Jump to content

Texas Recruiting Notes 2025: Duck Around and Find Out

texifornia

By texifornia
in 🤫$9.95🤫

 Share

Recommended Posts

utfan87

utfan87 413

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Bevo said:

Is this incorrect?

Name: Michael Taaffe 
College: Texas     Number: 16
Height: 6-0   Weight: 190
Position: FS  Pos2: SS
Class/Draft Year: rJr/2026
40 Low: 4.45   40 Time: 4.55  40 High: 4.63

https://draftscout.com/dsprofile.php?PlayerId=1094980&DraftYear=2026

When he was a junior he was 4th on the track team in LJ and TJ. He lacks athleticism, but he’s a smart football player. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 17k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

derpyhorndog
derpyhorndog
TXRed
TXRed
closetojumping
closetojumping

I’m not interested in getting political, but your description of circumstances can get immediately fucked. Negged for attempting to absurdly minimize the assassination attempt on a presidential candid

Posted Images

Park Gothic

Park Gothic 5376

Posted
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, hookemATL said:

Does Terry have an announcement set?

*If this was answered not long ago in this thread, please insult me personally/deeply for my transgression. *

From what I remember, he does not have one set yet. Just sometime this fall. 

Just now, utfan87 said:

When he was a junior he was 4th on the track team in LJ and TJ. He lacks athleticism, but he’s a smart football player. 

Hey man, triple jump is hard. I tried it at one track meet freshman year and I looked like a fucking QWOP character.

split-qwop.gif

Edited by Park Gothic
  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Codaxx

Codaxx 6261

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, 6th Street said:

Terry going to be a badass red zone target. Nice complement to Lockett 

Lockett is a bad ass red zone target. 6'2, great body control, long arms, huge hands (From Gerry, not from personal experience). Suppposed to be one of the best WRs at going up and making contested catches. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bevo

Bevo 13900

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, 6th Street said:

Terry going to be a badass red zone target. Nice complement to Lockett 

He seems like a better version of Lil'Jordan Humphrey, so it will be interesting to see whether he ends up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Funk Doctor Spock

Funk Doctor Spock 13287

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, WinningIsHard said:

the taafe being slow trope is really weird to me lol. Is it akin to the murphy being a fast qb because he's black? He is definitely small compared to williams or mcdonald but I think his speed is fine. I haven't been able to find a verified 40 time but his field speed is good from what I have seen. 

BO&W answered. He's a 4.8 guy, but he's instinctive and he has a penchant for being in the right place at the right time. But he ain't catching anybody. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Funk Doctor Spock

Funk Doctor Spock 13287

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, Codaxx said:

Lockett is a bad ass red zone target. 6'2, great body control, long arms, huge hands (From Gerry, not from personal experience). Suppposed to be one of the best WRs at going up and making contested catches. 

Hands are like 11" and uses them really well. He'll be a monster in the red zone. Gerry mentioned that 50/50 balls are more like 80/20 when thrown to him. Said he has the biggest hands for a WR he's ever seen. He, Ffrench, Wingo, and Terry is just unfair. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Funk Doctor Spock

Funk Doctor Spock 13287

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, utfan87 said:

When he was a junior he was 4th on the track team in LJ and TJ. He lacks athleticism, but he’s a smart football player. 

Very smart. Like I said, he has a penchant for being in the right place at the right time. He knows where to be and can help line up everyone else. He's definitely an asset, even if he's slow. He's a good problem to have until he has to run after somebody. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Funk Doctor Spock

Funk Doctor Spock 13287

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Dondrysdale1 said:

He flipped prior to Davis taking the job. Was also never recruited as an OL just saw the writing on the wall at the time and picked the better program for and coach.

This must be some Mandela effect shit, because I distinctly remember him being recruited by Mack for the o-line and he wanted to play defense, and Saban offered that. Plus Saban is/was a witch in recruiting and made good on his promises to get his guys to the league. Mack had mailed it in at this point, so it's moot. 

But him flipping definitely stung. That one hurt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Katfid54

Katfid54 9005

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Funk Doctor Spock said:

Why is that?

Because that's not how percentages work.  If a "50/50" ball is "80/20" when it's thrown to Lockett, then it was and is already an 80/20 ball.  It never was a 50/50 ball.

But a different pass can still be a 50/50 ball (even if that pass would be less than 50/50 if thrown to someone else).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Funk Doctor Spock

Funk Doctor Spock 13287

Posted
Posted (edited)

Fong bomb for Terry. Nice. 

No Fong bomb for Ffrench yet, but Tom Loy put in his prediction. Unless I'm missing something regarding Fong

3 minutes ago, Katfid54 said:

Because that's not how percentages work.  If a "50/50" ball is "80/20" when it's thrown to Lockett, then it was and is already an 80/20 ball.  It never was a 50/50 ball.

But a different pass can still be a 50/50 ball (even if that pass would be less than 50/50 if thrown to someone else).

Bruh, I didn't say that, Gerry did. Take it up with him lol. 

Edited by Funk Doctor Spock
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Park Gothic

Park Gothic 5376

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Katfid54 said:

Because that's not how percentages work.  If a "50/50" ball is "80/20" when it's thrown to Lockett, then it was and is already an 80/20 ball.  It never was a 50/50 ball.

But a different pass can still be a 50/50 ball (even if that pass would be less than 50/50 if thrown to someone else).

giphy.webp

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doc Daneeka

Doc Daneeka 6793

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Katfid54 said:

Because that's not how percentages work.  If a "50/50" ball is "80/20" when it's thrown to Lockett, then it was and is already an 80/20 ball.  It never was a 50/50 ball.

But a different pass can still be a 50/50 ball (even if that pass would be less than 50/50 if thrown to someone else).

It works better if you think of “50/50 ball” not as a percentage, but as a metaphor for a pass into tight coverage.

That said, yeah, if Lockett pulls in 80% of those, it was inherently never a 50/50 pass, percentage-wise.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PhillyHorn1

PhillyHorn1 81

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Codaxx said:

Lockett is a bad ass red zone target. 6'2, great body control, long arms, huge hands (From Gerry, not from personal experience). Suppposed to be one of the best WRs at going up and making contested catches. 

Nice try. We all know.

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
closetojumping

closetojumping 65449

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Doc Daneeka said:

It works better if you think of “50/50 ball” not as a percentage, but as a metaphor for a pass into tight coverage.

That said, yeah, if Lockett pulls in 80% of those, it was inherently never a 50/50 pass, percentage-wise.

It's just fatkid being a pedant. The term isn't meant to accurately describe the play via math, and it never was. It's a colloquialism. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doc Daneeka

Doc Daneeka 6793

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, closetojumping said:

It's just fatkid being a pedant. The term isn't meant to accurately describe the play via math, and it never was. It's a colloquialism. 

Or even a metaphor. 

If we can’t be pedantic, I don’t know what sets us apart from the lower animals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
JesusSweatDuck

JesusSweatDuck 18124

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
44 minutes ago, Katfid54 said:

Because that's not how percentages work.  If a "50/50" ball is "80/20" when it's thrown to Lockett, then it was and is already an 80/20 ball.  It never was a 50/50 ball.

But a different pass can still be a 50/50 ball (even if that pass would be less than 50/50 if thrown to someone else).

Autism Awareness GIF by Creative Courage

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 3
  • Haha 17
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doc Daneeka

Doc Daneeka 6793

Posted
Posted
Just now, closetojumping said:

Opposable thumbs. 

That’s weak sauce. It’s pedantry and sarcasm, imo. 

Even so, I’d argue that it’s higher levels of consciousness and reason and that a chimp with opposable thumbs is still just a chimp. But that’s probably just pedantry on my part. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doc Daneeka

Doc Daneeka 6793

Posted
Posted
Just now, Park Gothic said:

I've been on this board for a couple of years now. Not sure I'd rate humanity's levels of consciousness that high. 

Thumbs are pretty sweet though. They make hitting the space bar a lot easier. 

I could also have used “less low” and, in many contexts, would have.

I agree that thumbs are useful. Hell, I’m posting from an iPad… they’re all I use to type. They also make the Hook ‘em easier. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Katfid54

Katfid54 9005

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, closetojumping said:

It's just fatkid being a pedant. The term isn't meant to accurately describe the play via math, and it never was. It's a colloquialism. 

i got colloquial with your mom's pedant last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TommyGufano

TommyGufano 6023

Posted
Posted

Well, since we're wading in nonsense, I don't remember much convo around A'Shawn Robinson playing OL, but I do recall insistence from Texas' $9.95 crowd that Andrew Billings was making a huge mistake not embracing OL play. He's still in the NFL, so I guess he ended up alright.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bodacious Bevo

Bodacious Bevo 3691

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

Katfid engaging with Spider2yBanana on pedantic nonsense if the $9.95 equivalent of just getting spiked in the balls repeatedly. 

Ohhhh that's who that is? I was wondering how someone who posts so much got muted without me remembering them. It all makes sense now

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bevo14

Bevo14 8468

Posted
Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, texifornia said:

There's always the chance of a Filsaime type recruitment happening, but Sanchez and the staff haven't seemed to like each other from day one.

There's a whole season of ball, teams to shit the bed, and coaching changes to happen. I'm treating errbody like a possibility. 

Edited by Bevo14
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sal

Sal 1108

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Hookem2147 said:

Nahlin put in a flip pick for Myron Charles to Texas. 60% confidence.

“After Florida St’s devastating loss, I have a strong inclination to think that maybe Charles will potentially consider reopening his recruitment.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...