Tell Me About Texas a&m

[George Clooney 378]

Don't be surprised if they go after Vance Vice from VT as their new OL coach. I haven't seen their mods mention him, but he worked with Dickey at Memphis and is supposedly a good recruiter.

[OnAComputer 1443]

4 hours ago, THEHORN5561 said:

Now the Looch is making up AtM BCS wins and he agreed to debate 10 and lied and made it 9.  What a cock holster.

 

 

 

Since we're playing fast and loose with the number 10 to make things look good, my 10 is actually 125
Last "10" yrs:
Natl. Title Games: UT 2 A&M 0
Titles: UT 4 A&M 3
Conf Titles: UT 32 A&M 18
Conf Title Games: UT 1 A&M 0 (lol)
BCS/NY6 wins: UT 3 A&M 0
Bowl Game Appearances: UT 55 A&M 40
Double Digit Win Szns: UT 24 A&M 12
Top-5 finishes: UT 20, A&M 3
6+ loss seasons: UT 15, A&M 33
Losing seasons: UT 16, A&M 36

[THEHORN5561 2583]

From Frenzy:

 

😂

[Tex Pete 21489]

1 minute ago, OnAComputer said:

Since we're playing fast and loose with the number 10 to make things look good, my 10 is actually 125
Last "10" yrs:
Natl. Title Games: UT 2 A&M 0
Titles: UT 4 A&M 3
Conf Titles: UT 32 A&M 18
Conf Title Games: UT 1 A&M 0 (lol)
BCS/NY6 wins: UT 3 A&M 0
Bowl Game Appearances: UT 55 A&M 40
Double Digit Win Szns: UT 24 A&M 12
Top-5 finishes: UT 20, A&M 3
6+ loss seasons: UT 15, A&M 33
Losing seasons: UT 16, A&M 36

Where do you get 3 titles for aggy? They’ve won exactly 1. Those other ones they claim are the fake ones “awarded” in the last 10 years. 

[OnAComputer 1443]

11 minutes ago, Tex Pete said:

Where do you get 3 titles for aggy? They’ve won exactly 1. Those other ones they claim are the fake ones “awarded” in the last 10 years. 

My bad. "Claimed"

I believe it is 1970 that can be disputed for Texas.

It should say

Undisputed Titles: UT 3 A&M 1

 

Edited February 6, 2019 by OnAComputer

[texasstrong12 4668]

This account can't be a real person. He is really bragging about a national title from 1939. 

[OrangEngr 1035]

4 hours ago, OnAComputer said:

Since we're playing fast and loose with the number 10 to make things look good, my 10 is actually 125
Last "10" yrs:
Natl. Title Games: UT 2 A&M 0
Titles: UT 4 A&M 3
Conf Titles: UT 32 A&M 18
Conf Title Games: UT 1 A&M 0 (lol)
BCS/NY6 wins: UT 3 A&M 0
Bowl Game Appearances: UT 55 A&M 40
Double Digit Win Szns: UT 24 A&M 12
Top-5 finishes: UT 20, A&M 3
6+ loss seasons: UT 15, A&M 33
Losing seasons: UT 16, A&M 36

You are also missing a few Conf. CGs there Sport. Should be 6 to 2

[SwanderedTalent 5761]

How is their 1939 national championship "almost 30 years before they sniffed one" when we won one in 1963? 24 is not almost 30. The '41, '47, '50, '59, and '61 teams all "sniffed" one, as well. 

What gets tiresome about tweets like that is it's like saying "ha ha Michael Jordan's not a great basketball player, he couldn't shoot the basketball". It's factually wrong and sounds stupid when someone says it.

Edited February 6, 2019 by SwanderedTalent

[Focht Up 648]

47 minutes ago, SwanderedTalent said:

How is their 1939 national championship "almost 30 years before they sniffed one" when we won one in 1963? 24 is not almost 30. The '41, '47, '50, '59, and '61 teams all "sniffed" one, as well. 

What gets tiresome about tweets like that is it's like saying "ha ha Michael Jordan's not a great basketball player, he couldn't shoot the basketball". It's factually wrong and sounds stupid when someone says it.

It's just aggy being aggy.  The truth isn't kind to them, so they have to make things up. 

[DaggerHorns 3170]

5 hours ago, texasstrong12 said:

This account can't be a real person. He is really bragging about a national title from 1939. 

Well, it’s Daniel Figurelli, so any amount of sheer insanity on this silly fucker’s Twitter is expected.

[Tex Pete 21489]

 

6 hours ago, OnAComputer said:

My bad. "Claimed"

I believe it is 1970 that can be disputed for Texas.

It should say

Undisputed Titles: UT 3 A&M 1

 

Wrong again. We were presented the trophy in 1970. There is no dispute about that. 

Edited February 6, 2019 by Tex Pete

[Tex Pete 21489]

In 1970, the AP and UPI (coaches poll) awarded national championships. UPI did it before bowl games because bowls were considered exhibitions, AP did it afterwards. Later, it became AP and USA Today, and of course both awarded them after bowl games. We claim 4 because we’ve won 4. If we did the aggy thing, we could claim 10 or 13 or some other ridiculous number. 

[mr.goodkat 469]

33 minutes ago, Tex Pete said:

In 1970, the AP and UPI (coaches poll) awarded national championships. UPI did it before bowl games because bowls were considered exhibitions, AP did it afterwards. Later, it became AP and USA Today, and of course both awarded them after bowl games. We claim 4 because we’ve won 4. If we did the aggy thing, we could claim 10 or 13 or some other ridiculous number. 

actually we split with nebraska  

1970 NCAA University Division football season
Preseason AP #1	Ohio State Buckeyes[1]
Number of bowls	11
Bowl games	December 12, 1970 – January 2, 1971
Champion	Nebraska Cornhuskers (AP, FWAA)  Texas Longhorns (Coaches, NFF) Ohio State (NFF)
Heisman	Jim Plunkett, Stanford QB
← 1969 College football seas

[TKthunder2 5059]

18 minutes ago, mr.goodkat said:

actually we split with nebraska  

1970 NCAA University Division football season
Preseason AP #1	Ohio State Buckeyes[1]
Number of bowls	11
Bowl games	December 12, 1970 – January 2, 1971
Champion	Nebraska Cornhuskers (AP, FWAA)  Texas Longhorns (Coaches, NFF) Ohio State (NFF)
Heisman	Jim Plunkett, Stanford QB
← 1969 College football seas

We lost our bowl game so the AP went to Nebraska because they awarded theirs after the bowls.

We were the consensus #1 before the bowl so the UPI (coaches) awarded us the title because they didn’t count bowl games back then.

The title is real and counts unlike the 2 aggy claims.

[Tex Pete 21489]

44 minutes ago, mr.goodkat said:

actually we split with nebraska  

1970 NCAA University Division football season
Preseason AP #1	Ohio State Buckeyes[1]
Number of bowls	11
Bowl games	December 12, 1970 – January 2, 1971
Champion	Nebraska Cornhuskers (AP, FWAA)  Texas Longhorns (Coaches, NFF) Ohio State (NFF)
Heisman	Jim Plunkett, Stanford QB
← 1969 College football seas

Ok? I’m well aware of that. It’s still not an undisputed championship. It’s shared. 

[Horndog 2299]

45 minutes ago, TKthunder2 said:

We lost our bowl game so the AP went to Nebraska because they awarded theirs after the bowls.

We were the consensus #1 before the bowl so the UPI (coaches) awarded us the title because they didn’t count bowl games back then.

The title is real and counts unlike the 2 aggy claims.

Yeah, but we didn't really want to be there.  

[TrashMaster G 18096]

29 minutes ago, Tex Pete said:

Ok? I’m well aware of that. It’s still not an undisputed championship. It’s shared. 

It may be a split championship, but it's legit.  1,000x more legit than those two BS NCs aggy started claiming when they moved to the SECSEC.

[crimsonlonghorn 2313]

20 minutes ago, Horndog said:

Yeah, but we didn't really want to be there.  

We were in the SEC back then? I did not know that. 

[mr.goodkat 469]

i know its legit . it is nothing like aggy. but if its a split then the other side obviously disputes it . just stating onacomputer wasn't "wrong" .  ou sucks and fuck aggy 

[Tex Pete 21489]

15 minutes ago, mr.goodkat said:

i know its legit . it is nothing like aggy. but if its a split then the other side obviously disputes it . just stating onacomputer wasn't "wrong" .  ou sucks and fuck aggy 

He's wrong in that he didn't count it. We have counted it since 1970 because we won it in 1970.

[SwanderedTalent 5761]

6 minutes ago, Tex Pete said:

We have counted it since 1970 because we won it in 1970.

THIS, x1000. If you didn't count it when it happened, don't fucking count it now. Is our 1970 championship weird by our modern, post-bowl sensibilities? Sure. Did people yell about it and claim it was invalid in 1970? NOPE. People (some) wanted a playoff even back then, or wanted a post-all-the-bowls 1vs2 type of championship game, but no one said "so FUCK THE NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP, IT DOESN'T COUNT"

Likewise, did anyone consider Texas A&M the "national champions" in 1919 or 1927? Did the Aggies themselves think they'd won the national title? No. Because there was practically no such thing, there was no way of recognizing it anyway, and everyone knew 90% of the talent in CFB was located east of Ann Arbor and north of the Mason-Dixon. 

[SwanderedTalent 5761]

Here is how Dan Jenkins summarized things in the 1/11/71 issue of Sports Illustrated:

"...Texas' loss to the...Irish was required if the day of the big bowls was to have any prolonged drama for the followers of Ohio State or Nebraska. The reason was that Texas had already captured one 1 1/2 regular season No. 1s, those of the UPI (which the Longhorns won outright) and the Hall of Fame (for which the Longhorns tied Ohio State)."

That is how the UPI was seen at the time. It recognized the best team of the season, prior to bowl games, because the bowl games still weren't seen as trumping the entirety of what a team did prior to that.

Edited February 6, 2019 by SwanderedTalent

[mr.goodkat 469]

23 minutes ago, Tex Pete said:

He's wrong in that he didn't count it. We have counted it since 1970 because we won it in 1970.

oh did not see he didn't count it ..... my bad 

[MAUFRAIS 6740]

I will always defer to Dan Jenkins on college football, scotch and cigarettes.

[Burt Macklin 19230]

11 hours ago, OnAComputer said:

Since we're playing fast and loose with the number 10 to make things look good, my 10 is actually 125
Last "10" yrs:
Natl. Title Games: UT 2 A&M 0
Titles: UT 4 A&M 3
Conf Titles: UT 32 A&M 18
Conf Title Games: UT 1 A&M 0 (lol)
BCS/NY6 wins: UT 3 A&M 0
Bowl Game Appearances: UT 55 A&M 40
Double Digit Win Szns: UT 24 A&M 12
Top-5 finishes: UT 20, A&M 3
6+ loss seasons: UT 15, A&M 33
Losing seasons: UT 16, A&M 36

It’s really infuriating to see that in 121 years, we only had 11 6+ loss seasons and then Charlie added 3 to that list in 3 years.

We averaged one 6+ loss season per decade and then Charlie comes in and reels off 3 in a row.

[OrangEngr 1035]

3 minutes ago, Burt Macklin said:

We averaged one 6+ loss season per decade and then Charlie comes in and reels off 3 in a row

And had pretty significant culpability for a fourth

[OnAComputer 1443]

Fucking with Liucci is easy and fun
 

 

Edited February 6, 2019 by OnAComputer

[SwanderedTalent 5761]

34 minutes ago, Burt Macklin said:

It’s really infuriating to see that in 121 years, we only had 11 6+ loss seasons and then Charlie added 3 to that list in 3 years.

We averaged one 6+ loss season per decade and then Charlie comes in and reels off 3 in a row.

well, it was a lot harder to lose 6+ games in the 80s when you only played 11 and bowl appearances were harder to come by

but this response is irrelevant to Charlie sucking, so never mind

[Burt Macklin 19230]

25 minutes ago, SwanderedTalent said:

well, it was a lot harder to lose 6+ games in the 80s when you only played 11 and bowl appearances were harder to come by

but this response is irrelevant to Charlie sucking, so never mind

Lulz. Ok sub out 6+ wins for losing seasons. Same concept applies.

[DigglerontheHoof 21551]

poor aggy

[williemackgarza 1826]

I've seen nothing that shows Dabo would leave Clemson for any other program, including Bama. Bama is likely to dip some when Saban finally hangs it up but for aggy to think they're going to be the program that slides into the top spot in the SEC is laughable, man.

Bama could turn into aggy while they regrouped, but wtf does aggy think it would turn into bama?
If bama turned to aggy bama would kill theyself

[Scooter Monzingo 821]

Why would anyone willingly engage an aggy about football? Do you really believe you can change their minds? Or that they will acknowledge their ineptitude, or any Texas success? Let me help you out, they won’t. But fire away if you dig the drama.

[sushihorn 3249]

1 hour ago, williemackgarza said:

Bama could turn into aggy while they regrouped, but wtf does aggy think it would turn into bama?
If bama turned to aggy bama would kill theyself

There were a LOT of years between Bear Bryant and Nick Saban.

[Go Pokes 979]

How many years and how much $ did aggy give their basketball coach a few years ago after his miracle run alllllll the way to the sweet 16? Cuz he’s now 1-8 in a weak conference.

[Pato del Muerto 53508]

1 hour ago, sushihorn said:

There were a LOT of years between Bear Bryant and Nick Saban.

And stallings won an nc one of them

[Funk Doctor Spock 13287]

11 hours ago, mr.goodkat said:

i know its legit . it is nothing like aggy. but if its a split then the other side obviously disputes it . just stating onacomputer wasn't "wrong" .  ou sucks and fuck aggy 

Always this. 

[atomheartbevo 90650]

On 2/6/2019 at 7:47 AM, Focht Up said:

It's just aggy being aggy.  The truth isn't kind to them, so they have to make things up. 

 

20 hours ago, OnAComputer said:

Fucking with Liucci is easy and fun
 

 

Looch allows that batshit QAnon stuff to infest TexAgs, so it’s not going to be a surprise when their brain trust gins up another MNC or conference title based on some mathematical formula that the NSA couldn’t decipher.  

And they will come up with more titles from their past, because Jimbo sure as hell isn’t taking them to the promised land (especially if one or more of his players take his current squeeze to the promised land). 

If they place 2nd in their division, they will slap it on the side of the stadium. 

Edited February 7, 2019 by atomheartbevo

[SwanderedTalent 5761]

1 hour ago, atomheartbevo said:

And they will come up with more titles from their past,

I am telling you, 1994 is going to look like an untapped source of gold before much longer. UNDEFEATED! And look at how we all used to think the Big Ten and Big 8/12 could compete with the SEC, that's been proven wrong, so SEC teams should get the benefit of the doubt going back decades. A&M was practically IN the SEC in 1994, they would have mopped the field with Nebraska or Penn State. In fact A&M DID mop the field with Nebraska just four years later and WOULD have mopped the field with Penn State in 1999 but the refs were biased t-sippers. Your 1994 national champions: the UNBEATEN Texas A&M Aggies.

[ztejas 44227]

2 minutes ago, SwanderedTalent said:

I am telling you, 1994 is going to look like an untapped source of gold before much longer. UNDEFEATED! And look at how we all used to think the Big Ten and Big 8/12 could compete with the SEC, that's been proven wrong, so SEC teams should get the benefit of the doubt going back decades. A&M was practically IN the SEC in 1994, they would have mopped the field with Nebraska or Penn State. In fact A&M DID mop the field with Nebraska just four years later and WOULD have mopped the field with Penn State in 1999 but the refs were biased t-sippers. Your 1994 national champions: the UNBEATEN Texas A&M Aggies.

I discussed this a few pages ago.

First, they were on postseason probation.

Second, they tied one of the worst SMU teams in program history. A team that went 1-9-1 with the only win being against New Mexico at home.

So sure, had they beaten SMU some jack offs would probably try and put '94 on the wall, but when you can't beat the worst team on your schedule it's hard for even aggy to be that delusional.

[SwanderedTalent 5761]

Just now, ztejas said:

it's hard for even aggy to be that delusional.

they can do it!!!!

[Valmy77 13626]

They also have 1956, which almost a completely identical situation to 1994.

And they probably could just go ahead and claim 1917 and 1909 so long as they are claiming 1919 and 1927. 

[Harrison Stafford 3392]

Until 1949, aggy's yearbook was called 'The Longhorn'.  Just another log on their bonfire of insecurity.

Edited February 7, 2019 by Harrison Stafford

[ABSR 5370]

12 minutes ago, Valmy77 said:

They also have 1956, which almost a completely identical situation to 1994.

And they probably could just go ahead and claim 1917 and 1909 so long as they are claiming 1919 and 1927. 

The Bryan Womens Auxilliary may come out with a revised end of the year ranking for the 1917 and 1909 season with Aggie as the top rated team.  Then they can put it on the stadium as it fits their requirements for national titles....the requirement being that every Coach and Player on the team is dead before they claim the national title.

[Leanderman 2367]

 

Those nut squeezers will be putting their recruiting rankings on the wall next.

[ztejas 44227]

7 minutes ago, Leanderman said:

 

Those nut squeezers will be putting their recruiting rankings on the wall next.

Probably not this year's though

[Dennis Taylor 19358]

1 hour ago, ztejas said:

 it's hard for even aggy to be that delusional.

[sushihorn 3249]

1 hour ago, ABSR said:

The Bryan Womens Auxilliary may come out with a revised end of the year ranking for the 1917 and 1909 season with Aggie as the top rated team.  Then they can put it on the stadium as it fits their requirements for national titles....the requirement being that every Coach and Player on the team is dead before they claim the national title.

The guys from that 1994 team better watch their backs...

[Machinator 32103]

 

[Phoenix 65]

On 3/25/2018 at 4:30 PM, pasotex said:

When she give you the "come get it" eyes

[HtownHorn 15235]

If Elko leaves, then it would be what 4 assistants to leave in 13 months or less year at Jimbo aggy?

DL coach lasted a week

OL coach lasted a year

TE coach lasted less than a year

DC lasted a year