Cowboys vs Washington: SNF

[ztejas 44233]

Before the game I told my younger brother I thought Dallas was the 2nd best team in the NFC. He asked me "Really? Better than the Rams and Bucs?".

Pay attention, young blood. 

[Pato del Muerto 53542]

So at 14-0 I told my bil that if this goes like most wft games, nobody will score for the next 2.5 quarters and wft will make it 14-7 with about 5 minutes left in the game and make us sweat. 
 

I was incorrect. 

[Hate 20250]

If this pass rush can continue, there isn't a team in the league they can't beat.  Poor Heinicke didn't have a chance tonight.  The midget may get killed next week. 

[markstanco 12800]

Idiotic move on WFT to do this during a record warm spell.

Would it be any different if it was 5 degrees outside?

[markstanco 12800]

Dak is a beast and playing lights out. But giving Dalton Schultz the same amount of yardage as Coop and Ceedee is not going to work against teams better than 6-8. Schultz is Dak’s Kai Money. Dak is better than that. But I understand this all may be part of saving his best stuff for the playoffs so opposing teams don’t have more 100+ yard Coop and Ceedee games on tape for other teams to study. 

Not the best take I’ve seen here.

So dak should force more throws to WRs instead of throwing to who is open, right? Is that the hill you want to die on?

[immortal13 4059]

1 hour ago, rage-a-holic said:

NBC says Kurt Warner did in the playoffs

Yeah, well fuck Kurt Warner and his movie

[dcar00 14976]

30 minutes ago, Radical Larry said:

 

everyone knows the only reason they were pissed was because the benches had "Dallas Cowboys" on them.    it is hilarious that Rivera is such a bitch he would send them to an enclosed stadium though.

 

[Nicole44 22324]

Welcome to the show bitches! In all fairness I feel like the Colts will be there.

 

[Longboard Horn 41368]

6 hours ago, Surly Bevo said:

Garbage

 

Not a Cowboys fan, but I do like Dak. 

[TrashMaster G 18114]

8 hours ago, rage-a-holic said:

NBC says Kurt Warner did in the playoffs

Yeah, but did Warner do it by halftime?

[Sgt Hulk 14466]

We are going to the super bowl 

[TrashMaster G 18114]

4 minutes ago, Sgt Hulk said:

We are going to the super bowl 

"We"?

[deadshank 24654]

35 minutes ago, Sgt Hulk said:

We are going to the super bowl 

 

30 minutes ago, TrashMaster G said:

"We"?

Dude, he wears his jersey to the watch parties on Sundays. 

[Sgt Hulk 14466]

42 minutes ago, TrashMaster G said:

"We"?

Correct. Me and your mom. I got us both tickets 

[Horn80 6361]

9 hours ago, markstanco said:

Would it be any different if it was 5 degrees outside?

It’s fine provided it’s justified by the weather conditions but that obviously wasn’t the case.

[dcar00 14976]

1 hour ago, Sgt Hulk said:

We are going to the super bowl 

I'd be all in were it not for the fact that Brady and Rodgers are in our conference.  NFGoodell will show up eventually but I will enjoy the ride until the eventual fuckery.

['stache 22145]

23 hours ago, Surly Bevo said:

Garbage

 

Wasn’t Steele technically a TE in that formation?

[Huckleberry 34692]

7 minutes ago, 'stache said:

Wasn’t Steele technically a TE in that formation?

Well yes, but basing it on formation alignment and not roster position would make throwing a TD pass to an OL impossible.

[Surly Bevo 25759]

7 minutes ago, Huckleberry said:

Well yes, but basing it on formation alignment and not roster position would make throwing a TD pass to an OL impossible.

Right, when Biijan lines up wide and gets a ball thrown his way it's still an RB catching a pass

[Guest]

13 minutes ago, Huckleberry said:

Well yes, but basing it on formation alignment and not roster position would make throwing a TD pass to an OL impossible.

Not impossible. Depends on how many receivers are on the line and off. But you don’t run those trick formations on an NFL goalline. 

[Huckleberry 34692]

50 minutes ago, Porterhouse said:

Not impossible. Depends on how many receivers are on the line and off. But you don’t run those trick formations on an NFL goalline. 

Yes, impossible. He is saying that Steele was the TE by alignment. The end man on the line of scrimmage is either the TE or a SE (if he's not immediately next to the OL) by alignment.

Edited December 28, 2021 by Huckleberry

[Guest]

1 hour ago, Huckleberry said:

Yes, impossible. He is saying that Steele was the TE by alignment. The end man on the line of scrimmage is either the TE or a SE (if he's not immediately next to the OL) by alignment.

I know what he’s saying and maybe NFL formation rules are different. I also know Steele was a TE on the play. All I’m saying is, one of the oldest tricks in the book is splitting several receivers wide on each side with 5 down lineman and no TEs. Have some receivers on one side all on the LOS and the others off. The side where the receivers are off, that tackle is an eligible receiver. 

Again, not something you’d ever try in an NFL goalline situation, I know that wasn’t the formation here, and perhaps NFL formation rules are different. Just quibbling with the word impossible. 

Edited December 28, 2021 by Porterhouse

[Huckleberry 34692]

Yes, he's eligible. Because he's the tight end (and in the NFL he has to be announced as an eligible receiver).

['stache 22145]

35 minutes ago, Huckleberry said:

Yes, he's eligible. Because he's the tight end (and in the NFL he has to be announced as an eligible receiver).

And he has to announce because of the number on his jersey, correct? So the refs aren't confused and throw a flag if he's downfield or catches the ball?

I think it's different than a RB lining up out wide and catching a pass. He's still a RB and therefore eligible in general to catch the ball. It's still a neat stat I guess.

[markstanco 12800]

And he has to announce because of the number on his jersey, correct? So the refs aren't confused and throw a flag if he's downfield or catches the ball?
I think it's different than a RB lining up out wide and catching a pass. He's still a RB and therefore eligible in general to catch the ball. It's still a neat stat I guess.

Correct. I believe in the nfl receivers have to wear between 10-19 and 80-89. There are a few other offensive positions that are slotted as well. No idea of defensive numbers though but I don’t think there is a limitation.