Jump to content

United States Ambassador Herschel Walker

Gil Bang

By Gil Bang
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Nice Guy Eddie

Nice Guy Eddie 13713

Posted
Posted

I imagine that Newt and Hannitys of the right wish that it wasn't Hershel running but that was who wanted to run and Trump backed him, so now there can be nothing but full steam ahead. 

I could hear Hannity saying that maybe Herschel still suffers from mental health problems but we need him in the Senate so the GA voters need to show up for him. You can read it in the TexAgs post about Herschel, there is nothing that he could do now or have done previously that would convince any of them to not vote for Herschel or support him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

tx 3 putt
tx 3 putt
BrickHorn
BrickHorn

MAGA is often dismissed as racist, homophobic, and generally regressive. But that focus misses the point. MAGA is a big tent, and the defining characteristics are anger, entitlement, and raving s

Beau Vine
Beau Vine

Posted Images

atomheartbevo

atomheartbevo 90573

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

I imagine that Newt and Hannitys of the right wish that it wasn't Hershel running but that was who wanted to run and Trump backed him, so now there can be nothing but full steam ahead. 

I could hear Hannity saying that maybe Herschel still suffers from mental health problems but we need him in the Senate so the GA voters need to show up for him. You can read it in the TexAgs post about Herschel, there is nothing that he could do now or have done previously that would convince any of them to not vote for Herschel or support him.

I know a few people who have half-heartedly tried to defend them, and I just point out that Congress is not a make-work jobs program for the mentally ill.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhatTheBuck

WhatTheBuck 28904

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Pancho said:

 

There’s more to that Gingrich commentary. They showed a clip on Morning Joe today. He goes on to say Herschel suffered from PTSD (not a side effect of concussions, maybe he meant CTE), and credited him for his relationship to Christ. You know, unlike the REVEREND Raphael Warnock. Gingrich has been so full of shit for so long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GenXer

GenXer 3347

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:

lolololololololol

 

Grab ‘em by the pussy, Stormy Daniels, and other Trump fuckery exercised their mental gymnastics mettle for years.

GQPers are primed and ready for any challenge against their blind faith. No hurdle is too high for them to overcome for cult45.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
South Austin

South Austin 53159

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

There’s more to that Gingrich commentary. They showed a clip on Morning Joe today. He goes on to say Herschel suffered from PTSD (not a side effect of concussions, maybe he meant CTE), and credited him for his relationship to Christ. You know, unlike the REVEREND Raphael Warnock. Gingrich has been so full of shit for so long.

Gingrich has turned into someone very much like Ted Cruz, a member of the intellectual far right (yes, I can concede that there are very intelligent members of the far right), who have no problem casting their intelligence aside in order to speak to the lowest comment denominator of their party, which at the moment is a substantial voting bloc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mdmost

mdmost 43859

Posted
Posted

I've made peace with the fact that what a Republican does before they decide to run for office simply does not matter. It does for Democrats, hence Al Franken having to step down. But Republican voters simply do not care what your past is as long as you cast the votes they want. The thing I can't make peace with is why good meaning people also fall for this. But the ends justify the means for a lot of people in this country. It doesn't matter that Herschel is a walking hypocrisy. If he votes the way they want, that's all that matters. They will bend over backwards looking for ways to give him an out. They will undermine and contradict their own arguments and points. It simply does not matter. All that matters is winning. Democrats have got to start adopting that strategy. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nice Guy Eddie

Nice Guy Eddie 13713

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, mdmost said:

I've made peace with the fact that what a Republican does before they decide to run for office simply does not matter. It does for Democrats, hence Al Franken having to step down. But Republican voters simply do not care what your past is as long as you cast the votes they want. The thing I can't make peace with is why good meaning people also fall for this. But the ends justify the means for a lot of people in this country. It doesn't matter that Herschel is a walking hypocrisy. If he votes the way they want, that's all that matters. They will bend over backwards looking for ways to give him an out. They will undermine and contradict their own arguments and points. It simply does not matter. All that matters is winning. Democrats have got to start adopting that strategy. 

Franken's ouster was a Dem mistake. They decided that zero tolerance meant zero tolerance even when non-criminal, immature attempts at humor was at play. Don't get me wrong, I do think Franken hurt the actress/model that he kissed and pretended to grope. 100% wrong but that is far from domestic violence accusations and child neglect from Walker. Also Franken owned up to his mistakes and apologized.

I believe that some Dems have expressed regret for how they didn't stand up (behind the scenes) to the Dems that wanted Franken out.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
WhatTheBuck

WhatTheBuck 28904

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
22 minutes ago, South Austin said:

Gingrich has turned into someone very much like Ted Cruz, a member of the intellectual far right (yes, I can concede that there are very intelligent members of the far right), who have no problem casting their intelligence aside in order to speak to the lowest comment denominator of their party, which at the moment is a substantial voting bloc.

He’s always been a hypocritical piece of shit. He hasn’t turned at all. He’s an original architect of the partisan political divide CREATED BY THE GOP by choosing party over country. He railed against Clinton’s marital infidelity while cheating on his first wife while she was sick with cancer. He got ejected from Congress for ethics violations. He is who he’s always been.

  • Hook 'Em 15
  • Like 3
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 46999

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, WhatTheBuck said:

He’s always been a hypocritical piece of shit. He hasn’t turned at all. He’s an original architect of the partisan political divide CREATED BY THE GOP by choosing party over country. He railed against Clinton’s marital infidelity while cheating on his first wife while she was sick with cancer. He got ejected from Congress for ethics violations. He is who he’s always been.

100% correct.  + rep

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pancho

Pancho 46096

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

I imagine that Newt and Hannitys of the right wish that it wasn't Hershel running but that was who wanted to run and Trump backed him, so now there can be nothing but full steam ahead. 

I could hear Hannity saying that maybe Herschel still suffers from mental health problems but we need him in the Senate so the GA voters need to show up for him. You can read it in the TexAgs post about Herschel, there is nothing that he could do now or have done previously that would convince any of them to not vote for Herschel or support him.

not sure I buy that Herschel wanted to run.  This is a perfect example of radical racist republicans using a Black person as a pawn.  They needed a Black to run for a few reasons—Warnock is popular and would/will win again which means they needed to take Black votes away from him. Herschel was popular because of football and trump.  Radical racist republicans could also go forward with the message of “see, how can we be racist if we’re letting Herschel run!?!?!”

They know deep inside that Herschel has no business near the US Senate when he can’t even string together a coherent sentence.  Add in the fact that he’s paid for an abortion and racist republicans are like “oh well” and voting for him any way, it further lets you know the hypocrisy of those people has no bounds. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Dog

The Dog 44792

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, Pancho said:

not sure I buy that Herschel wanted to run.  This is a perfect example of radical racist republicans using a Black person as a pawn.  They needed a Black to run for a few reasons—Warnock is popular and would/will win again which means they needed to take Black votes away from him. Herschel was popular because of football and trump.  Radical racist republicans could also go forward with the message of “see, how can we be racist if we’re letting Herschel run!?!?!”

They know deep inside that Herschel has no business near the US Senate when he can’t even string together a coherent sentence.  Add in the fact that he’s paid for an abortion and racist republicans are like “oh well” and voting for him any way, it further lets you know the hypocrisy of those people has no bounds. 

this was 100% Trump and his loony base fucking up what should have been a pretty easy flip. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
High Plains Drifter

High Plains Drifter 11164

Posted
Posted

 

49 minutes ago, Pancho said:

not sure I buy that Herschel wanted to run.  This is a perfect example of radical racist republicans using a Black person as a pawn.  They needed a Black to run for a few reasons—Warnock is popular and would/will win again which means they needed to take Black votes away from him. Herschel was popular because of football and trump.  Radical racist republicans could also go forward with the message of “see, how can we be racist if we’re letting Herschel run!?!?!”

They know deep inside that Herschel has no business near the US Senate when he can’t even string together a coherent sentence.  Add in the fact that he’s paid for an abortion and racist republicans are like “oh well” and voting for him any way, it further lets you know the hypocrisy of those people has no bounds. 

 

I think the racism is even deeper and more insidious than that. Walker fits their idea of what a black man is- a big dumb stud who was good at sports. Bonus- he talks in a back country, aw shucks, I'm just a big dumb negro way. The blatant lies about being valedictorian, hospital admin, whatever it is today, is just country bragging and joshing, not lying.

In their mind, Walker the human stereotype, justifies their racism.

 

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hayden_horn

hayden_horn 11402

Posted
Posted

so i wasn't paying super close attention to this shit aside from some of the more comedic aspects, and noticing that herschel is broken. like, completely broken. it's not really all that funny any longer, and it's one hell of a fucking indictment on the party that wants to make mass shootings about mental health rather than gun regulation. 

this man is not well. 

and yet...

what the fuck, republicans?

WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 4
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Red Five

Red Five 41621

Posted
Posted

I'm pretty sure I heard Herschel say earlier that he doesn't know this woman, never paid for an abortion for her, and that she is not the mother of one of his kids. I feel like this could be proven one way or the other in the next oh 20 minutes or so. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pato del Muerto

Pato del Muerto 53371

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, MC Fresh Breath said:

To nobody's surprise:

Walker’s Christian fans unfazed by abortion revelations

Why would they?  The choice has been reframed to either a guy that wants to allow every woman to have abortions vs a guy that wants nobody to have them…unless it’s him or someone he knows that has a good reason but not really but really we just don’t talk about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hayden_horn

hayden_horn 11402

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Why would they?  The choice has been reframed to either a guy that wants to allow every woman to have abortions vs a guy that wants nobody to have them…unless it’s him or someone he knows that has a good reason but not really but really we just don’t talk about it. 

or we can talk about it because he's black and that baby was gonna be black, so we ain't gonna miss it anyways. besides, we expect that kind of behavior out of the blacks, even the house...erm, good....erm, republican ones. long as he set the table, erm....goes in the back door...erm...votes the way we tell him, he's a good guy in our book!

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Francisco 2.0

Francisco 2.0 32548

Posted
Posted

 

https://www.thedailybeast.com/herschel-walker-has-confirmed-he-had-a-kid-with-his-accuser?ref=home

 

Quote

GOP Senate candidate Herschel Walker’s attempt to answer reporter questions Thursday about whether he paid for an ex-girlfriend’s abortion crashed and burned, as he implied in rambling responses that he has not confirmed that the ex-girlfriend was the mother of one of his children.

The problem with that explanation? Walker has, in fact, confirmed that this woman is the mother of one of his kids. He did so to The Daily Beast in June, when we first broke the story about an undisclosed child.

 

 

Quote

Asked whether he’d reached out to any of the mothers of his children, Walker replied, “Why do I need to?”

The reporter explained that The Daily Beast had reported that the woman who says he paid for her to abort their child was also the mother of one of his children. Walker then implied that the woman would have to be the mother of a child he had not yet acknowledged.

“Because of the article I had more kids. That’s why I haven’t reached out to anyone, because I said no. And that’s what I mean when I said no, I said it’s not correct, that’s a lie. And that’s what I mean, when that’s a lie,” Walker said.

 

Quote

But that explanation doesn't make sense. Months ago, Walker himself publicly confirmed to The Daily Beast that this woman is the mother of one of his children. The Daily Beast independently confirmed the claim with a family court clerk and a court order declaring Walker the father, citing a DNA test.

Walker’s reply was possibly accurate in one dimension, however. He still has not contacted the woman after the story first broke.

Walker had previously tried to deny The Daily Beast’s reports on the abortion. “There’s no truth to this or any other Daily Beast report," he said.

 

Spoiler

But that’s a lie by his own admission. Walker has confirmed not just one Daily Beast report, but two. The outspoken critic of absentee fathers in the Black community has in all acknowledged that he has fathered four children by four different women.

His adult son, Christian Walker, has claimed that his father was not present in any of their lives, and the mother who also aborted one of his children told The Daily Beast on Wednesday that he wasn’t around for their son.

“He didn’t accept responsibility for the kid we did have together, and now he isn’t accepting responsibility for the one that we didn’t have,” she said. “That says so much about how he views the role of women in childbirth, versus his own. And now he wants to take that choice away from other women and couples entirely.”

After The Daily Beast reported earlier this week that the football legend urged a woman in 2009 to abort her child and later reimbursed her for the procedure, the Georgia Senate hopeful vehemently denied the story as a “flat-out lie” and claimed he had no idea who the anonymous woman was.

The Daily Beast followed up by reporting that not only had he paid for the woman’s abortion but that he had fathered another child with her. The woman, meanwhile, said that Walker’s attempts to spin the report as an attack from desperate Democrats sounded ridiculous and that it didn’t really shock her.

Meanwhile, hours after telling conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt that there was “nothing to be ashamed of” for paying for an abortion despite being extremely anti-abortion now (all while still denying the story), he held an election event in Georgia.

After speaking for a short time and receiving some mild applause from gathered voters, Walker decided to hold a short gaggle with reporters on the scene. And it was an absolute trainwreck as his absurd explanations and denials were all over the place.

Walker was also asked about his comments to Hewitt and how he claimed that he shouldn’t be ashamed for personally paying for an abortion, only for the ex-running back to insist that he was “talking about something totally different” and that he meant his ex-wife had nothing to do with what that woman said.

“I said this here, the abortion thing is false,” he continued. “It's a lie, and that's why I said that anything to happened to my ex-wife or what Christian was talking about, I don't know. but as i said, there's nothing to be ashamed of.”

Eventually, a reporter pressed Walker on his reaction to the mother of his kids and son saying that he’s lying and that they no longer trusted him.

“Just like what I said, the Democrats are desperate for this seat and so’s this reporter,” he bellowed. “They’re very desperate for this seat and I love my family and I always love my family. I'm going to win this race!”Walker would go on and dismiss some of the criticism he’s received from Georgia Republicans in recent days before exclaiming that “the Georgia people need a winner” before walking out of the presser.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Satchel

Satchel 6982

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, MC Fresh Breath said:

To nobody's surprise:

Walker’s Christian fans unfazed by abortion revelations

Then there’s this:

After President Bill Clinton’s infidelity, the 1998 Southern Baptist Convention passed the “Resolution on Moral Character of Public Officials” declaring that a person’s “moral character matters” and that Americans should not vote for candidates who do not “demonstrate consistent honesty, moral purity, and the highest character.”

  • Like 1
  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
27-25

27-25 2082

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, Satchel said:

Then there’s this:

After President Bill Clinton’s infidelity, the 1998 Southern Baptist Convention passed the “Resolution on Moral Character of Public Officials” declaring that a person’s “moral character matters” and that Americans should not vote for Democratic candidates who do not “demonstrate consistent honesty, moral purity, and the highest character.”

The added word in bold is implied, of course.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Beau Vine

Beau Vine 55844

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, High Plains Drifter said:

 

 

I think the racism is even deeper and more insidious than that. Walker fits their idea of what a black man is- a big dumb stud who was good at sports. Bonus- he talks in a back country, aw shucks, I'm just a big dumb negro way. The blatant lies about being valedictorian, hospital admin, whatever it is today, is just country bragging and joshing, not lying.

In their mind, Walker the human stereotype, justifies their racism.

 

He's literally a one-man modern-day minstrel show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Satchel

Satchel 6982

Posted
Posted (edited)

Where have these Baptists gone? Let’s hear from Lindsay Graham

“You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job as president in this constitutional republic if this body determines your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role” and, “Impeachment is about cleansing the office. Impeachment is about restoring honor and integrity to the office.” Back then, Republicans believed that immoral behavior by the president was a standard for impeachment. Today, with Trump as their savior, adjustments in moral convictions have become necessary.

Edited by Satchel
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Francisco 2.0

Francisco 2.0 32548

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, High Plains Drifter said:

 

@surlydocs is the rocking back and forth a CTE thing?

 

 

 

Not a doc, but I don't think it's from CTE.  More along the lines of "I'm nervous as fuck here in front of these reporters, and I can't screw up so I have to think carefully before I answer, and can't this hurry up and end" kind of thing.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...