Jump to content

Joe Biden 2022: Enter Dark Brandon

Longboard Horn

By Longboard Horn
in Cloak Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Foosters
Foosters
TexEx15
TexEx15

SLOW. CLAP.

HenryJames
HenryJames

Posted Images

F250

F250 28817

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, workswithseed said:

Sounds good, but fuckin saying getting rid of it is fuckin dumb, you doorknob licker.

There is no vaccine for cancer. There is one for Covid. Do better with your high school education.

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fudge Nuggets

Fudge Nuggets 19220

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, tchookem said:



 

 


My SS card doesn't have a picture on it. How would a SS card actually prevent voter fraud if it didn't have a picture? I mean, that's what's it's all for, preventing voter fraud.The huge problem that is voter fraud.

 

I have no fucking idea where my SS card is.  But I'm a middle aged white guy so I'm not worried about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
F250

F250 28817

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, workswithseed said:

A bastard till I die.

Hey, Fuck that. You are who you are but a bastard you will never be. Just because some asshole couldn't live up to his responsibility doesn't impact who you are or will ever be.

Anyone calls you a bastard in front of me will fill the wrath of a middle aged man. lol

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fudge Nuggets

Fudge Nuggets 19220

Posted
Posted
On 2/4/2022 at 4:11 PM, Johnny Sack said:

Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade and much of his nation's wealth not on providing for the Iraqi people but on developing nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them."
-- President Bill Clinton (State of the Union Address), Jan. 27, 1998

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001    

"I mean, we have three different countries that, while they all present serious problems for the United States -- they're dictatorships, they're involved in the development and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction -- you know, the most imminent, clear and present threat to our country is not the same from those three countries.  I think Iraq is the most serious and imminent threat to our country."
-- Sen. John Edwards (D, NC) Feb. 24, 2002

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.   We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."   "
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated.  He must be disarmed.  We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Edward Kennedy (D, MA) Sep. 27, 2002

"Now let me be clear -- I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein.  He is a brutal man.  A ruthless man.  A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power.  He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity.  He's a bad guy.  The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him."
-- State Senator Barack Obama (Democrat, Illinois) Oct. 2, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"My position is very clear: The time has come for decisive action to eliminate the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction."
-- Senator John Edwards (D, NC), Oct. 7, 2002

"We stopped the fighting [in 1991] on an agreement that Iraq would take steps to assure the world that it would not engage in further aggression and that it would destroy its weapons of mass destruction.  It has refused to take those steps.  That refusal constitutes a breach of the armistice which renders it void and justifies resumption of the armed conflict."
-- Sen. Harry Reid (D. NV) Oct. 9, 2002


"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my top priorities.  I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein.  ...  Others have talked about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein.  Yes, he has chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get nuclear weapons."  
-- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D. CA) Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

"People can quarrel with whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons."
-- Ex President Bill Clinton, Jul. 22, 2003 (Interview with CNN Larry King)

I asked very direct questions of the top people in the CIA and people who'd served in the Clinton administration.  And they said they believed that Saddam Hussein either had weapons or had the components of weapons or the ability to quickly make weapons of mass destruction.  What we're worried about is an A-bomb in a Ryder truck in New York, in Washington and St. Louis.  It cannot happen.  We have to prevent it from happening. 
-- Rep. Richard Gephardt (D, MT) Nov. 2, 2003
 

I don't know man, but sounds like they were worried Hussein would develop weapons capable of attacking the US.  Yet when we invaded their country and killed hundreds of thousands of their army / citizens we found fuck all.  Sounds like Clinton's policies and tactics kind of worked without the need for killing hundreds of thousands of their citizens.  And wasting trillions of our oh so cherished tax payer dollars... because that's the important thing, right?

  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Longhorn_Fan68

Longhorn_Fan68 33899

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, tchookem said:

I'm actually interested in what their sincere expectations were and how Joe Biden could have done to meet those expectations, but I know better than to ask an earnest question. I appreciate your attempt to engage.

Maybe it was a stupid thing for Biden to say, but I think he honestly thought Americans would jump on board with vaccinations. Oh well, at least the trolls are happy.

maybe he could have made masks and vaccines required. oh wait, they didn't want that either. it's classic right bullshit. create the problem and then blame the democrats when shit goes sideways.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 3
  • Rage+1 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sawbonz

Sawbonz 27587

Posted
Posted
On 2/4/2022 at 10:07 PM, Harrison Bergeron said:

Has Joe shut down the virus yet?

Didn’t you hear? It’s going to magically disappear! 

 

On 2/5/2022 at 9:56 AM, jimmyjazz said:

CDC Report -- Covid in LA County

 

Vaccinated + boosted = 23X lower chance of hospitalization than unvaccinated

Vaccinated (no booster) = 5X lower chance of hospitalization than unvaccinated

 

 

Counterpoint: California libtards.

 

Clear evidence vaccines don’t work 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Brisketexan

Brisketexan 105321

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
Clear evidence vaccines don’t work 

Perfect.

Biden: we’re going to crush COVID asap. All you have to do is take this free and safe vaccine.

MAGAts: no, we won’t take it.

Omicron: fine, then a shitload of you are going to die.

MAGAts [dying by the boatload]: Biden sucks, he said he’d crush COVID, but we’re still dying!

Biden:

96824eb246b6cfd92312df12b9c7cd7e.gif
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
  • Rage+1 4
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
gmr548

gmr548 16614

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

maybe if he had said covid was pro-crt they would have gotten the vax

You joke, but honestly, the best thing Democrats could do at this point is come out as anti-vax, anti-obamacare, etc.

You'd have a 95% vax rate and a GOP sponsored universal healthcare bill by close of business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Johnny Sack

Johnny Sack 8397

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Brisketexan said:


Perfect.

Biden: we’re going to crush COVID asap. All you have to do is take this free and safe vaccine.

MAGAts: no, we won’t take it.

Omicron: fine, then a shitload of you are going to die.

MAGAts [dying by the boatload]: Biden sucks, he said he’d crush COVID, but we’re still dying!

Biden:

96824eb246b6cfd92312df12b9c7cd7e.gif

85 percent of American adults have had at least one shot.  It’s never going to be 100 percent.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 46126

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Johnny Sack said:

85 percent of American adults have had at least one shot.  It’s never going to be 100 percent.  

Stop it.  Grow up.  Accept the fact that the people you align with in a political sense are dying at extraordinarily high rates compared to the alternative. 

 

image.thumb.png.9084e5407e1ad1d2f3fafaebba1ca1c0.png

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Johnny Sack

Johnny Sack 8397

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

https://freebeacon.com/biden-administration/biden-admin-to-fund-crack-pipe-distribution-to-advance-racial-equity/

Is this real or satire?  Must have had a Sunday conversation with the smartest man he knows.

Quote

The Biden administration is set to fund the distribution of crack pipes to drug addicts as part of its plan to advance "racial equity."

The $30 million grant program, which closed applications Monday and will begin in May, will provide funds to nonprofits and local governments to help make drug use safer for addicts. Included in the grant, which is overseen by the Department of Health and Human Services, are funds for "smoking kits/supplies." A spokesman for the agency told the Washington Free Beacon that these kits will provide pipes for users to smoke crack cocaine, crystal methamphetamine, and "any illicit substance."

HHS said the kits aim to reduce the risk of infection when smoking substances with glass pipes, which can lead to infections through cuts and sores. Applicants for the grants are prioritized if they treat a majority of "underserved communities," including African Americans and "LGBTQ+ persons," as established under President Joe Biden's executive order on "advancing racial equity."

 

Edited by Johnny Sack
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
gmr548

gmr548 16614

Posted
Posted
 
https://freebeacon.com/biden-administration/biden-admin-to-fund-crack-pipe-distribution-to-advance-racial-equity/
Is this real or satire?  Must have had a Sunday conversation with the smartest man he knows.
The Biden administration is set to fund the distribution of crack pipes to drug addicts as part of its plan to advance "racial equity."
The $30 million grant program, which closed applications Monday and will begin in May, will provide funds to nonprofits and local governments to help make drug use safer for addicts. Included in the grant, which is overseen by the Department of Health and Human Services, are funds for "smoking kits/supplies." A spokesman for the agency told the Washington Free Beacon that these kits will provide pipes for users to smoke crack cocaine, crystal methamphetamine, and "any illicit substance."
HHS said the kits aim to reduce the risk of infection when smoking substances with glass pipes, which can lead to infections through cuts and sores. Applicants for the grants are prioritized if they treat a majority of "underserved communities," including African Americans and "LGBTQ+ persons," as established under President Joe Biden's executive order on "advancing racial equity."
 

SAMHSA has been funding substance abuse grants for years. I’m sure you were outraged by its activities under Bush and Trump, right? I’m sure you have a huge problem with red states wrecked by opioids being the biggest per capita beneficiaries.

The $30mm in reference funding is for its entire three year harm reduction grant program over the next three years, not any single initiative.

Your article is clickbait for low IQ readers. Have another drink and try again.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JimmyJames

JimmyJames 12271

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

 

https://freebeacon.com/biden-administration/biden-admin-to-fund-crack-pipe-distribution-to-advance-racial-equity/

Is this real or satire?  Must have had a Sunday conversation with the smartest man he knows.

 

Yet another post by the sack about the evils of lazy black people and their white enablers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Johnny Sack

Johnny Sack 8397

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, gmr548 said:

 

SAMHSA has been funding substance abuse grants for years. I’m sure you were outraged by its activities under Bush and Trump, right? I’m sure you have a huge problem with red states wrecked by opioids being the biggest per capita beneficiaries.

The $30mm in reference funding is for its entire three year harm reduction grant program over the next three years, not any single initiative.

Your article is clickbait for low IQ readers. Have another drink and try again.

The feds have passed out crack pipes before?  If so, why?

I do not support this at all no matter who does it.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
F250

F250 28817

Posted
Posted
53 minutes ago, Johnny Sack said:

The feds have passed out crack pipes before?  If so, why?

I do not support this at all no matter who does it.  

 

He is talking about the issuing of grants for Harm Reduction programs. The Feds are not going to hand out crack pipes. Grants will be issued to community programs that may use them for Harm Reduction kits that can include things like needles, crack pipes, and what not.

This isn't really a new concept, needle exchanges have been around for decades. Granted, the Pro-Drug War crowd has always been opposed to such programs.

 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brisketexan

Brisketexan 105321

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, F250 said:

This isn't really a new concept, needle exchanges have been around for decades. Granted, the Pro-Drug War crowd has always been opposed to such programs.

This.

I mean, getting outraged over "grants to local organizations that may use them to provide clean drug paraphernalia" is SO 1990s.  Seriously.  The fucking NINETIES.  But we trot the greatest hits out, because that's what we do.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Johnny Sack

Johnny Sack 8397

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Brisketexan said:

This.

I mean, getting outraged over "grants to local organizations that may use them to provide clean drug paraphernalia" is SO 1990s.  Seriously.  The fucking NINETIES.  But we trot the greatest hits out, because that's what we do.

The government handing out crack pipes to black people in the name of racial justice is something Dave Chappelle probably deemed too ridiculous to put in a skit fifteen years ago.

  • Like 1
  • Fuck You 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
aggie08

aggie08 21531

Posted
Posted (edited)

Honestly, man, it doesn't cause you to question your information sources when, time after time, they feign outrage over something, only for you to find out later has been around for decades? Not even a little?

Edit: I didn't even read the link below I posted this. I'm glad I did now though. freebeacon.com??? Jesus fucking Christ.

Edited by aggie08
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Johnny Sack

Johnny Sack 8397

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, aggie08 said:

Honestly, man, it doesn't cause you to question your information sources when, time after time, they feign outrage over something, only for you to find out later has been around for decades? Not even a little?

Edit: I didn't even read the link below I posted this. I'm glad I did now though. freebeacon.com??? Jesus fucking Christ.

There are linked source documents. You have anything specific to criticize?

Has our government ever given grants for crack pipes?

You okay with this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jimmyjazz

jimmyjazz 46126

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Johnny Sack said:

The government handing out crack pipes to black people in the name of racial justice is something Dave Chappelle probably deemed too ridiculous to put in a skit fifteen years ago.

Look into HIV infection rates in Scandanavia when they started handing out clean needles, you disingenuous little fuck.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...