Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 7/14/2023 at 1:02 PM, Grade of D as in David said:

I had a similar feeling. I think it's going to be a blockbuster at the box office, but I've built it up in my head so much that if it isn't better that the first 2 Godfathers with a side of Shawshank I'll be disappointed.

Mash Up Ball GIF

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Captain Ron said:

Who's that one guy... ?

This dildo

Like its protagonist, Oppenheimer is a work in constant conflict with itself, with most of its problems rooted in Nolan’s screenplay.

Full Review | Jul 19, 2023

And also this one:

While Oppenheimer does feature a few truly brilliant moments, they are often overshadowed by the excesses of the narrative, ultimately resulting in a rather tedious viewing experience.

Full Review | Original Score: C+ | Jul 19, 2023

 

Edited by mdmost
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, mdmost said:

This dildo

Like its protagonist, Oppenheimer is a work in constant conflict with itself, with most of its problems rooted in Nolan’s screenplay.

Full Review | Jul 19, 2023

And also this one:

While Oppenheimer does feature a few truly brilliant moments, they are often overshadowed by the excesses of the narrative, ultimately resulting in a rather tedious viewing experience.

Full Review | Original Score: C+ | Jul 19, 2023

 

 

I just went and looked at their review history. Duralde liked fucking Fast X. Take away his reviewing credentials.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
54 minutes ago, mdmost said:

This dildo

Like its protagonist, Oppenheimer is a work in constant conflict with itself, with most of its problems rooted in Nolan’s screenplay.

Full Review | Jul 19, 2023

And also this one:

While Oppenheimer does feature a few truly brilliant moments, they are often overshadowed by the excesses of the narrative, ultimately resulting in a rather tedious viewing experience.

Full Review | Original Score: C+ | Jul 19, 2023

 

the rush of reviews certainly came from the press screening i attended last night.  it was supposed to be last week but they pushed.  i'm spoilering everything, even though these aren't really "spoilers".

Spoiler

the funny thing is that i would consider the roots of both of those reviews positive, depending on how you look at it.  the subject matter is tedious on the surface, which is why you need someone like nolan to present it to you.  he excels at that. 

my experience was not tedious.  it's a sprawling epic.  it needed to be done this way, and i still feel like they glossed over interesting details for the interest of presentation.

as for the screenplay, i can't imagine what it was like to write it.  there have to be 30+ speaking roles with 12+ lines each.  those are usually brutal to write and impossible to read.  but yeah, he made it work. 

technically, this might be the greatest film i've ever seen in the theater.  that's taking nothing away from the acting or storytelling, but this will win every technical award.  best sounding movie i think i've ever heard.  insane.

and the pacing of this film is nothing short of remarkable.  honestly, it's kind of ruining my productivity today.

 

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
Posted

as for my screenplay comment above, when i first interned in 1997 at paramount, i mostly read scripts and wrote coverage.  most people hate that, but i loved it because i already knew i wanted to write, i didn't want to be in production or development.  i read 3-4 scripts a day and copied and brought home dozens more (we were encouraged to do that).  whenever there are a bunch of characters introduced early in a script that all share similar looks, ages, demographics, which is very difficult to keep straight in written form, everyone called it the "hamburger hill" effect.  i still think about that all the time.

also that summer i played golf and got paired with some ucla dudes.  pretty nice and normal, and we all acknowledged that texas would fuck them up later that fall.  glad we did not keep in touch.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
  • Rage+1 3
Posted
33 minutes ago, henrygandorf said:

the rush of reviews certainly came from the press screening i attended last night.  it was supposed to be last week but they pushed.  i'm spoilering everything, even though these aren't really "spoilers".

  Hide contents

the funny thing is that i would consider the roots of both of those reviews positive, depending on how you look at it.  the subject matter is tedious on the surface, which is why you need someone like nolan to present it to you.  he excels at that. 

my experience was not tedious.  it's a sprawling epic.  it needed to be done this way, and i still feel like they glossed over interesting details for the interest of presentation.

as for the screenplay, i can't imagine what it was like to write it.  there have to be 30+ speaking roles with 12+ lines each.  those are usually brutal to write and impossible to read.  but yeah, he made it work. 

technically, this might be the greatest film i've ever seen in the theater.  that's taking nothing away from the acting or storytelling, but this will win every technical award.  best sounding movie i think i've ever heard.  insane.

and the pacing of this film is nothing short of remarkable.  honestly, it's kind of ruining my productivity today.

 

Avatar headwear choice checks out.  

Posted
52 minutes ago, henrygandorf said:

also that summer i played golf and got paired with some ucla dudes.  pretty nice and normal, and we all acknowledged that texas would fuck them up later that fall.  glad we did not keep in touch.

Trigger warning, please!

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted

Going to see it tomorrow at 5 on an EVO EVX screen. Reading reviews on Rotten Tomatoes and man this is being made out to be an epic masterpiece. Very curious if it lives up to its hype. If it does it may very well be an Oscars sweep.

Posted
6 minutes ago, tokamak said:

The Barbie thing is very surprising to me. It’s a two hour commercial, for fuck’s sake. 

Have you seen it yet? I feel like this is the furthest from the case since it seems like a very existential movie. Greta Gerwig certainly isn't a director/writer that strikes me as someone who makes a 2 hour commercial. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
13 minutes ago, mdmost said:

Have you seen it yet? I feel like this is the furthest from the case since it seems like a very existential movie. Greta Gerwig certainly isn't a director/writer that strikes me as someone who makes a 2 hour commercial. 

I haven’t seen it so maybe I’m being unfair. I assume Gerwig has enough skins on the wall to make whatever movie she wants. Don’t see why there’s any reason for said movie to be attached to a massive IP aside from some corporation saying “hey let’s use this to sell a shitload of dolls”. 

Posted (edited)

Margot Robbie and Ryan Gosling are pretty good at picking roles.  I don't think they would have both signed on to something they felt had no chance of being good.

Edited by kevwun
Posted (edited)

I decided last night that I'm definitely seeing Barbie eventually.  

I cannot imagine Gerwig making a bad movie, and Lady Bird just gutted me when I saw it.  

Edited by Beau Vine
Posted
33 minutes ago, tokamak said:

I haven’t seen it so maybe I’m being unfair. I assume Gerwig has enough skins on the wall to make whatever movie she wants. Don’t see why there’s any reason for said movie to be attached to a massive IP aside from some corporation saying “hey let’s use this to sell a shitload of dolls”. 

is barbie struggling to sell dolls?

Posted

Saw it last night. Incredible. The sound and score were phenomenal.

All the acting was great. I was worried that Matt Damon was going to overact based on the trailer, but he was right in line with the rest.

We went to Los Alamos over spring break because I knew this was coming out. Having just been there and getting a primer on it was extremely helpful.

I'm sure that little museum is overrun this summer.

There will be a lot of well deserved awards from this.




Posted
1 hour ago, tokamak said:

The Barbie thing is very surprising to me. It’s a two hour commercial, for fuck’s sake. 

The 80's Transformers movie was too.  And ti was awesome.  And I wore my mom out asking for more Transformer toys.

Posted
12 minutes ago, henrygandorf said:

is barbie struggling to sell dolls?

I literally just a few minutes ago got a spam email from a picture framing company asking me to check out "Barbie-inspired picture frames for [my] Dream House".

Barbie could be a great film. Probably is. Lots of people seem to think so. It's also, at it's core, a commercial exercise. Kudos to Gerwig for pulling it off.

That's enough of my unmitigated cynicism for today. Sorry for fucking up the thread about a completely different movie.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

I don't get the Barbie movie hype at all either.  Not that I think that it's going to be bad, and I know the people behind it have made great stuff, but I don't get how it's summer blockbuster material.  

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
18 hours ago, TexEx15 said:

Going to see it tomorrow at 5 on an EVO EVX screen. Reading reviews on Rotten Tomatoes and man this is being made out to be an epic masterpiece. Very curious if it lives up to its hype. If it does it may very well be an Oscars sweep.

what was the last summer movie to win best picture?  gladiator?

Posted
42 minutes ago, Gene Parmesan said:

I don't get the Barbie movie hype at all either.  Not that I think that it's going to be bad, and I know the people behind it have made great stuff, but I don't get how it's summer blockbuster material.  

My girlfriend saw it last night and said it was "funny, weird and super feminist, 7 out of 10". So there's that.

Posted

Just saw it. Incredible. It’ll sweep everything but Best Actress, because they’ll nominate Emily Blunt as a supporting actress. 

Spoiler

The testing scene was amazing. So intense, even though you know what’s coming.

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Just finished it. Excellent. Makes you think. The tension the test scene builds as you wait for “it” is masterful. 
 

That said it is way too thought provoking and dense for your average American. Also, helps a lot if you have taken some physics. Not so much for the actual physics but knowing major 20th century contributors to it. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Gene Parmesan said:

Leonardo Dicaprio Calvin Candie GIF

Bruh. Multiple times too 

nolan had a back shot of her ridding oppe too, cowgirl. Damn near hub material. 

Edited by kingkoopa6
Posted

I'm glad to see it is living up to the billing.  Hopefully it will start the next wave of films celebrating great achievements instead of the standard comic book super hero movies of the last umpteen fucking years.  I don't think there's a big enough market for this type of film to gain super popularity because people are dumb as shit with no attention spans; but it would be nice to get something like this every couple of years instead of once every five or six years.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
Just now, Fudge Nuggets said:

That is my concern.  It's also why Oppenheimer will be the first movie I've seen in a theater since Dunkirk.

You missed out on Top Gun Maverick (I too rarely go to the theatre).

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, Fudge Nuggets said:

I'm glad to see it is living up to the billing.  Hopefully it will start the next wave of films celebrating great achievements instead of the standard comic book super hero movies of the last umpteen fucking years.  I don't think there's a big enough market for this type of film to gain super popularity because people are dumb as shit with no attention spans; but it would be nice to get something like this every couple of years instead of once every five or six years.

Ehh, the problem too is that most filmmakers aren't capable of handling this kind of material well.

Posted
1 hour ago, atomheartbevo said:

Ehh, the problem too is that most filmmakers aren't capable of handling this kind of material well.

It should be the easiest kind of film to make.  Shit has already happened, there's tons of footage already shot so you know what plays to people's feels, plenty of documentation, books, to provide the filler material, and so on and so on.  I stand by my original assessment that this type of film doesn't come along very often because most people are total idiots and don't want to be bothered with stuff that is more complex than a TickTok video.

Posted
4 hours ago, Fudge Nuggets said:

I'm glad to see it is living up to the billing.  Hopefully it will start the next wave of films celebrating great achievements instead of the standard comic book super hero movies of the last umpteen fucking years.  I don't think there's a big enough market for this type of film to gain super popularity because people are dumb as shit with no attention spans; but it would be nice to get something like this every couple of years instead of once every five or six years.

it’s more about the director than the subject matter. 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...