Jump to content

Tell Me About Texas a&m

MrPhlegm

By MrPhlegm
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 79.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Longboard Horn

    2173

  • Randolph Duke

    2141

  • Deej

    2077

  • Cairn Horn88

    1613

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

MachoMan
MachoMan
Mittens
Mittens
TexLonghorn
TexLonghorn

Posted Images

Modessit

Modessit 5,600

Posted
Posted
Somebody do their conference record in the sec and b12

Here's in the SEC

 

2012

 

7-2 vs P5

6-2 vs SEC

3rd in SECW

 

2013

 

5-4 vs P5

4-4 vs SEC

4th in SECW

 

2014

 

4-5 vs P5

3-5 vs SEC

6th in SECW

 

2015

 

5-4 vs P5

4-4 vs SEC

4th in SECW

Lost to G5 in bowl game

 

2016

 

5-5 vs P5

4-4 vs SEC

4th in SECW

 

2017

 

4-6 vs P5

4-4 vs SEC

5th in SECW

 

2018

 

6-4 vs P5

5-3 vs SEC

2nd in SECW

 

2019

 

5-5 vs P5

4-4 vs SEC

4th in SECW

 

Total

 

41-35 vs P5 (53.94%)

34-30 vs SEC (53.13%)

Average SECW rank - 4th

 

 

Truly among the best.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
deft

deft 6,845

Posted
Posted
I don’t know, but you have reminded me: we need to work harder at destroying that racist piece of shit Daniel Joseph Figurelli. 

Are you implying that THE Daniel Joseph Figurelli, formerly of Price Waterhouse and Coopers, is a racist??! I cannot believe that Price Waterhouse and Coopers would be caught associating with a known and admitted racist like Daniel Joseph Figurelli. Thank goodness that Price Waterhouse and Coopers came to their good senses and immediately cut all ties with rabid fascist and racist Joseph Daniel Figurelli.

 

Isn’t Daniel Joseph Figurelli also a huge @texags @tamu aggie fan?!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
markstanco

markstanco 12,575

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Modessit said:

Here's in the SEC

 

2012

 

7-2 vs P5

6-2 vs SEC

3rd in SECW

 

2013

 

5-4 vs P5

4-4 vs SEC

4th in SECW

 

2014

 

4-5 vs P5

3-5 vs SEC

6th in SECW

 

2015

 

5-4 vs P5

4-4 vs SEC

4th in SECW

Lost to G5 in bowl game

 

2016

 

5-5 vs P5

4-4 vs SEC

4th in SECW

 

2017

 

4-6 vs P5

4-4 vs SEC

5th in SECW

 

2018

 

6-4 vs P5

5-3 vs SEC

2nd in SECW

 

2019

 

5-5 vs P5

4-4 vs SEC

4th in SECW

 

Total

 

41-35 vs P5 (53.94%)

34-30 vs SEC (53.13%)

Average SECW rank - 4th

 

 

Truly among the best.

 

 

 

 

So their best finish was with B12 type of players?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SHOOTER12

SHOOTER12 8,805

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, gernblansten said:

IIRC, aggy has a conference winning percentage around 50-57% in every conference in which they have played.  For simpletons: it don't matta da confrence, da aggy just da same.

Count on it...aggy always be aggy.  It doesn't matter what conference, what coach, what era, or what generation.  They are the model of consistency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Scholz

Scholz 11,943

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, gernblansten said:

IIRC, aggy has a conference winning percentage around 50-57% in every conference in which they have played.  For simpletons: it don't matta da confrence, da aggy just da same.

QFT

Middle. Of. The. Road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Armybrat

Armybrat 40,834

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Modessit said:

Btw - if you want to know their non-P5 records for both:

Big12 - 41-4 (91.11%)
5-0 vs FCS


SEC - 27-1 (96.43%)
8-0 vs FCS

Now there’s some Big Boy football!

Too bad those facts do not get posted on the SEC rant forum.

Edited by Armybrat
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dennis Taylor

Dennis Taylor 18,814

Posted
Posted

Stackin' em deep and sellin' em cheap...

2020

Saturday
Sep. 5 		Abilene Christian Football Schedule Abilene Christian WildcatsKyle Field, College Station, TX
 
2021
Saturday
Sep. 4 		Kent State Football Schedule Kent State Golden FlashesKyle Field, College Station, TX
Saturday
Nov. 20 		Prairie View A&M Football Schedule Prairie View A&M PanthersKyle Field, College Station, TX
 
2022
Saturday
Sep. 3 		Sam Houston State Football Schedule Sam Houston State BearkatsKyle Field, College Station, TX  

 

Saturday
Sep. 10 		Appalachian State Football Schedule Appalachian State MountaineersKyle Field, College Station, TX

 

Saturday
Nov. 19 		UMass Football Schedule UMass MinutemenKyle Field, College Station, TX

 

2023

 

Saturday
Sep. 16 		ULM Warhawks Football Schedule ULM WarhawksKyle Field, College Station, TX

 

Saturday
Nov. 18 		Abilene Christian Football Schedule Abilene Christian WildcatsKyle Field, College Station, TX

 

2024

 

Saturday
Sep. 7 		McNeese Football Schedule McNeese CowboysKyle Field, College Station, TX Time TBA ETTV TBA  
Saturday
Sep. 21 		Bowling Green Football Schedule Bowling Green FalconsKyle Field, College Station, TX

 

2025

 

Saturday
Nov. 22 		Tarleton State Texans Football Schedule Tarleton State TexansKyle Field, College Station, TX  
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pato del Muerto

Pato del Muerto 52,490

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, Modessit said:

Here's in the SEC

 

2012

 

7-2 vs P5

6-2 vs SEC

3rd in SECW

 

2013

 

5-4 vs P5

4-4 vs SEC

4th in SECW

 

2014

 

4-5 vs P5

3-5 vs SEC

6th in SECW

 

2015

 

5-4 vs P5

4-4 vs SEC

4th in SECW

Lost to G5 in bowl game

 

2016

 

5-5 vs P5

4-4 vs SEC

4th in SECW

 

2017

 

4-6 vs P5

4-4 vs SEC

5th in SECW

 

2018

 

6-4 vs P5

5-3 vs SEC

2nd in SECW

 

2019

 

5-5 vs P5

4-4 vs SEC

4th in SECW

 

Total

 

41-35 vs P5 (53.94%)

34-30 vs SEC (53.13%)

Average SECW rank - 4th

 

 

Truly among the best.

 

 

 

 

Lol so if you remove their 2012 season in which a team of big 12 players had a good run and their qb won a heisman, they are exactly .500 in conference play and 1 game over .500 vs P5 from 2013-2019.  If that makes them one of the best in the conference over that time, then maybe the conference isn’t so great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mininghorn88

mininghorn88 2,287

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Dennis Taylor said:

Stackin' em deep and sellin' em cheap...

2020

Saturday
Sep. 5 		Abilene Christian Football Schedule Abilene Christian WildcatsKyle Field, College Station, TX
 
2021
Saturday
Sep. 4 		Kent State Football Schedule Kent State Golden FlashesKyle Field, College Station, TX
Saturday
Nov. 20 		Prairie View A&M Football Schedule Prairie View A&M PanthersKyle Field, College Station, TX
 
2022
Saturday
Sep. 3 		Sam Houston State Football Schedule Sam Houston State BearkatsKyle Field, College Station, TX  

 

Saturday
Sep. 10 		Appalachian State Football Schedule Appalachian State MountaineersKyle Field, College Station, TX

 

Saturday
Nov. 19 		UMass Football Schedule UMass MinutemenKyle Field, College Station, TX

 

2023

 

Saturday
Sep. 16 		ULM Warhawks Football Schedule ULM WarhawksKyle Field, College Station, TX

 

Saturday
Nov. 18 		Abilene Christian Football Schedule Abilene Christian WildcatsKyle Field, College Station, TX

 

2024

 

Saturday
Sep. 7 		McNeese Football Schedule McNeese CowboysKyle Field, College Station, TX Time TBA ETTV TBA  
Saturday
Sep. 21 		Bowling Green Football Schedule Bowling Green FalconsKyle Field, College Station, TX

 

2025

 

Saturday
Nov. 22 		Tarleton State Texans Football Schedule Tarleton State TexansKyle Field, College Station, TX  

App State will beat them.  They have a nice program.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Longboard Horn

Longboard Horn 40,317

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Valmy77 said:

Tarleton State has a football team? Huh. I had no idea.

Yes they were in D2 forever. This coming season will be their first season in D1 as an independent member. They were a Lone Star Conference rival of my school, A&M-Commerce/East Texas State.

Honestly, I hated them. Tarleton State fans are just as bad as aggy. Good riddance. I for one won't miss them. Can't wait to see them lose most if not every game this season.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
4th&Five

4th&Five 41,526

Posted
Posted (edited)

  • The Texas A&M football program violated NCAA recruiting and countable athletically related activity rules between January 2018 and February 2019, according to an agreement released by the Division I Committee on Infractions. The head football coach also violated NCAA head coach responsibility rules.

    The university, head coach and NCAA enforcement staff agreed that the head coach and an assistant coach had impermissible recruiting contact with a prospect at his high school. The conversation was impermissible because it occurred before the completion of the prospect’s junior year in high school.

    Regarding the countable athletically related activity violations, during permissible weeks of spring and summer activity, the football program unintentionally caused student-athletes to exceed activity time limits by approximately seven hours.

    According to the agreement, the head coach failed to promote an atmosphere of compliance because of his personal involvement in the recruiting violation. The agreement also said the head coach failed to monitor his staff when he did not ensure the program was staying within the allowable number of countable athletically related activity hours.

    The university, head coach and the enforcement staff used ranges identified by the Division I membership-approved penalty guidelines for Level II-mitigated penalties agreed upon for the university and assistant coach and Level II-standard penalties for the head coach. Those and other penalties, approved by the Committee on Infractions, are detailed below:

  • One years of probation.
  • A fine of $5,000.
  • A reduction in football official visits by 17 days during the 2019-20 academic year.
  • An off-campus recruiting ban for the entire football coaching staff for November 2019, which reduced the permissible evaluation days for the 2019-20 academic year by 19.
  • A seven-day off-campus recruiting ban for the football coaching staff for the 2020 spring off-campus recruiting period and a 10-day off-campus recruiting ban for the football coaching staff for the 2020 fall off-campus recruiting period.
  • The university ended its recruitment of the prospect.
  • A ban on recruiting any prospects from the prospect's high school for the 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-222 academic years.
  • A six-month show-cause order for the head coach. The terms of the show-cause order include a previously served nine-day ban on phone calls, emails or texts with prospects in January 2020; a reduction in off-campus recruiting contact days by three for the December 2019 through January 2020 contact period; a ban on all off-campus recruiting activities for the fall 2020 contact period; additional one-on-one rules education; and a public statement from the head coach addressing the violations.

  • A six-month show-cause order for the assistant coach. The terms of the show-cause order include a previously served nine-day ban on phone calls, emails or texts with prospects in January 2020; a reduction in off-campus recruiting contact days by three for the December 2019 through January 2020 contact period; a ban on all off-campus recruiting activities for the fall 2020 contact period; and additional one-on-one rules education.

Edited by 4th&Five
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Randolph Duke

Randolph Duke 4,034

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, 4th&Five said:

  • The Texas A&M football program violated NCAA recruiting and countable athletically related activity rules between January 2018 and February 2019, according to an agreement released by the Division I Committee on Infractions. The head football coach also violated NCAA head coach responsibility rules.

    The university, head coach and NCAA enforcement staff agreed that the head coach and an assistant coach had impermissible recruiting contact with a prospect at his high school. The conversation was impermissible because it occurred before the completion of the prospect’s junior year in high school.

    Regarding the countable athletically related activity violations, during permissible weeks of spring and summer activity, the football program unintentionally caused student-athletes to exceed activity time limits by approximately seven hours.

    According to the agreement, the head coach failed to promote an atmosphere of compliance because of his personal involvement in the recruiting violation. The agreement also said the head coach failed to monitor his staff when he did not ensure the program was staying within the allowable number of countable athletically related activity hours.

    The university, head coach and the enforcement staff used ranges identified by the Division I membership-approved penalty guidelines for Level II-mitigated penalties agreed upon for the university and assistant coach and Level II-standard penalties for the head coach. Those and other penalties, approved by the Committee on Infractions, are detailed below:

  • One years of probation.
  • A fine of $5,000.
  • A reduction in football official visits by 17 days during the 2019-20 academic year.
  • An off-campus recruiting ban for the entire football coaching staff for November 2019, which reduced the permissible evaluation days for the 2019-20 academic year by 19.
  • A seven-day off-campus recruiting ban for the football coaching staff for the 2020 spring off-campus recruiting period and a 10-day off-campus recruiting ban for the football coaching staff for the 2020 fall off-campus recruiting period.
  • The university ended its recruitment of the prospect.
  • A ban on recruiting any prospects from the prospect's high school for the 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-222 academic years.
  • A six-month show-cause order for the head coach. The terms of the show-cause order include a previously served nine-day ban on phone calls, emails or texts with prospects in January 2020; a reduction in off-campus recruiting contact days by three for the December 2019 through January 2020 contact period; a ban on all off-campus recruiting activities for the fall 2020 contact period; additional one-on-one rules education; and a public statement from the head coach addressing the violations.

  • A six-month show-cause order for the assistant coach. The terms of the show-cause order include a previously served nine-day ban on phone calls, emails or texts with prospects in January 2020; a reduction in off-campus recruiting contact days by three for the December 2019 through January 2020 contact period; a ban on all off-campus recruiting activities for the fall 2020 contact period; and additional one-on-one rules education.

 

Jimbo promise.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NeverMarryAStripper

NeverMarryAStripper 21,905

Posted
Posted

You would think that one of the best teams in the SEC would have a winning record against P5 competition on their home field.  Aggy doesn't during their time in the SEC.  However, there are six other teams that have winning records against P5 competition in Kyle field during aggy's time in the SEC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SwanderedTalent

SwanderedTalent 5,761

Posted
Posted (edited)

Actually that pisses me off. It wouldn't shock me if Texas got pinched for the same thing, the way Michigan got pinched in 2008 (?) for incidental overages in the number of supervised workouts they did in the offseason or some parking-ticket level shit like that. 

A&M's over here fucking buying players, and they get a wrist slap for "just a little too much recruiting!"  

Edited by SwanderedTalent
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tigersnake

Tigersnake 670

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, Longboard Horn said:

Yes they were in D2 forever. This coming season will be their first season in D1 as an independent member. They were a Lone Star Conference rival of my school, A&M-Commerce/East Texas State.

Honestly, I hated them. Tarleton State fans are just as bad as aggy. Good riddance. I for one won't miss them. Can't wait to see them lose most if not every game this season.

When I got to Austin it was amazing to me that there could be more than two nightlife options on a weekend night.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NYBevo

NYBevo 1,699

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, satyanash said:

Unfortunately it's a slap on the wrist, especially since no one's doing in-person recruiting anyway. The $5,000 fine is a joke and the rest isn't much.

Its a black eye and its aggy just point and laugh

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CHIEF

CHIEF 5,081

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Tigersnake said:

When I got to Austin it was amazing to me that there could be more than two nightlife options on a weekend night.

 

 

Yep, in Stephenville it was only Bostock's or The Dodge House. Now, I think it is up to six options.

CHIEF

Link to comment
Share on other sites
'stache

'stache 21,805

Posted
Posted (edited)

Fuck aggy, but fuck the ncaa more. This one makes no sense.

Yeah, it's aggy, but if a player from that school has had a lifelong dream of being aggy, or would decide aggy is right for him after meeting with them for whatever reason, but now that's completely off the table? How the fuck does this one have anything to do with punishing aggy? It seems more of a punishment of players at that high school by limiting their opportunities for recruitment.

A ban on recruiting any prospects from the prospect's high school for the 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-222 academic years.

Edited by 'stache
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cairn Horn88

Cairn Horn88 8,262

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, SHOOTER12 said:

Count on it...aggy always be aggy.  It doesn't matter what conference, what coach, what era, or what generation.  They are the model of consistency.

Now, every 3-4 years they will upset a team, hang their hat on it,  push out their chest, and tell everybody they are a top 10 team and the sky is the limit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
deech

deech 2,274

Posted
Posted (edited)

Aggies do not lie or cheat or steal..... 

Sorry Jimbo.  It's been a good run, but that institutions integrity is not placed ahead of wins. I suppose they wait until early next week to terminate him? 

Edited by deech
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SwanderedTalent

SwanderedTalent 5,761

Posted
Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, 'stache said:

How the fuck does this one have anything to do with punishing aggy?

A&M is now temporarily prohibited from recruiting players from a high school they've targeted in the past? 

A&M now can't leverage whatever advantage the NCAA thinks the rule-breaking gave A&M at that school?

I feel like some of you look at this stuff and just say "OH IF THE NCAA SAYS IT THEN FUCK WHATEVER IT SAYS". I'm not arguing pro or con on the item, but it's not at all difficult to see why the NCAA would think this punishes A&M. 

Edited by SwanderedTalent
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...