Jump to content

Tell Me About Texas a&m

MrPhlegm

By MrPhlegm
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

Pato del Muerto

Pato del Muerto 52494

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Deej said:

Cost of an office visit for my dog at aggy last month was $40. This month? $116. I guess I know how they're paying for the new basketball coach.

aggy vet has been watered down along with the rest of the university. No longer can you trust a vet just because they went to aggy. Older vets are obviously still well trained. 

In Texas, you might not have that much choice in the matter as so many aggy vet grads stay in Texas. 

But if you or someone you know is thinking about vet school, point them strongly towards Colorado state. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 79.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Longboard Horn

    2173

  • Randolph Duke

    2141

  • Deej

    2077

  • Cairn Horn88

    1613

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

MachoMan
MachoMan
Mittens
Mittens
TexLonghorn
TexLonghorn

Posted Images

Cairn Horn88

Cairn Horn88 8262

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Armybrat said:

What happened to aggy’s attempt to block Texas Tech’s new vet school?

Well, according to aggy, the state does not need a new Vet school...imagine that:                                                     

A&M just broke ground on a $22 million, Veterinary Education, Research, and Outreach Facility (VERO) on the West Texas A&M campus, just 17 miles south of where Tech wants to locate its school.elated Stories

And in 2016, A&M opened a $125 million teaching facility in College Station with enough capacity to increase enrollment by at least the equivalent of Texas Tech’s proposed school.

To justify its cause, TTU cites a 48-year-old report of the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB). Perhaps they don’t want to be reminded of what THECB’s 2016 report concluded:

“The high cost of establishing a new veterinary school would outweigh the potential benefits to the state, given the small to moderate workforce demand and the issue that building a new school would not guarantee that any of the graduates would practice on livestock, which is the state’s principal area of need … ”Maybe that conclusion is why TTU chose to bypass the THECB and go straight to the Legislature.

TTU also chooses to overlook the 2016 report’s finding that A&M graduates “make up about 60 percent of the state’s veterinary workforce” – not the 25 percent cited by TTU.

Once Texas A&M’s new teaching facility opened in 2016, Aggies began increasing class size. Today, A&M has the largest entering class in the nation with 162 students.

A&M boasts the largest number of food animal, rural, and mixed animal veterinarians in the nation, with 33 percent of the 2017 class and 40 percent of the 2018 class choosing these paths.

Simply increasing class size does not guarantee more rural and food animal veterinarians. That’s why A&M and WTAMU began a targeted pipeline program that already has doubled the number of Panhandle-area students entering A&M’s veterinary college. Their numbers will increase with the A&M System’s ongoing investment in the Panhandle.

The pipeline program is a model for statewide implementation.  It can be ramped up and down, as needed. Agreements with three other A&M System schools will expand that pipeline into other rural areas.

TTU’s proposed veterinary school is neither innovative, nor cost efficient, and duplicates A&M’s efforts. It proposes a distributed model of veterinary education, a model created by off-shore, for-profit universities without access to clinical training.

TTU uses a Canadian veterinary school, Calgary, as its “affordable” model.  This comparison is flawed.  Calgary is heavily government subsidized. Distributed models are the most expensive models resulting in the highest student debt.

Conversely, A&M, which is ranked fourth in the nation, is one of the most affordable veterinary colleges with student debt that is the second-lowest in the nation.

TTU claims a teaching hospital is not needed.  In fact, teaching hospitals provide students opportunities to work alongside some of the best veterinarians.  They learn not only what is practical, but also what is possible with the latest, state-of-the-art diagnostic and treatment methods.

TTU’s estimated costs for a veterinary school are misrepresented.  A&M has invested nearly $400 million for veterinary facilities and infrastructure since 2009.  The costs are ongoing.  TTU’s request for state funds is a fraction of the support they will request over time.

Based on Texas A&M’s quality, wouldn’t it more effective and more cost efficient to invest more in A&M than to build an new veterinary school?

A&M can clearly meet all of the veterinary needs in Texas.

Dr. Eleanor Green is the Carl B. King Dean of Veterinary Medicine at the Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Armybrat

Armybrat 40841

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Cairn Horn88 said:

Well, according to aggy, the state does not need a new Vet school...imagine that:                                                     

A&M just broke ground on a $22 million, Veterinary Education, Research, and Outreach Facility (VERO) on the West Texas A&M campus, just 17 miles south of where Tech wants to locate its school.elated Stories

And in 2016, A&M opened a $125 million teaching facility in College Station with enough capacity to increase enrollment by at least the equivalent of Texas Tech’s proposed school.

To justify its cause, TTU cites a 48-year-old report of the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB). Perhaps they don’t want to be reminded of what THECB’s 2016 report concluded:

“The high cost of establishing a new veterinary school would outweigh the potential benefits to the state, given the small to moderate workforce demand and the issue that building a new school would not guarantee that any of the graduates would practice on livestock, which is the state’s principal area of need … ”Maybe that conclusion is why TTU chose to bypass the THECB and go straight to the Legislature.

TTU also chooses to overlook the 2016 report’s finding that A&M graduates “make up about 60 percent of the state’s veterinary workforce” – not the 25 percent cited by TTU.

Once Texas A&M’s new teaching facility opened in 2016, Aggies began increasing class size. Today, A&M has the largest entering class in the nation with 162 students.

A&M boasts the largest number of food animal, rural, and mixed animal veterinarians in the nation, with 33 percent of the 2017 class and 40 percent of the 2018 class choosing these paths.

Simply increasing class size does not guarantee more rural and food animal veterinarians. That’s why A&M and WTAMU began a targeted pipeline program that already has doubled the number of Panhandle-area students entering A&M’s veterinary college. Their numbers will increase with the A&M System’s ongoing investment in the Panhandle.

The pipeline program is a model for statewide implementation.  It can be ramped up and down, as needed. Agreements with three other A&M System schools will expand that pipeline into other rural areas.

TTU’s proposed veterinary school is neither innovative, nor cost efficient, and duplicates A&M’s efforts. It proposes a distributed model of veterinary education, a model created by off-shore, for-profit universities without access to clinical training.

TTU uses a Canadian veterinary school, Calgary, as its “affordable” model.  This comparison is flawed.  Calgary is heavily government subsidized. Distributed models are the most expensive models resulting in the highest student debt.

Conversely, A&M, which is ranked fourth in the nation, is one of the most affordable veterinary colleges with student debt that is the second-lowest in the nation.

TTU claims a teaching hospital is not needed.  In fact, teaching hospitals provide students opportunities to work alongside some of the best veterinarians.  They learn not only what is practical, but also what is possible with the latest, state-of-the-art diagnostic and treatment methods.

TTU’s estimated costs for a veterinary school are misrepresented.  A&M has invested nearly $400 million for veterinary facilities and infrastructure since 2009.  The costs are ongoing.  TTU’s request for state funds is a fraction of the support they will request over time.

Based on Texas A&M’s quality, wouldn’t it more effective and more cost efficient to invest more in A&M than to build an new veterinary school?

A&M can clearly meet all of the veterinary needs in Texas.

Dr. Eleanor Green is the Carl B. King Dean of Veterinary Medicine at the Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences.

Yet those rube fucks bought themselves a 4th rate law school for $73,000,000 and are bragging about it to their SEC overlords... just because.

Edited by Armybrat
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
texaslong

texaslong 678

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Cairn Horn88 said:

Well, according to aggy, the state does not need a new Vet school...imagine that:                                                     

A&M just broke ground on a $22 million, Veterinary Education, Research, and Outreach Facility (VERO) on the West Texas A&M campus, just 17 miles south of where Tech wants to locate its school.elated Stories

And in 2016, A&M opened a $125 million teaching facility in College Station with enough capacity to increase enrollment by at least the equivalent of Texas Tech’s proposed school.

To justify its cause, TTU cites a 48-year-old report of the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB). Perhaps they don’t want to be reminded of what THECB’s 2016 report concluded:

“The high cost of establishing a new veterinary school would outweigh the potential benefits to the state, given the small to moderate workforce demand and the issue that building a new school would not guarantee that any of the graduates would practice on livestock, which is the state’s principal area of need … ”Maybe that conclusion is why TTU chose to bypass the THECB and go straight to the Legislature.

TTU also chooses to overlook the 2016 report’s finding that A&M graduates “make up about 60 percent of the state’s veterinary workforce” – not the 25 percent cited by TTU.

Once Texas A&M’s new teaching facility opened in 2016, Aggies began increasing class size. Today, A&M has the largest entering class in the nation with 162 students.

A&M boasts the largest number of food animal, rural, and mixed animal veterinarians in the nation, with 33 percent of the 2017 class and 40 percent of the 2018 class choosing these paths.

Simply increasing class size does not guarantee more rural and food animal veterinarians. That’s why A&M and WTAMU began a targeted pipeline program that already has doubled the number of Panhandle-area students entering A&M’s veterinary college. Their numbers will increase with the A&M System’s ongoing investment in the Panhandle.

The pipeline program is a model for statewide implementation.  It can be ramped up and down, as needed. Agreements with three other A&M System schools will expand that pipeline into other rural areas.

TTU’s proposed veterinary school is neither innovative, nor cost efficient, and duplicates A&M’s efforts. It proposes a distributed model of veterinary education, a model created by off-shore, for-profit universities without access to clinical training.

TTU uses a Canadian veterinary school, Calgary, as its “affordable” model.  This comparison is flawed.  Calgary is heavily government subsidized. Distributed models are the most expensive models resulting in the highest student debt.

Conversely, A&M, which is ranked fourth in the nation, is one of the most affordable veterinary colleges with student debt that is the second-lowest in the nation.

TTU claims a teaching hospital is not needed.  In fact, teaching hospitals provide students opportunities to work alongside some of the best veterinarians.  They learn not only what is practical, but also what is possible with the latest, state-of-the-art diagnostic and treatment methods.

TTU’s estimated costs for a veterinary school are misrepresented.  A&M has invested nearly $400 million for veterinary facilities and infrastructure since 2009.  The costs are ongoing.  TTU’s request for state funds is a fraction of the support they will request over time.

Based on Texas A&M’s quality, wouldn’t it more effective and more cost efficient to invest more in A&M than to build an new veterinary school?

A&M can clearly meet all of the veterinary needs in Texas.

Dr. Eleanor Green is the Carl B. King Dean of Veterinary Medicine at the Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences.

So aggy felt threatened by Tech. John Sharp is going to destroy that school with his dick measuring crap. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CoTex

CoTex 1160

Posted
Posted

Driving around College Station this weekend my wife and i noted a lot of road repairs, and the general appearance of the campus.  

My six year old son in the backseat was listening to all of this and he blurted out "it looks like the prison from Despicable Me."

latest?cb=20170525041943

 

  • Like 5
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SwanderedTalent

SwanderedTalent 5761

Posted
Posted (edited)
35 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Hypothetically, could the state decide to transfer ownership of the vet school from aggy to tech?

hypothetically, politicians could do all sorts of things that in reality meet with way too much political fallout-- even legitimate, serious mismanagement would never produce consequences on that kind of scale, because the twits who make politics their careers want to be re-elected above anything else

Edited by SwanderedTalent
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SwanderedTalent

SwanderedTalent 5761

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, Nueces River Rat said:

Well,  shit.   I have the  title and deed   to a bridge in Brooklyn and some ocean front property in Arizona.   You think they might bite?

well, does the University of Texas have a nicer bridge in New York and better oceanfront property? Because if we do then fuck yes they'll bite

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
texifornia

texifornia 56945

Posted
Posted
On 5/3/2019 at 1:19 PM, Dennis Taylor said:

he gets more action in a week than Jimbo's had his entire life

Friend of mine went to the same all-boys Catholic high school as him. Said he was an absolute legend, did extremely well with their partner all-girls school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Deej

Deej 76772

Posted
Posted
On 5/5/2019 at 4:33 PM, Cairn Horn88 said:

Well, according to aggy, the state does not need a new Vet school...imagine that:                                                     

A&M just broke ground on a $22 million, Veterinary Education, Research, and Outreach Facility (VERO) on the West Texas A&M campus, just 17 miles south of where Tech wants to locate its school.elated Stories

And in 2016, A&M opened a $125 million teaching facility in College Station with enough capacity to increase enrollment by at least the equivalent of Texas Tech’s proposed school.

To justify its cause, TTU cites a 48-year-old report of the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB). Perhaps they don’t want to be reminded of what THECB’s 2016 report concluded:

“The high cost of establishing a new veterinary school would outweigh the potential benefits to the state, given the small to moderate workforce demand and the issue that building a new school would not guarantee that any of the graduates would practice on livestock, which is the state’s principal area of need … ”Maybe that conclusion is why TTU chose to bypass the THECB and go straight to the Legislature.

TTU also chooses to overlook the 2016 report’s finding that A&M graduates “make up about 60 percent of the state’s veterinary workforce” – not the 25 percent cited by TTU.

Once Texas A&M’s new teaching facility opened in 2016, Aggies began increasing class size. Today, A&M has the largest entering class in the nation with 162 students.

A&M boasts the largest number of food animal, rural, and mixed animal veterinarians in the nation, with 33 percent of the 2017 class and 40 percent of the 2018 class choosing these paths.

Simply increasing class size does not guarantee more rural and food animal veterinarians. That’s why A&M and WTAMU began a targeted pipeline program that already has doubled the number of Panhandle-area students entering A&M’s veterinary college. Their numbers will increase with the A&M System’s ongoing investment in the Panhandle.

The pipeline program is a model for statewide implementation.  It can be ramped up and down, as needed. Agreements with three other A&M System schools will expand that pipeline into other rural areas.

TTU’s proposed veterinary school is neither innovative, nor cost efficient, and duplicates A&M’s efforts. It proposes a distributed model of veterinary education, a model created by off-shore, for-profit universities without access to clinical training.

TTU uses a Canadian veterinary school, Calgary, as its “affordable” model.  This comparison is flawed.  Calgary is heavily government subsidized. Distributed models are the most expensive models resulting in the highest student debt.

Conversely, A&M, which is ranked fourth in the nation, is one of the most affordable veterinary colleges with student debt that is the second-lowest in the nation.

TTU claims a teaching hospital is not needed.  In fact, teaching hospitals provide students opportunities to work alongside some of the best veterinarians.  They learn not only what is practical, but also what is possible with the latest, state-of-the-art diagnostic and treatment methods.

TTU’s estimated costs for a veterinary school are misrepresented.  A&M has invested nearly $400 million for veterinary facilities and infrastructure since 2009.  The costs are ongoing.  TTU’s request for state funds is a fraction of the support they will request over time.

Based on Texas A&M’s quality, wouldn’t it more effective and more cost efficient to invest more in A&M than to build an new veterinary school?

A&M can clearly meet all of the veterinary needs in Texas.

Dr. Eleanor Green is the Carl B. King Dean of Veterinary Medicine at the Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences.

Wait, if they just opened a new teaching facility 3 years ago, why are they sending me emails asking for donations to build a new teaching facility? Never should have given them my email address when I took my dog in. Somebody needs to audit those fuckers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zharkov

Zharkov 288

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Deej said:

A&M can clearly meet all of the veterinary needs in Texas.

Er... since there is a need for more vets then it seems like aggy has NOT been meeting the need in Texas.  

Quote

Somebody needs to audit those fuckers.

That place need an audit going back to WW2 at least.  Corrupt and incompetent runs deep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C-Man

C-Man 27222

Posted
Posted
Wait, if they just opened a new teaching facility 3 years ago, why are they sending me emails asking for donations to build a new teaching facility? Never should have given them my email address when I took my dog in. Somebody needs to audit those fuckers.


Busy on Harvey relief, brah
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chopper

Chopper 17235

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Yes, clay travis. Because good livestock is only available in Cameron, TX and you have to be employed nearby to bid. 

"There are no good places to keep cattle near Baton Rouge!" Clay Imadipshit Travis, 2019.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...