Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

IT Scoop:

 

By: Justin, Eric, and Gerry

*Sark’s first couple of weeks of offseason seem about as perfectly scripted as his opening drives. The recruiting class finished incredibly strong, he’s poised to make staff upgrades, and groundwork is being laid to build momentum in the 2023 class.

*With the expected departure of wide receiver coach Andre Coleman, Steve Sarkisian appears to have his eyes on Pittsburgh wide receiver coach Brennan Marion. However, there could very well be other candidates IT is unaware of. On November 27th we wrote we were paying attention to TCU’s Malcolm Kelly. We do believe Kelly and Sark have talked, but are unsure what came of it. Very likely, nothing.

Marion is a Tulsa graduate well-known in Dallas/Fort Worth and East Texas as a volume recruiter. He coached with former Texas quarterback GJ Kinne in Hawaii in 2020 after stints as offensive coordinator at William and Mary and Howard.

One source described Marion as "relentless in pursuit of talent." The source said Marion, “holds his players accountable and they flourish when bought-in." His youthful energy would add a jolt on the recruiting trail and serve as a needed course correction from Andre Coleman.

Marion was instrumental in Pitt's Jordan Addison winning the 2021 Fred Biletnikoff Award, an award given to the nation's top wide receiver. That immediate success coupled with his personality would pair well on the trail.

The sophomore and All-ACC first teamer was sensational this season racking up 1,479 yards receiving on 93 catches, and 17 touchdowns.

Again, there could be other names we’re unaware of, but one thing is clear, Sark wants to get younger and more energetic with his position coaches. He proved that when he hired Tashard Choice, rather than chasing a big named veteran who expressed interest in the job.

*With changes on offense being set in motion, we turn our attention to defense. However, there is much less certainty what Sark intends to do, if anything, on that side of the ball. IT has heard he intends to sit down with every coach, player, and personnel member associated with the program to have frank discussions. As you know, those discussions with the players have already occurred, resulting in numerous players entering the transfer portal. We expect more still.

Sark is proving to be quite pragmatic, so it would be hard to fathom he would return the entire defense intact. However, we haven’t heard of any definitive moves he intends on making.

There was justified talk Brian Kelly wanted to reunite with Texas cornerbacks coach Terry Joseph at LSU. IT hears Jospeh is happy at Texas and would prefer to stay in Austin. Context for his job performance this year is more favorable to him than some of the conventional wisdom.

Along with defense, we’re unsure if or how Sarkisian intends to address strength and conditioning, but S&C falls under the umbrella of people he is going to have forthright discussions with.

Whatever Sark decides to do (even if it’s inaction), he has the full support and checkbook of the AD. The men in charge are big believers.

*There’s a good chance Texas won’t take an offensive lineman out of the portal given the O-line flourish over the last few weeks. If you don’t hear about a portal player at the position, it would be a good sign for UT’s chances with Devon Campbell.

  • Hook 'Em 8
  • Like 1
Posted
  On 12/20/2021 at 3:05 AM, Getafix said:

The streets have spoken!

Five candidates that would make sense for Texas wide receiver job

Mike Roach

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Expand  

I hope it's Marion or Emmett Jones (yeah I know he just joined TTU but Choice says hi)

I don't really get the Hankton hype. I feel like UGA's bag game does the recruiting there and their WRs are nothing special. I'd put Malcolm Kelly ahead of Hankton.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
  On 12/20/2021 at 3:47 PM, BurntOrange&White said:

IT Scoop:

 

By: Justin, Eric, and Gerry

*Sark’s first couple of weeks of offseason seem about as perfectly scripted as his opening drives. The recruiting class finished incredibly strong, he’s poised to make staff upgrades, and groundwork is being laid to build momentum in the 2023 class.

*With the expected departure of wide receiver coach Andre Coleman, Steve Sarkisian appears to have his eyes on Pittsburgh wide receiver coach Brennan Marion. However, there could very well be other candidates IT is unaware of. On November 27th we wrote we were paying attention to TCU’s Malcolm Kelly. We do believe Kelly and Sark have talked, but are unsure what came of it. Very likely, nothing.

Marion is a Tulsa graduate well-known in Dallas/Fort Worth and East Texas as a volume recruiter. He coached with former Texas quarterback GJ Kinne in Hawaii in 2020 after stints as offensive coordinator at William and Mary and Howard.

One source described Marion as "relentless in pursuit of talent." The source said Marion, “holds his players accountable and they flourish when bought-in." His youthful energy would add a jolt on the recruiting trail and serve as a needed course correction from Andre Coleman.

Marion was instrumental in Pitt's Jordan Addison winning the 2021 Fred Biletnikoff Award, an award given to the nation's top wide receiver. That immediate success coupled with his personality would pair well on the trail.

The sophomore and All-ACC first teamer was sensational this season racking up 1,479 yards receiving on 93 catches, and 17 touchdowns.

Again, there could be other names we’re unaware of, but one thing is clear, Sark wants to get younger and more energetic with his position coaches. He proved that when he hired Tashard Choice, rather than chasing a big named veteran who expressed interest in the job.

*With changes on offense being set in motion, we turn our attention to defense. However, there is much less certainty what Sark intends to do, if anything, on that side of the ball. IT has heard he intends to sit down with every coach, player, and personnel member associated with the program to have frank discussions. As you know, those discussions with the players have already occurred, resulting in numerous players entering the transfer portal. We expect more still.

Sark is proving to be quite pragmatic, so it would be hard to fathom he would return the entire defense intact. However, we haven’t heard of any definitive moves he intends on making.

There was justified talk Brian Kelly wanted to reunite with Texas cornerbacks coach Terry Joseph at LSU. IT hears Jospeh is happy at Texas and would prefer to stay in Austin. Context for his job performance this year is more favorable to him than some of the conventional wisdom.

Along with defense, we’re unsure if or how Sarkisian intends to address strength and conditioning, but S&C falls under the umbrella of people he is going to have forthright discussions with.

Whatever Sark decides to do (even if it’s inaction), he has the full support and checkbook of the AD. The men in charge are big believers.

*There’s a good chance Texas won’t take an offensive lineman out of the portal given the O-line flourish over the last few weeks. If you don’t hear about a portal player at the position, it would be a good sign for UT’s chances with Devon Campbell.

Expand  

So tell us Campbell signed with Texas without telling us Campbell signed with Texas. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

Marion is a big time up-and-comer in the coaching industry, a high volume recruiter who is well respected in the industry and beloved by his players. It would be a big time hire. I also wonder if it happens if he'd be able to convince Jordan Addison to come with him. Pittsburgh would be replacing a first round pick QB, it's OC and the WR coach a lot of people thought might get that OC job. It's maybe a pipe dream, but nice to think about.

Posted

CTJ, TL;DR

I'm sorry you feel smeared in this season of joy and merriment. The last thing I would want to do is harsh your holiday.

Have a merry Christmas in the certainty that your opinion is pretty much fact. You're often damn close. Don't view any glint of optimism as a personal affront and your new year will be the happier for it.

  • Like 4
  • Haha 3
Posted (edited)
  On 12/20/2021 at 4:12 AM, closetohumping said:

Passing the hat right now.  Daddy has to get Disney tickets for extended family that have decided to “surprise visit” us here in the oc

Expand  

What or where is “the oc” of which you speak?

Edit: If it’s The Orange County that some of the later posts seem to indicate, that is a punchable offense. 

Edited by ImissWallyPryor
Posted
  On 12/20/2021 at 4:17 PM, RomaVicta said:

CTJ, TL;DR

I'm sorry you feel smeared in this season of joy and merriment. The last thing I would want to do is harsh your holiday.

Have a merry Christmas in the certainty that your opinion is pretty much fact. You're often damn close. Don't view any glint of optimism as a personal affront and your new year will be the happier for it.

Expand  

Check out the Stockdale Paradox when you have some time, Roma. Blind optimism provides zero value to anyone including the source. I'm an entrepreneur and a ceaseless fan of Texas football - those two things should be proof enough that I'm inherently optimistic. I just have a nasty habit of mixing in reality along with it.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
  On 12/20/2021 at 4:23 PM, RomaVicta said:

And no small part of self-congratulation.

I'll look into this reality thing when you open up the monopoly.

Expand  

I'm struggling to understand how mixing in facts with having a view that things will get better, and I can help make that happen, is self-congratulatory. Not sure what else you're implying but I'm happy to be enlightened.

Posted
  On 12/20/2021 at 4:22 PM, closetojumping said:

Check out the Stockdale Paradox when you have some time, Roma. Blind optimism provides zero value to anyone including the source. I'm an entrepreneur and a i ceaseless fan of Texas football - those two things should be proof enough that I'm inherently optimistic. I just have a nasty habit of mixing in reality along with it.

Expand  

I loved Admiral Stockdale's zingers in his debate with Dan Quayle

  • Haha 1
Posted

Roach

  Reveal hidden contents

 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
  On 12/20/2021 at 4:22 PM, closetojumping said:

Check out the Stockdale Paradox when you have some time, Roma. Blind optimism provides zero value to anyone including the source. I'm an entrepreneur and a ceaseless fan of Texas football - those two things should be proof enough that I'm inherently optimistic. I just have a nasty habit of mixing in reality along with it.

Expand  

I’m a freelancer and ceaseless Texas football fan that comes back every year just to get my hopes dashed and destroyed. Hope is a funny thing. It’s not like I don’t realize the realities, but the pure want to have something better just makes the realities of inadequacy hurt that much more. Sure it would be wise to temper expectations, step back and take a realistic look. This is precisely why last season wasn’t all Sark’s fault and wasn’t all the players’ fault. Things are changing and that’s good. So we will see. But I’m certainly not expecting a NC next year. It would be good to hold onto leads and win games we are supposed to win. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
  On 12/20/2021 at 5:04 PM, ATLLonghorn said:

Will be an all-time fuck up on Narduzzi's part if he doesn't give Marion the Pitt OC job so hopefully he fucks up.

Expand  

Hold up didn't he hire Watson? He managed to survive that? Didn't realize he was the HC there still.

 

Maybe he'll target @closetojumping this time. The east-west coast offense would shine in Pittsburgh.

Edited by Bevo14
Posted
  On 12/20/2021 at 4:42 PM, closetojumping said:

I'm struggling to understand how mixing in facts with having a view that things will get better, and I can help make that happen, is self-congratulatory. Not sure what else you're implying but I'm happy to be enlightened.

Expand  
  Quote

Blind optimism provides zero value to anyone including the source. I'm an entrepreneur and a ceaseless fan of Texas football - those two things should be proof enough that I'm inherently optimistic. I just have a nasty habit of mixing in reality along with it.

Expand  

I'm not looking for a feud, but you don't see just a hint of arrogant self-congratulation in the above? 

Have the last word, CTJ.

Posted
  On 12/20/2021 at 4:12 PM, closetojumping said:

I'm legitimately interested in hearing about what you're defining as "gray" here for Sarkisian.

Texas signed a top 5 class. Credit to Sarkisian and staff, but they had a ton of help. Frankly, a confluence of events from late November to now turned this class into what it is, versus just good ol'earnest hard work from the staff. You know, just rollin' up the sleeves and really getting their grind on, the way it ought to be, right, Roma? 

Sarkisian chose to keep Coleman on staff. It impacted the WR play on the field and recruiting. Does Sarkisian only get credit for attempting to fix the problem? Or should that be tempered with the premise that he created the problem for himself in the first place?

Sarkisian's team went 5-7. They lost to Kansas, choked big leagues in 3 key games, got blown out and quit against Iowa State, and failed to make a bowl game. Is none of that on Sarkisian? Should we give him all of the credit for the first halves against OU, OSU, and Baylor, and blame the players and Tom Herman for the second halves? 

This seems to be the outlook from an emerging herd of fans. I get it. They want the HC at Texas to get the benefit of the doubt. Have at it. That isn't "gray" though. That's lily white Pollyanna hope at this point. Don't smear those of us who are from Missouri with regard to the guy, though. We're far darker than "gray" on this one until he can show us that the sun rises again on this program, but that's based on the history of his performance, which makes more sense to us than using hope as a strategy.

Expand  

 

  • Haha 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
  On 12/20/2021 at 5:24 PM, closetojumping said:

I was too young to give a shit about that election, but I do remember Phil Hartman playing him on SNL as a lifeless do-nothing. Was your post in sarcasm or did he really give it to Vice President Potatoe?

Expand  

His actual performance in the real life debates with the "who am I and why am I here?" was so bizarre/crazy (as I remember it- I think I was younger than you but paid more attention to that shit than any other 14 year old I knew) that it seemed like a parody or SNL spoof come to life.  Good times.  Good times. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
  On 12/20/2021 at 4:22 PM, closetojumping said:

Check out the Stockdale Paradox when you have some time, Roma.

Expand  
  Quote

The Stockdale Paradox is a concept, along with its companion concept Confront the Brutal Facts, developed in the book Good to Great. Productive change begins when you confront the brutal facts. Every good-to-great company embraced what we came to call the "Stockdale Paradox": you must maintain unwavering faith that you can and will prevail in the end, regardless of the difficulties, and at the same time, have the discipline to confront the most brutal facts of your current reality, whatever they might be.

Expand  

Excellent.

Over on the politics board, I often opine that no country or operation of any kind is made better by constant self-congratulation (No, I'm not turning this on you in this thread, I mean generally as you intend in your reference). 

I'll take learning wherever I can get it. Thanks.

Edit to add: I don't really think blind optimism is an apt description of my position.

Edited by RomaVicta
Posted
  On 12/20/2021 at 5:23 PM, RomaVicta said:

I'm not looking for a feud, but you don't see just a hint of arrogant self-congratulation in the above? 

Have the last word, CTJ.

Expand  

No. The part about entrepreneurialism and being a fan of Texas football making me an optimist was self-deprecating. I guess also subtle. Claiming that I'm infusing facts into my optimism, which then continues to give me pause when it comes to Seven Loss Steve, is taking a position. Specifically, it was taking a position against the  position you'd previously taken.

It's okay to disagree. I get it. I'm not trying to take being excited about the future away from anyone. I'm merely looking to defend the critics regarding what we've seen so far. Your original post that I responded to was one of multiple posts from posters lately that feels like is conflating being excited with the new class with Sarkisian being some sort of bad ass that is making criticism look silly. 

Not a fair way of viewing your original take? Fine. Consider it the head on a spike that should sit atop this board until Texas is competing for at least a conference title under our current feckless leader. Call it a strawman being deployed by a rhetorical hack and I can live with it either way.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
  On 12/20/2021 at 4:48 PM, Teryor said:

Roach

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Expand  

That energy/juice may be an underrated benefit of these moves. Seems badly needed.

Posted
  On 12/20/2021 at 5:35 PM, closetojumping said:

It's okay to disagree. I get it. I'm not trying to take being excited about the future away from anyone. I'm merely looking to defend the critics regarding what we've seen so far. Your original post that I responded to was one of multiple posts from posters lately that feels like is conflating being excited with the new class with Sarkisian being some sort of bad ass that is making criticism look silly. 

Expand  

I generally have the same disposition as you in regards to seeing the reality in most situations and keep my optimism grounded in order to keep from making decisions removed from practicality. 
 

However, I’ve never understood wanting to blunt those with hopeless optimism, especially on a message board where people go to escape the realities of their existence. If we were a forum of big money donors who had a say in the ongoings of the program (speaking for myself that I’m pretty sure I’d be tazed for coming within 50 feet of cdc) I could see where leveling expectations is important in order to maintain level-headedness, but if Roma wants to believe Sark can turn this around because he needs something to believe in, I say let him (and others).

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
  On 12/20/2021 at 6:02 PM, Sgt. Slaughter said:

I generally have the same disposition as you in regards to seeing the reality in most situations and keep my optimism grounded in order to keep from making decisions removed from practicality. 
 

However, I’ve never understood wanting to blunt those with hopeless optimism, especially on a message board where people go to escape the realities of their existence. If we were a forum of big money donors who had a say in the ongoings of the program (speaking for myself that I’m pretty sure I’d be tazed for coming within 50 feet of cdc) I could see where leveling expectations is important in order to maintain level-headedness, but if Roma wants to believe Sark can turn this around because he needs something to believe in, I say let him (and others).

Expand  

Fair unto itself, but no position is an island on a dynamic bulletin board. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
  On 12/20/2021 at 6:09 PM, BurntOrangeBlooded15 said:

Pretty sure it’s Marion.  

 

Expand  

Others have mentioned - Marion might get the job as OC at Pitt - in which case he would not simultaneously be the Texas WR coach.  I would guess Sark would have a candidate in his back pocket if he misses out on Marion (yes I know we kept Coleman last year because Sark missed out on several candidates - by firing Coleman we're guaranteed he has to go out and hire someone new).

Posted
  On 12/20/2021 at 4:12 PM, closetojumping said:

I'm legitimately interested in hearing about what you're defining as "gray" here for Sarkisian.

Texas signed a top 5 class. Credit to Sarkisian and staff, but they had a ton of help. Frankly, a confluence of events from late November to now turned this class into what it is, versus just good ol'earnest hard work from the staff. You know, just rollin' up the sleeves and really getting their grind on, the way it ought to be, right, Roma? 

Sarkisian chose to keep Coleman on staff. It impacted the WR play on the field and recruiting. Does Sarkisian only get credit for attempting to fix the problem? Or should that be tempered with the premise that he created the problem for himself in the first place?

Sarkisian's team went 5-7. They lost to Kansas, choked big leagues in 3 key games, got blown out and quit against Iowa State, and failed to make a bowl game. Is none of that on Sarkisian? Should we give him all of the credit for the first halves against OU, OSU, and Baylor, and blame the players and Tom Herman for the second halves? 

This seems to be the outlook from an emerging herd of fans. I get it. They want the HC at Texas to get the benefit of the doubt. Have at it. That isn't "gray" though. That's lily white Pollyanna hope at this point. Don't smear those of us who are from Missouri with regard to the guy, though. We're far darker than "gray" on this one until he can show us that the sun rises again on this program, but that's based on the history of his performance, which makes more sense to us than using hope as a strategy.

Expand  

I will agree excusing all Sarks mistakes and screwups this year(and they were numerable) is polyanna.  At the same time, refusing to give him or his staff any credit for anything or seeing the positives they achieved in recruiting and the possible hope it gives for the future, plus the fact that he seems to be actually addressing staff issues--- is satyanash. Yes, they had help but they also did the work and took advantage of the opportunities, Strong and Herman and their band of misfits doesn't pull off what just happened NIL and Coaching changes or not. Heck, I would argue Mack wouldn't have pulled it off either, because he would have already flown the white flag on those guys and gone else where to some low hanging easy to recruit target once they spurned him.  Not a high standard to measure against I will grant you, but it is what we currently have to compare to and they made the most of it.  Refusing to give them credit for it is akin to blaming them for no bag game to combat what other schools are doing.

 

Yes it remains to be seen if the issues get addressed and we see improvement in the fall, but just as there is nothing wrong with criticism( see my posts after Okie state  this year) there is nothing wrong with giving credit where it is due.  

Yes they benefitted from NIL and Coaching changes--primarily though NIL just leveled the playing field for them, and most of the flips related to coaching changes had been predicted long before the coaching change even occurred.

Hopefully the talent infusion on D and particularly Oline and QB bear the fruit that people are projecting(we shall have to wait and see), but having what is believed to be a competent QB under center should help with at least some of the offensive issues...

 

So no, Sark aint Bible, Royal, Akers, or even Brown yet, but the past week shows he isn't McWilliams, Mackovick, Strong, or Herman....

 

So in summation he currently sucks a lot less than he did at the end of the season but still has a long way to go and anyone being 100% polyanna or sataynash at this point is only deluding themselves....

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
  On 12/20/2021 at 4:22 PM, closetojumping said:

Check out the Stockdale Paradox when you have some time, Roma. Blind optimism provides zero value to anyone including the source. I'm an entrepreneur and a ceaseless fan of Texas football - those two things should be proof enough that I'm inherently optimistic. I just have a nasty habit of mixing in reality along with it.

Expand  

 

Good info in link below...

https://ebizfacts.com/stockdale-paradox/

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
  On 12/20/2021 at 6:12 PM, Hiphopopotamos said:

Others have mentioned - Marion might get the job as OC at Pitt - in which case he would not simultaneously be the Texas WR coach.  I would guess Sark would have a candidate in his back pocket if he misses out on Marion (yes I know we kept Coleman last year because Sark missed out on several candidates - by firing Coleman we're guaranteed he has to go out and hire someone new).

Expand  

Yeah it sounds like Marion isn't a done deal bc he could get an OC job. The smoke all seems legit but it's still very possible he told Sark that he's in unless Pitt give him OC, and now they're waiting.

Posted
  On 12/20/2021 at 6:15 PM, OB3 said:

You could miss on your top 5 replacements and still end up with someone better than Coleman 

Expand  

 

You could go with a bag of these, and still end up with something better than (Andre) Coleman.

 

Amazon.com: Coleman Rubber Mallet with Tent Peg Remover : Tools & Home  Improvement

 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted

These are good hires on offense but they do nothing to address the abysmal defense. The Big 12 quickly figured out how to exploit PK's scheme with runs and short passes. Pete was either unwilling or unable to adapt.

Posted
  On 12/20/2021 at 6:22 PM, BrazilHorn said:

Drayton gone, Coleman gone, now if only CDC would shove Plonsky's ass out the door the trifecta would be complete. (To be fair to Drayton and Coleman - she is a far worse problem)

Expand  

In this day and age, I doubt ole scissors is going anywhere unless there is dirt on her.

Posted
  On 12/20/2021 at 4:12 PM, closetojumping said:

I'm legitimately interested in hearing about what you're defining as "gray" here for Sarkisian.

Texas signed a top 5 class. Credit to Sarkisian and staff, but they had a ton of help. Frankly, a confluence of events from late November to now turned this class into what it is, versus just good ol'earnest hard work from the staff. You know, just rollin' up the sleeves and really getting their grind on, the way it ought to be, right, Roma? 

Sarkisian chose to keep Coleman on staff. It impacted the WR play on the field and recruiting. Does Sarkisian only get credit for attempting to fix the problem? Or should that be tempered with the premise that he created the problem for himself in the first place?

Sarkisian's team went 5-7. They lost to Kansas, choked big leagues in 3 key games, got blown out and quit against Iowa State, and failed to make a bowl game. Is none of that on Sarkisian? Should we give him all of the credit for the first halves against OU, OSU, and Baylor, and blame the players and Tom Herman for the second halves? 

This seems to be the outlook from an emerging herd of fans. I get it. They want the HC at Texas to get the benefit of the doubt. Have at it. That isn't "gray" though. That's lily white Pollyanna hope at this point. Don't smear those of us who are from Missouri with regard to the guy, though. We're far darker than "gray" on this one until he can show us that the sun rises again on this program, but that's based on the history of his performance, which makes more sense to us than using hope as a strategy.

Expand  

I think a lot of that can be on Steve Sarkisian and it still be the right thing to do support him and this staff in Year One.

I'm not talking about giving him the benefit of the doubt but also maybe not doom post about our "loser" coach and "7 win Steve".  I'm guessing there is a practical middle ground between naive pollyanna and angry cynic that most fans might be lining up behind.

Not trying to smear you.  You did a great thing with HWH and rightfully deserve a ton of praise.  Just maybe don't smear the folks that have a view that coaches and staffs are multi year bets and year one is too soon to call it.

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
  On 12/20/2021 at 6:25 PM, 6th Street said:

These are good hires on offense but they do nothing to address the abysmal defense. The Big 12 quickly figured out how to exploit PK's scheme with runs and short passes. Pete was either unwilling or unable to adapt.

Expand  

Of the fact he were running out the equivalent of the JV squad at DE, LB, and Safety may have had a ton to do with how bad the D looked.

Add some legit LBs or Safeties and the D would have been OK. Having holes at all 3 levels in the D was a death knell and that shit is all on Turtle Tom.

  • Hook 'Em 5

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...