Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, DixonHur said:

He's also talking about a shotgun.  I haven't heard a single person argue that shotguns should be illegal.  

What about his prescribed assault with a deadly weapon?   that illegal? 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
Just now, Incredulity said:

What about his prescribed assault with a deadly weapon?   that illegal? 

castle doctrine. you and yours should be familiar with it as y'all use it to justify all kinds of shit.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, DixonHur said:

He's also talking about a shotgun.  I haven't heard a single person argue that shotguns should be illegal.  

There is no amount of Biden dumbfuckery you guys won’t defend.  

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Haha 1
  • Fuck You 3
Posted
Just now, Johnny Sack said:

There is no amount of Biden dumbfuckery you guys won’t defend.  

and there is no amount of bullshit you will try to dig up to justify your shitty, shitty positions.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

While we're on the subject of presidents demonstrating some stupidity about firearms, I'd love to see someone hand Trump an unloaded semiautomatic handgun with an unloaded mag and enough rounds to fully load the mag, and see if he could figure out how to load it, chamber a round, and fire a shot.

I'd bet any sum of money he couldn't figure it out in under two minutes. I'm not sure he could figure it out in twenty.

Posted
Just now, wildcat09 said:

While we're on the subject of presidents demonstrating some stupidity about firearms, I'd love to see someone hand Trump an unloaded semiautomatic handgun with an unloaded mag and enough rounds to fully load the mag, and see if he could figure out how to load it, chamber a round, and fire a shot.

I'd bet any sum of money he couldn't figure it out in under two minutes. I'm not sure he could figure it out in twenty.

or we can all hope he figures out in 30 seconds and fires into his own stupid face

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

I know that this is probably a novel concept for you guys, but people don't actually have still believe and cling to the dumb fuck opinions that they had about something 10 years ago. They can take in new information and acknowledge that they used to have dumb fuck opinions on certain issues.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 1
Posted

Also, color me shocked that Johnny Sack is being completely disingenuous and taking the quote out of context. Here is the entire quote:

Quote

 

Well, the way in which we measure it is–I think most scholars would say–is that as long as you have a weapon sufficient to be able to provide your self-defense. I did one of these town-hall meetings on the Internet and one guy said, “Well, what happens when the end days come? What happens when there’s the earthquake? I live in California, and I have to protect myself.”

I said, “Well, you know, my shotgun will do better for you than your AR-15, because you want to keep someone away from your house, just fire the shotgun through the door.” Most people can handle a shotgun a hell of a lot better than they can a semiautomatic weapon in terms of both their aim and in terms of their ability to deter people coming. We can argue whether that’s true or not, but it is no argument that, for example, a shotgun could do the same job of protecting you. Now, granted, you can come back and say, “Well, a machine gun could do a better job of protecting me.” No one’s arguing we should make machine guns legal.

 

He's talking about a hypothetical post-apocalyptic, end of days situation. Not what he'd recommend doing if someone triggers your Ring at 2am.

Posted

Any of you chuckle fucks want to take part in the 1/6 hearings thread?  You know, the one where your heroes are getting completely pantsed as the complete motherfucking traitors they are?  No?  Because that is what is happening.  

Nah, let's just camp out and take pot shots at Joe Biden for random shit from the past that is barely relevant.  

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
and there is no amount of bullshit you will try to dig up to justify your shitty, shitty positions.
Crazy thing that I realized today... if Donald Trump had handled his presidency the way Joe Biden is handling his, Donald Trump would have won the 2020 popular and electoral vote in a landslide. I'm talking Reagan in '84 landslide.
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
7 hours ago, tchookem said:
17 hours ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:
and there is no amount of bullshit you will try to dig up to justify your shitty, shitty positions.

Crazy thing that I realized today... if Donald Trump had handled his presidency the way Joe Biden is handling his, Donald Trump would have won the 2020 popular and electoral vote in a landslide. I'm talking Reagan in '84 landslide.

So if he were a completely different person? 

  • Haha 1
Posted
16 hours ago, aggie08 said:

I know that this is probably a novel concept for you guys, but people don't actually have still believe and cling to the dumb fuck opinions that they had about something 10 years ago. They can take in new information and acknowledge that they used to have dumb fuck opinions on certain issues.

Ten years ago Biden's brain was still functional.  

 

15 hours ago, Biff Tannen said:

Any of you chuckle fucks want to take part in the 1/6 hearings thread?  You know, the one where your heroes are getting completely pantsed as the complete motherfucking traitors they are?  No?  Because that is what is happening.  

Nah, let's just camp out and take pot shots at Joe Biden for random shit from the past that is barely relevant.  

Dozens of people care about the 1/6 hearings.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
  • Fuck You 5
Posted
18 hours ago, wildcat09 said:

While we're on the subject of presidents demonstrating some stupidity about firearms, I'd love to see someone hand Trump an unloaded semiautomatic handgun with an unloaded mag and enough rounds to fully load the mag, and see if he could figure out how to load it, chamber a round, and fire a shot.

I'd bet any sum of money he couldn't figure it out in under two minutes. I'm not sure he could figure it out in twenty.

I virtually guarantee that he lacks the strength to rack the slide.

Posted
45 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

Ten years ago Biden's brain was still functional.  

 

Dozens of people care about the 1/6 hearings.

You are an un-American piece of shit.

  • Hook 'Em 8
  • Like 3
  • Fuck You 2
Posted (edited)

I think the “the base” are too dominated by privileged babies who have the luxury of being somewhat arm’s length from the personal consequences of defeat. Maybe they should focus more on  gaining durable majorities in the house and senate and less on finding novel ways to lose. 
if they aren’t  “rallied” right now I don’t know what packing the court would do, other than create a public spectacle of infighting between various flavors of intersectional myopia. 

Edited by Bozo_Casanova
  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
On 6/24/2022 at 6:22 AM, Zeus said:

1656039722654-pol.jpg

This is the stupidest right wing thing I’ve seen yet.  Really, it’s just so low I.Q. to believe something like this makes a shit or is even exclusive to Biden.  Every principal in every country has cards like this prepped for them, right down to the capital YOU. Even DJT. Especially DJT, whose paper was infamously dumbed down. These things are scripted and tight and this is how you avoid gaffes and aimless milling.  

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 hour ago, David Dennison said:

So much for rallying the base.

 

Biden is such two ply. I hate our choices are moderate pussy and fascist that ends democracy. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Neonmoon said:

Biden is such two ply. I hate our choices are moderate pussy and fascist that ends democracy. 

Well there was a candidate with moxie, but Jim Clyburn was never going to endorse him even if said candidate asked for it. Also, the DNC would've been too timid to overcome any and all "socialist" labels thrown at him, so it might not have mattered anyway. Any time you elect a candidate without charisma, you're tying one hand behind your back. It was dumbfounding to read people backing uninteresting suits from John Delaney to Bloomberg to Biden during the primaries, but unfortunately relationships prevailed so we got the ordinarily gregarious geezer. If any one of Biden, Kamala, or Pete gets the nod for '24 then I'll force myself to disengage until they realize how crucial charisma and aesthetic appeal are for the masses' approval.

Posted
1 hour ago, George Clooney said:

Well there was a candidate with moxie, but Jim Clyburn was never going to endorse him even if said candidate asked for it. Also, the DNC would've been too timid to overcome any and all "socialist" labels thrown at him, so it might not have mattered anyway. Any time you elect a candidate without charisma, you're tying one hand behind your back. It was dumbfounding to read people backing uninteresting suits from John Delaney to Bloomberg to Biden during the primaries, but unfortunately relationships prevailed so we got the ordinarily gregarious geezer. If any one of Biden, Kamala, or Pete gets the nod for '24 then I'll force myself to disengage until they realize how crucial charisma and aesthetic appeal are for the masses' approval.

Username checks out

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Incredulity said:

Username checks out

Yes, this phenomenon isn't limited to politics. Those who try to deny this are just trying to negate something intrinsic to humanity. You are making your climb steeper when you have the less interesting/charismatic candidate.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, George Clooney said:

Well there was a candidate with moxie, but Jim Clyburn was never going to endorse him even if said candidate asked for it. Also, the DNC would've been too timid to overcome any and all "socialist" labels thrown at him, so it might not have mattered anyway. Any time you elect a candidate without charisma, you're tying one hand behind your back. It was dumbfounding to read people backing uninteresting suits from John Delaney to Bloomberg to Biden during the primaries, but unfortunately relationships prevailed so we got the ordinarily gregarious geezer. If any one of Biden, Kamala, or Pete gets the nod for '24 then I'll force myself to disengage until they realize how crucial charisma and aesthetic appeal are for the masses' approval.

Honestly, Democrats need me to get Dwayne Johnson to run. Fuck it, that's where we're heading anyway in our reality show, celebrity obsessed culture. Might as well beat the Republicans to the punch before we get President Honey Boo Boo.

 

Edited by aggie08
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, aggie08 said:

Honestly, Democrats need me to get Dwayne Johnson to run. Fuck it, that's where we're heading anyway in our reality show, celebrity obsessed culture. Might as well beat the Republicans to the punch before we get President Honey Boo Boo.

 

Yes, or even someone like Kim Kardashian (I know, I know). She's smarter than people give her credit for, and Kris Jenner is a cold-blooded Machiavellian matriarch. I think she'll be Governor of California if she desires that position, and from then on just see how she could grow. If the Dems piss all over themselves in '24 and then '28 (very likely unfortunately), just let Kris go to work and get Kim elected.

Posted (edited)
On 6/23/2022 at 2:35 PM, wildcat09 said:

While we're on the subject of presidents demonstrating some stupidity about firearms,

Agree. 
Edit: He ought have said a shotgun is sufficient to protect your home. Superior to long rifles and handguns, in that chambering a shell is a stark audio warning, your aim is less critical, and the energy of the shot is dispersed and therefore less lukely to harm neighbors.

Edited by Willfully Horn
Explaned
Posted
3 hours ago, aggie08 said:

Honestly, Democrats need me to get Dwayne Johnson to run. Fuck it, that's where we're heading anyway in our reality show, celebrity obsessed culture. Might as well beat the Republicans to the punch before we get President Honey Boo Boo.

 

I would vote for Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho 100%.

  • Like 1
Posted
13 hours ago, fattyflattie said:

You voted for a man who altered a weather map with a sharpie.

I will grant that DJT was virtually gaffe proof because everything he said and did was stupid or hateful by design. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

You voted for a man who altered a weather map with a sharpie.

I will grant that DJT was virtually gaffe proof because everything he said and did was stupid or hateful by design. 

Are we playing my brain damaged moron could beat up your brain damaged moron? 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, fattyflattie said:

Are we playing my brain damaged moron could beat up your brain damaged moron? 

Pretty good summary of the state of the American two party system. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
My wife if The Rock were to announce his Presidency campaign... 
A29E91B2-6AC7-4756-881F-1BF1A575E572.gif.c38f77afc3be6c8c1aacd683b16e67ab.gif
 

If your spouse is bating with lotion, I think y’all are technically both a husband in your relationship.
  • Haha 1


×
×
  • Create New...