, talk about a fucking reach.

Do you get all of your facts from the CR? 

[Captainant 27405]

Posted it in the DT thread, but fucking lulz of course johnny sack of shit is going to grifters for his rittenhouse updates

 

[Incredulity 11541]

4 minutes ago, Cheeseweasel said:

Do you get all of your facts from the CR? 

and MSNBC

[NaTeWHO 850]

11 hours ago, High Plains Drifter said:

 

I've seen Sack mention this a number of times, so I'm going to ask:

 

do we have any actual evidence that Pudge "rendered aid" to anyone?

do we have any actual evidence that he cleaned graffiti?

 

 

 

 

Googled "Rittenhouse cleaning graffiti."

Didn't see anything about "rendered aid."

[JimmyJames 12271]

9 minutes ago, NaTeWHO said:

Googled "Rittenhouse cleaning graffiti."

Didn't see anything about "rendered aid."

The only time he had a chance to “render aid” was after he shot someone. Instead of calling 911 or doing anything about it he instead called a buddy to tell him he just shot someone and let the daily caller guy he almost shot deal with it and call 911.

Then he started jogging away with his AR in a ready position like he was some sort of marine storming a village. Then he shot two more people.
 

Eventually it looked like he was trying to surrender to his buddies the cops and instead of arresting him they apparently told him to leave the scene.

Edited November 8, 2021 by JimmyJames

[JimmyJames 12271]

5 minutes ago, Bravo said:

Did you just see with Grosskreutz on the stand in his own livestream vid jogging with Rittenhouse right next to him? Did you hear him tell Grosskreutz "I'm going to the police"? seconds later he tripped and was then attacked by the same man he just told he is going to the police.

Grosskreautz didn’t attack him. The guy with the skateboard did trying to disarm him. So I’m not sure what point you’re making here.

[PenelopeWitherspoon 19092]

1 minute ago, JimmyJames said:

Grosskreautz didn’t attack him. The guy with the skateboard did trying to disarm him. So I’m not sure what point you’re making here.

There is no point.  They have their own narratives, and they will say anything to excuse what Kyle Rittenhouse did.  They are trolling.  As has been said, if they want to talk about fantasy, they need to head back into their own thread. 

[DonkeyCigars 144]

When do we expect the trial to be over and the verdict rendered? I keep thinking it's happening as this thread trends hot, but it's just Onboard and Penelope flirting incessantly for pages on end.

Edited November 8, 2021 by DonkeyCigars

[JimmyJames 12271]

The circle jerk going on in the other thread right now is absolutely hilarious. The sack wants the guy Kyle shot in the bicep to be given his Miranda warnings in the courtroom and arrested for aggravated assault of a minor. He’s a fucking lunatic 

[JimmyJames 12271]

1 minute ago, Bravo said:

Judge may just render a verdict at any point because this is such a weak case. Each witness for the prosecution is worse than the one before.

Like I said. You guys are hilarious. Not gonna happen counselor. He murdered two people and the only real issue is self defense. 

[JimmyJames 12271]

1 minute ago, Bravo said:

it's not murder if self defense in fact the judge came down hard on Grosskreutz 30 mins ago for using the same phrase. Shut down the trial for a bit and then a lecture to the jury had to be made.

The judge has already made at least 2 wrong rulings in the case so that doesn’t surprise me. 

[wildcat09 29213]

10 minutes ago, Bravo said:

Judge may just render a verdict at any point because this is such a weak case. Each witness for the prosecution is worse than the one before.

This man knows how trials work.

[Macanudo 12925]

The evangelicals have to be perplexed on whether to believe Big Cross.  

[JimmyJames 12271]

3 minutes ago, Bravo said:

It was a joke to point out the case is very weak. Obviously, it is going to the jury. I forgot no room for sarcasm in CR.

Dude your buddies in the other thread ain’t joking. They want the case dismissed with apologies to hero boy and everyone Kyle shot prosecuted even if they’re already dead. 
 

It’s pretty funny watching confirmation bias in real time. 

[PenelopeWitherspoon 19092]

1 hour ago, DonkeyCigars said:

When do we expect the trial to be over and the verdict rendered? I keep thinking it's happening as this thread trends hot, but it's just Onboard and Penelope flirting incessantly for pages on end.

[Gatorubet 30083]

Not gonna lie. I’d convict just on shitty haircut grounds.

[Johnny Sack 8397]

1 hour ago, JimmyJames said:

Grosskreautz didn’t attack him. The guy with the skateboard did trying to disarm him. So I’m not sure what point you’re making here.

You don't think pointing a gun at someone is an attack?

[Fletch 5799]

1 hour ago, PenelopeWitherspoon said:

There is no point.  They have their own narratives, and they will say anything to excuse what Kyle Rittenhouse did.  They are trolling.  As has been said, if they want to talk about fantasy, they need to head back into their own thread. 

I mean yeah those dudes are trolling, but that’s the least of my concern here. A shitload of people in our country believe this kid is fucking today’s Paul Revere and Ashli Babbit is a fucking hero. Oh and I love the part of this thread where some random dude didn’t get his prescriptions and died, it’s a tragic story, but they don’t give a fuck about the 100’s of thousands of lives lost in the pandemic. And see nothing wrong with storming the capital. And the FBI has thankfully stopped a few of the domestic terrorist, but a McVeigh situation is going to happen again probably pretty soon, and half the country is gonna fucking celebrate it. How the fuck did this happen 

[Johnny Sack 8397]

Sorry. It's always been acceptable to defend yourself against someone that says that they plan on killing you, chases you, corners your and tries to grab a gun.

[Johnny Sack 8397]

The defense got Gaige to admit that Rittenhouse didn't point his gun at him or shoot him while his hands were up, only after he dropped his hands and pointed his gun at Rittenhouse.

[JimmyJames 12271]

1 hour ago, Bravo said:

Would you admit this is an exceptionally weak case being brought thus far by the prosecution?

No. It’s actually a close call. That’s what the jury is for. The judge is definitely helping the defense out though. It’s not some slam dunk like the DT fan bois are trying to make it out to be, including you. 

[JimmyJames 12271]

30 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

You don't think pointing a gun at someone is an attack?

Yes and your hero boy is guilty of doing that at least three times. 

[wildcat09 29213]

17 minutes ago, Fletch said:

I mean yeah those dudes are trolling, but that’s the least of my concern here. A shitload of people in our country believe this kid is fucking today’s Paul Revere and Ashli Babbit is a fucking hero. Oh and I love the part of this thread where some random dude didn’t get his prescriptions and died, it’s a tragic story, but they don’t give a fuck about the 100’s of thousands of lives lost in the pandemic. And see nothing wrong with storming the capital. And the FBI has thankfully stopped a few of the domestic terrorist, but a McVeigh situation is going to happen again probably pretty soon, and half the country is gonna fucking celebrate it. How the fuck did this happen 

The only good thing is that the Surly poster closest to taking a Rittenhouse acquittal as inspiration to go on a shooting rampage would drink so much before beginning that he'd pass out. 

Scratch that, there's a second good thing: the Surly poster next closest to taking a Rittenhouse acquittal as inspiration to go on a shooting rampage will be hocking all of his firearms to buy more tailored jerseys.

[JimmyJames 12271]

1 minute ago, Bravo said:

where are you seeing the prosecution presenting a good case? they're constantly caught flat footed with horrible statements from their witnesses for their case. you're seeing this as a close call right now?

I’ve made multiple posts on both threads on why I think this sack of shit could be found guilty and the evidence that supports that. Most of the time you and the others just ignored them or shouted pedo! You are welcome to go back and peruse them.

I’m not gonna waste time trying to convince you of something that you have repeatedly and clearly stated that your mind is made up before the trial even began. Your comments today in the other thread simply show that it doesn’t matter what the facts are, you will spin them to fit your preconceived and prejudged narrative. 

[JimmyJames 12271]

1 hour ago, Bravo said:

the ole i dont have time to present the facts

The ole I already told them to you and they were ignored the first time so why bother doing it again.