Jump to content

Texas Recruiting Notes 2025: Duck Around and Find Out


texifornia

Recommended Posts

Guessing aggy is throwing a ridiculous amount of $$ to keep him from us.

Four-star++ Javion Hilson (Cocoa, Fla./High)

Hilson made an OV to Michigan over the weekend, and is scheduled to be at Texas A&M Saturday-Sunday for an OV. Texas vs. Texas A&M is where the decision was expected to come from headed into the Michigan visit.

  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Elmer_Fudd said:

Guessing aggy is throwing a ridiculous amount of $$ to keep him from us.

Four-star++ Javion Hilson (Cocoa, Fla./High)

Hilson made an OV to Michigan over the weekend, and is scheduled to be at Texas A&M Saturday-Sunday for an OV. Texas vs. Texas A&M is where the decision was expected to come from headed into the Michigan visit.

A&M doesn't need us involved to back up the Brinks truck for elite DL.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Getafix said:

 

Just  FYI - from Sark's presser this AM:

 

image.thumb.png.86141d40097ce5907e4a6862a4a34a2b.png

 

And I liked hearing this - 

 

image.thumb.png.55e7fef570509b634cf66e385c8f48a2.png

 

 

I never understood this dumbass "10 win season" measuring stick bullshit. Who gives a fuck, other than Mack, about 10 wins? That's tard-level thinking. Alamo/Holiday bowl Mack. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Funk Doctor Spock said:

I never understood this dumbass "10 win season" measuring stick bullshit. Who gives a fuck, other than Mack, about 10 wins? That's tard-level thinking. Alamo/Holiday bowl Mack. 

I think it was purely moving the goalposts on an outcome variable by Mack to cover his ass. It gave him some "standard of excellence" while allowing for a loss to OU and someone else on the schedule.

In reality, it just meant Texas missed the BigXII South crown and a title game appearance, and settled for the Holiday/Alamo Bowl, as you mentioned. Real neat, FUPM.

Edited by MuellerHorn
  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MuellerHorn said:

I think it was purely moving the goalposts by Mack to cover his ass. It gave him some "standard of excellence" while allowing for a loss to OU and someone else on the schedule.

Well back before they went to 12 games seasons 10 wins was a good metric. Just like 9 wins was a good metric in the 90s. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

Well back before they went to 12 games seasons 10 wins was a good metric. Just like 9 wins was a good metric in the 90s. 

10 wins is "good," but it's all relative. In five of those nine 10-win seasons, Texas didn't play for shit at the end.

image.thumb.png.c699df2c7f2e3473142209f4e9f7e587.png

Edited by MuellerHorn
  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Tex Pete said:

Mack used 9 wins as his goal.

God, even worse. No wonder we only have 3 conference titles from that shitty conference. 

2 hours ago, MuellerHorn said:

I think it was purely moving the goalposts on an outcome variable by Mack to cover his ass. It gave him some "standard of excellence" while allowing for a loss to OU and someone else on the schedule.

In reality, it just meant Texas missed the BigXII South crown and a title game appearance, and settled for the Holiday/Alamo Bowl, as you mentioned. Real neat, FUPM.

This actually makes a ton of sense. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MuellerHorn said:

Didn’t someone recently say that Texas was trying to get this kid to open things back up?

 

Yea I think I remember seeing that and thinking if thats true, that kid was about to upgrade in life in a major way, all because he's good at drop kicking an inflated piece of leather.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Frank Drebin said:

We have 4. And it was a very good conference most of the time. 

With the teams we had, we should have double or more than that. We by far had the best rosters, and yet Mack constantly got butt fucked by Stoops almost yearly, and add in K-State, Tech,or some other team we had superior talent to. Mack sucked as a HC, but he was a good smiley glad hand. There's a reason he was called coach February, and they weren't wrong. Very few times did we lose just 1 game. In fact, he has 3, and 1 undefeated season (remember, he was here for 15 years). Other than that, he has 2+ losses per season. We were constant holiday bowl attendees. But we did have great ST's for almost his entire tenure. 

Stoops won the conference 7 times, and Mack just 2 times. How sad is that? Stoops is 8-5 over Mack, and then went on to wreck other teams on his way to yet another CC. 

With all those NFL players we churned out during his tenure, it's pathetic he only had 2 CC's in his 15 seasons. John Mackovic has 1, Sark has the other 1. 

Edited by Funk Doctor Spock
  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Funk Doctor Spock said:

With the teams we had, we should have double or more than that. We by far had the best rosters, and yet Mack constantly got butt fucked by Stoops almost yearly, and add in K-State, Tech,or some other team we had superior talent to. Mack sucked as a HC, but he was a good smiley glad hand. There's a reason he was called coach February, and they weren't wrong. Very few times did we lose just 1 game. In fact, he has 3, and 1 undefeated season. Other than that, he has 2+ losses per season. in a season. We were constant holiday bowl attendees. But we did have great ST's for almost his entire tenure. 

Stoops won the conference 7 times, and Mack just 2 times. How sad is that? Stoops is 8-5 over Mack, and then went on to wreck other teams on his way to yet another CC. 

With all those NFL players we churned out during his tenure, it's pathetic he only had 3 CC's in his 15 seasons. Sark has the other 1. 

And yet he was still a vast upgrade over Mackovic, McWilliams, and the later half of Akers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TexasRenegade said:

And yet he was still a vast upgrade over Mackovic, McWilliams, and the later half of Akers.

And that's how low we had been. Just absolutely crazy to think about. 

The other guys you mentioned I'm too young to remember, but didn't Akers do pretty well until the end? I honestly don't know; I think I've seen posts about it before he was fired, but I'm not entirely sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...